News
“50% of ITAK supports common Tamil presidential candidate”
By Saman Indrajith
Fifty percent of Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK) will support the Tamil common presidential candidate, Gurusuwamy Surenthiran, Media Spokesman, Tamil National Common Structure and Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO) said during a televised interview recently.
Surenthiran said that they understand their candidate, P. Ariyanethran, will not be the winning presidential candidate but this is a great opportunity to demonstrate the electoral power of the Tamil people. He said C.V. Vigneswaran’s Tamil People’s Alliance, Selvam Adaikkalanathan’s Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO), D. Siddharthan’s People’s Liberation Organisation of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE), Suresh Premachandran’s Eelam People’s Revolutionary Liberation Front (EPRLF), Democratic Crusaders party and former MP Srikantha’s Tamil National Party, supported the common candidate.
There were about 593,000 votes in the Jaffna District, about 306,000 votes in Vanni District, and about 900,000 votes in the Northern Province, he said. In the East there were about 1.3 million votes, he added.
“Altogether there are 2.2 million Tamil speaking voters,” he said.
Surenthiran said that while they intended to contest the 21 September presidential election, they were also open for supporting a main candidate who would agree to implement a political solution to the problems faced by the Tamils.
“In the coming weeks, we will show our strength and then negotiate. There are 2.2 million Tamil speaking voters in the North and East and everyone knows how important these votes are in a tight presidential election,” Surenthiran said.
“There are four main candidates in the coming presidential election, and this is the most competitive presidential elections in Sri Lankan history,” he said. Perhaps the winner would scrape through and all leading candidates needed the support of the Tamils in the North, he said.
He said that while Tamils had been demanding a common candidate, some sections of the ITAK, including MP M.A. Sumanthiran were opposed to the idea.
Sumanthiran has even declared that they would take disciplinary action against Ariyanethran, who is an ITAK member. Surenthiran said.
“We have not fielded a candidate to win the presidential election. We want to highlight the fact that the problems of the Tamils have not been addressed by successive governments. In the past, main candidates visited the north and east, acknowledged that the Tamils had a political problem, and promised to solve it but they reneged on their promises. We have voted for Sarath Fonseka, Maithripala Sirisena and Sajith Premadasa. The living standards of the north and east have not improved at all,” he said.
Fifteen years had elapsed since the conclusion of the war, but there was not a single factory in the north, he said. In 2022, the contribution of the Northern Province to the GDP had been 4.1 percent. The east contributed 5.2 percent that year, he said.
Latest News
Interment of singer Latha Walpola at Borella on Wednesday [31st]
Family sources have confirmed that the interment of singer Latha Walpola will be performed at the General Cemetery Borella on Wednesday (31 December).
News
Western Naval Command conducts beach cleanup to mark Navy’s 75th anniversary
In an environmental initiative commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Sri Lanka Navy, the Western Naval Command organized a cleanup programme at Galle Face Beach on Saturday (27 Dec 25).
The programme focused on the removal of substantial solid waste littering the beachfront, including accumulated plastic and polythene debris. All collected wastey was systematically disposed of utilizing methods designed to safeguard the sensitive coastal ecosystem.
Demonstrating a strong commitment to the cause, the cleanup effort saw the participation of the Commander Western Naval Area and a group of over 200 naval personnel.
News
Environmentalists warn Sri Lanka’s ecological safeguards are failing
Sri Lanka’s environmental protection framework is rapidly eroding, with weak law enforcement, politically driven development and the routine sidelining of environmental safeguards pushing the country towards an ecological crisis, leading environmentalists have warned.
Dilena Pathragoda, Managing Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), has said the growing environmental damage across the island is not the result of regulatory gaps, but of persistent failure to enforce existing laws.
“Sri Lanka does not suffer from a lack of environmental regulations — it suffers from a lack of political will to enforce them,” Pathragoda told The Sunday Island. “Environmental destruction is taking place openly, often with official knowledge, and almost always without accountability.”
Dr. Pathragoda has said environmental impact assessments are increasingly treated as procedural formalities rather than binding safeguards, allowing ecologically sensitive areas to be cleared or altered with minimal oversight.
“When environmental approvals are rushed, diluted or ignored altogether, the consequences are predictable — habitat loss, biodiversity decline and escalating conflict between humans and nature,” Pathragoda said.
Environmental activist Janaka Withanage warned that unregulated development and land-use changes are dismantling natural ecosystems that have sustained rural communities for generations.
“We are destroying natural buffers that protect people from floods, droughts and soil erosion,” Withanage said. “Once wetlands, forests and river catchments are damaged, the impacts are felt far beyond the project site.”
Withanage said communities are increasingly left vulnerable as environmental degradation accelerates, while those responsible rarely face legal consequences.
“What we see is selective enforcement,” he said. “Small-scale offenders are targeted, while large-scale violations linked to powerful interests continue unchecked.”
Both environmentalists warned that climate variability is amplifying the damage caused by poor planning, placing additional strain on ecosystems already weakened by deforestation, sand mining and infrastructure expansion.
Pathragoda stressed that environmental protection must be treated as a national priority rather than a development obstacle.
“Environmental laws exist to protect people, livelihoods and the economy,” he said. “Ignoring them will only increase disaster risk and long-term economic losses.”
Withanage echoed the call for urgent reform, warning that continued neglect would result in irreversible damage.
“If this trajectory continues, future generations will inherit an island far more vulnerable and far less resilient,” he said.
Environmental groups say Sri Lanka’s standing as a biodiversity hotspot — and its resilience to climate-driven disasters — will ultimately depend on whether environmental governance is restored before critical thresholds are crossed.
By Ifham Nizam ✍️
-
News5 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News3 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
News6 days agoAir quality deteriorating in Sri Lanka
-
News6 days agoCardinal urges govt. not to weaken key socio-cultural institutions
-
Features5 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?
-
Opinion6 days agoRanwala crash: Govt. lays bare its true face
-
News5 days agoSuspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
-
News6 days agoCID probes unauthorised access to PNB’s vessel monitoring system
