Connect with us

Sports

Cricket needs to address burning issues

Published

on

Former Test captain Sanath Jayasuriya will head the Technical Advisory Committee that was appointed early this week.

by Rex Clementine

As a nation we are used to appointing commissions or committees when faced with disasters, natural or man-made. Often these committees and their reports are an eyewash, masterfully crafted by politicians to buy time during moments of crisis. Sports Minister Roshan Ranasinghe this week appointed a five-member Cricket Advisory Committee headed by former skipper Sanath Jayasuriya. It is hoped that this committee is fully empowered as well to take decisions at a time when cricket is going through a major crisis.

Sri Lanka’s participation in this year’s ICC Cricket World Cup to be held in India in October is in doubt after the former champions and two-time runners-up were denied automatic qualification for the sport’s showpiece event. Dasun Shanaka’s side now will have to play a qualifying tournament in Zimbabwe, an event where there’s little room for error as only two teams go through. It’s nothing but a sad predicament for a proud cricketing nation.

As we have harped time and again, Sri Lanka have adopted a flawed selection policy and that’s one key reason for the ODI team’s abysmal performance. The team’s inability to bat 50 overs has not been addressed during the current selection panel’s tenure. Some players who are capable of occupying the crease for long periods have been cold shouldered.

It also appears that Niroshan Dickwella’s batting has more consistency than the selectors’ fitness policy. There was a time when players were kicked out for failing fitness tests and the results were leaked but when certain players fail fitness tests those reports are pushed under the carpet and worse they are even tolerated. That makes you wonder whether the selectors have favourites? That’s simply not cricket!

The selectors also stick to the outdated theory of backing too many all-rounders or as Sanjay Manjrekar unkindly called ‘bits and pieces cricketers. This ploy has proved to be disastrous, and we need to move away from it at least for the qualifiers. You don’t see that happening if the current selectors persevere.

Shanaka’s captaincy in the ODI format also needs to be discussed for the simple reason that he doesn’t seem to be able to hold onto his place in the 50 over format. There are some hard and unpopular decisions need to be made and there’s a man by the name of Sidath Wettimuny who is capable of making those calls.

Having too many teams playing domestic cricket has been an area that has been highlighted for some time now and even former greats like Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene have voiced concerns about this. But sadly, since joining SLC ranks, MJ doesn’t seem to have addressed the issue. The number of domestic teams is another area that needs to be looked at as they keep mushrooming to please SLC’s vote base.

When several former administrators sought the help of the court to bring much needed changes to cricket structure and governance, the current Sports Minister won admirers when he informed the court that he did not have any objections for change taking place.

But the Minister has been rather slow in acting. He should have sacked the selectors the moment Danushka Gunathilaka was arrested in Sydney bringing the nation’s reputation to shame. It is the selectors who decided to keep the injured player on tour. After the latest debacle in New Zealand where the team failed to qualify automatically for the World Cup, he needs to act. Better late than never.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Jaden’s century confirms draw Thomians yearned for

Published

on

S. Thomas' retained the shield with a draw.

The 147th edition of the historic Battle of the Blues ended in a draw, with Jaden Amaraweera producing the only century of the Big Match to give fans a rare highlight after three days of largely uneventful cricket.

‎Amaraweera’s unbeaten hundred in the final stages of the match provided an individual milestone for spectators who had otherwise endured a contest dominated by cautious batting and slow scoring.

‎From the outset it appeared that S. Thomas’ College Mount Lavinia had approached the game with the intention of batting for a draw. Their first innings progressed at a snail’s pace, raising questions among critics about whether the Mount Lavinia side had come prepared to merely occupy the crease rather than push for a result.

‎The Thomians batted for a massive 124 overs but managed only 302 runs, a modest return for more than 500 minutes of batting. Openers Jaden Amaraweera and Avinash Fernando set the tone with an extremely cautious approach, adding 110 runs for the first wicket in 40 overs. Even their consistent batsman, Reshon Solomon, consumed 147 deliveries for his 66 runs.

‎In contrast, Royal College Colombo scored at a comparatively brisker rate in their first innings. Skipper Rehan Peiris and Ramiru Perera struck half centuries to guide Royal’s reply. The Reid Avenue school eventually declared their innings in 86 overs with nine wickets down, still trailing by 41 runs.

‎However, the declaration had little impact on the outcome, as the final day offered limited opportunity for a decisive result.

‎With the match drifting towards an inevitable draw, the stage was set for individual achievements. Amaraweera seized the moment, crafting the only century of the 2026 encounter. His composed unbeaten 100 came off 162 deliveries and included nine fours and three sixes, ensuring that the match would at least be remembered for a notable batting effort.

Jaden Amaraweera scored an unbeaten century in the second innings

‎Royal entered the contest as favourites, yet the Thomians once again managed to deny their arch rivals victory, settling for a draw in another chapter of Sri Lanka’s most celebrated school cricket rivalry

Continue Reading

Latest News

Three more Iran football team members change minds over asylum

Published

on

By

One of the three has been named as Mona Hamoudi, pictured here during a match against the Philippines on 8 March [BBC]

Three more members of the Iranian women’s football delegation – who were given humanitarian visas to stay in Australia – have changed their mind and will return home.

The trio have been named by human rights activists in the Iranian diaspora as Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar, Mona Hamoudi, and Zahra Sarbali.

Concerns grew for the Iranian team after they were silent for the country’s anthem in their opening Asian Cup match against South Korea on 2 March – which led to them being branded “war traitors” in Iran.

Confirming the decisions, Australia’s home affairs minister said his government had done everything it could to ensure the women were given the chance to have a safe future in the country.

“Australians should be proud that it was in our country that these women experienced a nation presenting them with genuine choices and interacted with authorities seeking to help them,” Tony Burke said in a statement.

“While the Australian government can ensure that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which the players are making these incredibly difficult decisions.”

Iran’s sports ministry also earlier confirmed the news, first reported by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-linked Tasnim News Agency, in a statement.

“The national spirit and patriotism of the Iranian women’s national football team defeated the enemy’s plans against this team,” the statement says, also accusing Australia’s government of “playing in Trump’s field”.

Tasnim said the three were on their way to Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to join the rest of the squad and were “returning to the warm embrace of their families and homeland after withdrawing their asylum application in Australia”.

It said they had resisted “psychological warfare, extensive propaganda and seductive offers”.

It means that, of the seven who initially said they wanted to stay in Australia, only three now remain as defectors. One of the players made the same decision to return to Iran on Wednesday.

Hamoudi and Sarbali were among the original five who refused, after giving minders the slip at the team’s hotel on the Gold Coast, south of Brisbane, last Monday and being taken to a safe house by Australian Federal Police.

Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar, a member of the team’s technical staff, was one of two more women from the group to seek asylum the next day. The other – Mohaddeseh Zolfi – changed her mind hours after being given the right to stay. She is understood to have already rejoined the team.

There was concern in Australia that members of the team and their families might face repercussions in Iran after the players refused to sing the national anthem.

One conservative commentator on Iranian state media accused them of being “wartime traitors” and called for a harsh punishment.

The team did sing the anthem in their last two games before they were eliminated on Sunday, leading critics to believe they had been told to sing by government officials accompanying them during the tournament.

The remaining Iranian players left Australia on Tuesday night local time – two days after they were knocked out of the Asian Cup.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Sports

Kirsten brings pedigree, but Sri Lanka must fix the system

Published

on

Peter Kirsten

Our cricket bosses didn’t earn many admirers for their choice of chairman of selectors, but they have certainly struck a chord with students of the game like us, and more importantly with the fans, in their appointment of the national team’s head coach. In Gary Kirsten, Sri Lanka have brought in a man with a proven pedigree and it looks like a step in the right direction.

As an opening batsman for South Africa, Kirsten never quite possessed the charm, elegance or textbook technique of his older brother Peter Kirsten. Gary’s success was forged the hard way. He thrived on grit, discipline and a stubborn refusal to give in, the sort of qualities that don’t always make headlines but win you matches. Once asked to follow on by England, he dug in for more than 14 hours at the crease and churned out 275, the highest score of his career. That innings summed up the man perfectly. When the going got tough, Gary simply rolled up his sleeves and got going.

Those very traits travelled with him into coaching, where he carved out an enviable reputation. Managing a star-studded Indian dressing room featuring Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman and MS Dhoni is no walk in the park. Handling so many big personalities requires more than tactical nous; it demands man management. Kirsten passed that test with flying colours. Under his watch India climbed to the No.1 ranking in Test cricket and, of course, lifted the 2011 World Cup, breaking 21 million Sri Lankan hearts in the final in Bombay.

Kirsten was hugely popular with Indian supporters. Many wanted him to stay on, but he knew better than to overstay his welcome and bowed out gracefully.

Soon after, South Africa came calling and true to form he went about the job methodically, guiding the Proteas to the top of the world rankings. Wherever he has gone, results have tended to follow.

That said, simply because Kirsten has joined our ranks does not mean Sri Lanka will suddenly start knocking over the top sides week in, week out. Kirsten carries no magic wand. A coach, after all, can only take the horse to water; it is the players who must drink.

For a cricket team to flourish, the entire system needs to be rock solid. It starts with the players themselves, their hunger to improve, their willingness to leave their comfort zones and put in the hard yards. The next crucial cog in the wheel is selection. In years gone by, men like Michael Tissera and Sidath Wettimuny had the foresight to look beyond the obvious and the courage to make unpopular calls when necessary. A selection panel that continues to back Dasun Shanaka as captain, however, is asking for trouble. It’s a bit like appointing Sagala Ratnayake as National Security Adviser.

Sri Lanka Cricket deserves credit for trimming down the number of teams competing in the First Class tournament, but the worrying reality is that the number of international games Sri Lanka play each year has shrunk alarmingly. Last year the country played a grand total of four Test matches, hardly enough cricket for a side hoping to stay relevant in the longest format. The Test calendar needs beefing up and the Lanka Premier League must return to the fold if Sri Lanka are to stay competitive in white-ball cricket.

For a team to succeed consistently, cricket has to run like a well-oiled machine. In Sri Lanka’s case, however, the wheels tend to wobble. Ahead of almost every major tournament our leading bowler seems to be nursing an injury. That is hardly the hallmark of a smooth operation.

Kirsten, to his credit, has struck all the right notes since being appointed. He has spoken about improving Sri Lanka’s rankings, winning overseas and developing a strong bench, the sort of forward thinking the game desperately needs here.

Just look at India for an example of depth. Sanju Samson walks in as their back-up wicketkeeper and ends up as Player of the Tournament in a World Cup. They can hand the gloves to Ishan Kishan, while players of the calibre of Rishabh Pant and KL Rahul struggle to find a place in the squad. Any one of those four would walk into most international sides as the first-choice keeper. Such is the luxury of India’s bench strength.

There’s no point envying them. The smarter move is to learn from them.

Kirsten, therefore, has plenty on his plate. And if he is looking for a place to begin, he might start with a rather pressing issue, figuring out how Sri Lanka’s batters plan to play spin, a challenge that has been turning our innings into a procession far too often in recent times.

by Rex Clementine ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending