Editorial
Aragalaya machine being re-cranked?

Although the country situation has somewhat eased after the crippling fuel and gas shortages were resolved to a great extent, how long supplies will be maintained is an open question. That, of course, is totally dependent on the country’s ability to pay for fuel imports. There was a somewhat reassuring comment the other day from Central Bank Governor Nandalal Weerasinghe that we are now, touch wood, able to fund our essential imports and that we can survive without bridging finance. The recently implemented QR system for equitably distributing available fuel stocks to as many consumers as possible has been acclaimed as a forward movement. Many, if not most, would agree with this in the context of the kilometers long petrol/diesel queues no longer being a feature in our evening television news bulletins. But the question arises on why it took as long as it did to implement such a decision. Clearly it came far too late.
It is not necessary to labor the fact that shortages spawn rackets. A shortage as big as our recent experience over fuel naturally created massive rackets in the shape of a black-market in petrol and diesel. Three-wheelers on which a considerable proportion of the workforce depend on for a living were widely blamed for what happened. But it must be said in fairness to the tuk-tuk drivers that in the context of a critical shortage of fuel supplies which made it impossible for them to offer their vehicles for hire, they were compelled to make a living by black marketing petrol. It made more sense for them to spend most of their time in the endless queues, tank up, sell whatever they got at a premium, and rejoin the queue. This was obviously more profitable than burning petrol cruising for hires. Who can blame these people, many of whom obtained their vehicles on expensive lease arrangements, from making the best of a bad situation.
Hopefully all that is water under the bridge. Although the fuel supply disaster is no longer as visible as it was as far as motorists are concerned, farmers and fishermen remain affected. The former continue to be starved of, or at best inadequately supplied, with fuel for their agricultural machinery. As is usual in this country, promises have been made but have not been honored provoking protests. Fishermen too are in a bind with no kerosene, mainly, to go out to sea. Their protests are now becoming more strident. Beached fishing craft have had the obvious result of rocketing fish prices sending consumers reeling. A kilo of the once inexpensive salayas now costs up to Rs. 900. Chicken, egg and dried fish prices have gone through the roof and the poor compelled to drop animal protein from their diet. Dhal (lentils), an excellent substitute vegetable protein, too has become so expensive that even the middle classes find it too costly to include in their food baskets.
While the cascading effects of the fuel shortage that touched most aspects of the national economy have now eased somewhat, consumers can hope for some respite from the galloping inflation that has been this country’s lot for the past several months. President Ranil Wickremesinghe, in the course of a wide-ranging interview with The Economist has gone on record that he worries “especially on food.” Not just Wickremesinghe but nobody would want people to go hungry as is happening now. The president admitted that the middle class was expanding but the government has been compelled to cut on the living standards of middle income families. People above the poverty line have fallen below it. He restated that taxes will have to be raised and wealth and capital taxes are on the way.
But nobody can deny that equity, the basic tenet of taxation, is totally absent in Sri Lanka. Nobody has credibly justified why tax exemptions on emoluments, pensions, duty free vehicle permits etc. are granted to public servants, parliamentarians and other preferred animals while private sector employees are taxed on similar incomes. The nouveau riche displaying their affluence is all too visible via the high-end vehicles they ride and the crowds five star dining venues attract even during these hard times. Many such people do not pay income tax and they are allowed to get off Scot free while squeezed lemons with tax files are further squeezed.
It wasn’t very long ago that Wickremesinghe told the Wall Street Journal that he did ot think the time was opportune for former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to return to Sri Lanka. He believed his predecessor’s return will inflame passions. Since then GR who first fled to the Maldives, then to Singapore and in now in Thailand is anxious to return home, possibly because he has nowhere else to kick his heels while awaiting the outcome of an application to return to the US where he once held citizenship. He renounced it to run for president but has requested permanent residence on the ground of his wife’s citizenship of the United States. Whether the U.S. will permit our former president to butter his bread on both sides remains to be seen. Meanwhile the SLPP that elected RW to serve the balance of GR’s term wants the incumbent president to facilitate his predecessor’s return.
Colombo helped Rajapaksa with his Thai visa but with another confrontation between the Inter University Students Federation (IUSF) and law enforcers on Thursday, complete with teargas and water cannons, whether Wickremesinghe will still feel the time opportune for GR’s return remains to be seen. Aragalaya has certainly lost steam but attempts are afoot to crank up the machine. How much support it can muster remains an open question for the time being.
Editorial
Moment of truth for ‘patriots’

Friday 9th May, 2025
The battle’s lost and won, but the hurly-burly is not yet done, one might say about the post-election blues in Sri Lanka—with apologies to the Bard. When the clouds of uncertainty will clear and the newly-elected local councils will begin functioning in earnest is anybody’s guess.
Since the conclusion of Tuesday’s local government (LG) elections, government politicians and their propagandists have been vigorously peddling an argument that the people have endorsed the way the JVP-led NPP is governing the country and reaffirmed their faith in it by enabling it to win a majority of local councils. This argument is not without some merit, but the question is why the people stopped short of giving the NPP absolute majorities in many of those councils.
The government has to come to terms with the fact that its vote share has declined considerably across the country; the majority of voters backed the Opposition parties and independent groups in Tuesday’s election.
There is another school of thought that the significant drop in the NPP’s vote share and the fact that the rivals of the NPP have together polled more votes than the NPP justify the Opposition’s efforts to secure the control of the hung councils. However, the people would have given the Opposition parties clear majorities in those councils if they had wanted those institutions to be run by the opponents of the NPP.
There is no way the NPP can form alliances with the independent groups, without compromising its much-avowed principles and integrity. The NPP has won elections by propagating its hidebound binary view of politics and politicians. The main campaign slogan of its leaders was that “either you are with us or you are with them, and only those who are with us are clean and others are rogues”. Having resorted to such ‘othering’, the NPP has no moral right to seek the support of the independent members of the hung councils. But the problem is that expediency also makes strange bedfellows. There is hardly anything that politicians do not do to gain or retain power, especially in this country.
During the NPP’s LG polls campaign, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya urged the public not to vote for the independent groups which, she said, consisted of undesirables who were wary of contesting from the Opposition parties for fear of being rejected again. All other NPP speakers echoed that view. So, how can the NPP justify its efforts to control the hung councils with the help of those independent groups?
Both the government and the Opposition ought to heed the popular will, reflected in the outcome of the LG polls, and act accordingly, instead resorting to horse-trading to muster majorities to further their interests, regardless of the methods used to achieve that end. Worryingly, the two sides are reportedly trying to secure the backing of the independent councillors and others by using financial inducements in a desperate bid to sway the balance of power in the hung councils. This sordid practice must end. After all, the NPP and the main Opposition party, the SJB, have promised to bring about a new political culture, and their leaders wrap themselves in the flag and make a grand show of their readiness to do everything for the public good. They never miss an opportunity to take the moral high ground and pontificate about the virtues of good governance. If their love for the country is so selfless and boundless, why can’t they sink their political and ideological differences and work out a strategy to share power in the hung councils, adopt a common programme and work for the greater good? They should be able to share the leadership positions in the non-majority councils on a rotational basis, if necessary. This is the moment of truth for the self-proclaimed patriots.
Editorial
People have spoken

Thursday 8th May, 2025
Sri Lankans have spoken, and what they have said is being interpreted in different ways. That the ruling NPP would be the overall winner in Tuesday’s local government (LG) polls was a foregone conclusion. Its stunning win in last year’s general election, where it obtained 159 out of 225 seats in Parliament, was still fresh when the country went to the polls again. A decline in its vote share was also expected. The Opposition managed to recover lost ground to some extent, but it has a long way to go before it can make a decisive comeback.
JVP General Secretary Tilvin Silva, addressing a press conference yesterday morning, sought to downplay the NPP’s failure to prevent a drastic drop in its vote share during the past six months or so; he claimed that the local government polls were called ‘village elections’, where voters were swayed by various factors other than national issues. That may be generally so, but the NPP made an otherwise grassroots level voting event assume the same importance as a national election, with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake himself leading its LG election campaign. The President and Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya fervently appealed to the people to vote for the NPP in the LG elections and help consolidate its hold on power. The NPP polled 6.86 million votes (61.56%) in the last parliamentary election, but it could obtain only 4.5 million votes (43.2%) in Tuesday’s LG polls.
Tilvin argued that the NPP’s performance had been better than the SLPP’s in the 2018 LG polls. What he left unsaid was that the SLPP polled 44.6% of votes and secured 231 councils and 3,360 seats while it was in the Opposition, with the UNP-led Yahapalana government and President Maithripala Sirisena going all out to queer the pitch for it. In contrast, the NPP faced Tuesday’s LG polls after winning a presidential election and parliamentary polls late last year. It won 266 councils with 3,926 members. However, it will be able to form stable administrations on its own in only about 133 LG institutions, according to reports available at the time of going to press. This figure is subject to change.
Many local councils, including the Colombo MC are hung, and their members will have to elect their heads. The NPP, which has condemned all its political rivals as rogues, will not be able to enlist the support of the Opposition members to muster working majorities in such councils.
The NPP has come to terms with the fact that its popularity is on the wane, and growing public disillusionment is beginning to weigh on its government. Votes it polled in the North and the East in the last general election helped it secure a two-thirds majority in Parliament. Its support base has shrunk significantly in those parts of the country, where the traditional Tamil political parties have made a comeback. The ITAK has secured 307,657 votes (2.96%) and 377 seats; it has won 37 councils.
The NPP did everything in its power to win the LG polls. The President, the Prime Minister, and all MPs including ministers, were actively involved in its election campaign; the government obviously outspent its rivals in electioneering, gave pay hikes to state workers and subsidies to farmers, put on a mammoth show of strength on May Day, held a relic exposition, branded the Opposition as a bunch of thieves and promised jobs to the youth. Most of all, President Dissanayake himself issued a veiled threat of fund restrictions for the councils to be won by parties other than the NPP. But the government failed to achieve the desired result. Instead of trying to mislead the public, the NPP should figure out what the people have given it a knock for, work on its mistakes and improve its performance. Mere rhetoric won’t do.
Similarly, the Opposition should stop labouring under the delusion that the NPP’s broken promises, the anti-incumbency factor and adverse social media campaigns against the NPP leaders, will enable it to turn the tables on the incumbent government. The SJB, the SLPP, the UNP, etc., have been able to improve their electoral performance significantly, compared to that in the last general election, but they have a lot more ground to cover before they can savour power. The SJB’s votes have increased from 1.9 million (17.66%) in last year’s parliamentary election to 2.2 million (21.6%). The SJB has secured 14 local councils, but it would have been able to bag some more if it had changed its campaign strategy and worked harder. The SLPP, too, has made significant gains; its votes have increased from 350,429 (3.14%) in last year’s general election to 954,517 (9.17%).
The Opposition parties, too, would do well to heed the message the people have conveyed; they have to work harder to win back public trust and secure enough popular support to win elections.
Thankfully, another election has passed without violence or rigging. The Election Commission and the police deserve praise for a job well done.
Editorial
Hurtful propaganda

Wednesday 7th May, 2025
Smearing opponents has become the dominant form of electioneering in Sri Lanka. All political parties unflinchingly resort to mud-slinging during election campaigns, and they are quite adept at making lies indistinguishable from the truth. They float various claims and counterclaims, and leave the public confused and unable to make informed decisions in elections.
One of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s close aides, Thusitha Halloluwa, created quite a stir on the eve of Tuesday’s local government polls. He levelled a very serious allegation against President Anura Kumara Dissanayake himself; Dissanayake had made a questionable investment in Greece while calling the Opposition politicians corrupt, he said.
The government let out a howl of protest, and lost no time in reporting Halloluwa to the CID, which amply demonstrated its selective efficiency once again by launching a prompt investigation into the NPP’s complaint. Halloluwa has been summoned to the CID. Having claimed that he has irrefutable evidence to support his claim, he will have to disclose it when he visits the CID today. Will the CID act in a similar manner if complaints are made against the government politicians that they have made statements derogatory of Opposition politicians?
Unsubstantiated allegations against key opposition figures formed a central pillar of the NPP’s election platform. Some NPP politicians claimed that the Rajapaksa family had stashed away billions of dollars in Uganda, and asked for a mandate to bring the stolen money back. Later, one of the NPP MPs who propagated that claim admitted that she had told the public a lie, and argued that anyone had a right to lie! The NPP carried out such propaganda attacks on its political rivals relentlessly, and the media gave them wide publicity, helping it turn public opinion in its favour. What if the Opposition politicians also make complaints to the CID that the NPP made false allegations against them?
Some NPP notables even made complaints to the CID about an alleged conspiracy to tarnish their reputation; they claimed that the Opposition was employing devious methods to have the public believe that they were falsely claiming academic titles. It is doubtful whether the CID has any time left for its regular duties and functions after it investigates government leaders’ complaints against their opponents.
Hardly a day passes without an underworld killing being reported. On Monday, a gunman killed a youth in what resembled a scene from a 1920s Chicago gangster film. CCTV footage shows the victim running away after being shot twice, in Mount Lavinia, and the gunman running after him and shooting him at close range on the Galle Road. These killings show how bold crime syndicates and their death squads have become of late. The police and the CID are apparently not up to the task of neutralising the nether world of narcotics and crime. So, it is hoped that the police will concentrate more on their operations against organised criminal gangs while investigating complaints from government politicians.
The police set up a special unit called the FCID (Financial Crimes Investigation Division) to probe allegations of corruption against the political opponents of the UNP-led Yahapalana government, which the JVP also backed. Given the sheer amount of political work the CID has to handle at present, it looks as if the police had to set up a special unit to probe complaints from the ruling party members so that the CID can devote more time to criminal investigations. That unit can be called the PCID (Political Complaints Investigation Division).
Some media rights groups have expressed serious concern about reports that the government is contemplating legal action against the media outfits that carried Halloluwa’s claim. One of the main reasons why the NPP succeeded in winning elections was wide media coverage of its unsubstantiated allegations against its rivals. So, the question is whether the NPP, which came to power, with the help of social media and a section of the mainstream media, has any moral right to institute legal action against the media for relaying unproven allegations.
-
Opinion5 days ago
Remembering Dr. Samuel Mathew: A Heart that Healed Countless Lives
-
Business3 days ago
Aitken Spence Travels continues its leadership as the only Travelife-Certified DMC in Sri Lanka
-
Business3 days ago
LinearSix and InsureMO® expand partnership
-
Latest News2 days ago
NPP win Maharagama Urban Council
-
Business1 day ago
John Keells Properties and MullenLowe unveil “Minutes Away”
-
Features5 days ago
Trump’s economic missiles are boomeranging
-
Latest News5 days ago
The Heat index is likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in Eastern, Northern, North-central and North-western provinces and in Monaragala and Hambantota districts.
-
Business2 days ago
NDB Bank partners with Bishop’s College to launch NDB Pixel awareness