News
“No Genocide in Sri Lanka,” Naseby tells House of Lords
Speaking in the House of Lords last week, Lord Naseby unequivocally declared there had been no genocide here. But in a short response, Lord Tariq Ahmad, Minister of State for South Asia at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office reiterated that the UK “stands by the strength of the resolution passed at the UN Human Rights Council on Sri Lanka.”
Ahamed also indicated that his planned visit to Sri Lanka had been canceled due to the national Covid lockdown.
“I am engaging directly with the Sri Lankan government”, he said in response to Naseby in the Queen’s Speech debate in the House of Lords on Wednesday.
Naseby, identified as a strong friend of Sri Lanka in the British Parliament, said in his speech that he was focusing specifically on Britain’s Indo-Pacific tilt. He said he had lived and worked in India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and he knows the rest of ASEAN quite well.
He concluded his speech dealing with current British Sri Lanka policy by asking: “”It (SL) will be forced back to rely on China, thereby threatening the sea lanes and the dissident Tamils setting up an independent state. Is this really a way to say thank you to a country whose people helped us in two world wars and whose Government accepted and helped our Government over the Falklands vote in the United Nations?”
Declaring an interest as joint chair of the All-Party Group on Sri Lanka, he said:
“Today in Sri Lanka, there is huge tension over the UNHCR’s report on alleged war crimes by the Sri Lankan armed forces, and the UK in its role as chair of the Core Group — the USA having pulled out, as it sees no point in it. The war of 2009 was not some minor insurrection, so judgment must be made on the basis of the law of armed conflict, known as the international humanitarian law”.
It was a war between a democratically elected Government and probably the world’s most evil terrorists, who killed two presidents, Ministers, civilians in their thousands and the most moderate Tamil leaders. It was a war partially conducted from Camden in London, at the Tamil Tigers’ international HQ, led by Anton Balasingham—a UK citizen. Millions were raised illegally here on the ground in this country. His wife, Adele, was fighting in Sri Lanka and was closely involved in recruiting over 5,000 child soldiers, as stated by UNICEF. This is a war crime by any yardstick, he noted.
Continuing his speech, Lord Naseby further said: “Charges by the UN start with the Darusman report, from three human rights lawyers who never visited Sri Lanka. Worse still, they claimed that at least 40,000 civilians were killed. But all the sources of evidence are to be hidden for 20 years. Is this robust evidence? Why the secrecy?”The second UN report, from OISL, is largely based on the first, Darusman. I spent three years looking at all the sources, which I have listed in my book, Sri Lanka: Paradise Lost; Paradise Regained. I have given a copy to my noble friend; I do not know whether he has received it, because he has not yet told me. The claim is of Tamil genocide, but my firm conclusion is that there were a maximum of 6,000 to 7,000 deaths.
“My evidence is verified—there was no genocide. My evidence comes from sources such as US Ambassador Blake, the UN in-country team, the census done after the war by the Tamils, University Teachers for Human Rights, the UK’s own expert military attaché in the field and many others, all of whom confirm the figure of 6,000 to 7,000. But just recently, Her Majesty’s Government stated in a letter sent to me from the MoD on 25 March, and in another from the FCO, that”despatches written by Lieutenant Colonel Gash … reported on isolated information … from a number of different sources … without offering any independent verification of this information. As such, they cannot be considered an evidenced-based assessment”.”One wonders why in heaven the dispatches I have—48 pages of what has been produced—are so heavily redacted if they are so useless. In my judgment, that redaction should be removed forthwith.”It is wonderful—not only is our military attaché cast aside and my evidence seemingly cast aside but it goes on. I say to my noble friend: read the Paranagama commission report, which had some of the UK’s finest human rights lawyers as advisers—namely Sir Desmond de Silva, Sir Geoffrey Nice and others. Their eminent view on Darusman was that it was of no value to a court seeking to establish the truth because the reports are based on anonymous sources.
“There are others on top of this; there is the US military attaché. All report that the Sri Lankan army behaved appropriately under the leadership of General Shavendra Silva. OISL’s view on the camp of 200,000 was that it was a quasi-concentration camp. How so, when the Red Cross was there from day one? Additionally, the Tamil MPs who visited it said a huge thank you to the Sri Lankan Government for the way the Tamils were looked after.”I turn briefly to the way forward. Truth and reconciliation are a huge challenge, but the most reverend Primate the Archbishop of Canterbury visited in 2019 and said that Sri Lanka was making real progress. Our colleague, the noble Baroness, Lady Stroud, says from the Legatum Institute that Sri Lanka has done extremely well over the last decade. I urge the Minister to work with Sri Lanka on implementing the recommendations of the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission and the Paranagama report to establish a truth and reconciliation committee. If the UK chooses to dictate, then let me be clear: there is a clear risk to our Indo-Pacific strategy on Sri Lanka.
News
CEBEU warns of operational disruptions amid uncertainty over CEB restructuring
The Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) yesterday warned that uncertainty surrounding the ongoing restructuring of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) had forced many employees to refrain from performing their regular duties, raising concerns about potential disruptions to electricity sector operations.
The engineers’ union said the current situation had arisen due to what it described as either deliberate actions or extreme negligence in implementing the restructuring process, which has created significant confusion among staff who previously served under the CEB.
According to the union, although the state power utility has been formally restructured and new companies established, a large majority of former CEB employees have yet to receive official appointment letters, confirming their positions in the newly formed entities.
“The reality is that the institution, previously known as the Ceylon Electricity Board, no longer exists in its earlier form, yet most employees, who served under it, have not been issued proper appointment letters, or related documentation, assigning them to the newly established companies,” the CEBEU said.
The union said that while some workers had been issued “assignation letters”, those documents merely indicate the institution to which an employee has been attached and do not clearly define employment conditions, responsibilities, authority, or reporting structures.
“As a result, employees currently lack the necessary legal framework confirming their employment status, their duties, the authority under which they operate, and who they are accountable to within the new institutions,” the CEBEU said.
The engineers’ union emphasised that the current crisis was not created by employees but was the direct result of, what it called, shortsighted and questionable actions taken by those responsible for implementing the reforms.
It also expressed concern that the relevant Minister, appointed through the National List, had failed to hold meaningful discussions with employees, despite having previously advocated strongly for workers’ rights.
The union said trade union action had been launched only after months of unsuccessful attempts to resolve the issues through verbal requests and written communication with the authorities.
“Despite repeated appeals made over several months, there has been no satisfactory response. Decisions appear to have been taken under the assumption that a government with a strong mandate can proceed without proper consultation,” the union said.
However, the CEBEU stressed that employees engaged in essential operations—including power generation, transmission, and distribution—continue to work in order to ensure electricity supply to the public.
“These staff members are continuing their duties under considerable risk to prevent major disruptions to the electricity supply,” the union noted.
Nevertheless, the union warned that the prevailing uncertainty could affect certain operational activities, and restoration work following breakdowns may take longer than usual.
The CEBEU appealed to the public to understand the situation and expressed regret for any inconvenience that may arise.
“We request the public to understand the situation and cooperate with us during this difficult period. We sincerely regret any inconvenience that may be caused,” the union added.
By Ifham Nizam
News
Remittances up compared to last year before outbreak of war, but the economic picture is not rosy
Sri Lanka Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE) yesterday said that foreign remittances, during January and February this year, had been 32% higher than the corresponding period in the previous year.
According to a press release issued by the SLBFE, Sri Lanka received Rs 1,480.1 mn during January and February this year, whereas in 2025 the country received Rs1,121 mn during the corresponding period. During the first two months of this year, 47,819 Sri Lankans had left the country for employment abroad.
However, Prof. Priyanga Dunusinghe has warned that Sri Lanka could face a catastrophic situation due to a rapid and sharp drop in revenue caused by the escalating Gulf war. Fighting erupted on February 28 following a joint US-Israel attacks on Iran.
Appearing on Derana ‘Big Focus’ on Monday, the Professor in Economics in the Department of Economics, and Head – Department of Information Technology, University of Colombo, Dunusinghe said that that the drop in remittances from the Middle East, as well as exports, should be examined against the backdrop of runaway oil prices.
News
The Netherlands alleges Russian Embassy interfering in World Press Photo Exhibition
The Netherlands Embassy in Colombo has accused the Russian Embassy of trying to limit freedom of expression and right to know in Sri Lanka. The Embassy yesterday issued the following statement: “The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands’ attention has been drawn to the attempts by the Russian Embassy in Colombo to deny the people of Sri Lanka’s right to information and freedom of expression by demanding photos related to “Russia’s war of aggression” on Ukraine be removed from the World Press Photo exhibition, currently on display in Sri Lanka.
The 2025 edition of the World Press Photo Exhibition was officially opened by Dr Kaushalya Ariyaratne, Deputy Minister of Mass Media, and Wiebe de Boer, Ambassador of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on February 27, 2026, at One Galle Face. The same exhibition will be held in Kandy from 13 to 17 March 2026 at Sahas Uyana.
The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to Sri Lanka visited the exhibition during the weekend of March 7 and 8 and demanded the photographs, related to “Russia’s war of aggression on Ukraine,” be removed from the exhibition, and threatened to stage a protest if the organisers failed to do so.
The exhibition is jointly organised by the Netherlands Embassy, along with the Sri Lanka Press Institute, and the World Press Photo Foundation in the Netherlands.
Continuing the same demand, the Russian Embassy has now approached the Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs to remove the said photos from the exhibition in Kandy. The same exhibition is currently underway in the USA and Germany and is showing all around the world in dozens of countries with freedom of expression.
The photos, including the photos that the Russian Embassy in Colombo wanted to hide from the Sri Lankan citizens, are also available online on the World Press Photo website for free for anyone to access them.
The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands deplores the attempts by any party to compromise people’s right to know and right to freedom of expression. It also amounts to a violation of the host country’s sovereignty if an Embassy attempts to decide what and which content its citizens should see and not. While we, as the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, assure the Sri Lankan public that as our commitment to protect press freedom and respect for editorial integrity, we will continue the exhibition in Kandy with its full content without censoring any photos of the exhibition.
The exhibition is open to the public, free of charge, from 10.30am on Friday, March 13, till March 17, at Sahas Uyana in Kandy.”
-
News5 days agoUniversity of Wolverhampton confirms Ranil was officially invited
-
News6 days agoLegal experts decry move to demolish STC dining hall
-
News5 days agoFemale lawyer given 12 years RI for preparing forged deeds for Borella land
-
News4 days agoPeradeniya Uni issues alert over leopards in its premises
-
News2 days agoRepatriation of Iranian naval personnel Sri Lanka’s call: Washington
-
Business7 days agoCabinet nod for the removal of Cess tax imposed on imported good
-
News5 days agoLibrary crisis hits Pera university
-
News4 days agoWife raises alarm over Sallay’s detention under PTA
