Features
The Red Sea Alliance: Not in our name!
By Sanja de Silva Jayatilleka
President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s decision to send a Sri Lankan Navy ship to the Red Sea was questioned in parliament by several Opposition lawmakers including the Leader of the Opposition, days after it was announced. It was clear that Parliament was not aware and no discussion had taken place before such a decision was made. Navy Capt. Wickramasuriya had reportedly said “The Sri Lanka Navy warship is being deployed as per the presidential order”.
Is it constitutionally possible for the President to unilaterally decide to send a warship to a conflict zone overseas, to join a US-led military enterprise which has implications for Sri Lanka’s foreign policy? How constitutional is it for an interim President with no mandate from us to involve our country riskily in an on-going clash (whatever the declared objective) in the Middle-East, at a massive financial cost to us citizens?
The sorry excuse of a response in parliament by State Minister for Defence, Pramitha Bandara Tennakoon, who declared that Sri Lanka, as a member of the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) had a global responsibility to fight against terrorism anywhere, regardless of the cost, was annoyingly unconvincing.
IORA has made no statement on the matter, and India itself is not joining Operation Prosperity Guardian (OPG), preferring to send its ships under its own command, after one of its cargo ships was attacked.Our President’s stated reason that it was to prevent price hikes of goods as ships re-route, assumes a population in a state of stupor and stupidity, possibly through hunger.
State Minister Tennakoon was either untruthful or was ignorant when he assured that no extra cost would be incurred to the country as a result of this operation as the ships were already deployed in deep waters. Where exactly is the ship that’s due to sail docked at the moment? Is it already somewhere near the Red Sea? And if so, what is it doing out there? If not, and it’s just cruising around the island, wouldn’t it cost to get to the Red Sea and join the operation with 100 men on board and appropriately equipped to fight the Houthis? Or was the President economical with the truth when he said it would cost Rs 250 million every two weeks?
Did the State Minister of Defence inspect the warship “Vijayabahu”, which is set to sail into the turbulent waters of the Red Sea? Does it have the air defence capability and underwater detection capability, necessary for any vessel entering this conflict zone? Is it equipped to withstand the sophisticated IEDs used by the Houthi rebels? Have the 100 men due to sail in it been trained on the new generation of IEDs? Are they ready for the volatile waters of the Red Sea, a very different prospect from what they are used to?
The official statements only confirm that no proper thought had been given to the consequence of such a serious decision as contributing a warship to a dangerous conflict zone. We also appear to have lost our moral compass and taken a side in this conflict, as we align ourselves with an operation led by the US, when many other US allies have been reluctant to do so openly, given the merciless attacks by Israel on innocent Palestinian civilians while the US continues to supply weapons with which they do so.
For the record, we the people did not elect this President, the Pohottuwa parliamentarians did. This is on them.
Not on the same page
It is not a secret why Yemen’s Houthis attack Israeli-bound and Israeli-owned ships in the Red Sea. They have announced that it is to put pressure on Israel to stop bombing the Palestinians out of existence. The majority of the world is of one mind that there should be an immediate ceasefire, as the UNGA vote made manifest. The most recent UN Security Council vote made as clear as day that it was only the United States that stood in the way of the legal enforcement of that most desired outcome of a ceasefire, enabling instead the continued massacre of an entire people.
Threats and counter threats in the Red Sea indicate escalation and widening of the war as Yemen, the home of the Houthis, and Iran which reportedly backs the Houthis, could get involved, apart from Lebanon where Hezbollah is already exchanging fire at its border with Israel.
The US has not been able to convince America’s own allies to join the OPG, with several distancing themselves from it. The Guardian (UK) quotes an analyst from Chatham House, Farea Al-Muslimi, saying that neither Egypt nor Saudi Arabia signing up to the coalition shows “heightened concerns in the Arab world about Israel’s intense bombing of Gaza, and Washington’s support for Israel.” (, 19 Dec 2023)
Military analyst Tom Freebairn writes in Defence and Security Monitor that “Though the Pentagon claimed a united effort made up of 20 nations, commitment from allies has seemed trepidatious, with almost half preferring to remain unnamed…” He points out that several key allies “including Turkey, Germany, Egypt, South Korea and Japan” are not participants. Instead, some important partners are acting on their own: “Some partners like Italy, India and France have opted to send ships to the region on their own initiative, distancing themselves from the U.S. umbrella.… even some close allies are hesitant to join the U.S. effort publicly.”
The analysis also raises a concern that should be paramount for all participants, including Sri Lanka: “The lack of a clear international mandate and reluctance from key allies pose challenges to the sustainability of Prosperity Guardian and the operation may require significant future corrections to reach policymakers’ intended aspirations.”
Fools rush in
What was the role of the Foreign Ministry in this decision, if any? Sri Lanka is joining a coalition of countries led by a great power in a fraught situation of alleged genocide (a charge about to be adjudicated by the World Court), against a group explicitly stating that their asymmetric military action was in direct response and an effort to stop the suffering and deaths of the Palestinian people, at a time when most of the world demands an immediate ceasefire, and our stated foreign policy is of non-alignment.
Such a decision clearly requires consideration of the consequences and consultation with those who are familiar with the regional issues, such as the Foreign Ministry.
This is especially so when the coalition we are to join has been described by a former Australian Ambassador as “The clumsy way that the US rushed to create this new coalition as in the Australian case where the USN so publicly requested an RAN ship for the group – circumventing the accepted normal intergovernmental procedures for such sensitive defence matters – and in the confusing way the USN spokesperson set out such a confused set of its objectives ()
So why did Ranil rush in where others feared to tread?
Did Sri Lanka’s successful operations against the Somali pirates inspire the decision to bravely and blindly set forth? There is a difference, as analysts point out, between that operation and the one in the Red Sea. Firstly, the Houthis fought the strong Saudi military to a stalemate and are in control of the capital Sanaa as most of Yemen’s territory, a rather more daunting prospect than the Somali pirates. Secondly, this operation has no international mandate, no global or regional support.
“The operations in Somalia received a clear international mandate, with all five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council offering support, while no such coalition has manifested in the wake of the current situation. This owes to the intrinsically political nature of the Houthis’ attacks, with their express citation of the Israeli operation in Gaza as the cause for their escalation.
With the U.S. offering firm support to Tel Aviv during the war, many states are deeply hesitant to join an initiative that can be seen as taking a partisan side in the conflict. This is particularly true of Middle Eastern and North African states with broad public support for Palestine, and European countries with significant pro-Palestinian electorates.”
The Indian Express reports that the “general lack of enthusiasm perhaps also points to countries wanting to stay away from getting deeply embroiled in a global flashpoint, even as Israel continues its offensive.” That offensive is set to continue for most of 2024, with no end in sight yet.
Sky news reports Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles saying that they made the choice “to focus more on its own strategic concerns, saying, “We need to be really clear around our strategic focus, and our strategic focus is our region…” As such, Australia is not sending any warships. Why then is Sri Lanka?
In his article, Ambassador Williams makes the pertinent point that despite our hope that there will be a positive outcome for the “global economy and maybe, man in the street”, it will be “the large shipping companies and insurance networks who will benefit directly the most.” He wonders “how much national defence budgets will have to bear the cost of actually providing this protection!”
As increasingly impoverished citizens, some of us starving, that is indeed our question too, since we will be paying for it.
Features
Maduro abduction marks dangerous aggravation of ‘world disorder’
The abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by US special forces on January 3rd and his coercive conveying to the US to stand trial over a number of allegations leveled against him by the Trump administration marks a dangerous degeneration of prevailing ‘world disorder’. While some cardinal principles in International Law have been blatantly violated by the US in the course of the operation the fallout for the world from the exceptionally sensational VVIP abduction could be grave.
Although controversial US military interventions the world over are not ‘news’ any longer, the abduction and hustling away of a head of government, seen as an enemy of the US, to stand trial on the latter soil amounts to a heavy-handed and arrogant rejection of the foundational principles of international law and order. It would seem, for instance, that the concept of national sovereignty is no longer applicable to the way in which the world’s foremost powers relate to the rest of the international community. Might is indeed right for the likes of the US and the Trump administration in particular is adamant in driving this point home to the world.
Chief spokesmen for the Trump administration have been at pains to point out that the abduction is not at variance with national security related provisions of the US Constitution. These provisions apparently bestow on the US President wide powers to protect US security and stability through courses of action that are seen as essential to further these ends but the fact is that International Law has been brazenly violated in the process in the Venezuelan case.
To be sure, this is not the first occasion on which a head of government has been abducted by US special forces in post-World War Two times and made to stand trial in the US, since such a development occurred in Panama in 1989, but the consequences for the world could be doubly grave as a result of such actions, considering the mounting ‘disorder’ confronting the world community.
Those sections opposed to the Maduro abduction in the US would do well to from now on seek ways of reconciling national security-related provisions in the US Constitution with the country’s wider international commitment to uphold international peace and law and order. No ambiguities could be permitted on this score.
While the arbitrary military action undertaken by the US to further its narrow interests at whatever cost calls for criticism, it would be only fair to point out that the US is not the only big power which has thus dangerously eroded the authority of International Law in recent times. Russia, for example, did just that when it violated the sovereignty of Ukraine by invading it two or more years ago on some nebulous, unconvincing grounds. Consequently, the Ukraine crisis too poses a grave threat to international peace.
It is relevant to mention in this connection that authoritarian rulers who hope to rule their countries in perpetuity as it were, usually end up, sooner rather than later, being a blight on their people. This is on account of the fact that they prove a major obstacle to the implementation of the democratic process which alone holds out the promise of the progressive empowerment of the people, whereas authoritarian rulers prefer to rule with an iron fist with a fixation about self-empowerment.
Nevertheless, regime-change, wherever it may occur, is a matter for the public concerned. In a functional democracy, it is the people, and the people only, who ‘make or break’ governments. From this viewpoint, Russia and Venezuela are most lacking. But externally induced, militarily mediated change is a gross abnormality in the world of democracy, which deserves decrying.
By way of damage control, the US could take the initiative to ensure that the democratic process, read as the full empowerment of ordinary people, takes hold in Venezuela. In this manner the US could help in stemming some of the destructive fallout from its abduction operation. Any attempts by the US to take possession of the national wealth of Venezuela at this juncture are bound to earn for it the condemnation of democratic opinion the world over.
Likewise, the US needs to exert all its influence to ensure that the rights of ordinary Ukrainians are protected. It will need to ensure this while exploring ways of stopping further incursions into Ukrainian territory by Russia’s invading forces. It will need to do this in collaboration with the EU which is putting its best foot forward to end the Ukraine blood-letting.
Meanwhile, the repercussions that the Maduro abduction could have on the global South would need to be watched with some concern by the international community. Here too the EU could prove a positive influence since it is doubtful whether the UN would be enabled by the big powers to carry out the responsibilities that devolve on it with the required effectiveness.
What needs to be specifically watched is the ‘copycat effect’ that could manifest among those less democratically inclined Southern rulers who would be inspired by the Trump administration to take the law into their hands, so to speak, and act with callous disregard for the sovereign rights of their smaller and more vulnerable neighbours.
Democratic opinion the world over would need to think of systems of checks and balances that could contain such power abuse by Southern autocratic rulers in particular. The UN and democracy-supportive organizations, such as the EU, could prove suitable partners in these efforts.
All in all it is international lawlessness that needs managing effectively from now on. If President Trump carries out his threat to over-run other countries as well in the manner in which he ran rough-shod over Venezuela, there is unlikely to remain even a semblance of international order, considering that anarchy would be receiving a strong fillip from the US, ‘The World’s Mightiest Democracy’.
What is also of note is that identity politics in particularly the South would be unprecedentedly energized. The narrative that ‘the Great Satan’ is running amok would win considerable validity among the theocracies of the Middle East and set the stage for a resurgence of religious fanaticism and invigorated armed resistance to the US. The Trump administration needs to stop in its tracks and weigh the pros and cons of its current foreign policy initiatives.
Features
Pure Christmas magic and joy at British School
The British School in Colombo (BSC) hosted its Annual Christmas Carnival 2025, ‘Gingerbread Wonderland’, which was a huge success, with the students themseles in the spotlight, managing stalls and volunteering.
The event, organised by the Parent-Teacher Association (PTA), featured a variety of activities, including: Games and rides for all ages, Food stalls offering delicious treats, Drinks and refreshments, Trade booths showcasing local products, and Live music and entertainment.

The carnival was held at the school premises, providing a fun and festive atmosphere for students, parents, and the community to enjoy.
The halls of the BSC were filled with pure Christmas magic and joy with the students and the staff putting on a tremendous display.
Among the highlights was the dazzling fashion show with the students doing the needful, and they were very impressive.

The students themselves were eagerly looking forward to displaying their modelling technique and, I’m told, they enjoyed the moment they had to step on the ramp.
The event supported communities affected by the recent floods, with surplus proceeds going to flood-relief efforts.
Features
Glowing younger looking skin
Hi! This week I’m giving you some beauty tips so that you could look forward to enjoying 2026 with a glowing younger looking skin.
Face wash for natural beauty
* Avocado:
Take the pulp, make a paste of it and apply on your face. Leave it on for five minutes and then wash it with normal water.
* Cucumber:
Just rub some cucumber slices on your face for 02-03 minutes to cleanse the oil naturally. Wash off with plain water.
* Buttermilk:
Apply all over your face and leave it to dry, then wash it with normal water (works for mixed to oily skin).
Face scrub for natural beauty
Take 01-02 strawberries, 02 pieces of kiwis or 02 cubes of watermelons. Mash any single fruit and apply on your face. Then massage or scrub it slowly for at least 3-5 minutes in circular motions. Then wash it thoroughly with normal or cold water. You can make use of different fruits during different seasons, and see what suits you best! Follow with a natural face mask.
Face Masks
* Papaya and Honey:
Take two pieces of papaya (peeled) and mash them to make a paste. Apply evenly on your face and leave it for 30 minutes and then wash it with cold water.
Papaya is just not a fruit but one of the best natural remedies for good health and glowing younger looking skin. It also helps in reducing pimples and scars. You can also add honey (optional) to the mixture which helps massage and makes your skin glow.
* Banana:
Put a few slices of banana, 01 teaspoon of honey (optional), in a bowl, and mash them nicely. Apply on your face, and massage it gently all over the face for at least 05 minutes. Then wash it off with normal water. For an instant glow on your face, this facemask is a great idea to try!
* Carrot:
Make a paste using 01 carrot (steamed) by mixing it with milk or honey and apply on your face and neck evenly. Let it dry for 15-20 minutes and then wash it with cold water. Carrots work really well for your skin as they have many vitamins and minerals, which give instant shine and younger-looking skin.
-
News2 days agoInterception of SL fishing craft by Seychelles: Trawler owners demand international investigation
-
News2 days agoBroad support emerges for Faiszer’s sweeping proposals on long- delayed divorce and personal law reforms
-
News3 days agoPrivate airline crew member nabbed with contraband gold
-
News1 day agoPrez seeks Harsha’s help to address CC’s concerns over appointment of AG
-
News1 day agoGovt. exploring possibility of converting EPF benefits into private sector pensions
-
News5 days agoHealth Minister sends letter of demand for one billion rupees in damages
-
Features2 days agoEducational reforms under the NPP government
-
Features3 days agoPharmaceuticals, deaths, and work ethics
