Connect with us

News

UK Guardian publishes extensive report of how SL plunged into the present mess

Published

on

n a wide ranging Colombo datelined story published on Thursday, The Guardian, the widely respected British newspaper, has laid bare the inside story of Sri Lanka’s current predicament in a report headlined “‘The family took over:’ how a feuding ruling dynasty drove Sri Lanka to ruin.”

Written by Hanah Ellis-Peterson the report offers damning quotes from several former cabinet ministers who voted for the 20th Amendment enhancing President Gotabaya Rajapaksas powers but now publicly rue what they have done. It also quotes media and advertising magnate, Dilith Jayaweera, described as a “close friend of the president.”

The former ministers quoted in the report are Dr. Nalaka Godahewa, Messrs. Udaya Gammanipila and Vasudeva Nanayakkara. Charitha Herath, who has played important roles in the administration and now heads COPE is also quoted.

Jayaweera figures early in the narrative. Although no friend of Basil Rajapaksa, he had invited the latter to his plush office for dinner. As they ate, Dilith had fired some questions. The report quoted him saying, “Basil couldn’t answer even my basic questions. He was giving very lousy answers – that we’ll find money from here, from there, saying it would all be fine to pay our debts. I saw then he really didn’t understand the economy at all; that it was done, dusted, finished for us.”

Godahewa has some interesting things to say as illustrated by the following quotation.

“As soon as Gotabaya took office, “the family took over; he was dancing only to their tune. Basil loyalists were given the key cabinet portfolios and the family parachuted in PB Jayasundara, a bureaucrat who had a decades-long relationship with Mahinda and Basil, to become secretary and economic adviser to the president. Jayasundara had once been barred from holding public office, but that was later overturned.”

“Gotabaya had no political experience and knew nothing about economics; he depended entirely on PB Jayasundara to run the economy,” said Charitha Herath, an SLPP MP who sat on several parliamentary finance committees. The problem was, he was giving very bad advice.”

This is what Gammanpila has said: “”I submitted 11 cabinet papers warning about the impending crisis. But whenever we raised an economic issue, Basil felt we were interfering with his work and he got offended. He repeatedly said that everything was fine. But in my assessment, he doesn’t have even a basic understanding about economics.” He also says: “”Basil was the true power. Gotabaya didn’t know how bad things were and Mahinda was getting old and not in the best health, he was just the figurehead. Everything was controlled by Basil.” He has further said, “This was a time bomb that had been accumulating for several decades now. Everything was built with borrowed, not earned, money.”

Basil Rajapaksa had declined to be interviewed for this article and his close aides had refused to speak on the record.

Vasudeva Nanayakkara says that the president accepted whatever proposal Basil put before him. Also that “”The relationship between Gotabaya and Mahinda had always been very cordial, very loving and paternal. But towards the end, as Gotabaya told Mahinda in so many words to step down, it was very, very bitter.”

The Guardian report says those on the inside say Mahinda agreed to resign on three or four occasions, but would then return to his inner circle – including his wife and two sons who were in politics – to be persuaded he did not need to go. “This kept on happening for about two weeks,” said Godahewa. Frustration and anger grew between the two brothers.

It further says that as reports of the May 9 attacks reached Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who was at home in Colombo, he exploded in anger. The night before, having already had concerns about the gathering, he had given instructions to the chief of police to be ready with officers, teargas and water cannon.

“The president was screaming over the phone to the senior DIG, asking why the hell haven’t you prevented these people entering Galle Face,” said Godahewa, who was holed up at Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s home for two days as it all took place. “He was shouting: ‘I’m the president, you do what I say, somehow stop these people.”

It further says that by the time the police resonded, the spark had already been lit with the worst violence in decades engulfing the country.Gotabaya also appeared to have lost control of the military, who failed to intervene, many said out of fear by top brass that they would be held accountable if anyone was killed.

“I saw how much the president pleaded with the army chief to take action, saying: ‘Send troops, do something,’” said Godahewa, whose own house was burned down. “The president was so frustrated because everybody’s house was burning and the army was not stopping them.”

But, according to police and ministerial sources, the police chief held back from taking action against the mobs attacking Galle Face, having been told by his seniors that this was a family matter between Mahinda and Gotabaya and it was safer for police to not be seen to take sides.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

No change in death toll, stands at 639 as at 0600AM today [11th]

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 0600 AM today [11th December 2025] confirms that there has been no addition to the death toll in the past 24 hours and remains at 639. The number of missing persons has reduced by ten [10] and stands at 193.

There is a slight reduction in the  number of persons who are at safety centers and, stands at 85,351  down from 86,040 yesterday.  Five safety centers have also closed down in the past 24 hours and  873 safety centers are still being maintained.

Continue Reading

News

Regulatory rollback tailored for “politically backed megaprojects”— Environmentalists

Published

on

Investigations have revealed that the government’s controversial easing of environmental regulations appears closely aligned with the interests of a small but powerful coalition of politically connected investors, environmentalists have alleged.

The move weakens key Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requirements and accelerates approvals for high-risk projects, has triggered a storm of criticism from environmental scientists, civil society groups and even sections within the administration, they have claimed.

Environmental Scientist Hemantha Withanage, Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice, told The Island that the policy reversal “bears the fingerprints of elite political financiers who view Sri Lanka’s natural assets as commodities to be carved up for profit.”

“This is not accidental. This is deliberate restructuring to favour a specific group of power brokers,” he told The Island. “The list of beneficiaries is clear: large-scale mineral extraction interests, luxury hotel developers targeting protected coastlines, politically backed hydropower operators, industrial agriculture companies seeking forest land, and quarry operators with direct political patronage.”

Information gathered through government insiders points to four clusters of projects that stand to gain substantially:

Several politically shielded operators have been lobbying for years to weaken environmental checks on silica sand mining, gem pit expansions, dolomite extraction and rock quarrying in the central and northwestern regions.

High-end tourism ventures — especially in coastal and wetland buffer zones — have repeatedly clashed with community opposition and EIA conditions. The rollback clears obstacles previously raised by environmental officers.

At least half a dozen mini-hydro proposals in protected catchments have stalled due to community objections and ecological concerns. The new rules are expected to greenlight them.

Plantation and agribusiness companies with political links are seeking access to forest-adjacent lands, especially in the North Central and Uva Provinces.

“These sectors have been pushing aggressively for deregulation,” a senior Ministry source confirmed. “Now they’ve got exactly what they wanted.”

Internal rifts within the Environment Ministry are widening. Several senior officers told The Island they were instructed not to “delay or complicate” approvals for projects endorsed by select political figures.

A senior officer, requesting anonymity, said:

“This is not policymaking — it’s political engineering. Officers who raise scientific concerns are sidelined.”

Another added:”There are files we cannot even question. The directive is clear: expedite.”

Opposition parliamentarians are preparing to demand a special parliamentary probe into what they call “environmental state capture” — the takeover of regulatory functions by those with political and financial leverage.

“This is governance for the few, not the many,” an Opposition MP told The Island. “The rollback benefits the government’s inner circle and their funders. The public gets the consequences: floods, landslides, water scarcity.”

Withanage issued a stark warning:

“When rivers dry up, when villages are buried in landslides, when wetlands vanish, these will not be natural disasters. These will be political crimes — caused by decisions made today under pressure from financiers.”

He said CEJ was already preparing legal and public campaigns to challenge the changes.

“We will expose the networks behind these decisions. We will not allow Sri Lanka’s environment to be traded for political loyalty.”

Civil society organisations, environmental lawyers and grassroots communities are mobilising for a nationwide protest and legal response. Several cases are expected to be filed in the coming weeks.

“This is only the beginning,” Withanage said firmly. “The fight to protect Sri Lanka’s environment is now a fight against political capture itself.”

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

UK pledges £1 mn in aid for Ditwah victims

Published

on

Acting UK High Commissioner Theresa O’Mahony inspecting a school damaged by floods, during a visit to the Sri Lanka Red Cross operations in Gampaha.

The UK has pledged £1 million (around $1.3 million) in aid to support victims of Cyclone Ditwah, following Acting High Commissioner Theresa O’Mahony’s visit to Sri Lanka Red Cross operations in Gampaha.

“This funding will help deliver emergency supplies and life-saving assistance to those who need it most,” the British High Commission said. The aid will be distributed through humanitarian partners.

During her visit, O’Mahony toured the Red Cross warehouse where UK relief supplies are being prepared, met volunteers coordinating relief efforts, and visited flood-affected areas to speak with families impacted by the cyclone.

“Our support is about helping people get back on their feet—safely and with dignity,” she said, adding that the UK stands “shoulder to shoulder with the people of Sri Lanka” and will continue collaborating with the government, the Red Cross, the UN, and local partners in recovery efforts.

She was accompanied by John Entwhistle, IFRC Head of South Asia, and Mahesh Gunasekara, Secretary General of the Sri Lanka Red Cross.

Continue Reading

Trending