Connect with us

Midweek Review

AI, education reform, forgotten power of history, aesthetics and ethics

Published

on

"We already see this in action: in healthcare, AI helps detect diseases in X-rays or predict patient complications, but doctors still make the final call. In finance, AI can flag fraudulent transactions or assess creditworthiness, but human experts review the decisions before action is taken. These safeguards prevent errors, ensure accountability, and build public trust." (An AI-generated image)

Humanising future:

As Sri Lanka debates sweeping reforms to its school education system, one question looms larger than any curriculum revision: what kind of future are we preparing our children for?

In an era increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, we cannot answer this question simply by aligning education with today’s job market. We must instead anticipate a rapidly transforming economy, one in which many traditional jobs may disappear and where machines, not humans, become the main drivers of production and profit.

While Sri Lanka is rightly focusing on skills, employability, and STEM education, we risk training students for a world that may not exist unless we simultaneously confront a deeper economic truth: if machines do most of the work, who will earn, spend, and sustain the economy as consumers?

This is why we must talk seriously about humanisation policies: strategic interventions to ensure that human beings remain essential, valuable, and employed in the AI age. And we can draw inspiration from an unlikely source: workforce nationalisation policies in the Gulf region.

From Nationalisation to Humanisation: Strategic Lessons for an Automated Future

Several countries, especially in the Gulf region, have introduced workforce nationalisation policies to increase job opportunities for their citizens by setting minimum quotas in the private sector. Examples include Oman’s Omanization, Saudi Arabia’s Saudization, the UAE’s Emiratization, Bahrainisation in Bahrain, Kuwaitization in Kuwait, and Qatarisation in Qatar. These policies aim to reduce reliance on foreign labour and promote greater citizen participation in the economy.

Since the implementation of these policies, they have significantly increased national employment in various sectors. For instance, Omanisation has resulted in over 400,000 Omanis working in the private sector by 2025, while Saudisation and Emiratisation have also raised local employment rates.

However, these initiatives encounter common challenges across countries, such as slow progress in high-skill and technical roles, skill gaps among local workers, employer preferences for cheaper expatriate labour, and sometimes superficial compliance focused on meeting quotas rather than achieving genuine integration. These experiences reveal a crucial lesson: quotas alone are not enough. Meaningful and lasting outcomes require not only investment in education, vocational training, and industry-specific incentives, but also a deliberate effort to enhance the human dimension of the workforce. By “humanization,” I propose not merely reserving defined spaces or quotas for humans, but actively enriching their uniquely human capabilities, particularly soft skills that machines cannot/will not replicate. This approach ensures that workers are not just present, but are indispensable contributors in an increasingly automated world. Just as past nationalisation policies sought to shield citizens from foreign labour displacement, we must now protect them from being replaced by machines.

This humanisation approach offers Sri Lanka a unique strategic advantage regardless of global trends. Whether other nations adopt similar policies or pursue full automation, Sri Lanka benefits. If automation accelerates globally, our graduates will become premium exports, possessing the human skills, as discussed later in this article, that many other economies may lack. If humanization spreads internationally, we are positioned as early adopters with proven frameworks. Either way, we are not just protecting jobs, we are creating a competitive advantage.

Expanding the Role of Government

We face a paradox. Free markets are essential for fostering entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic growth. However, these same forces can accelerate automation, replacing human workers across industries. For instance, robots are already assembling cars, AI is scanning medical images faster than doctors, and algorithms are approving bank loans in seconds. While these advances boost productivity, they also risk leaving people behind.

To address this, the government’s role must evolve into that of a responsible steward. It should support vibrant, competitive markets while introducing innovative policies, such as automation taxes (as explored in countries like South Korea and Italy) to fund workforce retraining, means-tested programmes to support those most affected by job displacement, and “human-in-the-loop” regulations to ensure critical decisions still involve human oversight.

We already see this in action: in healthcare, AI helps detect diseases in X-rays or predict patient complications, but doctors still make the final call. In finance, AI can flag fraudulent transactions or assess creditworthiness, but human experts review the decisions before action is taken. These safeguards prevent errors, ensure accountability, and build public trust.

Challenges Ahead

These “humanization” policies, despite their potential relevance, will not be without many challenges:

* Knowledge, skills and attitude-related mismatches and training gaps can weaken employment quotas and mandates, as shown in Oman. Without thorough reskilling and cooperation between industries, people-focused policies may become inefficient.

* Businesses’ resistance: Regulations raising costs or reducing flexibility could drive investment away.

* Means-Tested programme concerns:

* Administrative complexity,

* Potential stigmatization of recipients,

* Risk of creating disincentives to work.

* Careful design is needed to ensure fairness, accessibility and long-term effectiveness in responding to a changing labour market.

* AI integration challenges: Bias, transparency and fairness issues demand ethical AI management and human oversight.

* Educational reform resistance: Teacher readiness and societal expectations may hinder the acceptance of new curricula and pedagogies.

By striking a balance between entrepreneurial freedom and careful government intervention, including targeted educational reforms, we can cultivate a future workforce with the right mindset. This workforce will be ready to become entrepreneurs and to support entrepreneurship in different institutions within the entrepreneurial ecosystem. By implementing suitable economic policies and adjusting education to value innovation and entrepreneurial contributions, the government can foster a culture that supports innovation and entrepreneurship. This approach strengthens support networks in government, private, and nonprofit sectors that empower innovators and ensure that the rewards of entrepreneurship promote widespread prosperity and social unity.

Reimagining Learning: From Individual Success to Collective Growth

Sri Lanka can turn its educational challenges into a global competitive advantage. While other nations may prioritize technical skills for automation, we can cultivate uniquely human capabilities: collaboration, creativity, and ethical reasoning that become more valuable as AI advances.

Currently, our students enter a system centred on grades, rankings, and exams that produces high achievers who might lack the relational and emotional skills needed to create a humane, cohesive society. Success is defined mainly by beating peers, creating a culture where learning becomes a race, and students are conditioned to value personal achievement over shared progress.

Collaborative learning, when built around cultural values and mutual growth, offers a strong alternative. It changes the focus from “How can I be the best?” to “How can we all grow together?”

Such an approach promotes:

* Peer-to-peer learning, where students teach and support one another, reinforcing both understanding and mutual respect.

* Internalisation of cultural values such as cooperation, humility, and collective responsibility.

* Psychological well-being, by reducing isolation and anxiety caused by constant competition.

* Inclusive and equitable classrooms, where diverse learners can contribute in ways beyond standard testing.

This is not a call to abandon assessment or excellence, but rather to redefine success. Education must evolve from being a sorting mechanism to a nurturing space that cultivates both cognitive skills and ethical character. By promoting collaborative learning infused with cultural values, Sri Lanka can build a generation that is not only competent but also compassionate, community-oriented, and resilient.

Beyond Rote Learning: Educating for the Future

To thrive in a world where humans increasingly collaborate with intelligent systems, education must move beyond rote memorization and shift towards cultivating deeper, more relevant capacities.

We must foster:

* Curiosity and research-mindedness, replacing passive learning with active inquiry

* Creativity and adaptability, enabling students to solve complex, evolving problems

* Collaboration skills, including the ability to work with both humans and machines

* Ethical sensitivity and civic responsibility, ensuring that learners value human dignity beyond economic utility

This shift requires:

* Moving away from rigid curricula that prioritize exam scores

* Encourage project-based, problem-based, and research-driven learning

* Training teachers to become facilitators of inquiry rather than transmitters of content

* Embedding ethical reflection and emotional development into everyday

Ultimately, this should not be just an educational reform; it is a cultural transformation. It reframes the purpose of education: not just to produce workers for the market, but to nurture thoughtful, humane, and socially responsible global citizens for the future.

Why History and Aesthetics Still Matter.

The Sri Lankan government has officially confirmed that History and Aesthetics will remain mandatory subjects under the new reforms, despite social media controversy suggesting the opposite. This is significant: History is foundational not merely for memorising dates or ancient events, but for cultivating ethical reasoning, critical awareness, and civic identity.

These reforms face challenges, including resistance from teachers and communities, but demonstrate the transformative potential of History teaching to foster civic engagement and ethical reasoning.

Currently, much of School History education in Sri Lanka seems to focus on the chronology of rulers and eras, preserving facts, but not always fostering curiosity. Yet, there is a great opportunity to teach History differently. Highlighting the ancient irrigation systems that sometimes rival modern irrigation engineering, or the architectural ingenuity of Sigiriya and Anuradhapura, will surely motivate our younger generation. Consequently, they will see themselves as heirs to a legacy of innovation and not just tradition, and also as a source of technological inspiration that empowers creativity and instils pride.

Rethinking Free Education and the Ethics of Migration

Sri Lanka’s free education system has empowered generations of students to reach their professional heights that they may otherwise never have achieved. However, a new challenge is emerging: many of our most talented, highly educated professionals, doctors, engineers, academics, scientists, and IT experts are migrating in increasing numbers, often within just a few years of graduation.

This trend makes sense on a personal level, but it raises an important ethical and systemic issue. How sustainable is it for a country to heavily subsidize higher education, only to lose its best talent to other nations without getting anything in return?

More critically, as we develop future-ready curricula that make our graduates even more globally competitive with stronger soft skills, emotional intelligence, and humanised learning, they will become even more attractive to overseas markets. Sri Lanka will produce world-class professionals for other economies. At the same time, it will deal with shortages in its own essential sectors.

To address this, new policy thinking is required.

Rather than restricting migration, we must explore balanced mechanisms such as:

* Graduated payback schemes: Where professionals who migrate within a defined period after benefiting from free university education contribute financially to a public fund over time.

* Return incentive programmes: Encouraging professionals to return after gaining international exposure through support for entrepreneurship, research, or public service roles.

* Global service bonds: Allowing graduates to work abroad but commit to contributing to Sri Lanka in defined ways (e.g., through remote services, training, or national projects).

These ideas are not meant to punish. Instead, they show a principle of shared responsibility. The state invests in its citizens, and citizens understand they have a duty to give back, whether through time, money, or service, as already demonstrated by a handful of those who have migrated and are enjoying successful careers elsewhere.

As part of a broader humanization strategy, such policies would ensure ethical reciprocity, build local capacity, and reinforce national development, even in a globally mobile era.

Conclusion

Sri Lanka has an opportunity to lead by integrating humanisation concepts into economic, technological, and educational policies. As the global economy moves forward, with automation and AI-driven growth, we must ensure that our future is not jobless growth and social fragmentation. AI is not the enemy. Our failure to respond with ethical and systemic foresight is. Reimagining the future must begin at the foundation. School education is not just a feeder into the university system; it is where the character, mindset, and emotional resilience of tomorrow’s workforce are formed. Therefore, now is the time to design a future where humans are not sidelined by machines but empowered by them. The future begins with the policies we shape, policies that will determine whether technology serves humanity or humanity serves technology.

Sarath S. Kodithuwakku, B.Sc. Agric.(P’deniya); MBA Marketing; Ph.D. Entrepreneurship (Stir.), MSLIM, FIMSL, is a Senior Professor in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Business Management at the University of Peradeniya and serves as Chair of the Board of Study in Business Administration at the Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture. He is currently the President of the Institute of Management of Sri Lanka. Professor Kodithuwakku’s research and policy work primarily focus on entrepreneurship, SME development, and innovation.

Over the years, he has held numerous key academic and administrative roles, including Dean of the Faculty of Agriculture, Head of Department, and Director of the Agribusiness Centre at the University of Peradeniya. He has also served as Chairman of the Sri Lanka Institute of Tourism and Hotel Management and as a board member of the Sri Lankan School in Muscat, Oman. Views are personal.

by Sarath S Kodithuwakku



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot

Published

on

President Dissanayake addresses Parliament as PM Dr. Harini Amarasuriya looks on. Dissanayake is the leader of both the JVP and NPP

The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.

Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.

The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.

The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.

The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.

Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.

Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).

Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.

The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.

MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.

The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.

Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation

The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.

The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.

The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.

No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.

JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.

The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.

Major cases, key developments

Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments

* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.

Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.

* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.

The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:

* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.

Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.

Foreign policy dilemma

Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?

Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.

Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.

Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.

Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.

In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.

Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.

But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.

The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?

The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.

****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?

Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?

 

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community

Published

on

Through the Eyes of the Patua:

Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.

The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.

The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”

‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.

A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”

There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”

As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”

From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.

Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.

While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Spoils of Power

Published

on

Power comes like a demonic spell,

To restless humans constantly in chains,

And unless kept under a tight leash,

It drives them from one ill deed to another,

And among the legacies they thus deride,

Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,

By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,

Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,

And other such places of hallowed renown,

Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Trending