Connect with us

News

Karu blames weak governance for economic crisis

Published

on

Weak governance, the polticisation of the public service and their ill-effects had led to an economic crisis, Chairman of the National Movement for Social Justice (NMSJ) and former Speaker Karu Jayasuriya says.

Jayasuriya said yesterday that competent administrative officers had been sidelined and retired military officers appointed to top positions in the state service. Excerpts of his statement:

“This is why government decisions are constantly changing. Public administration requires experience,” Jayasuriya said.

“We listened to the address by the President on the country’s Independence Day with great interest. I wish him the strength to fulfil his promises to the country. Even though the current plight of the people, especially that of the farmers has been raised before, it is imperative to once again remind that it is the duty of the President to address these issues and provide solutions to their woes. We must accept that the people are suffering and acknowledge their pain and anger.

“We believe weak Governance, a politicized public service and its ensuing collapse has led to this economic crisis faced by the country today. One key reason identified is the decision to disregard talented administrative officers and appointed retired military officers Instead. It is for this reason that government decisions are constantly changing and then reversed. Administration requires experience.

“The government must acknowledge that the 20th Amendment and the two-thirds majority no longer benefit the people. The government must correct these shortcomings. Even though this year’s Independence Day celebration was held with great pomp and pageantry, it was evident that public interest in the event was lacking. This must be taken as a message from the people to the government.

The Forex Crisis

“The hit taken by the foreign exchange reserves was also the result of administrative failures. Local and foreign economists say this has been caused by large scale corruption in the country, lack of a long term plan and large scale looting of assets. This is more commonly known as Plundering National Wealth.

“If the Bribery Commission had sprung into action and law enforcement officials took the necessary steps this day light robbery could have been averted. However, the Bribery Commission is withdrawing certain cases filed against powerful people.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act

“Currently there is an ongoing discussion on the possible amendment of the PTA. The international community has continuously voiced their dissent at the gross misuse of the PTA in Sri Lanka while the UN Human Rights Council has also mentioned this on various occasions. In Sri Lanka, this act is used to take revenge on opponents. Many similar cases have been reported to us.

“We appreciate the steps taken to change this Act after 43 years and we feel that it would be more appropriate to bring in the most appropriate legislation or to make the necessary amendments to suit the developing world, as seen in the world’s democracies. We believe a broader discussion on the issue will be fruitful. It also must be noted that certain proposed amendments may be taken into consideration at the upcoming UNHRC sessions in Geneva.

Levying of taxes on the EPF

“A significant number of Sri Lankans not serving in the public service are members of the EPF. Their only hope is to use the fund to either build a home, fund their children’s education or spend on their child’s marriage at the end of their retirement.

“Therefore, it is the view of the National Movement for Social Justice that the attempt to steal from the Employees’ Provident Fund, the only asset of helpless workers, is an inhumane act. We know of many instances where certain powerful individuals have used this fund to make money in the stock market. There are many instances where millionaires were born out of the money of these helpless people. Therefore, we request the government to refrain from imposing a tax on the EPF.

The ‘One Country, One Law’
policy and granting a pardon to Ranjan Ramanayake

“The people of this country had hoped MP Ranjan Ramanayake would receive a Presidential pardon on Independence Day. We are saddened that it was not to be. As crime bosses, drug dealers and murderers are set free while a popular artistes such as Rajan Ramanayake continues to languish in prison, it is evident that the government’s so-called ‘One Country, One Law’ policy is not a reality in Sri Lanka.

“I hope that the authorities will pay attention to these facts we have raised today in good faith for the betterment of the country and the people.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending