Connect with us

Features

Sportsmanship – Australian Style

Published

on

by Vijaya Chandrasoma

I am neither a cricketer nor a sports writer, just an avid enthusiast of the game. I am in total agreement with the sentiments expressed in the excellent letter penned by Mr. S. Skandakumar to legendary English umpire, Mr. Simon Taufel, on his comments about the incident relating to the dismissal of Jonny Bairstow during the second Ashes test at Edgbaston a couple of weeks ago.

Though Taufel argued that this controversial decision changed the complexion of the entire match, he said, “Correct decision made. They (England) just didn’t like it. For that ball to be considered dead, both sides need to disregard it is in play. Clearly, the fielding side hadn’t”.

I am not trying to dispute the opinion of one of the greatest umpires ever to grace a cricket field. However, strictly according to the rules of cricket, there is one aspect of this dismissal which is definitely a grey area, which should have played an important role in the final decision of the third umpire. A grey area is defined as “an ill-defined situation or area of activity not readily conforming to a category or set of rules”. In other words, a matter of doubt.

Giving the benefit of the doubt to the batsman is not merely a tradition in the game. It is the Law. This is especially true of the LBW rule. LBW is governed by Law 36, which states that “the striker is out LBW if he intercepts the ball with any part of his person and but for the interception, the ball would have hit the wicket”. Unfortunately, the decision that the umpire is faced with making within seconds is not humanly possible. No one, not even modern technology, can predict to a certainty the path the ball will take after it hits the pad. There are too many extraneous factors – the wind, the degree of the spin and turn of the ball – which make a 100% accurate decision well-nigh impossible.

Today’s technology, in the form of the Decision Review System (DRS) has made matters infinitely easier for the field umpire in the decision of most dismissals. For example, DRS is invaluable in the event of a snick, to determine whether the ball had taken even a minute edge with the bat before being caught by the wicket-keeper, an edge at times not discernible to the human eye.

However, where an LBW appeal is concerned, the DRS confirms or overrules the decision based often on the “umpire’s call”. If the umpire puts his finger up, then the batter is out, if DRS determines that the ball would have hit any part of the stumps and bails. But if the umpire rules NOT OUT, the batter is deemed NOT OUT if the ball hits the outside half of the leg stump, the off stump or the top of the bails.

So in the event of the umpire’s NOT OUT decision, even the DRS gives the benefit of the doubt to the batsman.

According to the Laws of Cricket, the ball is considered dead once the fielding side and both batters have ceased to regard it as in play. At Edgbaston, the batter, Bairstow clearly regarded the ball as dead, having ducked under an innocent bouncer from bowler Cameron Green and seeing the ball nestled in wicketkeeper Carey’s gloves. He was in no way trying to steal an unfair advantage to get an extra run. On the other hand, Carey having caught the ball, saw that Bairstow had wrongly assumed the ball was dead, took unfair advantage of a justifiable misconception and threw the ball at the stumps.

There is no way that Marais Erasmus, the third umpire could have made a certain decision that the ball had settled in the wicketkeeper’s gloves for the required time to be called a dead ball. I have seen many catchers in the field throw the ball in the air immediately after making the

catch, in exultation, in less time than the ball had nestled in Carey’s gloves.The correct thing for Carey to do would have been to warn Bairstow before the stumping. The correct thing for Aussies’ Captain Cummins to do, after the dismissal was confirmed by the third umpire, would have been to call Bairstow back. But these are Australians. To expect them to do the gentlemanly thing is optimistic, to expect them to even do the legal thing is a matter of hopeful conjecture.

Remember Sandpapergate, the 2018 ball tampering scandal in an Australian test match against South Africa. The then Australian captain, Steve Smith and vice-captain, David Warner were both found guilty of collusion in that dastardly attempt by the bowler to sandpaper the ball to enhance its swing. This was not a misdemeanor of bad sportsmanship; it was a cricketing felony of a heinous nature. An illegal attempt to gain a distinct advantage by altering equipment with the specific motive of bowling out the opposing batters.

These two “gentlemen” are now playing for Australia in the current Ashes series, having escaped committing an act of brazen cheating with a mere slap on the wrist.  English Seamer, Stuart Broad told Carey, “You’ll be forever remembered for that.” No, he won’t. This is an incident which will probably never happen again. Carey will be remembered as just another Australian who is a stranger to the concept of sportsmanship.

It would be interesting to compare the punishment meted out to one of the most respected cricketers of his time, Indian all-rounder, Vinoo Mankad with the Edgbaston fiasco. Mankad was regarded as one of India’s greatest-ever all-rounders. In 2021, he was inducted to the ICC Hall of Fame, one of the ten iconic cricketers so inducted, including household names like Sir Learie Constantine, Ted Dexter, Stan McCabe and our own Kumar Sangakkara.

In spite of his illustrious career, Vinoo Mankad is best and unfairly known for one incident on a test match during an Indian tour of Australia in 1947/8. He ran out Bill Brown, the batsman at the non-striker’s end, who was backing up too far and out of the crease at the point of delivery. This was an obvious violation of the rules by the batsman, who was clearly trying to steal an unfair advantage.

This act of supposed poor sportsmanship infuriated the Australians, who introduced a contemptuous term, “Mankading” for anyone who used this perfectly legal method of running out the batsman at the non-striker’s end who was out of his crease at the point of delivery. Australians, and other cricketing nations, contend that a warning should be given before such a run out was contemplated. No such warning is required according to the rules; it had been traditionally regarded as a courtesy to warn the batsman that he was breaking the rules and would be run out if he persists in trying to steal an advantage of a few yards.

In fact, two warnings had already been given by Mankad, but Brown persisted in backing up and was well out of the crease at the point of Mankads’s delivery when he ran him out. Even the great Don Bradman slammed the critics of Mankad, saying, “For the life of me, I can’t understand why (the press) questioned his (Mankad’s) sportsmanship. The laws of cricket make it quite clear that the non-striker must keep within his ground until the ball has been delivered…. By backing up too far or too early, the non-striker is very obviously gaining an unfair advantage”.

Both Carey and Mankad acted well within the rules. Unlike Carey, Mankad warned the batsman Brown twice before running him out, a courtesy not offered to Bairstow by Carey. Most importantly, there is one salient point which should have been taken into consideration by the third umpire. Bairstow was not trying to steal an advantage by his actions. Brown was.

Carey’s name will fade into obscurity for the mediocre cricketer he is; Steve Smith and David Warner, who tacitly endorsed Carey’s action, really have no reputation for sportsmanship to lose. But Mankad’s great career will always have an asterisk against his name because of a perfectly legal action, originally stigmatized by the Australian press. A stigma which followed him throughout his illustrious career.

The point I am laboring to make is that the old rules and lessons Mr. Skandakumar and I (I am taking the liberty of using his distinguished name with mine in the same sentence, because we both attended Royal Prep) learnt at our alma mater are lost. The truisms we learnt at the School of our Fathers (inaccurate in my father’s case; sadly, he went to Ananda), do not seem to hold true today. Axioms like “The umpire’s word is law”; “the benefit of the doubt always goes to the batsman”; “it’s not that you won or lost but how you played the game”. Or most simply, “It’s not cricket, old man”. All gone.

I am an enthusiastic follower of the game of cricket, but the one match etched in my memory is one in the 1950s, which to my pre-teen mind, represented the very epitome of sportsmanship.

Royal was playing St. Joseph’s at Reid Avenue. Nearing the end of the game, when Royal had to make a few runs to win, the umpires called a halt to the game because of rain/bad light. The Josephian captain elected to continue playing in heavy rain to enable Royal to score the few runs necessary to win. In his mind, Royal should not have been deprived of a well-deserved victory because of the vagaries of the weather. In appreciation of his sportsmanship, he was cheered and carried on Royal shoulders after the match. Today, of course, he would have been lynched by the Josephians.

O tempora O mores.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Acid test emerges for US-EU ties

Published

on

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland on Tuesday put forward the EU’s viewpoint on current questions in international politics with a clarity, coherence and eloquence that was noteworthy. Essentially, she aimed to leave no one in doubt that a ‘new form of European independence’ had emerged and that European solidarity was at a peak.

These comments emerge against the backdrop of speculation in some international quarters that the Post-World War Two global political and economic order is unraveling. For example, if there was a general tacit presumption that US- Western European ties in particular were more or less rock-solid, that proposition apparently could no longer be taken for granted.

For instance, while US President Donald Trump is on record that he would bring Greenland under US administrative control even by using force against any opposition, if necessary, the EU Commission President was forthright that the EU stood for Greenland’s continued sovereignty and independence.

In fact at the time of writing, small military contingents from France, Germany, Sweden, Norway and the Netherlands are reportedly already in Greenland’s capital of Nook for what are described as limited reconnaissance operations. Such moves acquire added importance in view of a further comment by von der Leyen to the effect that the EU would be acting ‘in full solidarity with Greenland and Denmark’; the latter being the current governing entity of Greenland.

It is also of note that the EU Commission President went on to say that the ‘EU has an unwavering commitment to UK’s independence.’ The immediate backdrop to this observation was a UK decision to hand over administrative control over the strategically important Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia to Mauritius in the face of opposition by the Trump administration. That is, European unity in the face of present controversial moves by the US with regard to Greenland and other matters of contention is an unshakable ‘given’.

It is probably the fact that some prominent EU members, who also hold membership of NATO, are firmly behind the EU in its current stand-offs with the US that is prompting the view that the Post-World War Two order is beginning to unravel. This is, however, a matter for the future. It will be in the interests of the contending quarters concerned and probably the world to ensure that the present tensions do not degenerate into an armed confrontation which would have implications for world peace.

However, it is quite some time since the Post-World War Two order began to face challenges. Observers need to take their minds back to the Balkan crisis and the subsequent US invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq in the immediate Post-Cold War years, for example, to trace the basic historic contours of how the challenges emerged. In the above developments the seeds of global ‘disorder’ were sown.

Such ‘disorder’ was further aggravated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine four years ago. Now it may seem that the world is reaping the proverbial whirlwind. It is relevant to also note that the EU Commission President was on record as pledging to extend material and financial support to Ukraine in its travails.

Currently, the international law and order situation is such that sections of the world cannot be faulted for seeing the Post World War Two international order as relentlessly unraveling, as it were. It will be in the interests of all concerned for negotiated solutions to be found to these global tangles. In fact von der Leyen has committed the EU to finding diplomatic solutions to the issues at hand, including the US-inspired tariff-related squabbles.

Given the apparent helplessness of the UN system, a pre-World War Two situation seems to be unfolding, with those states wielding the most armed might trying to mould international power relations in their favour. In the lead-up to the Second World War, the Hitlerian regime in Germany invaded unopposed one Eastern European country after another as the League of Nations stood idly by. World War Two was the result of the Allied Powers finally jerking themselves out of their complacency and taking on Germany and its allies in a full-blown world war.

However, unlike in the late thirties of the last century, the seeming number one aggressor, which is the US this time around, is not going unchallenged. The EU which has within its fold the foremost of Western democracies has done well to indicate to the US that its power games in Europe are not going unmonitored and unchecked. If the US’ designs to take control of Greenland and Denmark, for instance, are not defeated the world could very well be having on its hands, sooner rather than later, a pre-World War Two type situation.

Ironically, it is the ‘World’s Mightiest Democracy’ which is today allowing itself to be seen as the prime aggressor in the present round of global tensions. In the current confrontations, democratic opinion the world over is obliged to back the EU, since it has emerged as the principal opponent of the US, which is allowing itself to be seen as a fascist power.

Hopefully sane counsel would prevail among the chief antagonists in the present standoff growing, once again, out of uncontainable territorial ambitions. The EU is obliged to lead from the front in resolving the current crisis by diplomatic means since a region-wide armed conflict, for instance, could lead to unbearable ill-consequences for the world.

It does not follow that the UN has no role to play currently. Given the existing power realities within the UN Security Council, the UN cannot be faulted for coming to be seen as helpless in the face of the present tensions. However, it will need to continue with and build on its worldwide development activities since the global South in particular needs them very badly.

The UN needs to strive in the latter directions more than ever before since multi-billionaires are now in the seats of power in the principle state of the global North, the US. As the charity Oxfam has pointed out, such financially all-powerful persons and allied institutions are multiplying virtually incalculably. It follows from these realities that the poor of the world would suffer continuous neglect. The UN would need to redouble its efforts to help these needy sections before widespread poverty leads to hemispheric discontent.

Continue Reading

Features

Brighten up your skin …

Published

on

Hi! This week I’ve come up with tips to brighten up your skin.

* Turmeric and Yoghurt Face Pack:

You will need 01 teaspoon of turmeric powder and 02 tablespoons of fresh yoghurt.

Mix the turmeric and yoghurt into a smooth paste and apply evenly on clean skin. Leave it for 15–20 minutes and then rinse with lukewarm water

Benefits:

Reduces pigmentation, brightens dull skin and fights acne-causing bacteria.

* Lemon and Honey Glow Pack:

Mix 01teaspoon lemon juice and 01 tablespoon honey and apply it gently to the face. Leave for 10–15 minutes and then wash off with cool water.

Benefits:

Lightens dark spots, improves skin tone and deeply moisturises. By the way, use only 01–02 times a week and avoid sun exposure after use.

* Aloe Vera Gel Treatment:

All you need is fresh aloe vera gel which you can extract from an aloe leaf. Apply a thin layer, before bedtime, leave it overnight, and then wash face in the morning.

Benefits:

Repairs damaged skin, lightens pigmentation and adds natural glow.

* Rice Flour and Milk Scrub:

You will need 01 tablespoon rice flour and 02 tablespoons fresh milk.

Mix the rice flour and milk into a thick paste and then massage gently in circular motions. Leave for 10 minutes and then rinse with water.

Benefits:

Removes dead skin cells, improves complexion, and smoothens skin.

* Tomato Pulp Mask:

Apply the tomato pulp directly, leave for 15 minutes, and then rinse with cool water

Benefits:

Controls excess oil, reduces tan, and brightens skin naturally.

Continue Reading

Features

Shooting for the stars …

Published

on

That’s precisely what 25-year-old Hansana Balasuriya has in mind – shooting for the stars – when she was selected to represent Sri Lanka on the international stage at Miss Intercontinental 2025, in Sahl Hasheesh, Egypt.

The grand finale is next Thursday, 29th January, and Hansana is all geared up to make her presence felt in a big way.

Her journey is a testament to her fearless spirit and multifaceted talents … yes, her life is a whirlwind of passion, purpose, and pageantry.

Raised in a family of water babies (Director of The Deep End and Glory Swim Shop), Hansana’s love affair with swimming began in childhood and then she branched out to master the “art of 8 limbs” as a Muay Thai fighter, nailed Karate and Kickboxing (3-time black belt holder), and even threw herself into athletics (literally!), especially throwing events, and netball, as well.

A proud Bishop’s College alumna, Hansana’s leadership skills also shone bright as Senior Choir Leader.

She earned a BA (Hons) in Business Administration from Esoft Metropolitan University, and then the world became her playground.

Before long, modelling and pageantry also came into her scene.

She says she took to part-time modelling, as a hobby, and that led to pageants, grabbing 2nd Runner-up titles at Miss Nature Queen and Miss World Sri Lanka 2025.

When she’s not ruling the stage, or pool, Hansana’s belting tunes with Soul Sounds, Sri Lanka’s largest female ensemble.

What’s more, her artistry extends to drawing, and she loves hitting the open road for long drives, she says.

This water warrior is also on a mission – as Founder of Wave of Safety,

Hansana happens to be the youngest Executive Committee Member of the Sri Lanka Aquatic Sports Union (SLASU) and, as founder of Wave of Safety, she’s spreading water safety awareness and saving lives.

Today is Hansana’s ninth day in Egypt and the itinerary for today, says National Director for Sri Lanka, Brian Kerkoven, is ‘Jeep Safari and Sunset at the Desert.’

And … the all-important day at Miss Intercontinental 2025 is next Thursday, 29th January.

Well, good luck to Hansana.

Continue Reading

Trending