Connect with us

News

Operation to rescue distressed fishers cost SLN a packet

Published

on

Navy spokesman Captain Gayan Wickramasuriya

The Sri Lanka Navy dispatched its vessel, Vijayabahu, within five hours after the Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources informed them that some Sri Lankan fishermen had fallen ill after consuming a liquid that was in a bottle found floating in the sea, Navy Spokesman Captain Gayan Wickramasuriya has said.

“There is a crew of around 100 in such a ship. We need to mobilise a medical team and the required medicine. Despite all this we managed to dispatch an offshore patrol vessel in five hours. We had to travel about 675 nautical miles to reach the fishermen and the entire journey is over 1,200 miles. We can’t send a fast attack craft because they can’t reach such distances,” he said.

Captain Wickramasuriya said dipatching a helicopter was also not possible because of the distance.

He said that according to maritime conventions a master of a ship at sea, who was in a position to be able to provide assistance on receiving a signal from any source that persons were in distress at sea, was bound to proceed with all speed to their assistance. That is why a Singaporean merchant vessel had gone out of its way to rescue the aforementioned fishermen and provide them with medical care.

“The merchant vessel lost about 10-12 hours because it changed course to hand over the surviving fishermen to SLNS Vijayabahu,” he said.

Captain Wickramasuriya said Sri Lanka Maritime Rescue Coordinating Centre (SLMRCC) had received 331 requests for assistance in 2022 and 377 in 2023.

“By 01 July 2024, SLMRCC had received 162 requests for assistance. In 2023 we saved 36 lives and in 2022 we saved 226 lives,” he said.

The Navy Spokesman said that he didn’t possess the exact estimates of the costs borne by the Navy for the operation to rescue the fisherman earlier this week. However, it was likely that the mission cost several tens of millions of rupees, he said.

Captain Wickramasuriya added that a warship like SLNS Vijayabahu could not tug a fishing vessel because the ship travels at high speeds. “The sea is rough these days. What happens if the fishing vessel capsizes? There were bodies inside the trawler and evidence to carry out an investigation. War ships are not built to tug along fishing vessels.” (RK)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending