Features
Trump’s Second Coming and the Tech-Industry Complex

by Rajan Philips
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.· W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming
It is pathos time in American politics. In his second inaugural address on Monday, January 20, Donald Trump proclaimed divine causality for his second coming. “My life was saved for a reason. I was saved by God to make America great again,” declared Trump. He was referring to the failed attempts on his life during the election campaign.
But there was no hint of humility or any offering of thanks for God’s mercy. Neither attribute is a part of his constitution, and Trump owes nothing to the god he has created for himself to be used as a marketing embellishment. While there is nothing eschatological about Trump’s second coming, what rings familiar is Yeats’s second coming foreboding from a different era a hundred years ago. The Irish poet’s insight forcefully captures Trump’s America – where the best lack conviction and the worst have all the intensity.
An even more powerful insight as well as foresight of what is now unfolding in America can be found in the writings of the progressive American philosopher Richard Rorty (1931-2007) from the late 1990s. Rorty’s 1998 book, Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America, has been noted for its prophetic prediction of “an authoritarian strongman” rising to power taking advantage of the economical struggles of the working classes and their disaffection with over-righteous left-liberals preaching social rights over economic necessities. Trump’s election in 2016 fulfilled Rorty’s 1998 prophesy.
The Dark Years and Beyond
Two years earlier in 1996, Rorty presaged Trump’s second coming in a retro-futuristic essay entitled, “Looking Backwards from the Year 2096.” The essay is presented as an excerpt from a speculative article on ‘Fraternity’ published in a 2095 symposium edited by symbolically fictional Cynthia Rodriguez, SJ and Youzheng (not Kash) Patel, and offers these glimpses of light at the end of a long Trumpian tunnel:
“Our long, hesitant, painful recovery, over the last five decades, from the breakdown of democratic institutions during the Dark Years (2014-2044) has changed our political vocabulary, as well as our sense of the relation between the moral order and the economic order. Just as twentieth-century Americans had trouble imagining how their pre-Civil War ancestors could have stomached slavery, so we at the end of the twenty-first century have trouble imagining how our great-grandparents could have legally permitted a CEO to get 20 times more than her lowest paid employees. We cannot understand how Americans a hundred years ago could have tolerated the horrific contrast between a childhood spent in the suburbs and one spent in the ghettos. Such inequalities seem to us evident moral abominations, but the vast majority of our ancestors took them to be regrettable necessities.”
Rorty died one year before Obama was elected, but he was spot on in setting the start of the Dark Years that began with Trump’s foray into politics to negate the promises of Obama’s presidency. But Trump was not a one-term aberration as many thought he would be, and Biden’s presidency did not turn out to be a permanent restoration after Trump. Indeed, another American prognosticator, Harvard University’s Michael Sandel, has called the Biden presidency an interregnum between Trump’s two terms. Trump is now musing about a third term and there is no limit to what he thinks he can do. He might even fancy that he is physically immortal. But there are limits to what he can actually do and even to the lasting effects of all his executive orders and odours that he has been issuing in the first two weeks of his second term.
In Rorty’s sweep of American history, Americans overcame the scourge of slavery in their first hundred years, and they opened the age of human rights and social rights for all peoples in the next hundred years. The Dark Years under Trump are the culmination of the tussles between the promises of the welfare state and supremacy of the market; the frustrations of socialist endeavours followed by the fanaticism of globalization; the fragmentation of societies and lopsided wealth distribution between the overclass of the super-rich and the professional and cultural elites, on the one hand, and the mass of underclasses, on the other; and the rise of populisms targeting the very structures that were created to expand equality and inclusivity as deep state enemies of the people.
Rorty is optimistic that by 2044, twenty first-century Americans, like their predecessors in the earlier two centuries, will find their enlightened way out of the current darkness by rediscovering fraternity and unselfishness and moving past the insistence over rights and their denial. Fraternity, for Rorty, “is an inclination of the heart,” and “not the sort of thing that anybody can have a theory about or that people can be argued into having.” The sources for this metamorphosis will come not from philosophers, lawyers, political theorists or social scientists, but from a “political discourse dominated by quotations from Scripture and literature” that have always been a huge part of the American spirit and ethos. From the likes of John Steinbeck’s “Grapes of Wrath,” and the “social gospel theology” of Walter Rauschenbusch.
If Rorty’s end goals seem utopian, the means to them that he advocates are not. Nor are they ahistorical. The means involve reconstituting the old “coalition of trade unions and churches” that would “topple(d) the military dictatorship in 2044” and “retain(ed) control of Congress by successfully convincing the voters that its opponents constitute ‘the parties of selfishness’.” While Rorty’s prescience is remarkable, even though there is no military dictatorship, it could not be expected to be microscopic about the specific aspects of the current darkness and the way out of it.
For instance, Rorty could not have presaged in any detail the personification of the American crisis in a president called Donald Trump. What might be worrisome for the here and now is whether Trumpism and its hangover could last as far as 2044. To borrow from Scripture, Trump is turning what was set up to be “government of the people, by the people, for the people”, into a “den of thieves,” by the super-rich, for the super-rich. His MAGA (Make America Great Again) universe has always been enthralled by what was mistakenly magnified to be Trump’s business talent and acumen. The truth of the matter is that Trump always knew that he never belonged in the club of the great captains of American capitalism. Now he is pursuing the illusion of presidential greatness.
He seems to be proving to be far more successful in politics than he has been in business. His business was primarily limited to the parking lots and vacant parcels of capitalism, i.e., property development. And he thrived not by playing straight but going crooked all the time. He is deploying the same methods in politics to good, rather bad, effect. He has overshadowed four living former presidents (Clinton, Bush, Obama and Biden), and has bested the two best female candidates who challenged him – Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris.
A slight majority of American voters ignored and rejected Kamala Harris’s warnings that Trump was carrying an Enemies List, and that his second term would be dedicated to implementing Project 2025 – a conservative road map for using the Trump presidency to overhaul the federal government structures and dismantle the social welfare and civil rights scaffoldings that have been put in place by Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society initiatives. Trump is now fully bought into upending them, and is blindly signing Executive Orders drafted by his policy minions.
True to form, the orders are creating chaos and confusion all around, and the executive order to end the funding of federal agencies and programs, all of which have been created by law, had to be rescinded within 24 hours in the face of court challenges and stay orders. The method in all the madness of the Trump presidency is keeping the MAGA base happy and looking after Trump’s super-rich sponsors.
To keep his base happy, Trump has pardoned all 1,500 or so criminals who were already jailed or facing prosecution for the 2021 January 6 insurrection at the Capitol to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. That has not gone down well with police organizations, courts and a majority of the population including Republicans. Trump has also fired all the lawyers in the Department of Justice (DOJ) who were involved in indicting Trump for inciting the January 6 insurrection. That should send an unflattering message to Chief Justice Roberts who has defined presidential interactions with the DOJ as a core executive function protected by absolute immunity.
The deportation of illegal immigrants was already a common practice under the Obama and Biden Administrations. But Trump is making a show of it by televising the rounding up and handcuffing of immigrants and deporting them on military aircrafts as opposed to commercial airlines.
A third sop to the base is Trump’s threat to eradicate the policy and programmes implemented by the federal government to promote diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the hiring of government employees and contractors. Their origin goes all the way back to President Kennedy’s 1961 Executive Order that started the American Affirmative Action. Now Trump wants to end it and there is no level too low that he will not stoop to end DEI. He has been doing just that in the wake of the tragic midair crash last Wednesday of a passenger plane and a military helicopter over the Potomac River in Washington.
Rather than showing presidential compassion and empathy over the death of everyone in the two ill-fated aircraft, 67 in all, Trump has taken to blaming Obama, Biden, and Biden’s Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (one of Biden’s more brilliant cabinet ministers) and their DEI hiring practices for the crash. Even Republican politicians are disgusted at the crude crassness of Trump’s politics.
The Tech-Industrial Complex
In his farewell address to the nation on January 15, outgoing President Biden warned of the danger of a “tech-industrial complex” in the form of “an oligarchy (is) taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms, and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.” Biden was following the example of President Eisenhower who had similarly, in his farewell address in 1960, warned of the danger of a military-industrial complex. More than hundred years earlier Theodore Roosevelt had warned of the danger of money power in American politics.
These presidential warnings betray the tensions between the power of capital and the political power of the state. While there is no illusion about the sway that money power and corporate elites have had over any and all governments, never before has an American president surrounded himself with all the richest men the way Trump is doing now. There seems to be no billionaire woman yet who is a member of Trump’s White House billionaire club. What is also unique about this club is that it is comprised entirely of big tech billionaires.
They are a different breed and are the exponents of what the Greek economist Yanis Varoufakis calls ‘Techno Feudalism.’ One that has been devouring industrial capitalism of old and replacing its two pillars of markets and profits with ‘digital trading platforms’ and ‘cloud rents.’ More on that for another time. The brazenness of this cabal and its agenda run diametrically counter to the nativist compulsions of MAGA populists. Not to mention the internal contradictions and egotistical clashes within the cabal itself.
The chasm between the tech cabal and the rest of the country couldn’t be deeper or wider. In this century so far, the top 1% of Americans, or 3 million people, own more than a third of the national wealth, and tech cabal is at the apex within this group. For the bottom 50% of Americans, or 150 million people, their share of the national wealth is only 1.5%. For the American households, the median household net worth is about $193,000 and median annual household income is about $81,000. It is their cost of living and affordability challenges that Trump exploited to win the presidential election. But after taking his oath as president, and amidst two weeks of non-stop issuance of executive orders, he has said little or nothing about the people’s main grievances that he got elected to address.
At the same time, Trump is pushing his party in Congress to give him the budget to jumpstart his tax reduction agenda amounting to $4 trillion. He needs it to keep his bargain with his billionaire club. But the Republican Party with slender majorities in the Congress and the Senate is not offering Trump its unanimous support without which nothing could be passed by Congress.
For this reason, Trump is looking for alternative revenue sources to accommodate his tax cuts. They include imposing tariffs on imports that has global implications, freeze on federal grants and programs, revenue from increased fossil fuel production and downsizing government. But none of them can be easily implemented or achieved. The cuts to programs to enable tax cuts for the wealthy will impact everyone who is not wealthy and will mobilize their opposition. Democrats are gearing up for the fight, calling Trump’s tax cut agenda – “a contract against America.” The midterm elections in 2026 will show which way the political wind is blowing.
Features
Shame! Ragging raises its cowardly head again

Ragging at Sabaragamuwa university has resulted in the loss of another student’s life and there is another incident of barbaric attack on an anti-rag student of J’pura university by some students from the same university. Whether the bullies are backed by political parties or not, they show their undeveloped and conformist minds that need urgent refinement; if they are connected to political parties and student unions, the latter show only their vulgarity and duplicity when they wax eloquent about modern education, culture, decadent politics, human rights, corruption and all that jazz. That this barbarous practice continues in broad daylight and under the very nose of university and law enforcement authorities is deplorable and puzzling to say the least. It is ironic that the best minds, the superstars in academia, the leading lights in education and the guardians of all that is progressive have become helpless spectators of this bullying happening in their universities. The ignominious records of rag victims in our country are a crying shame as all those perpetrators have been from that somewhat musty and largely conservative ‘cream of intelligence’ as they are called at all inauguration ceremonies where their egos are pampered.
Ragging in our universities is a sure sign of the backwardness of our culture and education, in comparison with that of civilized societies. The brutal practice of ragging shows that education in our country, both in schools and universities, has a lot of room for improvement about making the undergraduate population sensitive and sensible, more than ‘educated’. Of course, we can understand torture if it is something which happens in the underworld or in any place where the new recruits must be brutaliesed before they are admitted to their circles, but how can one understand when it happens in the highest seats of academia? Professor O. A. Ileperuma has, in his article “Ragging and loss of life” published in The Island of 5 May 2025, stated that some academics turn a blind eye to ragging perhaps “because they themselves were raggers in the past and see nothing harmful in such sordid instances of ragging”. This is pathetic and may perhaps prove some of the accusations that have been made ad nauseum about the lack of a wholesome education in our university system, which is said to be obsessed with mass producing ‘employable graduates’.
As they say, desperate times call for desperate measures. As far as the ragging culture in our universities is concerned, desperate measures are long overdue. In the highest institutes of learning where knowledge is produced and all the progressive and advanced ideas are supposed to be generated, there has been unfathomable brutality, crudeness and conventionality in the name of an acquired beastliness which they call ‘ragging’ to give it a quasi-academic smell when all it amounts to is lack of refinement which can be linked to numerous reasons.
Most of the culprits are the victims of a system which esteems hierarchy where it is accepted that superiority is synonymous with repressive power and inferiority is another term for meekness and passive acceptance of all commands coming from above. It is a mentality which is based on the warped logic that superiority is absurd if the seniors have no right to snub the juniors. Those who have tasted humiliation in one form or another for long due to reasons inherent in society can grow up to be vengeful. Most of these diehard raggers often show signs of this mentality in the way they behave the minute they have been automatically lifted to their pathetic superiority after one year in the university where they enjoy a mistaken sense of immunity from the law. The widely publicised idea of ‘freedom’ associated with universities and their relative aloofness from the rest of society and the aura they have acquired have made them safe havens for the raggers if the unmitigated brutality in ragging over the long years is any indication. The question is why (oh why?) these learned bullies despise civilised behaviour so much in their enclaves of power merely on the strength of one year’s seniority. If it is their one year’s accumulated knowledge which makes them feel superior to the newcomers in an aggressive way, surely, such knowledge is questionable, which must intrigue educationists, psychologists, sociologists and all academics interested in the role of education in character building.
Raggers have been saying ad nauseam that ragging is given to make the new entrants tough enough for academic work. As we know their methods include using foul language, humiliation, intimidation, physical and psychological abuse, torture, beating and forcing rigorous exercises even leading to death. The resultant trauma has led some to commit suicide. All this is done to help the new students with a proven capacity for hard work in the academic field!
However, there are some pertinent questions to be asked. Is this method of building resilience of potential academics backed by research? Should this ‘programme’ be conducted by senior students (who are apparently mentally unsound)? Aren’t there better qualified people to conduct a civilised programme which would help make the newcomers ready to face the trials of academic life? Do they believe that no refined programme can be as ‘effective’ as their ragging? Why should they spend their valuable time doing it when it can be done by experts in a more organised and civilised manner? Have they ever been cultured enough to discuss this so-called ‘personality development’ programme with the relevant authorities and academics, with any reliable evidence to prove its effectiveness?
As we know, these raggers who are self-appointed ‘experts’ in character building of sorts expect total submission from the juniors they try to brutalise, and those who dare resist this bullying are viciously suppressed. To what extent does this compulsory compliance expected from the new students at the beginning of their academic career help them to be better undergrads?
How much more brutality in ragging is to be endured by the new university entrants for “desperate measures” to be called for?
by Susantha Hewa
Features
80th Anniversary of Second World War

One of the most important dates in World War II, is May 9, 1945, when the Soviet red flag with the hammer and sickle emblem was raised over the Reichstag building, the German parliament. This confirmed Germany’s unconditional surrender to the Soviet Union. Since then, 80 years have passed upto May 9, 2025. It is very timely to look back on the past 80 years of history, and to briefly discuss some of the current issues and the future.
Beginning and End of the 2nd World War
World War II began on September 1, 1939, when Nazi Germany attacked Poland. Within a year of the war, the world’s imperialist powers had divided into two camps. Germany was on one side, targeting Europe, Italy Africa, and Japan Asia, while Great Britain, the United States, and France were on the other side of the war.
Within a short time from the start of the war, Germany had conquered many countries in Europe, and on June 22, 1941, Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union joined the anti- Nazi Allies and launched the “Great Patriotic War” to defend the world’s first socialist state, and progressive forces around the world acted in a way that supported the Soviet Union.
Three major battles known as the Battles of Moscow, Stalingrad, and Kursk turned the tide of World War II, shattering Hitler’s dream of capturing Moscow in a few months (4 months) through Operation “Barbarossa” and celebrating the victory from Red Square. By the beginning of 1945, the entire Soviet Union had been liberated from Nazi Germany, and by March 1945, the Soviet Red Army had surrounded Berlin from the east, south, and north, and then surrounded the entire city, surrendering the German forces, ending the European War of World War II on May 9.
World War II was a major war in which 61 countries, representing 89% of the world’s population participated, and the total number of deaths in this war was 50 million, of which 25-30 million were Soviet citizens. The Soviet Red Army, which ended the Great War for the Liberation of Europe on May 9, 1945, entered the Battle of Manchuria three months later on August 9, 1945, and defeated imperialist Japan. By then, the United States had dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (on August 6 and 9). Thus, the Soviet Union played the major role in defeating the fascist military coalition, including Nazi Germany, during World War II.
Post-World War order
Negotiations, to shape the post-war world order, began while World War II was still ongoing. In talks held in Washington in January-February 1942, in Canada in 1943, later in Moscow, and in Tehran, Iran in November-December 1943, the Soviet Union, the United States, Great Britain, and China agreed to establish an international organisation with the aim of preserving world peace. Later, the Soviet, American and British leaders who met in Yalta in Crimea agreed on the structure of the United Nations, the Security Council, and the veto power, and the United Nations Charter, signed by 50 countries in San Francisco in 1945, came into force on October 24, 1945.
Rise of Socialist world and collapse of colonialism
With the Soviet victory in World War II, the world underwent unprecedented changes. Although Mongolia was the only socialist state other than the Soviet Union at the start of World War II, after that war, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Yugoslavia, and Albania in Eastern Europe also became socialist countries. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam was established in 1945, and in 1947 a socialist state was established in East Germany under the name of the German Democratic Republic. The Chinese Revolution triumphed in 1949, and the Cuban Revolution triumphed in 1959. Thus, the socialist system established in a single country by the October Revolution in 1917 developed into a world system against the backdrop of the unique victory of the Soviet Union in World War II.
Another direct result of the victory in World War II was the collapse of the colonial system. National liberation struggles intensified in Asia, Africa and Latin America, and new independent countries emerged one after another on these continents. In the 25-30 years that followed the end of World War II, the colonial system almost completely collapsed. The United Nations, which began with 50 member states, now has 193 members.
With the end of World War II, working class struggles intensified. Communist parties were formed all over the world. Although the Sri Lankan working people’s movement was in a state of truce during World War II, the war ended in May 1945 and by August it had gone on a general strike. The 8-hour workday, wage boards, holiday systems and monthly salary systems were won through that struggle. The working class movement in this country was able to win many rights, including pension rights, overtime pay, and other rights, through the general strike held in 1946. Although the general strike of 1947 was suppressed, there is no doubt that the British government was shocked by this great struggle. In the elections held in 1947, leftist and progressive groups were elected to parliament in large numbers, and independence with Dominion status was achieved in 1948.
World is in turmoil
Until this era, which is 80 years after the end of World War II, the world has so far managed to prevent another world war. Although there have been no world wars, there have been several major conflicts around the world. The ongoing Middle East conflict over the forced displacement of the Palestinian people, the conflict created by Western powers around Iran, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and the recently escalating Indo-Pakistan conflict are among them. The limited military operation launched by Russia to prevent the NATO organization reaching its borders, has transformed into a battle between Russia and the collective West. But the conflict now seems to have entered a certain path of resolution.
Several parties have launched trade wars that are destabilising the world, perhaps even escalating into a state of war. Thousands of trade sanctions have been imposed against Russia, and the US President has declared a trade war by imposing tariffs on dozens of countries around the world.
Meanwhile, the world has not yet been able to provide a satisfactory solution to the problem of global warming, which has threatened the existence of the entire human race.
The Bretton Woods Organizations (International Monetary Fund and World Bank), which were economic operating institutions established after World War II, have not only failed to lead the world’s economic development, but there is a strong allegation that the guidance of those institutions has exacerbated the economic problems of newly independent countries.
At this time of commemoration of the 80th anniversary of World War II, it is our responsibility to resolve the above problems facing the people of the world and to dedicate ourselves to the future of humanity.
Way forward
Accordingly, a futuristic, new economic order is emerging, and a multipolar world has been formed. The most important point to emphasise here is that the world order that was established after World War II, which encompasses various fields, is a system jointly developed by the great powers that won that war, and the reforms that need to be made in accordance with the demands to change this world order to suit the current reality must be identified collectively. No single country can change these world structures.
People are rallying all over the world for issues related to the survival of the entire human race, such as controlling global warming. New programmes that contribute to the economic development of most countries in the world have been or are being developed. The New Silk Road projects, the BRICS organisation, the New Development Bank, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization are such programs/new institutions. A global process has been launched to prevent a nuclear war and maintain world peace.
Many of the above-mentioned issues and problems have arisen through imperialist military and economic planning and operations, and therefore, the contradiction between imperialism and the people has become the main contradiction of this era. Therefore, it must be emphasized on the 80th anniversary of the Second World War that the way forward in the world will be through the people’s struggle against imperialism.
by Dr. G. Weerasinghe
General Secretary, Communist
Party of Sri Lanka
Features
New Mayors; 80th Anniversary of VE Day; Prince Harry missteps yet again

This week’s Cry is put together as the voting goes on for mayors of Municipal Councils. Cass is rather confused about this second tier of government, so she googled and here is what she got: “There are currently 29 municipal councils in Sri Lanka. These councils govern the largest cities and first tier municipalities in the country. The local government system also includes 36 urban councils and 276 Pradeshiya Sabhas.” Not that this has made matters clearer to Cass.
She believes that for a small country of 22 m people, we are too heavily governed from above, with a central government and then all these councils and sabhas below. Consider the number employed in them; most underworked and underworking. Another matter is that if you want a matter seen to, regarding property rates, etc., you are most often sent from this Sabha to that council.
This came about with the 13th Amendment to the Sri Lanka Constitution introduced on November 14, 1987, following the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord, which aimed to address the ethnic conflict by granting some autonomy to provincial councils. As Cass believes it was imposed on us by India after the threat expressed by India, instigated by Tamil Nadu, when Prabhakaran in his military childhood, was cornered and almost captured in Vadamarachchi.
India rained parippu on the northern peninsular, demanded no arrests of LTTE; and it was rumoured Indian forces were poised on the southern and south eastern coasts of the subcontinent ready to sail to war to the island below them. PM Rajiv Gandhi came instead; Prez JRJ was constrained to meet, greet and honour him. One rating in a guard of honour which handsome Rajiv inspected, expressed the majority people’s opinion; “We don’t want you here!” After which guards of honour worldwide are kept strictly at a safe distance from the VVIP honoured.
To Cass the most important fact of the election progressing now and its outcome is that she hopes newly elected mayors will insist on the Municipal Councils’ employees doing the work allotted to them: mostly garbage collectors; sprayers against mosquitoes; PHIs inspecting kitchens of eating houses and those in charge of general cleanliness of cities keeping s clean.
Complaints are numerous that roads are dirty, garbage piled up and drains and small waterways clogged so water remains stagnant and thus the rapid spread of most debilitating chikungunya.
May 8 1945 – VE Day
This date marked Victory in Europe. “… after Britain and its allies formally accepted Nazi Germany’s surrender after almost six years of war. At 15.00, the then Prime Minister Winston Churchill announced World War Two in Europe had come to an end.” Allied Forces marched into Germany from west and South and the Russians entered from the north. Hitler committed suicide and the Nazi so far invincible forces were shattered, battered and splintered. It was Emperor Hirohito who surrendered Japan and himself on August 15, 1945, after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings (Aug 6,9).
Thus, this year is the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and Britain brought out its Palace Guards, forces and cheering crowds to celebrate the event, and more to pay homage to veterans still living and extend gratitude to those soldiers, sailors and airmen and women who laid down their lives to save their country. King Charles III was present in a special seating area which had other members of the royal family; politicians and veterans and their families, while some of those who had served in the war rode in open cars to the cheers of the spectators.
The Netherlands and Canada too mounted celebrations. Canada made it a point to pay allegiance to the British Monarch as their head, and Cass feels sure King Charles III reciprocated with acknowledgement. Commented on were video statements Cass heard that this reiteration was for the benefit of Prez Trump with his plans to annex Canada as the 51st State of the US.
Prince of groans and complaints
In the midst of this pageantry and show of British royal family’s unity was Prince Harry cutting a very poor figure of himself, most in an interview given to the BBC after he lost his British Court of Appeal challenge over his security arrangements. “The Duke of Essex, who attended both days of the hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice last month, was appealing a ruling dismissing his challenge to the level of police protection he receives in the UK” He was demanding armed security for himself and his family if and when they visit England. This was refused because of his own withdrawal from royal duties, opting not to be a working member of the British Royal Family; and moving to the US to live. Videos Cass watched tore him to pieces on several counts. He said he could not bring his wife and children to Britain. He said he wanted reconciliation but his father would not speak with him. Then the blunder of adding the sentiment that King Charles’ days on earth were numbered. “We don’t know how long he has to live.”
He was very annoyed with a compere of a British late-night show for referring to him as Harry with no Prince or Duke salutation. He and his wife are not allowed to use HRH by King Charles’ orders, but it was said Meghan loves using the title. Here is a straightforward case of wanting and not wanting something, of utter selfishness and gross grasping.
Local news in English
Cass bemoans the fact she is no longer able to watch MTV News First at 6.30 of a morning. MTV late news in English is at 9.00 pm but it was repeated the next morning. Served lots, I am sure. In Cass’ case the TV set is monopolised by the two helpers she has with her. They watch teledramas on various channels all through the late evening almost to midnight. Can she butt in? Never! They need entertainment. So, no local news for her these days until she goes to another TV channel for news in English – few available. She hopes TV One will resume its news relay in English at 6.30 am after the welcome chanting of pirith.
Cassandra wishes everyone and our much-loved country a continuation of the peace of Vesak. Oneness of the people as good persons was demonstrated in the crowds in Kandy recently. Mosques opened their doors wide to let in anyone and everyone come in and sleep. All races supplied food and water. Such unity was not seen before. A propitious sign for the future.
-
Opinion7 days ago
Remembering Dr. Samuel Mathew: A Heart that Healed Countless Lives
-
Business5 days ago
Aitken Spence Travels continues its leadership as the only Travelife-Certified DMC in Sri Lanka
-
Latest News3 days ago
NPP win Maharagama Urban Council
-
Business5 days ago
LinearSix and InsureMO® expand partnership
-
Business3 days ago
John Keells Properties and MullenLowe unveil “Minutes Away”
-
Features7 days ago
Trump’s economic missiles are boomeranging
-
Latest News6 days ago
The Heat index is likely to increase up to ‘Caution level’ at some places in Eastern, Northern, North-central and North-western provinces and in Monaragala and Hambantota districts.
-
Business4 days ago
NDB Bank partners with Bishop’s College to launch NDB Pixel awareness