Features
London exhibitions of two women artistes of the past
Jane Austen and Julia Margaret Cameron are distinguished women in their fields of artistic expression, and I admire them greatly. The first from the time as a teenager when I read several novels from her collected work while confined to segregation and bed with an attack of measles. The admiration and appreciation of Austen’s writing increased as the years went by. The second, when a niece and nephew invited me for a holiday in Boganwantalawa and en route we visited the colonial era unique St Mary’s Churchyard where Julia Margaret is buried alongside her husband, Charles Hay Cameron. Interest was further increased when discussions were had with a friend who lived in Windsor and visited the Cameron’s home in the Isle of White which is now a museum. He knew much about her and kindled my interest further.
This article was initiated by two articles from the NYTimes about them. I am not writing about the exhibitions held at the Morgan Library & Museum organized by the Victoria and Albert Museum in London of many of portraitist Cameron’s photographs, in acknowledgement that she was a pioneering great photographer. The same museum held the exhibition titled “A lively mind: Jane Austen at 250.” which celebrates the landmark birth anniversary of the author. The NYT articles were by Arthur Lubow (June 19) and Diana Cole (June 23) respectively.
Jane Austen (1775-1817)
More readers of this column would know Jane Austen better than the photographer Cameron. The article I read by Diane Cole about her 250th birthday being celebrated with an exhibition at the Morgan Library London – titled A lively mind: Jane Austen at 250 starts thus: “Literary reputations come and go, but the uncommon sense and sensibility of Jane Austen abides, as demonstrated by the millions of copies sold of the books she penned, and by the innumerable adaptations in different media that they continue to spawn.” And about the exhibition Cole writes: “The museum upends various misconceptions about the novelist’s life by celebrating the anniversary of her birth through a fresh, intimate glimpse at her personal artifacts, manuscripts and more.” One artifact is a ring of hers with a large turquois semi-precious stone.
Cole continues: “The plot line that runs throughout the exhibition answers a most intriguing question: how did the spinster daughter of a country minister of modest means in a small village of Steventon, England, come to nurture a mind so lively and develop a wit so intrepid that she was able to write her way into the forefront of what the literary critic F R Leavis dubbed ‘The Great Tradition’.” Numerous letters, documents, notes are presented to show her gift and skill in writing, while debunking lingering misconception about her artistry, in particular that she never wrote for publication or profit but only for her pleasure.
Austen began writing fiction as a teenager. One of her collections of these (1790 – 93) is in the British Library, first read to family members. Proof that she wrote with profit in mind is a 1817 list if ‘Profits of my novels’. Also exhibited is a tally of opinions from various friends and family members of her novel Emma. Her mother, older sister Cassandra and she lived in a cottage in Chawton from 1809, which is a museum now. The present exhibition shows how Jane lived: her daily routine, such as playing the piano before breakfast. All these exhibits including family letters exchanged prove that Austen lived a life that was far from monotonous.
Cole ends her article about the exhibition marking Jane Austen’s 250th birth anniversary thus: “It is only apt, then, that visitors exit through a doorway framed by bookshelves filled with translated copies of Austen’s works from around the world. Prominent among the pictures is a 2019 painting showing a handsome young black man in casual dress and titled with the familiar phrase – ‘A single man in possession of a good fortune.’”
Another article read by me was by Lauren Groff, a three times National Book Award finalist and bestselling author of seven novels, who avers that “Jane Austen’s boldest novel and also her least understood is Mansfield Park.” with its “dark themes and complex ironies that help keep Austen weird.” She explains her statement. “Mansfield Park is, by far, the strangest of Jane Austen’s novels. In juxtaposition with the merry and major key orchestration of her four better known novels, Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, Persuasion and Emma, Austen’s third published book sings in a decidedly minor key. The other novels are not the romances that film studios so often mistake them for – they are instead, clever and cogent satires on societal mores – but since they are written in the major key, they can seem too light and bright and sparkling, as Austen herself once said jokingly about her Pride and Prejudice. Compared with the others, Mansfield Park can appear too dark and dim and lugubrious.” Groff says she avoided reading it for a long time.
I add I read Austen through the years only in appreciation and in wonder and praise that a spinster living a circumscribed life with a parson as father could write so brilliantly, so cogently of the times she lived in in rural England.
Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879)
I quote article writer Lubow: “More than two centuries after her birth, Julia Margaret Cameron is trendy. The appeal of her photography rests on her scornful disregard of rules, an attitude that colours all aspects of her life…(She) was not merely unrestrained by ‘normal boundaries’ but she was ‘unconscious of their very existence.’ In its infancy photography sought recognition as an art, and the clearest path was through comparison to revered painters. She had a knack of capturing hair and especially beards.” She is considered one of the most important portraitists of the 19th century having moved with British high society and photographed famous Victorians.
She was born Julia Margaret Pattle in Calcutta, fourth in a family of ten, her father a high official in the East India Company. For her schooling she moved to France to live with an aunt and then to London where they lived in and moved in high society. Her sisters married very well. In 1835, her parents took her to the Cape of Good Hope to recover from an illness where she met Charles Hay Cameron who worked for the British government in India. Two years later they married and between 1839 and 1852 had five children and adopted five more and a poor Irish girl.
She met Sir John Herschell, pioneer in photography, who told her about the new art. When 48, her daughter gifted her a camera and thus the beginning of an illustrious career. After relocating from India to England they lived in the seaside village of Freshwater in the Isle of Wight and had many famous Victorians as friends such as Charles Darwin and Alfred Lord Tennyson whom she photographed. Her favourite subject was a niece of hers – Julia Jackson. After three years of marriage, Julia’s husband died leaving her with two children and pregnant with a third. She became depressed but later married Leslie Stephen and had four more children including Virginia Woolf.
The Camerons bought a coffee plantation in Ceylon and moved to live in the hill country in 1875. The couple brought their coffins by ship! In January 1879 after a brief illness, Julia Margaret died and was buried in Bogawantalawa.
Her legacy lives on, more appreciated and praised as time goes on. And Sri Lanka, or Ceylon then, features prominently in it.
Features
Cyclones, greed and philosophy for a new world order
Further to my earlier letter titled, “Psychology of Greed and Philosophy for a New World Order” (The Island 26.11.2025) it may not be far-fetched to say that the cause of the devastating cyclones that hit Sri Lanka and Indonesia last week could be traced back to human greed. Cyclones of this magnitude are said to be unusual in the equatorial region but, according to experts, the raised sea surface temperatures created the conditions for their occurrence. This is directly due to global warming which is caused by excessive emission of Greenhouse gases due to burning of fossil fuels and other activities. These activities cannot be brought under control as the rich, greedy Western powers do not want to abide by the terms and conditions agreed upon at the Paris Agreement of 2015, as was seen at the COP30 meeting in Brazil recently. Is there hope for third world countries? This is why the Global South must develop a New World Order. For this purpose, the proposed contentment/sufficiency philosophy based on morals like dhana, seela, bhavana, may provide the necessary foundation.
Further, such a philosophy need not be parochial and isolationist. It may not be necessary to adopt systems that existed in the past that suited the times but develop a system that would be practical and also pragmatic in the context of the modern world.
It must be reiterated that without controlling the force of collective greed the present destructive socioeconomic system cannot be changed. Hence the need for a philosophy that incorporates the means of controlling greed. Dhana, seela, bhavana may suit Sri Lanka and most of the East which, as mentioned in my earlier letter, share a similar philosophical heritage. The rest of the world also may have to adopt a contentment / sufficiency philosophy with strong and effective tenets that suit their culture, to bring under control the evil of greed. If not, there is no hope for the existence of the world. Global warming will destroy it with cyclones, forest fires, droughts, floods, crop failure and famine.
Leading economists had commented on the damaging effect of greed on the economy while philosophers, ancient as well as modern, had spoken about its degenerating influence on the inborn human morals. Ancient philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus all spoke about greed, viewing it as a destructive force that hindered a good life. They believed greed was rooted in personal immorality and prevented individuals from achieving true happiness by focusing on endless material accumulation rather than the limited wealth needed for natural needs.
Jeffry Sachs argues that greed is a destructive force that undermines social and environmental well-being, citing it as a major driver of climate change and economic inequality, referencing the ideas of Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes, etc. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Laureate economist, has criticised neoliberal ideology in similar terms.
In my earlier letter, I have discussed how contentment / sufficiency philosophy could effectively transform the socioeconomic system to one that prioritises collective well-being and sufficiency over rampant consumerism and greed, potentially leading to more sustainable economic models.
Obviously, these changes cannot be brought about without a change of attitude, morals and commitment of the rulers and the government. This cannot be achieved without a mass movement; people must realise the need for change. Such a movement would need leadership. In this regard a critical responsibility lies with the educated middle class. It is they who must give leadership to the movement that would have the goal of getting rid of the evil of excessive greed. It is they who must educate the entire nation about the need for these changes.
The middle class would be the vanguard of change. It is the middle class that has the capacity to bring about change. It is the middle class that perform as a vibrant component of the society for political stability. It is the group which supplies political philosophy, ideology, movements, guidance and leaders for the rest of the society. The poor, who are the majority, need the political wisdom and leadership of the middle class.
Further, the middle class is the font of culture, creativity, literature, art and music. Thinkers, writers, artistes, musicians are fostered by the middle class. Cultural activity of the middle class could pervade down to the poor groups and have an effect on their cultural development as well. Similarly, education of a country depends on how educated the middle class is. It is the responsibility of the middle class to provide education to the poor people.
Most importantly, the morals of a society are imbued in the middle class and it is they who foster them. As morals are crucial in the battle against greed, the middle class assume greater credentials to spearhead the movement against greed and bring in sustainable development and growth. Contentment sufficiency philosophy, based on morals, would form the strong foundation necessary for achieving the goal of a new world order. Thus, it is seen that the middle class is eminently suitable to be the vehicle that could adopt and disseminate a contentment/ sufficiency philosophy and lead the movement against the evil neo-liberal system that is destroying the world.
The Global South, which comprises the majority of the world’s poor, may have to realise, before it is too late, that it is they who are the most vulnerable to climate change though they may not be the greatest offenders who cause it. Yet, if they are to survive, they must get together and help each other to achieve self-sufficiency in the essential needs, like food, energy and medicine. Trade must not be via exploitative and weaponised currency but by means of a barter system, based on purchase power parity (PPP). The union of these countries could be an expansion of organisations,like BRICS, ASEAN, SCO, AU, etc., which already have the trade and financial arrangements though in a rudimentary state but with great potential, if only they could sort out their bilateral issues and work towards a Global South which is neither rich nor poor but sufficient, contented and safe, a lesson to the Global North. China, India and South Africa must play the lead role in this venture. They would need the support of a strong philosophy that has the capacity to fight the evil of greed, for they cannot achieve these goals if fettered by greed. The proposed contentment / sufficient philosophy would form a strong philosophical foundation for the Global South, to unite, fight greed and develop a new world order which, above all, will make it safe for life.
by Prof. N. A. de S. Amaratunga
PHD, DSc, DLITT
Features
SINHARAJA: The Living Cathedral of Sri Lanka’s Rainforest Heritage
When Senior biodiversity scientist Vimukthi Weeratunga speaks of Sinharaja, his voice carries the weight of four decades spent beneath its dripping emerald canopy. To him, Sri Lanka’s last great rainforest is not merely a protected area—it is “a cathedral of life,” a sanctuary where evolution whispers through every leaf, stream and shadow.
“Sinharaja is the largest and most precious tropical rainforest we have,” Weeratunga said.
“Sixty to seventy percent of the plants and animals found here exist nowhere else on Earth. This forest is the heart of endemic biodiversity in Sri Lanka.”
A Magnet for the World’s Naturalists
Sinharaja’s allure lies not in charismatic megafauna but in the world of the small and extraordinary—tiny, jewel-toned frogs; iridescent butterflies; shy serpents; and canopy birds whose songs drift like threads of silver through the mist.
“You must walk slowly in Sinharaja,” Weeratunga smiled.
“Its beauty reveals itself only to those who are patient and observant.”
For global travellers fascinated by natural history, Sinharaja remains a top draw. Nearly 90% of nature-focused visitors to Sri Lanka place Sinharaja at the top of their itinerary, generating a deep economic pulse for surrounding communities.
A Forest Etched in History
Centuries before conservationists championed its cause, Sinharaja captured the imagination of explorers and scholars. British and Dutch botanists, venturing into the island’s interior from the 17th century onward, mapped streams, documented rare orchids, and penned some of the earliest scientific records of Sri Lanka’s natural heritage.
These chronicles now form the backbone of our understanding of the island’s unique ecology.
The Great Forest War: Saving Sinharaja
But Sinharaja nearly vanished.
In the 1970s, the government—guided by a timber-driven development mindset—greenlit a Canadian-assisted logging project. Forests around Sinharaja fell first; then, the chainsaws approached the ancient core.
“There was very little scientific data to counter the felling,” Weeratunga recalled.
- Poppie’s shrub frog
- Endemic Scimitar babblers
- Blue Magpie
“But people knew instinctively this was a national treasure.”
The public responded with one of the greatest environmental uprisings in Sri Lankan history. Conservation icons Thilo Hoffmann and Neluwe Gunananda Thera led a national movement. After seven tense years, the new government of 1977 halted the project.
What followed was a scientific renaissance. Leading researchers—including Prof. Savithri Gunathilake and Prof. Nimal Gunathilaka, Prof. Sarath Kottagama, and others—descended into the depths of Sinharaja, documenting every possible facet of its biodiversity.
“Those studies paved the way for Sinharaja to become Sri Lanka’s very first natural World Heritage Site,” Weeratunga noted proudly.
- Vimukthi
- Nadika
- Janaka
A Book Woven From 30 Years of Field Wisdom
For Weeratunga, Sinharaja is more than academic terrain—it is home. Since joining the Forest Department in 1985 as a young researcher, he has trekked, photographed, documented and celebrated its secrets.
Now, decades later, he joins Dr. Thilak Jayaratne, the late Dr. Janaka Gallangoda, and Nadika Hapuarachchi in producing, what he calls, the most comprehensive book ever written on Sinharaja.
“This will be the first major publication on Sinharaja since the early 1980s,” he said.
“It covers ecology, history, flora, fauna—and includes rare photographs taken over nearly 30 years.”
Some images were captured after weeks of waiting. Others after years—like the mysterious mass-flowering episodes where clusters of forest giants bloom in synchrony, or the delicate jewels of the understory: tiny jumping spiders, elusive amphibians, and canopy dwellers glimpsed only once in a lifetime.
The book even includes underwater photography from Sinharaja’s crystal-clear streams—worlds unseen by most visitors.
A Tribute to a Departed Friend
Halfway through the project, tragedy struck: co-author Dr. Janaka Gallangoda passed away.
“We stopped the project for a while,” Weeratunga said quietly.
“But Dr. Thilak Jayaratne reminded us that Janaka lived for this forest. So we completed the book in his memory. One of our authors now watches over Sinharaja from above.”
An Invitation to the Public
A special exhibition, showcasing highlights from the book, will be held on 13–14 December, 2025, in Colombo.
“We cannot show Sinharaja in one gallery,” he laughed.
“But we can show a single drop of its beauty—enough to spark curiosity.”
A Forest That Must Endure
What makes the book special, he emphasises, is its accessibility.
“We wrote it in simple, clear language—no heavy jargon—so that everyone can understand why Sinharaja is irreplaceable,” Weeratunga said.
“If people know its value, they will protect it.”
To him, Sinharaja is more than a rainforest.
It is Sri Lanka’s living heritage.
A sanctuary of evolution.
A sacred, breathing cathedral that must endure for generations to come.
By Ifham Nizam
Features
How Knuckles was sold out
Leaked RTI Files Reveal Conflicting Approvals, Missing Assessments, and Silent Officials
“This Was Not Mismanagement — It Was a Structured Failure”— CEJ’s Dilena Pathragoda
An investigation, backed by newly released Right to Information (RTI) files, exposes a troubling sequence of events in which multiple state agencies appear to have enabled — or quietly tolerated — unauthorised road construction inside the Knuckles Conservation Forest, a UNESCO World Heritage site.
At the centre of the unfolding scandal is a trail of contradictory letters, unexplained delays, unsigned inspection reports, and sudden reversals by key government offices.
“What these documents show is not confusion or oversight. It is a structured failure,” said Dilena Pathragoda, Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), who has been analysing the leaked records.
“Officials knew the legal requirements. They ignored them. They knew the ecological risks. They dismissed them. The evidence points to a deliberate weakening of safeguards meant to protect one of Sri Lanka’s most fragile ecosystems.”
A Paper Trail of Contradictions
RTI disclosures obtained by activists reveal:
Approvals issued before mandatory field inspections were carried out
Three departments claiming they “did not authorise” the same section of the road
A suspiciously backdated letter clearing a segment already under construction
Internal memos flagging “missing evaluation data” that were never addressed
“No-objection” notes do not hold any legal weight for work inside protected areas, experts say.
One senior officer’s signature appears on two letters with opposing conclusions, sent just three weeks apart — a discrepancy that has raised serious questions within the conservation community.
“This is the kind of documentation that usually surfaces only after damage is done,” Pathragoda said. “It shows a chain of administrative behaviour designed to delay scrutiny until the bulldozers moved in.”
The Silence of the Agencies
Perhaps, more alarming is the behaviour of the regulatory bodies.
Multiple departments — including those legally mandated to halt unauthorised work — acknowledged concerns in internal exchanges but issued no public warnings, took no enforcement action, and allowed machinery to continue operating.
“That silence is the real red flag,” Pathragoda noted.
“Silence is rarely accidental in cases like this. Silence protects someone.”
On the Ground: Damage Already Visible
Independent field teams report:
Fresh erosion scars on steep slopes
Sediment-laden water in downstream streams
Disturbed buffer zones
Workers claiming that they were instructed to “complete the section quickly”
Satellite images from the past two months show accelerated clearing around the contested route.
Environmental experts warn that once the hydrology of the Knuckles slopes is altered, the consequences could be irreversible.
CEJ: “Name Every Official Involved”
CEJ is preparing a formal complaint demanding a multi-agency investigation.
Pathragoda insists that responsibility must be traced along the entire chain — from field officers to approving authorities.
“Every signature, every omission, every backdated approval must be examined,” she said.
“If laws were violated, then prosecutions must follow. Not warnings. Not transfers. Prosecutions.”
A Scandal Still Unfolding
More RTI documents are expected to come out next week, including internal audits and communication logs that could deepen the crisis for several agencies.
As the paper trail widens, one thing is increasingly clear: what happened in Knuckles is not an isolated act — it is an institutional failure, executed quietly, and revealed only because citizens insisted on answers.
by Ifham Nizam
-
News5 days ago
Lunuwila tragedy not caused by those videoing Bell 212: SLAF
-
News4 days agoLevel III landslide early warning continue to be in force in the districts of Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala and Matale
-
Latest News6 days agoLevel III landslide early warnings issued to the districts of Badulla, Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya
-
Features6 days agoDitwah: An unusual cyclone
-
Business2 days agoLOLC Finance Factoring powers business growth
-
News2 days agoCPC delegation meets JVP for talks on disaster response
-
News2 days agoA 6th Year Accolade: The Eternal Opulence of My Fair Lady
-
Midweek Review5 days agoHouse erupts over Met Chief’s 12 Nov unheeded warning about cyclone Ditwah










