Connect with us

Opinion

UNHRC’s 49th Session:

Published

on

A brief recap and suggestions of a way forward

by Dharshan Weerasekera

The United Nations Human Rights Commission’s (UNHRC) 49th Session ended on 1st April and the question is whether it was a success or failure for Sri Lanka. In my opinion, the session was a success because at the interactive dialogue, following the tabling of the High Commissioner’s report on Sri Lanka, 31 nations spoke in support of this country while 12 spoke against. It shows that Sri Lanka is not isolated on the world stage with regard to human rights, as some critics claim.

This is an opportune time to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the government’s position and reflect on a way forward. I argue that,

a) Sri Lanka’s strength at the moment is that the principled stance taken by the government in rejecting resolution 46/1 last year which, among other things, authorised an evidence-gathering mechanism on Sri Lanka was appreciated by the majority of nations,

b) the weakness is that the High Commissioner has called for “alternative strategies’ including universal jurisdiction to pursue allegations of war crimes and other crimes against Sri Lanka and the government will have to deal with these efforts regardless of the domestic mechanisms it has established to address the concerns raised by the Council in resolution 46/1.

In this article, I shall briefly discuss these issues and make some recommendations on a way forward.

The GOSL’s stance and
expressions of support by various nations

At the commencement of the interactive dialogue, Minister of Foreign Affairs Prof. G.L. Peiris eloquently set out the government’s objections to the High Commissioner’s report (A/HRC/49/9) along with resolution 46/1. He says,

“The Resolution 46/1 was adopted by a divided vote in this Council. Sri Lanka and other Member States opposed this resolution in fundamental disagreement with its deeply flawed procedure and unacceptable content, in particular its operative paragraph 6 regarding a so-called evidence-gathering mechanism. The resolution was directly contrary to the Council’s founding principles of impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity. It went beyond the mandate that Member States conferred on it by UNGA resolution 60/251.” (www.lankamission,org, 4 March 2022).

As pointed out earlier, 31 nations then spoke in support of Sri Lanka. The following are some of the things they said. The head of the Philippine delegation said,

“The Philippines voted against HRC resolution 46/1 as we disagree with the role being set for the OHCHR in collecting evidence and developing strategies for future accountability processes. The decision of the OHCHR to establish an “accountability project” is a breach of the text of the mandate and in effect a usurpation of the role of the State as duty bearer. We are not convinced that OHCHR has the mandate and capacity to carry out this so-called project with the highest standards of objectivity and professional rigor.” (Statement at the interactive dialogue, 4 March 2022)

The head of delegation for Cuba said, “The Human Rights Council must privilege cooperation and constructive dialogue as well as universal mechanisms such as the UPR as the only guarantee to address human rights issues in a fair and non-selective manner. The resolution that gives rise to this dialogue does not have the support of the country concerned. At this point, there should be awareness that any action or mandate that derives from it will only contribute to politicisation, selectivity and double standards that have been imposed on this body and will not make any contribution to the promotion of human rights.” (Statement at the interactive dialogue, 4 March 2022)

The head of delegation for Ethiopia said, “Ethiopia has always stressed the importance of abiding by the principles of universality, impartiality and neutrality. The primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights rests with the individual country. As a subsidiary organ of the General Assembly of the United Nations the Council must live up to the values and fundamental principles enshrined in the Charter and resolution 60/251 which calls for the sovereign equality and respect for agreed international rules—fundamentals which must work for all.” (Statement at the interactive dialogue, 4 March 2022)

Meanwhile, the head of the delegation for Venezuela pointed out, “The Council resolution that gave rise to the submitted written update does not have the consent of Sri Lanka. That resolution set a dangerous precedent by requiring the Office to collect criminal evidence for future prosecutions, a mandate that was never conferred on it by General Assembly resolution 48/141 that created the mandate.” (Statement at the interactive dialogue, 4 March 2022)

Finally, Ambassador Hamid Ahmadi speaking for the Islamic Republic of Iran, said, “The Resolution 60/251 upholds the need for genuine dialogue and cooperation; the UN Human Rights bodies and mechanisms should support Governments, upon their consent, in implementing their obligations under applicable international human rights law and should not assume roles that go beyond their mandates as stated in resolutions 48/141 and 60/251.” (Statement at the interactive dialogue, 4 March 2022)

The above quotes, and there are many others, indicate that the GOSL is on solid legal ground when it insists that in adopting resolution 46/1 the Council has exceeded its mandate. This point should therefore play a central role in any strategy of the GOSL going forward.

The weakness in the GOSL’s position

The weakness in the government’s position is that, in spite of the domestic mechanisms—these include the Office on Missing Persons, Office of Reparations, the Presidential Commission of Inquiry reviewing the conclusions of previous Presidential Commissions including the LLRC and the Paranagama Commission and so on—the High Commissioner has called on the Council to pursue “alternate strategies” including universal jurisdiction to advance accountability. She says,

“The current government has not only demonstrated its unwillingness to pursue accountability, it has incorporated military officials implicated in alleged war crimes into the highest levels of government reinforcing a narrative of impunity. For these reasons, I have called on the Council to pursue alternate strategies to advance accountability at the international level. Regarding our implementation of the accountability related aspects of resolution 46/1, preparatory work is underway. Our team will analyze the information that has been consolidated in the evidence repository using a criminal justice perspective with a view to identifying gaps and priorities for further information collection, and incorporating a victim-centered approach.” (4 March 2022, )

The above indicates that, the work of the repository has progressed considerably and evidence is being “consolidated” with a view to initiating criminal prosecutions. In these circumstances, one can expect actions under universal jurisdiction to start being filed against selected officers and civilian leaders who oversaw the war against the LTTE in the near future.

In the event, the government would have to spend enormous amounts of money to defend the accused persons unless the government plans on leaving them to defend themselves. Meanwhile, the government would also suffer irreparable harm as a result of the loss of face and humiliation of letting officers and men that most Sri Lankans whether rightly or wrongly consider as heroes who fought in order to free the country from terrorism, be dragged in front of foreign courts on charges that the government itself says are based on unsubstantiated allegations.

It would by definition be an exercise in futility for the government to expend energy and resources to address the concerns raised by the Council including to brief members on the progress of the domestic mechanisms if the Council nevertheless persists in such parallel measures. Therefore, the way forward must include the means to deal with this problem.

Recommendations

Firstly, in addition to keeping the friendly nations updated on the activities of the domestic mechanisms, the government should in consultation with the nations that spoke in favour at the 49th session, produce a legal opinion on the impugned evidence-gathering mechanism and file it of record with the Council. This would discourage people, especially judges, from relying on material forwarded by or associated with the unit.

Secondly, the government should establish a mechanism to “collect, consolidate, analyze and preserve” the mountain of material including photographic evidence of soldier’s helping civilians out of the battlefield, records of the food and medicines sent to the conflict during the relevant period, testimonies of foreign journalists and others who were at or near the conflict zone during the crucial period, testimonies of the thousands of rescued civilians as well as rehabilitated LTTE cadres and so on, to create a repository of exculpatory evidence that can be made available to the Council as well as to foreign judges before whom actions under universal jurisdiction may be filed in order to help them gain some perspective on the charges.

Thirdly, the government in consultation with like-minded nations should launch a concerted effort to discuss reform at the UNHRC focused on re-affirming the principles and purposes of the Council. Such a drive would blunt any effort by the “Core Group’ and others to introduce yet another country-specific resolution on Sri Lanka at the UNHRC’s 51st Session in September.

(The writer is an Attorney-at-law and a Consultant to the Strategic Communications Unit of the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Lakshman Balasuriya – Not just my boss but a father and a brother

Published

on

Lakshman Balasuriya

It is with profound sadness that we received the shocking news of untimely passing of our dear leader Lakshman Balasuriya.

I first met Lakshman Balasuriya in 1988 while working at John Keells, which had been awarded an IT contract to computerise Senkadagala Finance. Thereafter, in 1992, I joined the E. W. Balasuriya Group of Companies and Senkadagala Finance when the organisation decided to bring its computerisation in-house.

Lakshman Balasuriya obtained his BSc from the University of London and his MSc from the University of Lancaster. He was not only intellectually brilliant, but also a highly practical and pragmatic individual, often sitting beside me to share instructions and ideas, which I would then translate directly into the software through code.

My first major assignment was to computerise the printing press. At the time, the systems in place were outdated, and modernisation was a challenging task. However, with the guidance, strong support, and decisive leadership of our boss, we were able to successfully transform the printing press into a modern, state-of-the-art operation.

He was a farsighted visionary who understood the value and impact of information technology well ahead of his time. He possessed a deep knowledge of the subject, which was rare during those early years. For instance, in the 1990s, Balasuriya engaged a Canadian consultant to conduct a cybersecurity audit—an extraordinary initiative at a time when cybersecurity was scarcely spoken of and far from mainstream.

During that period, Senkadagala Finance’s head office was based in Kandy, with no branch network. When the decision was made to open the first branch in Colombo, our IT team faced the challenge of adapting the software to support branch operations. It was him who proposed the innovative idea of creating logical branches—a concept well ahead of its time in IT thinking. This simple yet powerful idea enabled the company to expand rapidly, allowing branches to be added seamlessly to the system. Today, after many upgrades and continuous modernisation, Senkadagala Finance operates over 400 locations across the country with real-time online connectivity—a testament to his original vision.

In September 2013, we faced a critical challenge with a key system that required the development of an entirely new solution. A proof of concept was prepared and reviewed by Lakshman Balasuriya, who gave the green light to proceed. During the development phase, he remained deeply involved, offering ideas, insights, and constructive feedback. Within just four months, the system was successfully developed and went live—another example of his hands-on leadership and unwavering support for innovation.

These are only a few examples among many of the IT initiatives that were encouraged, supported, and championed by him. Information technology has played a pivotal role in the growth and success of the E. W. Balasuriya Group of Companies, including Senkadagala Finance PLC, and much of that credit goes to his foresight, trust, and leadership.

On a deeply personal note, I was not only a witness to, but also a recipient of, the kindness, humility, and humanity of Lakshman Balasuriya. There were occasions when I lost my temper and made unreasonable demands, yet he always responded with firmness tempered by gentleness. He never lost his own composure, nor did he ever harbour grudges. He had the rare ability to recognise people’s shortcomings and genuinely tried to guide them toward self-improvement.

He was not merely our boss. To many of us, he was like a father and a brother.

I will miss him immensely. His passing has left a void that can never be filled. Of all the people I have known in my life, Mr. Lakshman Balasuriya stands apart as one of the finest human beings.

He leaves behind his beloved wife, Janine, his children Amanthi and Keshav, and the four grandchildren.

May he rest in eternal peace!

Timothy De Silva

(Information Systems Officer at Senkadagala Finance.)

Continue Reading

Opinion

The science of love

Published

on

A remarkable increase in marriage proposals in newspapers and the thriving matchmaking outfits in major cities indicate the difficulty in finding the perfect partners. Academics have done much research in interpersonal attraction or love. There was an era when young people were heavily influenced by romantic fiction. They learned how opposites attract and absence makes the heart grow fonder. There was, of course, an old adage: Out of sight out of mind.

Some people find it difficult to fall in love or they simply do not believe in love. They usually go for arranged marriages. Some of them think that love begins after marriage. There is an on-going debate whether love marriages are better than arranged marriages or vice versa. However, modern psychologists have shed some light on the science of love. By understanding it you might be able to find the ideal life partner.

To start with, do not believe that opposites attract. It is purely a myth. If you wish to fall in love, look for someone like you. You may not find them 100 per cent similar to you, but chances are that you will meet someone who is somewhat similar to you. We usually prefer partners who have similar backgrounds, interests, values and beliefs because they validate our own.

Common trait

It is a common trait that we gravitate towards those who are like us physically. The resemblance of spouses has been studied by scientists more than 100 years ago. According to them, physical resemblance is a key factor in falling in love. For instance, if you are a tall person, you are unlikely to fall in love with a short person. Similarly, overweight young people are attracted to similar types. As in everything in life, there may be exceptions. You may have seen some tall men in love with short women.

If you are interested in someone, declare your love in words or gestures. Some people have strong feelings about others but they never make them known. If you fancy someone, make it known. If you remain silent you will miss a great opportunity forever. In fact if someone loves you, you will feel good about yourself. Such feelings will strengthen love. If someone flatters you, be nice to them. It may be the beginning of a great love affair.

Some people like Romeo and Juliet fall in love at first sight. It has been scientifically confirmed that the longer a pair of prospective partners lock eyes upon their first meeting they are very likely to remain lovers. They say eyes have it. If you cannot stay without seeing your partner, you are in love! Whenever you meet your lover, look at their eyes with dilated pupils. Enlarged pupils signal intense arousal.

Body language

If you wish to fall in love, learn something about body language. There are many books written on the subject. The knowledge of body language will help you to understand non-verbal communication easily. It is quite obvious that lovers do not express their love in so many words. Women usually will not say ‘I love you’ except in films. They express their love tacitly with a shy smile or preening their hair in the presence of their lovers.

Allan Pease, author of The Definitive Guide to Body Language says, “What really turn men on are female submission gestures which include exposing vulnerable areas such as the wrists or neck.” Leg twine was something Princess Diana was good at. It involves crossing the legs hooking the upper leg’s foot behind the lower leg’s ankle. She was an expert in the art of love. Men have their own ways. In order to look more dominant than their partners they engage in crotch display with their thumbs hooked in pockets. Michael Jackson always did it.

If you are looking for a partner, be a good-looking guy. Dress well and behave sensibly. If your dress is unclean or crumpled, nobody will take any notice of you. According to sociologists, men usually prefer women with long hair and proper hip measurements. Similarly, women prefer taller and older men because they look nice and can be trusted to raise a family.

Proximity rule

You do not have to travel long distances to find your ideal partner. He or she may be living in your neighbourhood or working at the same office. The proximity rule ensures repeated exposure. Lovers should meet regularly in order to enrich their love. On most occasions we marry a girl or boy living next door. Never compare your partner with your favourite film star. Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder. Therefore be content with your partner’s physical appearance. Each individual is unique. Never look for another Cleopatra or Romeo. Sometimes you may find that your neighbour’s wife is more beautiful than yours. On such occasions turn to the Bible which says, “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife.”

There are many plain Janes and penniless men in society. How are they going to find their partners? If they are warm people, sociable, wise and popular, they too can find partners easily. Partners in a marriage need not be highly educated, but they must be intelligent enough to face life’s problems. Osho compared love to a river always flowing. The very movement is the life of the river. Once it stops it becomes stagnant. Then it is no longer a river. The very word river shows a process, the very sound of it gives you the feeling of movement.

Although we view love as a science today, it has been treated as an art in the past. In fact Erich Fromm wrote The Art of Loving. Science or art, love is a terrific feeling.

karunaratners@gmail.com

By R.S. Karunaratne

Continue Reading

Opinion

Are we reading the sky wrong?

Published

on

Rethinking climate prediction, disasters, and plantation economics in Sri Lanka

For decades, Sri Lanka has interpreted climate through a narrow lens. Rainfall totals, sunshine hours, and surface temperatures dominate forecasts, policy briefings, and disaster warnings. These indicators once served an agrarian island reasonably well. But in an era of intensifying extremes—flash floods, sudden landslides, prolonged dry spells within “normal” monsoons—the question can no longer be avoided: are we measuring the climate correctly, or merely measuring what is easiest to observe?

Across the world, climate science has quietly moved beyond a purely local view of weather. Researchers increasingly recognise that Earth’s climate system is not sealed off from the rest of the universe. Solar activity, upper-atmospheric dynamics, ocean–atmosphere coupling, and geomagnetic disturbances all influence how energy moves through the climate system. These forces do not create rain or drought by themselves, but they shape how weather behaves—its timing, intensity, and spatial concentration.

Sri Lanka’s forecasting framework, however, remains largely grounded in twentieth-century assumptions. It asks how much rain will fall, where it will fall, and over how many days. What it rarely asks is whether the rainfall will arrive as steady saturation or violent cloudbursts; whether soils are already at failure thresholds; or whether larger atmospheric energy patterns are priming the region for extremes. As a result, disasters are repeatedly described as “unexpected,” even when the conditions that produced them were slowly assembling.

This blind spot matters because Sri Lanka is unusually sensitive to climate volatility. The island sits at a crossroads of monsoon systems, bordered by the Indian Ocean and shaped by steep central highlands resting on deeply weathered soils. Its landscapes—especially in plantation regions—have been altered over centuries, reducing natural buffers against hydrological shock. In such a setting, small shifts in atmospheric behaviour can trigger outsized consequences. A few hours of intense rain can undo what months of average rainfall statistics suggest is “normal.”

Nowhere are these consequences more visible than in commercial perennial plantation agriculture. Tea, rubber, coconut, and spice crops are not annual ventures; they are long-term biological investments. A tea bush destroyed by a landslide cannot be replaced in a season. A rubber stand weakened by prolonged waterlogging or drought stress may take years to recover, if it recovers at all. Climate shocks therefore ripple through plantation economics long after floodwaters recede or drought declarations end.

From an investment perspective, this volatility directly undermines key financial metrics. Return on Investment (ROI) becomes unstable as yields fluctuate and recovery costs rise. Benefit–Cost Ratios (BCR) deteriorate when expenditures on drainage, replanting, disease control, and labour increase faster than output. Most critically, Internal Rates of Return (IRR) decline as cash flows become irregular and back-loaded, discouraging long-term capital and raising the cost of financing. Plantation agriculture begins to look less like a stable productive sector and more like a high-risk gamble.

The economic consequences do not stop at balance sheets. Plantation systems are labour-intensive by nature, and when financial margins tighten, wage pressure is the first stress point. Living wage commitments become framed as “unaffordable,” workdays are lost during climate disruptions, and productivity-linked wage models collapse under erratic output. In effect, climate misprediction translates into wage instability, quietly eroding livelihoods without ever appearing in meteorological reports.

This is not an argument for abandoning traditional climate indicators. Rainfall and sunshine still matter. But they are no longer sufficient on their own. Climate today is a system, not a statistic. It is shaped by interactions between the Sun, the atmosphere, the oceans, the land, and the ways humans have modified all three. Ignoring these interactions does not make them disappear; it simply shifts their costs onto farmers, workers, investors, and the public purse.

Sri Lanka’s repeated cycle of surprise disasters, post-event compensation, and stalled reform suggests a deeper problem than bad luck. It points to an outdated model of climate intelligence. Until forecasting frameworks expand beyond local rainfall totals to incorporate broader atmospheric and oceanic drivers—and until those insights are translated into agricultural and economic planning—plantation regions will remain exposed, and wage debates will remain disconnected from their true root causes.

The future of Sri Lanka’s plantations, and the dignity of the workforce that sustains them, depends on a simple shift in perspective: from measuring weather, to understanding systems. Climate is no longer just what falls from the sky. It is what moves through the universe, settles into soils, shapes returns on investment, and ultimately determines whether growth is shared or fragile.

The Way Forward

Sustaining plantation agriculture under today’s climate volatility demands an urgent policy reset. The government must mandate real-world investment appraisals—NPV, IRR, and BCR—through crop research institutes, replacing outdated historical assumptions with current climate, cost, and risk realities. Satellite-based, farm-specific real-time weather stations should be rapidly deployed across plantation regions and integrated with a central server at the Department of Meteorology, enabling precision forecasting, early warnings, and estate-level decision support. Globally proven-to-fail monocropping systems must be phased out through a time-bound transition, replacing them with diversified, mixed-root systems that combine deep-rooted and shallow-rooted species, improving soil structure, water buffering, slope stability, and resilience against prolonged droughts and extreme rainfall.

In parallel, a national plantation insurance framework, linked to green and climate-finance institutions and regulated by the Insurance Regulatory Commission, is essential to protect small and medium perennial growers from systemic climate risk. A Virtual Plantation Bank must be operationalized without delay to finance climate-resilient plantation designs, agroforestry transitions, and productivity gains aligned with national yield targets. The state should set minimum yield and profit benchmarks per hectare, formally recognize 10–50 acre growers as Proprietary Planters, and enable scale through long-term (up to 99-year) leases where state lands are sub-leased to proven operators. Finally, achieving a 4% GDP contribution from plantations requires making modern HRM practices mandatory across the sector, replacing outdated labour systems with people-centric, productivity-linked models that attract, retain, and fairly reward a skilled workforce—because sustainable competitive advantage begins with the right people.

by Dammike Kobbekaduwe

(www.vivonta.lk & www.planters.lk ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending