Latest News
Qantas data breach exposes up to six million customer profiles
Qantas is contacting customers after a cyber attack targeted their third-party customer service platform.
On 30 June, the Australian airline detected “unusual activity” on a platform used by its contact centre to store the data of six million people, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates and frequent flyer numbers.
Upon detection of the breach, Qantas took “immediate steps and contained the system”, according to a statement.
The company is still investigating the full extent of the breach, but says it is expecting the proportion of data stolen to be “significant”.
It has assured the public that passport details, credit card details and personal financial information were not held in the breached system, and no frequent flyer accounts, passwords or PIN numbers have been compromised.
Qantas has notified the Australian Federal Police of the breach, as well as the Australian Cyber Security Centre and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner.
“We sincerely apologise to our customers and we recognise the uncertainty this will cause,” said Qantas Group CEO Vanessa Hudson.
She asked customers to call the dedicated support line if they had concerns, and confirmed that there would be no impact to Qantas’ operations or the safety of the airline.
The cyber attack is the latest in a string of Australian data breaches this year, with AustralianSuper and Nine Media suffering significant leaks in the past few months.
In March 2025, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) released statistics revealing that 2024 was the worst year for data breaches in Australia since records began in 2018.
“The trends we are observing suggest the threat of data breaches, especially through the efforts of malicious actors, is unlikely to diminish,” said Australian Privacy Commissioner Carly Kind in a statement from the OAIC.
Ms Kind urged businesses and government agencies to step up security measures and data protection, and highlighted that both the private and public sectors are vulnerable to cyber attacks.
[BBC]
Latest News
Triumph and disaster: India, New Zealand and a trophy for one
Call it beauty, call it cruelty, but this is the reality.
This Indian T20I unit is a GOAT team. They last lost a series or tournament in August 2023. Since the start of the previous T20 World Cup, they have won seven matches for every one they have lost. To the group that won the trophy in 2024 they have added Abhishek Sharma, Tilak Varma, Varun Chakravarthy and loads of intent.
India are so good that they have pivoted twice – first from Shubman Gill to Ishan Kishan just before this tournament began, then to bring back Sanju Samson during the tournament – and the pieces have seamlessly fallen in place.
Yet they won’t be viewed as the GOAT if they don’t win in Ahmedabad on Sunday. We don’t make the rules. This is how cricket works. Anything that involves more than two teams in cricket – even all the “leagues” – are a hybrid of league and knockout.
When you do that in the most fickle format of the sport, where it is the most difficult to establish an association between process and outcome, you can end up having the cagey campaign India have had. They are so good that they only have everything to lose in this tournament.
Kipling’s two impostors are more different for India than any other team. This is not to justify a lack of scientific temperament but there’s been an element of the obsessiveness to India’s journey through the T20 World Cup: regular visits to temples, avoiding training during a lunar eclipse, possible changing of hotels for the final. There aren’t enough controllables in this format, so you start trying to control whatever you can.
On the field, India have still done enough – though not at their absolute best – to make the final. Sanju Samson has found the form of his life, Jasprit Bumrah is still being “played out” even in chases of 254, and Hardik Pandya is the closest you get to two players in one.
Still, India don’t want to be anything less than their best against an opponent whose DNA is to care a lot but play like they don’t care at all. New Zealand don’t have mystery spin, they don’t have a Bumrah like genie , but they are dangerous because they can treat the two impostors almost the same. In India, November 19 is a day of mourning; for New Zealand, whatever happens on March 8 might not dominate conversation the following week.
Like India, New Zealand have also had to pivot, calling in a 34 year old mid-tournament, giving him the new ball, having him take out two dangerous left-hand batters and then not have him do anything for the rest of the semi-final. Since 2019, no team has made more ICC semi-finals than New Zealand’s six. Only India have made more finals than their four. Their best players don’t even want their national contracts; they encourage such a healthy workspace, let them play elsewhere most of the time, but put the band together for the big time.
New Zealand will not make the mistakes England’s bowlers made against India in the semi-final. They will have researched every batter and put plans in place, ready to execute. Now India could still be good enough to beat them, but they will not be fed.
Sunday will be tactical, it will be emotional, it will be full of skill and some luck, and by the end of the night, both teams will have to make peace with whatever impostor they draw. That is the reality of the game.
India have won every match except for the Super Eight contest against South Africa, after which they won the must-win games against Zimbabwe and West Indies, and then beat England in a high-scoring thriller in the semi-final.
New Zealand only barely made it to the semi-final, losing comprehensively to South Africa in the first round and to England in the Super Eight, but then they thrashed the unbeaten South Africans in the semi-final.
He didn’t end up as the Player of the Match in either of them, but Jasprit Bumrah repeated in the semi-final the work he did in the final two years ago. England had brought a chase of 254 down to 69 off the last five, but Bumrah bowled two of those overs for just 14 runs. If he can again put in a performance where New Zealand only take what is on offer, India should win.
Daryl Mitchell has had a quiet tournament. He hardly got to bat in the group stage and then had an ordinary Super Eight round on slower pitches in Sri Lanka. Having steered New Zealand to their first ODI series win in India in January, Mitchell will be vital to his team because he has scored at two a ball against Bumrah in internationals, and 10.18 per over overall. If he can impose on Bumrah a normal day at the T20 office, he will have gone a long way to helping New Zealand’s cause.
Abhishek will not be touched, but India have a Varun Chakravarthy problem. Eight of his leakiest spells in T20Is have come in the last two and a half months. Current form has higher weightage in T20 cricket than in other formats and Varun’s current form is 11.6 per over and four wickets since the start of the Super Eight round. The three alternatives are Kuldeep Yadav, Mohammed Siraj and Washington Sundar in that order of likelihood because India won’t want to diminish their striking ability.
India (probable): Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson (wk), Ishan Kishan, Tilak Varma, Suryakumar Yadav (capt), Hardik Pandya, Shivam Dube, Axar Patel, Arshdeep Singh, Jasprit Bumrah, Varun Chakravarthy/Kuldeep Yadav/Mohammed Siraj
For New Zealand, the question is more about structure. They made do against South Africa with just three specialist bowlers, and James Neesham carded at No. 9. With the ball, Neesham went for 42 in three overs, and New Zealand were rescued by Rachin Ravindra’s four overs for 29 runs and two wickets, including that of David Miller, who mishit a slot ball and still got caught only just inside the boundary. You won’t always have such luck. Can New Zealand afford to play with the same structure against India? Jacob Duffy is a choice. Ish Sodhi might not be because the pitch in Ahmedabad is more suited to hit-the-deck bowlers than spinners.
New Zealand (probable): Tim Seifert (wk), Finn Allen, Rachin Ravindra, Glenn Phillips, Mark Chapman, Daryl Mitchell, Mitchell Santner (capt), Cole McConchie, Jimmy Neesham/Jacob Duffy, Matt Henry, Lockie Ferguson

Mitchell Santner addresses the media before the T20 World Cup final [Cricinfo]
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Sutherland’s sublime century and Hamilton’s night-time burst flatten India
Annabel Sutherland continued to produce heroics on the WACA ground after an imperious century was followed by superb bowling under lights late on day two as Australia moved to the brink of a crushing victory over India in the pink-ball Test.
On what has been a challenging surface, Sutherland made batting look like a breeze with her commanding 129 off 171 balls in Australia’s first innings grinding down India’s attack amid sweltering heat hitting 40 degrees Celsius.
It was her third straight Test ton and continued her affection for the WACA ground having memorably made 210 against South Africa two years ago. Sutherland’s average in Test cricket is now an astonishing 89.37 after 10 innings and her four tons are the most by an Australian.
Australia’s first innings was dominated by Sutherland and Ellyse Perry, with the pair combining for a 128-run fourth-wicket partnership. Perry, playing as a specialist batter after recovering from a quad strain, cracked 76 off 116 balls and in the process became Australia’s all time leading run scorer in Test cricket after passing Karen Rolton, who made 1002 runs from 1995-2009.
She backed up in the final session with the wickets of Jemimah Rodrigues and captain Harmanpreet Kaur as India capitulated in their second innings. There was the slim chance of another two-day Test in this Australian season but debutant Pratika Rawal and Sneh Rana held firm in the last 25 minutes.
Trailing by 125 runs, India’s second innings started disastrously when Darcie Brown claimed a wicket on the second delivery with Smriti Mandhana bowled off the inside edge in shades of her first innings dismissal.
Left-armer Lucy Hamilton continued her outstanding debut when she nicked off Shafali Verma before Rodrigues came out blazing. But she had something of a brain fade after unfurling the ramp shot to disastrous results before Harmpanpreet was caught at third slip.
Hamilton was keen to wrap things up after dismissing Deepti Sharma – a superb set-up with a bouncer followed by a fuller delivery which zipped between bat and pad – and Richa Ghosh within the space of three deliveries.
Even though India hung on to reach stumps, Australia are almost certain to claim victory and a decisive 12-4 triumph in the multi-format series.
There remains an unknown whether skipper Alyssa Healy will bat again in the final match of her legendary international career.
Australia resumed at 96 for 3 at the start of the day’s play and were ominously poised after Sutherland and Perry defied India’s surge under lights on the previous night.
They relished the easier batting conditions under the baking sun as India quickly wilted with their new pace attack unable to conjure the type of rampant swing that troubled the Australia batters late on day one.
Harmanpreet desperately rang the changes, with six bowlers used in the opening hour and she resorted to spin which only accounted for one of the 13 wickets on the first day.
Perry reached a 70-ball half-century in style when she smashed Rana over the deep midwicket boundary for just the second six of her Test career.
She also showed deft touch to pierce gaps in the field and keep a flagging India side feeling flustered. Sutherland also reached her half-century in 70 balls and she was in fine touch with arguably her best stroke of the session being a glorious straight drive that rocketed to the boundary.
It appeared that the pair were in for the very long haul until Perry out of nowhere was hit on the pads by Deepti after playing back to a delivery that didn’t bounce as much as she expected.
India’s catching has been mostly outstanding – the one facet where they’ve bettered their counterparts so far in this match – other than Rana dropping a straightforward chance at slip on Beth Mooney’s second ball.
Mooney was scratchy but still provided support for Sutherland in an important 56-run partnership that soared Australia into a first innings lead. Sutherland went into the tea break unbeaten on 93 and she didn’t have long to wait to reach her milestone although it was reached in ungainly fashion after a top-edge flew to the boundary.
She raised her bat to all parts of the terraces, where her father James Sutherland – the former Cricket Australia chief executive – was beaming with pride just like he did last month at the same ground when Will Sutherland scored a century for Victoria in the Sheffield Shield.
Australia had moved into a commanding position with India looking on the brink of spiralling until they unexpectedly hit back with four quick wickets. Mooney was brilliantly caught at short extra cover by Rodrigues, who snared her third brilliant catch of the innings.
Debutant Kranti Gaud had a tougher time of it in the day conditions after impressing under lights, but her persistence was rewarded when she bowled Ashleigh Gardner.
Sutherland had made batting look far easier than everyone else, but her brilliant knock finally ended when she wearily holed out as Australia were in danger of letting their stranglehold slip.
But Hamilton and Alana King added an important 34-run partnership for the ninth wicket as Australia stretched their innings into the final session. Hamilton showed why she is rated a potential allrounder after making 23 off 54 balls – the third highest score of the innings.
They batted long enough to ensure that India’s batters had to face the music under the lights.
Brief scores:
India Women 198 in 62.4 overs and 105 for 6 in 29 overs (Pratika Rawal 43*; Lucy Hamilton 3-32, Annabel Sutherland 2-15) trail Australia Women 323 in 90.4 overs (Annabel Sutherland 129, Ellyse Perry 76; Sayali Satghare 4-50, Kranti Gaud 2-72. Deepti Sharma 2-67) by 20 runs
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Trump says US does not need UK aircraft carriers for Iran war
United States President Donald Trump has posted on social media that he does not need the United Kingdom to deploy aircraft carriers to the Middle East, amid the ongoing war with Iran.
Saturday’s post on Truth Social follows a statement from the UK’s Ministry of Defence that one of its two flagship aircraft carriers, the HMS Prince of Wales, has been placed on “high readiness”.
“The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” Trump wrote.
“That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”
The post, with its reference to the UK as a “once great ally”, signals a deepening rift between the two countries that has emerged since Trump returned to office last year.
The divide appears to have deepened over the past week, as the US and Israel continue to hammer Iran as part of a war they launched on February 28.
The conflict has sparked fears across the Middle East, as retaliatory strikes from Tehran target US allies across the region.
Already, an estimated 1,332 people have been killed in Iran, and the US has confirmed the deaths of six of its service members. More deaths have been reported in countries like Lebanon, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq.
The UK government has increased its involvement in the war on Iran, widely considered illegal under international law.
The UK Defence Ministry, for instance, said on Saturday that the government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer had allowed the US to use its military bases for what it termed “limited defensive purposes”.
The bases include RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and tbe Diego Garcia site in the Chagos Islands, located in the Indian Ocean. Initially, there had been reports that Starmer had blocked the US use of the bases.
In the immediate aftermath of the initial US-Israeli strike, Starmer appeared to blanche at the prospect of joining the war.
He and the leaders of France and Germany issued a joint statement, underscoring that any actions they might take would be defensive in nature.
“We will take steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the region, potentially through enabling necessary and proportionate defensive action to destroy Iran’s capability to fire missiles and drones at their source,” the joint statement said.
“We have agreed to work together with the US and allies in the region on this matter.”
But Starmer has had to push back on domestic criticism both for and against joining the war.
On Monday, he told the UK Parliament, “We are not joining the US and Israeli offensive strikes”, citing the need to protect “Britain’s national interest” and “British lives”.
The war in Iran remains largely unpopular in the UK. The polling firm Survation conducted a survey over the last week of 1,045 British adults, and it found that 43 percent of respondents called the war not justifiable.
When asked if they supported Starmer’s initial decision not to allow the US to use British bases, 56 percent of respondents approved. Only 27 percent said it was the wrong choice.
Thousands of protesters gathered outside the US embassy in London on Saturday to call for an end to the ballooning conflict.
But Trump has upped his criticism of Starmer over the past week, further fraying relations with the UK government.
On March 3, for instance, he held an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz where he said repeatedly he was “not happy with the UK”.
Of Starmer, Trump added, “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.”
Trump has long admired Churchill and last year installed a bust of the wartime prime minister in the Oval Office, just as he had during his first term.
By contrast, the US president has issued a flood of criticism against Starmer, particularly for his 2024 decision to transfer control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.
The transfer comes after the International Court of Justice found the UK acted unlawfully in 1965 by separating the islands from Mauritius to create a separate colony.
The deal with Mauritius, however, allows the US and the UK to maintain a military base on Diego Garcia, part of the archipelago.
Trump has repeatedly slammed the transfer, however, writing on social media that “giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY”.
Tensions between the US and UK also rose in January after Trump told Fox News that NATO allies had “stayed a little off the frontlines” during the US war in Afghanistan.
Starmer responded that he found Trump’s comments “to be insulting and frankly appalling”.
The Trump administration, however, has signalled it is pivoting away from its traditional European allies in favour of more politically aligned countries.
At a summit on Saturday with right-wing Latin American leaders, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio appeared to praise the attendees while casting shade on other allies.
“At a time when we have learned that oftentimes an ally, when you need them, maybe may not be there for you, these are countries that have been there for us,” Rubio told the summit.
[Aljazeera]
-
Features6 days agoBrilliant Navy officer no more
-
News2 days agoUniversity of Wolverhampton confirms Ranil was officially invited
-
Opinion6 days agoSri Lanka – world’s worst facilities for cricket fans
-
News3 days agoLegal experts decry move to demolish STC dining hall
-
Features6 days agoA life in colour and song: Rajika Gamage’s new bird guide captures Sri Lanka’s avian soul
-
News2 days agoFemale lawyer given 12 years RI for preparing forged deeds for Borella land
-
Business4 days agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
News1 day agoWife raises alarm over Sallay’s detention under PTA
