News
Time-bar objection in Easter Bombing compensation cases dismissed
By A.J.A. Abeynayake
Objection raised by the legal representatives of former Inspector General of Police Pujith Jayasundara and former State Intelligence Service Chief Nilantha Jayawardena, claiming that compensation lawsuits filed against them, related to the Easter Sunday bombings, were not filed within the stipulated period of three months as per the provisions of the Police Ordinance, were dismissed by Negombo District Judge Lalith Kannangara yesterday (11).
The victims of the Easter Sunday bombings have filed 182 cases seeking compensation. Jayasundara and Jayawardena have been named as the fourth and fifth defendants, respectively.
The defendants’ lawyers argued that both of their clients, being police officers, were subject to the provisions of the Police Ordinance, and according to them any legal action against them must be filed within three months of the alleged incident. Since the compensation cases were not filed within this time frame following the Easter Sunday bombings, the lawyers argued that the cases should be dismissed.
The petitioners’ legal representatives opposed the claim, stating that they had become aware of the accountability of those police officers only after the release of the report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry on the Easter Sunday attacks. They argued that they had filed the lawsuits as soon as they became aware of this information.
The District Judge ruled that the defendants’ objection regarding the time limitation was a matter to be determined through evidence presented during the trial and could not be resolved as a preliminary issue.
The court directed that the case be scheduled for hearing on 13 December.
Senior Counsel Varuna Senadheera, along with Counsel Indika Bandara Abeykoon, appeared for the petitioners under the guidance of Counsel Angelica Perera. Counsel Samadhi Gamlath represented Pujith Jayasundara, while Counsel Nissasiri Dayananda, under the guidance of Counsel Madhulathie Jayathilake, appeared for Nilantha Jayawardena.
News
Price revision: Rice retailers ask for grace period
By Rathindra Kuruwita
Rice retailers were in trouble following the sudden imposition of price controls, the President of the Marandagahamula Rice Traders’ Association, B.K. Ranjith, told a media briefing on Wednesday (11).
He said rice millers usually released rice at Rs 215 per kilo, which is then supplied to retailers through intermediaries who transport it to shops.
Ranjith noted that on 7 December, the government had set maximum retail prices for rice with a kilogram of white kekulu capped at Rs 220 a kilo, nadu at Rs 230 a kilo, and keeri samba at Rs 260 a kilo.
“We have been receiving rice at prices ranging from Rs 10 to Rs 25 above these controlled rates. We have requested officials to grant us a few days to sell off the existing stock purchased at higher prices. However, the Consumer Affairs Authority (CAA) began conducting raids on 10 December. Now, we are left with no option but to incur substantial losses,” he said.
News
Proposed action against wild animals: Minister Lalkantha has undermined NPP manifesto, says MONLAR
By Rathindra Kuruwita
Minister of Agriculture, Livestock, Lands, and Irrigation K. D. Lalkantha’s recent statement that there are no legal restrictions on taking measures against wildlife that damage crops on private agricultural lands encourages farmers to violate the law, says Sajeewa Chamikara of the Movement for Land and Agricultural Reform (MONLAR).
Chamikara noted that such remarks undermined the principles outlined in the government policy declaration “A Prosperous Country, A Beautiful Life,” which emphasises fostering responsible citizens, developing human resources, and upholding the rule of law. “This shows that government Ministers are disregarding these principles. The legislative power granted to the government by the people, after the defeat of corrupt and authoritarian regimes in the past, was not intended to enable breaches of agreements made with the public within such a short period,” Chamikara said.
Under Section 53A of the Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance No. 02 of 1937, as last amended by Act No. 07 of 2022, the use of poisons, explosives, or intoxicants to kill or immobilise wild animals is strictly prohibited. Section 52 of the Act further makes it illegal to use artificial lighting to dazzle or lure animals or to act in a way that facilitates their capture.
“Additionally, Section 52A prohibits the use of food items, scents, colours, or any material or device to attract or entice animals for capture. Section 53A also forbids the possession of any animal killed or captured using poisons, explosives, or intoxicants,” Chamikara said.
According to Section 58, individuals guilty of such offences face penalties of fines between Rs. 15,000 and Rs. 30,000, imprisonment for one to two years, or both. Section 59 clarifies that anyone who attempts or abets the commission of these offences is equally culpable and subject to the same penalties.
Chamikara warned that if Minister Lalkantha’s suggestion to control wild animals on private agricultural lands like other agricultural pests is acted upon, it would result in direct violations of the Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance, carrying severe penalties. “By encouraging farmers to engage in illegal activities, the Minister has effectively facilitated potential breaches of the law,” he said.
Under Section 59 of the Act, legal action could also be taken against Minister Lalkantha for abetting these offences. “Ignorance of the law is no excuse, a principle that applies equally to the Minister. Moreover, misleading farmers constitutes a significant injustice that warrants accountability,” he added.
Chamikara said that crop damage by wild animals is not only a legal fact but also common knowledge, and the underlying causes of this behaviour are well understood. “Wild animals have been forced into these situations due to human actions, such as the destruction and fragmentation of natural ecosystems for human settlements, commercial agricultural lands, and development projects. The introduction of non-native plantations like acacia, pine, eucalyptus, and teak, along with the spread of monoculture crops such as tea, rubber, coconut, oil palm, and maize, have exacerbated the issue. Additionally, invasive plants such as giant mimosa, lantana, and thorny creepers have proliferated in natural habitats, providing neither food nor shelter for wildlife,” he said.
These factors, Chamikara said, have caused species like monkeys, toque macaques, porcupines, wild boars, and peacocks to lose their habitats and foraging grounds, forcing them onto agricultural lands. He added that the reduction and fragmentation of natural habitats have also limited natural predators, leading to population increases in these species.
“In response, Schedule I of the Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance designates certain mammals, including monkeys, toque macaques, wild boars, porcupines, and hares, as non-protected due to their status as agricultural pests. Similarly, Schedule III lists non-protected birds such as the Indian nightjar, crows, feral pigeons, spotted doves, and white-backed munias,” Chamikara said.
However, these animals and birds are deemed non-protected only within private agricultural lands. Even so, they cannot be controlled using chemicals, poisons, electrical traps, or intoxicants. Their control is permissible only through the use of a licensed firearm, as stipulated by law.
“To better address the issue of crop-damaging species, it is recommended that the Fauna and Flora Protection Ordinance be revised. Species like toque macaques and hares, which contribute minimally to crop damage, should be removed from Schedule I. Instead, more impactful species, such as toque langurs, should be included. Similarly, birds like feral pigeons and white-backed munias could be replaced with peacocks in Schedule III, as they contribute significantly to crop damage. This would ensure that the non-protected lists focus solely on species with substantial impact on agriculture,” Chamikara said.
News
Chinese grant: First batch of school uniform material arrives
Sri Lanka received the first shipment of fabric from the People’s Republic of China on Tuesday (10) as part of a larger grant to supply uniform materials for schoolchildren in 2025.
The fabric was officially handed over to Premier Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, who is also the Minister of Education, Higher Education, and Vocational Education, by Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka Qi Zhenhong during a ceremony at the Colombo Port.
The fabric will arrive in three shipments before the end of this year, with the first one now delivered.
Ambassador Qi noted that a total of 11.82 million meters of fabric, valued at approximately 5.2 billion Sri Lankan rupees (18 million U.S. dollars), will be provided.
In November, the Ambassador said the Chinese government would fully cover the cost of the fabric required for school uniforms for all public school students in Sri Lanka for the next school year, free of charge.
-
News3 days ago
Sri Lanka’s first seven-star hotel ready for opening in 2025
-
Business2 days ago
Launching in Kandy of SL’s first seven-star hotel, valued at Rs. 9 billion
-
News5 days ago
Locally produced superphosphate to be introduced next year to save foreign exchange
-
News6 days ago
First Sri Lankan Buddhist monk in 105 years joins Oxford for MPhil in Buddhist Studies
-
Features6 days ago
All quiet on home front – hence peek overseas
-
Business5 days ago
‘Hotel sector investment in tourism industry exceeding USD 15 billion despite facing stiff challenges’
-
Business2 days ago
Sri Lankan appointed Vice President, Global Rural Tourism Council
-
Editorial6 days ago
Mega crises and ad hoc remedies