Connect with us

News

Sirisena and Fonseka blame each other for security lapses

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

Ex-President Maithripala Sirisena and ex-Army Commander Field Marshal Sarath Fonskea had a heated argument in Parliament yesterday over national security lapses that had led to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

Field Marshal Fonseka said Sirisena had no sense of national security and that had led to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

“Even after the attacks, Sirisena, who was in Singapore, did not return to the country in the first flight available. There were two flights from Singapore, one at 12 noon and the other at 9 pm on that day. First class seats were not available in them and Sirisena waited till 1 am the following day to return home. He had no sense of urgency to attend to the national crisis here. Now, he is going with a till in Pettah to collect money to pay compensation to the victims,” Fonseka said.

Former President Sirisena said Fonseka was an ungrateful man to accuse him of security lapses. “If anyone collects money with a till at Pettah, I am willing to take that contribution because I have no money. Fonseka is an ungrateful man. It is I who gave him a presidential pardon while he was languishing in jail. He came after me asking for the field marshal post. The basic requirement to make a field marshal in a country is the strength of the army of that country. It needs more than one million troops to create the field marshal post. We did not have it. So, we made recruitments to enable the creation of that post. In the past several days he has been calling to put me behind bars. He says that I have no qualifications to talk about national security. What qualifications does he have to talk about national security? He was not even able to maintain security at the Army Headquarters when he was the commander of the army. A female suicide cadre went into the army headquarters and blew herself up injuring Fonseka seriously. The one who could not maintain security now talks about national security. Even the Supreme Court has accepted the fact that I have not been informed by any officer of the impending attacks while they had received prior warnings. It is unfair to criticise me. I destroyed the Zahran group within three weeks of the attacks.

Field Marshal Fonseka:

Sirisena did not give me pardon or promotion because he personally favoured me. It was there in the manifesto of his presidential election. That manifesto promised to give justice to me. People endorsed it. He was carrying out only an election promise when he gave the presidential pardon and the promotion. I had made speeches in hundreds of his rallies in support of him. He later removed my ministerial post because I criticized him. The attack on the army headquarters was because of the lapse of security measures following the Ceasefire Agreement. During a ceasefire we scaled down security. He does not understand security concepts.

Sirisena:

Fonseka says that the field marshal post was given to him as an election promise. He visited me many times begging to get that post. I finally made him the field marshal. Fonseka is not a man who knows what language he should use in Parliament. I regret hearing these things.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

486 dead, 341 missing, 171,778 displaced as at 0600hrs today [05]

Published

on

By

The situation report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 0600hrs today [5th December] confirms that 486 persons have died and another 341 persons are missing after the devastating weather conditions in the past week.

171,778 persons have been displaced and have taken refuge at 1,231 safety centers established by the government.

 

Continue Reading

News

Media slams govt.’s bid to use Emergency to silence critics

Published

on

Sunil Watagala

Media organisations have denounced Deputy Minister of Public Security and Parliamentary Affairs Sunil Watagala after he urged law enforcement authorities to use emergency regulations to take action against those posting allegedly defamatory content about the President and senior ministers on social media.

The Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association (SLWJA) yesterday issued a strongly worded statement condemning Watagala’s remarks, warning that they posed a direct threat to freedom of expression and media rights, particularly at a time when the country is struggling through a national disaster.

Watagala made the controversial comments on 2 December during a meeting at the Malabe Divisional Secretariat attended by government officials and Deputy Media Minister Dr. Kaushalya Ariyarathna. During the discussion, the Deputy Minister claimed that a coordinated effort was underway to spread distorted or false information about the disaster situation through physical means, social media, and even AI-generated content. He also alleged that individuals based overseas were contributing to such activity.

According to the SLWJA, Watagala went further, directing police officers present at the meeting to treat those posting such content “not merely as suspects but as offenders” and to take action against them under emergency regulations currently in force.

The SLWJA accused the government of abandoning the democratic principles it once campaigned on, noting that individuals who publicly championed free speech in the past were now attempting to clamp down on it. The association said this was not an isolated incident but part of a pattern of growing state pressure on journalists and media platforms over the past year.

It warned that attempts to criminalise commentary through emergency powers especially during a disaster constituted a grave violation of constitutional rights. The union urged the government to respect democratic freedoms and refrain from using disaster-related powers to silence criticism.

In a separate statement, Internet Media Action (IMA) also expressed “strong objection” to Watagala’s comments, describing them as a “serious threat to freedom of expression”, which it said is a fundamental right guaranteed to all Sri Lankan citizens.

The IMA said Watagala’s assertion that “malicious character assassination attacks” were being carried out against the President and others through social media or other media channels, and that such acts should attract severe punishment under emergency law, represented “an abuse of power”. The organisation also criticised the Deputy Minister’s claim that false opinions or misrepresentations whether physical, online, or generated by AI could not be permitted.

Using emergency regulations imposed for disaster management to suppress political criticism amounted to “theft of fundamental rights”, the statement said, adding that the move was aimed at deliberately restricting dissent and instilling fear among social media users.

“Criticism is not a crime,” the IMA said, warning that such rhetoric could lead to widespread intimidation and self-censorship among digital activists and ordinary citizens.

The group demanded that Watagala withdraw his statement unconditionally and insisted that freedom of expression cannot be curtailed under emergency laws or any other legal framework. It also called on the government to clarify its stance on the protection of fundamental rights amid increasing concerns from civil society.

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal calls for compassionate Christmas amid crisis

Published

on

Archbishop of Colombo

Archbishop of Colombo, Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, has called on Sri Lankans to observe this Christmas with compassion and restraint, as the nation continues to recover from one of its worst natural disasters in recent memory.

In his message, the Colombo Archbishop has highlighted the scale of the crisis, noting that more than 1.5 million people have been displaced, while an “uncounted number” remain buried under debris in the hill country following landslides and severe flooding.

“It is a most painful situation,”

he has written acknowledging the difficulty of celebrating a season traditionally associated with joy while thousands are mourning lost loved ones, living in refugee centres, or left with nothing but the clothes they were wearing.

The Cardinal has urged the faithful to temper excessive celebrations and extravagance, instead focusing on helping those affected. “Celebrate, by all means, yes, but make it a moment of spiritual happiness and concern for the needs of those who suffer,” he said. “Assist as much as possible those who lost their loved ones, their homes, and their belongings.”

He has called for a Christmas marked by love, sharing, and solidarity, describing it as an opportunity to make the season “a deeply spiritual and joyful experience.”

Continue Reading

Trending