Connect with us

News

SLT Mobitel offered same service at USD 1 per person but VFS charges USD 25 plus – SJB

Published

on

Prof. G. L. Peiris and Mujibur Rahuman

On-arrival visa controversy:

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The SJB has called upon the government to explain why the Department of Immigration and Emigration had entered into an agreement with VFS Global-led grouping for the issuance of online visas against the backdrop of SLT Mobitel offering the same service at a much lower cost.

Prof. G. L. Peiris, MP, and former SJB MP Mujibur Rahuman said that SLT Mobitel offered to issue an online visa per person at USD 1 whereas VFS-led operation charged USD 25.70 per person.

The disclosure was made at a media briefing held on Monday at the Opposition Leader’s Office at Sir Marcus Fernando Mawatha.

Prof. Peiris and Rahuman demanded that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government come clean on the issue.

Dissident SLPP MP Prof. Peiris recently aligned himself with the main Opposition SJB.

The Department of Immigration and Emigration recently finalised a tripartite agreement with GBS Technology Services and IVS Global FZCO being the prime contractor and VFS Global being the technology partner for the Sri Lanka government’s new E-Visa solution.

Referring to an expert evaluation of the controversial deal submitted to the Cabinet of Ministers, Prof. Peiris emphasised that the government had outsourced the vital function that shouldn’t have been removed from the Department of Immigration and Emigration, under any circumstances, contrary to the report submitted by its own committee, headed by T. V. D. Damayanthi S. Karunaratne, the Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Public Security.

The committee included Director General, Emigration and Immigration I.S.H.J. Ilukpitiya, Senior Assistant Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Home Affairs, Provincial and Local Government Champika Ramawickrema, Chief Financial Officer, Ministry of Public Security Ms. M. P. D. P. Pathirana and Additional Director General representing the Treasury M. R. G .A. Muthukuda.

They questioned the rationale in outsourcing responsibilities of the Department of Immigration and Emigration in the absence of serious shortcomings on their part. They insisted that Public Security Minister Tiran Alles should take responsibility for the situation. Minister Alles has denied any wrongdoing on his part or that of his Ministry. The SLPP National List MP claims both Parliament and Cabinet approved the project.

Former MP Rahuman asked whether Attorney General Sanjay Rajaratnam, PC, sanctioned the outsourcing of the Department of Immigration and Emigration functions.

At the onset of the briefing Prof. Peiris alleged that the latest deal was as corrupt as the February 2015 Treasury bond scams. Claiming that the Treasury bond scams had been perpetrated to fund the general election later that year, Prof. Peiris asked whether the incumbent government was in the process of raising funds for the forthcoming presidential poll.

The former Law Professor said that there hadn’t been any requirement, whatsoever, to involve an external party in operations performed by the Department of Immigration and Emigration.

Prof. Peiris emphasized that the USD 25.70 charged by the service provider is in addition to the visa fee received by the government. Pointing out that citizens of several countries, including India, China and Russia had been exempted from visa fees, Prof. Peiris said that they, too, were fleeced by the online visa provider to the tune of USD 25.70.

Alleging that the whole exercise was meant to benefit VFS Global led grouping and its local agents, Prof. Peiris warned that tourism could suffer quite a serious setback. “This could discourage tourists. The government cannot be unaware of the consequences, especially against the backdrop of Tourism Minister Harin Fernando disowning the tripartite agreement.

Prof. Peiris said that the tripartite agreement should be examined taking into consideration two issues. First of all, the government should explain the circumstances under which SLT Mobitel offer had been rejected and how tenders were called.

Prof. Peiris said that the government shouldn’t resort to this sort of clandestine deal against the backdrop of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and donor countries repeatedly demanding transparency and accountability on the part of the government. The internationally recognised law academic declared that the whole process was flawed and contrary to the law of the land regardless of denials at different levels.

Pointing out that the agreement had been signed for a period of six years, Prof. Peiris said that there was provision for extending it for six more years. “But in case the government has to rescind the agreement, who will take the responsibility for paying compensation to the external party?” he asked.

The former Minister alleged that the government in a desperate bid to suppress the truth was threatening public servants not to discuss the sordid issue with the media.

Ex-MP Rahuman said that the latest deal exposed the mentality of members of the Cabinet. At a time, the IMF had been mounting pressure on the government to introduce a new law to tackle corruption at all levels, they perpetrated another mega corrupt deal.

Referring to former Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwelle’s declaration that the Cabinet approved procurement of medicines now under investigation, Rahuman said that the Cabinet had lost public faith. The former MP said that Parliament approved increases in visa fees but not the outsourcing of services contrary to Minister Alles’s claim.

Rahuman said that according to the agreement the government received the right to examine the service provider only after completion of 10 years of service of the stipulated 12 years.



Latest News

Sri Lanka Coast Guard commence clearing oil spill in Maduru Oya Reservoir

Published

on

By

The Sri Lanka Coast Guard launched an operation to clear the oil spill  caused by the crash of a Sri Lanka Air Force Bell 212 helicopter into the Maduru Oya Reservoir, during a training flight on 09 May 2025.

The  efforts to clear the oil spill  are ongoing and will continue today, 10 May.

Continue Reading

News

Maduru Oya helicopter crash: Army, Air Force launch probes

Published

on

Rescue teams searching for the missing military personnel after yesterday’s SLAF chopper crash in the Maduru Oya. (Image courtesy Derana)

Bell 212 accident during passing out parade kills six military personnel, injures six others

A Bell 212 helicopter, belonging to the Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF), crashed into the Maduru Oya reservoir yesterday morning, killing six forces personnel and injuring six others. The helicopter was on a routine mission in support of a Special Forces passing-out parade when it encountered technical difficulties and attempted an emergency landing.

The crash occurred at approximately 8:17 a.m., after the helicopter took off from the SLAF Base Hingurakgoda, at 6:47 a.m., and picked up Army personnel in Maduru Oya around 7:08 a.m. According to the SLAF, the aircraft was conducting a heli-rappelling drill as part of a military demonstration when it suffered a technical malfunction shortly after takeoff.

The aircraft was carrying 12 individuals—six from the Army and six from the Air Force, including two pilots. Initial rescue efforts led to all passengers being retrieved alive and transported to the Aralaganwila Regional Hospital, with eight later transferred to the Polonnaruwa General Hospital due to the severity of their injuries.

Despite emergency medical care, six of the personnel succumbed to their injuries—four Army Special Forces soldiers and two Air Force members. Among the deceased were helicopter gunmen and elite Special Forces troops.

In the wake of the tragedy, both the Army and Air Force have launched separate investigations to determine the cause of the crash. Air Force Commander Air Marshal Bandu Edirisinghe has appointed a nine-member inquiry committee, while Army Commander Lieutenant General Lasantha Rodrigo confirmed that expert teams have been dispatched to the crash site to gather evidence.

Air Force spokesperson Group Captain Eranda Geeganage said the crash occurred during a drill demonstration at the training school and that the exact cause of the accident remains unknown at this time.The remaining six injured personnel are still receiving treatment, with their conditions being closely monitored.

 By Norman Palihawadane

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal Prevost becomes Pope Leo XIV

Published

on

Pope Leo XIV

Nearly half a century has passed since the Catholic Church last had an Italian Pope. In the hallowed corridors of the Vatican, as the Conclave began deliberations to elect a successor to Pope Francis, several Italian names were whispered with increasing frequency. Chief among them was Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State, a seasoned diplomat, and well-known among the electors. Others, like Cardinals Pierbattista Pizzaballa and Matteo Zuppi, also had their share of admirers.

Yet, when the white smoke rose above the Sistine Chapel, it was not an Italian who emerged. Instead, the Cardinals turned to an unheralded American – Robert Francis Prevost, a canon law professor and lifelong missionary – electing him as successor to St. Peter. He has taken the name Pope Leo XIV.

Though born in the United States, Pope Leo’s spiritual and pastoral heart lies in Peru, where he spent much of his life in missionary service. His elevation comes as a surprise to many as he had been made a Cardinal just two years earlier, appointed by Pope Francis himself. A relative newcomer in the College of Cardinals, he was seen by many as a wildcard – yet perhaps that’s exactly what the Church needed.

At 69, Pope Leo is poised for what could be a lengthy pontificate – time enough, perhaps, to carry forward the reforms initiated by his predecessor. It’s no secret that Pope Francis saw in him a leader fit for the challenges of global Catholicism. When Prevost returned from Peru to head the Augustinian Order – a role he held for 12 years – it was Francis who sent him back across continents, appointing him Bishop of Chiclayo and entrusting him with pastoral care once more in Peru.

Those close to the new Pontiff describe him as deeply spiritual, a steady hand, and a bridge-builder, qualities sorely needed in a Church increasingly split between traditionalists and reformists. He is expected to offer a more measured, balanced approach on key issues, fostering dialogue rather than division.

In many ways, this Conclave echoed the dramatic scenes of October 1978, when an unknown outsider from Poland – Karol Wojtyla – was chosen as Pope John Paul II. Like then, the Cardinals have once again looked beyond the obvious front-runners. But, unlike 1978, when it took eight ballots to break the deadlock and settle on a compromise, this time it took just four.

That speed speaks volumes. The Cardinals were not merely settling – they were convinced that here’s the man to take the Church forward. In Cardinal Prevost, they found a shepherd capable of steering the Church through a time of transition, someone who could temper Franciscan reform with pastoral wisdom and unite a divided flock under the banner of faith and humility.

By Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Trending