Connect with us

Sports

Need to get the right combination

Published

on

Sri Lanka lost the first ODI against Bangladesh by 33 runs. The second ODI will be played today in Dhaka followed by the final game on Friday. 

 

by Rex Clementine

 

Sri Lanka are languishing at 12th in the ICC Cricket World Cup Super League with minus two points and at this moment automatic qualification looks a dream for the sport’s showpiece event. These are tough times no doubt to be in selectors’ boots. They have made the call to axe a whole lot of seniors and need to show faith in the young charges they have chosen. In the meantime, the team also needs to pick up a few points to improve their poor ranking. Bangladesh were the ideal opponents to get some points to your name for England and India over the next two months would prove to be formidable opponents.

If Sri Lanka can win the next two games, they can move up to number nine; ahead of teams like Zimbabwe and Ireland. If they don’t, they have got to bite the bullet and face harsher realities having let grass grow under their feet having ignored vital aspects like fitness, fielding and discipline.

There were some glaring errors during the first ODI that Sri Lanka lost by 33 runs and of the main aspects was that the team got the combination wrong.

Opening batsman Danushka Gunathilaka played so well with an array of attacking shots – there were five boundaries in his 21 – but he perished playing one too many drives. On a track where the ball was not coming onto the bat the batsmen were struggling with their timing. More than the drive, the sweep and the reverse sweep would have been an ideal tool on this track. Talking of the sweep, there’s no better batsman to execute it than Niroshan Dickwella.

His mannerisms at times can be irritating but Dickwella can be such an important asset to the team with his ability to put the bowlers off their rhythm with his unconventional batting. Why he has not played an ODI since March 2019 is beyond us.

One of the things that they had identified in our ODI cricket was that the team had not been able to utilize the quota of 50 overs often. So they came up with a solution. It was to pick someone to bat through the innings. The person who was chosen to do that job was Dimuth Karunaratne. His calming influence in leading the side was an additional bonus. He did such a wonderful job having brought together a team that was in disarray.

Karunaratne was in the form of his life having amassed 427 runs in three innings during the recent Test series in Kandy. His numbers were Bradmansque but for some strange reason he was kicked out of the ODI side. Nobody had told him that his strike rate was poor in limited over cricket. Nobody had told him that he had to play a few attacking shots. All what he had been told was to bat through the innings and he finds himself out of the side for doing exactly what was asked of him to do. It does not make sense.

Sri Lanka opted to play two wrist spinners in the opening match. There’s Dhananjaya de Silva too. He was the pick of the bowlers claiming three wickets with his off-spin. Should they have played Ramesh Mendes is an interesting question. Bangladesh are depending heavily on spin. Should you bring your specialist off-spinner into the side is something for the authorities to ponder. Or should he replace Lakshan Sandakan? The left-arm wrist spinner goes for runs. That doesn’t matter if he can pick up three of four wickets. If he does not, since you already have a wrist spinner in Wanindu Hasaranga, you need to look at the other Mendis.

It was a brilliant show by Hasaranga. His clean hitting was so good to watch and had the top order stretched a few partnerships, Sri Lanka could have got over the line. There are those who are talking that Hasaranga should bat up the order. He is someone who is ideal for number seven; a good finisher. Let him not do more than what he could chew.

 



Latest News

Senegal beat Egypt 1-0 in AFCON semifinal as Sadio Mane scores late

Published

on

By

Senegal's Sadio Mane scores the only goal of the game [Aljazeeera]

Sadio Mane fired Senegal into the final of the Africa Cup of Nations with  a 1-0 victory over seven-time winners Egypt.

The two-time African Footballer of the Year broke the deadlock in the 78th minute on Wednesday when he let fly from just outside the penalty area inside the bottom left corner after Lamine Camara’s initial effort was blocked.

It sparked joy and relief among the Teranga Lions’ fans in Tangier, where the 2021 champions – after beating Egypt in the final – had taken the initiative but struggled to create clear chances against the Pharaohs’ stubborn defence.

Senegal captain Kalidou Koulibaly will miss the title match – against either host Morocco or Nigeria, who were to  play in Rabat later on Wednesday – after picking up a yellow card that meant a suspension and then going off injured in the 23rd minute.

Koulibaly was booked in the 17th for a tactical foul on Omar Marmoush. The captain was also sent off in the group-stage win over Benin and consequently missed the win over Sudan. His tournament was effectively ended when he had to be replaced by Mamadou Sarr because of injury.

Nicolas Jackson had fired over just before Senegal displayed more attacking intent. Habib Diarra and Pape Gueye also had efforts saved.

Tensions boiled over when Mohamed Salah fouled his former Liverpool teammate Mane, but Senegal coach Pape Thiaw and Egypt counterpart Hossam Hassan managed to cool tempers.

Senegal’s Habib Diarra was booked for arguing, however, meaning he will miss the final, too.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Bangladesh cricketers threaten boycott unless BCB director Nazmul Islam resigns

Published

on

By

Will the BPL matches go ahead on Thursday? [Cricinfo]

Bangladesh’s cricketers have threatened a boycott of all forms of cricket unless BCB director M Nazmul Islam tenders his resignation, following disparaging comments he made against players on Wednesday. Nazmul, the board’s finance committee chairman, had said earlier on Wednesday that he believes national cricketers should be asked to return the “crores and crores of taka” that the BCB spends on them.

Mohammad Mithun, the president of the Cricketers Welfare Association of Bangladesh (CWAB), raised the prospect of a boycott – which will have immediate impact on the BPL – hours after Nazmul’s press conference at the BCB’s headquarters in Dhaka.

“The remark made by the BCB director Najmul Islam has hurt the cricket fraternity greatly and it’s not acceptable,” Mithun told reporters on Wednesday evening. “We demand his resignation. If he doesn’t resign before tomorrow’s match, we will announce a boycott of all cricket, starting from the BPL matches tomorrow (Thursday).”

There are two BPL matches scheduled for January 15. ESPNcricinfo understands that team captains Najmul Hossain Shanto (Rajshahi Warriors), Mehidy Hasan Miraz (Sylhet Titans), Mahedi Hasan (Chattogram Royals) and Mithun (Dhaka Capitals), along with Noakhali coach Khaled Mahmud have confirmed their solidarity with the boycott call.

Nazmul’s comments, which the BCB has officially distanced itself from, were made on the sidelines of the board’s prayer meeting for the late former prime minister Khaled Zia. They come as part of ongoing reverberations from the BCB’s decision to not play matches in India at the upcoming T20 World Cup. The ICC event is co-hosted with Sri Lanka and the BCB, citing security concerns, has remained firm in not wanting to play games in India, a decision they made after the BCCI instructed the Kolkata Knight Riders to remove Mustafizur Rahman from their playing roster.

Nazmul was asked questions about the potential financial implications for Bangladesh should they end up not playing in the T20 World Cup at all. He responded by saying the board would not take a hit and that only the cricketers would, adding that there would be no compensation for them should they miss out. “Why would there be? Are we asking them for the crores and crores of taka that we are spending on them? Answer me first.

“We are spending so much money on them, they are not being able to do anything in different places. Have we got any international awards? What have we done at any level? Let us now ask them for the money back after every time they couldn’t play. Give us back. Why should there even be a question of compensating the players?”

The BCB released a statement soon after, making it clear Nazmul’s views were his alone. “The Board expresses its sincere regret for remarks that may be deemed inappropriate, offensive, or hurtful. Such comments do not reflect the values, principles, or official position of the Bangladesh Cricket Board, nor do they align with the standards of conduct expected from individuals entrusted with the responsibility of serving Bangladesh cricket.

“The BCB reiterates that it does not endorse or take responsibility for any statement or remark made by any director or Board member unless issued formally through the Board’s designated spokesperson or the Media & Communications Department. Any statements made outside these authorised channels are personal in nature and should not be interpreted as representing the views or policies of the Board.

“The Bangladesh Cricket Board also makes it clear that it will take appropriate disciplinary action against any individual whose conduct or comments show disrespect towards cricketers or cause harm to the reputation and integrity of Bangladesh cricket.”

It is the second time in quick succession that Nazmul has put himself in the spotlight for comments against players. Earlier this week he had hit out at Tamim Iqbal in a Facebook post, over comments the former Bangladesh captain made last Friday, calling for the BCB to think through more carefully their decision-making over participation in the T20 World Cup. “Bangladesh cricket’s interest, future and everything else must be considered before making such a decision,” Tamim had said, urging for a resolution to be found through dialogue.

Nazmul and another board director Asif Akbar were harsh in their response to Tamim’s statement, saying that he was acting in the interests of India on this issue.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Mitchell upstages Rahul as New Zealand level series

Published

on

By

Daryl Mitchell and Will Young helmed New Zealand's chase [Cricinfo]

Daryl Mitchell and Will Young powered Bew Zealand’s highest successful chase in India to end their eight-match losing streak against India. They might not have been chasing that high a total had it not been for a masterful KL Rahul century when the ball gripped the surface in the afternoon. India’s fast bowlers were superb in the early goings, reducing New Zealand to 46 for 2, but from the moment Mitchell targeted Kuldeep Yadav on his introduction, New Zealand didn’t look back.

The pitch quickened up in the cooler evening even though there was no dew, Kuldeep went for 82, Mitchell and Young added 162, Mitchell went on to get his eighth hundred, Rajkot’s new stadium had its first successful chase in five ODIs, and the high-scoring Indore was set for a decider. Rahul’s century in the afternoon was his eighth in 85 innings, an impressive feat in itself, which puts Mitchell’s eighth in his 53rd innings in elite echelons, especially given how Mitchell has been a career middle-order batter.

Mitchell now has 2553 runs, which, for a start to an ODI career, is matching Shubman Gill, who looked imperious in getting 56 off 53 earlier in the piece. Kyle Jamieson and Zak Foulkes started well with the ball, conceding just 10 in the first five overs, but, led by Rohit Sharma’s charge, Gill carried India to 70 for 0 in 12 overs. Rohit, though, was already showing signs of getting stuck: his innings had phases of 1 off 11, 18 off 9, and 5 off 18, ending with a catch at deep cover off Kristian Clarke.

Gill and Virat Kohli still looked in control even though debutant left-arm spinner Jayden Lennox started with five overs for just 18 runs. The slowness of the pitch was apparent when Gill’s pull off Jamieson ended up with short midwicket. Michael Bracewell then put the squeeze on in the middle overs with fast bowlers getting the wickets. Kohli played Clarke on, which tends to happen in such conditions, and Shreyas Iyer hit Clarke straight to mid-off.

The game had changed dramatically once the balls became soft. The first 100 legal balls produced 99 for 1 with 15 fours and a six, the next 100 went for just 58 for 3 with two fours. It was only Rahul, who injected some momentum into the innings.

At full strength, India will probably want Hardik Pandya and Axar Patel at Nos 6 and 7, but they must try their other options. Given the conditions, Jadeja fought hard for his 27 off 44, but fell to the returning Bracewell. Nitish Kumar Reddy didn’t do much wrong in his 21-ball 20, but India were still short of the power they needed to go past 300.

Rahul scored 112 off 92 out of the 169 that came while he was at the wicket for 28.3 overs, playing some delightful shots along the way, including a reverse-swept four, the only sweep of any kind played by India in 23 overs of spin, which went for just 2 for 89. By comparison, New Zealand played 13 sweeps for 23 runs in 18 overs of spin.

While 284 seemed a good effort for the conditions India had to face when they were batting, ODI cricket in India is seldom that straightforward. You have to almost always score above par because batting gets easier in the night even when there is no dew.

It is also imperative you do a lot of damage with the new ball when defending totals in India. For some reason, the new ball seamed more for India than it did for New Zealand, which threw them a bone. Mohammed Siraj, Harshit Rana and Prasidh Krishna were excellent in their first spells of five overs each, conceding just 53 in their 15 overs put together, getting rid of Devon Conway and Henry Nicholls. With the ball still seaming, Gill tried to get Reddy into the game before spin came on, but Mitchell started transferring the pressure back when he lofted hard length from Reddy down the ground for a six.

Prasidh and Jadeja still kept scoring under wraps, which meant New Zealand would have to take risks when Kuldeep was introduced at 82 for 2 in 20 overs. The second ball he faced from Kuldeep, Mitchell charged him and cleared deep midwicket not by much. He followed it up with a lap sweep for four. This was enough for Kuldeep to go largely defensive and flat. The one time he tossed up a wrong’un, he drew a false shot from Young, but it fell short of long-off. He eventually got Young for 87 off 98, which perhaps only saved him from the ignominy of the costliest analysis of his career by two runs.

That the returning fast bowlers couldn’t extract the same amount of grip from the surface with the older balls compounded India’s problems. Young, who had struggled his way to 40 off 61, and Mitchell batted in cruise mode once they had neutralised the Kuldeep threat. Mitchell, who narrowly missed out on a hundred last game and also dropped a catch that could have given New Zealand an outside chance, was reprieved twice in the 36th over when Jadeja missed a run-out from close range and Prasidh dropped him in the deep. However, needing only 98 in 15 overs, it can be argued New Zealand would still have won from there.

When Glenn Phillips drove Kuldeep for a four in the 40th over, the ask, which never reached seven an over, was now down to under a run a ball. Despite doing most things right, India were beaten handsomely by the transformation in the conditions. India would have batted first if they had won the toss anyway.

Brief scores:
New Zealand 286 for 3 in 47.3 overs  (Daryl Mitchell 131*, Will Young 87;  Prasidh Krishna  1-49) beat India 284 for 7 in 50 overs (KL Rahul 112*, Shubman Gill 56; Kristian  Clarke 3-56) by seven wickets

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Trending