Connect with us

News

Namal Rajapaksa speaks out

Published

on

Namal Rajapaksa

Basil shouldn’t have left country on the eve of Prez poll

Mahinda should have retired after 2015 defeat

Political marriage with Ranil ruined SLPP though it saved country

By Shamaindra Ferdinando

SLPP National Organizer Namal Rajapaksa claimed that his uncle Basil Rajapaksa leaving the country on the eve of the recently concluded presidential election contributed to his heavy defeat at that poll.

Even Basil Rajapaksa is aware of how the SLPP’s political rivals used the social media to exploit that situation, young Rajapaksa said, pointing out they even claimed that me and my wife, too, fled the country. The former Minister said so appearing on the live political show Salakuna on Hiru TV on Monday night (0).

The panel of journalists consisted of Hiru anchor Chamuditha Samarawickrema, Panuka Rajapaksha and Kalindu Vithanage.

Namal Rajapaksa said that his uncle always used to leave the country on the eve of national elections, regardless of the ground situation. However, the latest foreign jaunt caused a major setback, the nephew asserted, indicating that he couldn’t do anything about Basil Rajapaksa’s movements.

Namal polled just 342,781 votes (2.57%) at the presidential poll, down from Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s 6,924,255 (52.25%) at the previous election held in Nov. 2019.

Namal Rajapaksa said that the major reason for the disastrous outcome at the presidential election was nothing but their alliance with UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe.

Declaring that the SLPP made a desperate attempt to reach a consensus with Wickremesinghe ahead of the presidential election, Namal Rajapaksa claimed their failed bid caused irreparable damage to the party.

The former parliamentarian declared that their whole strategy in bringing in Wickremesinghe as Premier in May 2022 and then electing him as the President from the Parliament they controlled in July, the same year, was a huge blunder. However, at the time they had no option but to accept that strategy to save the country from economic ruination, he claimed.

Responding to another query, the ex-MP recalled that he accepted the challenge at the last moment as their candidate (he was not named) pulled out of the race. Businessman and the then National List MP Dhammika Perera is on record as having said that he pulled out of the contest for personal reasons.

Acknowledging that the presidential election result didn’t reflect the expenditure of Rs 388 mn and financial liabilities amounting to Rs 199 mn, Namal Rajapaksa said that the SLPP is contesting the general election with the hope of showing a much improved performance.

According to him, in spite of the débâcle at the presidential poll, the result of the Elpitiya Pradeshiya Sabha proved that the SLPP staged a quick comeback though the outcome of the general election couldn’t be ascertained on the basis of that LG poll.

Namal Rajapaksa harped on a severe setback caused by an influential section of the party switching its allegiance to Wickremesinghe who contested the presidential election as an independent candidate.

The ex-MP explained how he decided to come on the National List taking into consideration post-presidential poll developments and challenges ahead. “I couldn’t have carried out an ongoing campaign as the national organizer in case I was on the Hambantota district list.” Namal Rajapaksa dismissed the interviewing panel’s assertion that he got himself placed on the National List as he feared facing the electorate.

Referring to the improved SLPP performance at Elpitiya, Namal Rajapaksa claimed that they could have polled two or perhaps three times more than what the party obtained at the presidential poll.

Chamuditha Samarawickrema pointed out that the total number of votes polled by Namal Rajapaksa was very much less than the number of votes the party used to obtain from one electoral district.

Declaring that a major reorganization effort that had been initiated in the wake of the presidential polls defeat was suspended pending the conclusion of the general election, Namal Rajapaksa said that the party would resume the project this coming January. The Local Government polls that would be held early next year wouldn’t compel them to suspend the reorganisation, Namal Rajapaksa said, claiming that certain changes made on the ground at Elpitiya, too, helped the party to do better.

Commenting on his father’s political future, the ex-parliamentarian said that he believed Mahinda Rajapaksa shouldn’t have contested the 2015 presidential election. Namal Rajapaksa added that his father shouldn’t have engaged in active politics after his defeat at the 2015 presidential election.

Namal Rajapaksa reiterated the SLPP’s position that in spite of contradictory statements made by the NPP government, security provided to the war-winning President had been reduced. The government shouldn’t resort to such measures, the former Minister said, whatever changes in respect of security should be made on the basis of proper intelligence assessments.

Namal Rajapaksa said that the NPP continued to attack the SLPP and the Rajapaksas even after they won the presidential election. Declaring that they had been under threat since 2009 after the successful conclusion of the war, Namal Rajapaksa said that the Tamil Diaspora threw its weight behind ‘Aragalaya’ that facilitated the NPP bid at the presidential poll.

Responding to a spate of questions directed at the Rajapaksas over high profile corruption cases, Namal Rajapaksa challenged President Dissanayake to prove those allegations.

The ex-MP reminded that all allegations that had been repeated in the run-up to the general election next week were used against them since 2014/2015. “Anura Wijepala who now functions as Secretary to President Dissanayake, in fact, handled a committee that decided on the cases they investigated. They never found anything.”

Namal Rajapaksa said that he had repeatedly challenged the NPP to do whatever possible to expose the so-called corrupt deals perpetrated by them.

Contradictory statements that had been on the transferring of money from Sri Lanka to Uganda exposed the NPP, Namal Rajapaksa said, declaring that during President Dissanayake’s five-year term he would have to admit in Parliament that the war-winning President didn’t rob the country. “We are prepared to face no holds barred investigations. Prove if he has stashed away public funds overseas or here. You won’t find anything new,” Namal Rajapaksa said, warning the NPP that it couldn’t survive on the basis of continuing lies.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Maldives Coast Guard Ship Huravee departs island

Published

on

By

The Maldives Coast Guard Ship Huravee which arrived in Sri Lanka for replenishment purposes, departed the island on 04 Mar 26.

In accordance with naval tradition, the Sri Lanka Navy extended a customary farewell to the departing ship at the Port of Colombo

Continue Reading

News

‘IRIS Dena was Indian Navy guest, hit without warning’, Iran warns US of bitter regret

Published

on

A day after a US submarine sunk an Iranian Navy warship off the coast of Sri Lanka, the Foreign Minister of Iran, Sayed Abbas Araghchi, has warned that the US would “pay bitterly” for targeting a ship in international waters, The Tribune has reported.

Araghchi posted on social media platform X on Thursday saying, “The US has perpetrated an atrocity at sea, 2,000 miles away from Iran’s shores.”

The frigate IRIS Dena, a guest of India’s Navy carrying almost 130 sailors, was struck in international waters without warning, said the Iran Foreign Minister, adding, “Mark my words: The US will come to bitterly regret the precedent it has set.”

US Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, on Wednesday confirmed that a US submarine fired a torpedo and sank the Iranian Navy vessel IRIS Dena west of Sri Lanka.

In a way, the Iran and US-Israel conflict has reached close to the Indian coast. The strike today at sea was almost 4,000 kms away from Iran, significantly expanding the radius of war. Already, fearing Iranian missile strikes, several US warships have moved eastward towards India.

These ships are in international waters. India has denied that any US Navy assets were using Indian ports. The Iranian ship, hit on Wednesday, was returning after participating in the international fleet review and exercise Milan hosted by India at Visakhapatnam.

The Iranian ship went down with almost 130 sailors on board missing. The Sri Lankan Navy, acting on a distress call, rescued 32 of the Iranian sailors. Hegseth confirmed the act by the US forces, saying the ship was hit in the Indian Ocean, stating, “an Iranian warship that thought it was safe in international waters. .. Instead, it was sunk by a torpedo”.

Hegseth did not name the Iranian ship that was attacked. But earlier, the Sri Lankan Navy reported the distress call from IRIS Dena when it was some 40 kms west of Galle, located on the south-western part of the island country. On February 16, the Iranian ship had sailed into the port of Visakhapatnam, where seventy-four nations participated.

Warships from Australia, Japan, South Korea, Russia, and dozens of others were anchored alongside the now-sunk Iranian vessel. Iran’s Navy Commander, Rear Admiral Shahram Irani, held talks with India’s Chief of Naval Staff on strengthening maritime security cooperation.

The theme was “United through Oceans.” Notably, the US Navy was supposed to send the guided-missile destroyer USS Pinckney to the exercise Milan; however, the ship was diverted to Singapore on February 15. The US did not field its warship in Milan, which had ships from Russia and Iran.

The exercise ended on February 25. Three days later, on February 28, the United States and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury. The IRIS Dena was transiting home. This morning at 5:08 a.m. local time, the IRIS Dena issued a distress call. Sri Lanka’s Foreign Minister, Vijitha Herath, informed parliament that two navy vessels and an aircraft were deployed. Thirty crew members were rescued and admitted to Karapitiya Hospital in Galle.

The Straits Times reported 32 critically wounded survivors. Reuters reported 101 missing and 78 wounded. The Sri Lankan Navy spokesman said the operation was conducted in line with the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue.

Continue Reading

News

Risk of power cuts due to use of low-quality coal,PUCSL warns

Published

on

The Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) has warned of a possible risk of power cuts due to the use of inferior quality coal affecting generation capacity at the Lakvijaya Power Plant, according to a recent commission report.

The commission said the risk to the continuous electricity supply was assessed based on the peak demand forecast submitted by the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) for 2026.

According to the report, the analysis assumed that hydropower plants could contribute up to 1,300 MW to meet the night peak demand, while the Lakvijaya Power Plant (LVPS) would be able to contribute only up to 690 MW due to a capacity shortfall, assuming a 40 MW generation capacity reduction from each unit.

The PUCSL said the assessment was carried out taking into account the planned maintenance schedule submitted by the CEB. Under the schedule, Unit 1 of the Lakvijaya plant is due to undergo maintenance checks and repairs in June for a period of 25 days, while Unit 2 is scheduled for maintenance in July for another 25 days.

The report also noted that the 270 MW West Coast Power Plant is scheduled to undergo maintenance in April for 10 days, while the 150 MW Kelanitissa Combined Cycle Power Plant (KCCP 2) is expected to undergo maintenance during May, June and July.

Under normal conditions, the report said, there is a potential risk of a generation capacity shortage if electricity demand reaches 3,030 MW in April, 3,070 MW in June and 3,000 MW in July.

The highest recorded night peak demand so far in 2026 was 2,949 MW on February 25.

The PUCSL further warned that if one coal unit or any major power plant becomes unavailable from the existing generation mix, there would be a significant risk of a generation capacity shortage to meet the night peak demand, particularly during April, June and July.

Energy sector analysts said the use of substandard coal could further aggravate operational challenges at the Norochcholai plant, potentially affecting generation efficiency and reliability if corrective measures are not taken promptly.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending