Connect with us

Midweek Review

Justice Minister, NARA battle before SC: Case for National Hydrographic Bill to empower Navy

Published

on

The then NARA Chairman Eng. E.A.S.K. Edirishinghe and UK Hydrographic Office Chief Rear Admiral Tim Lowe display an old map of Sri Lanka after signing two bilateral agreements in Colombo on Oct 11, 2019. They dealt with production and distribution of Nautical Charts and Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC).

NARA has reiterated that the Justice Minister is at fault and accused him of basing his conclusions on wrong assumptions. It cited the much touted claim that USD 200 mn (Rs 60 bn) could be earned annually by selling ‘maps’ (Electronic Navigation Charts/Hydrographic maps) to 35,000 foreign vessels that passed through local waters. NARA pointed out that the total number of vessels couldn’t be countered as 35,000 as some vessels passed through Sri Lankan waters on more than one occasion in a given year. “They do not have to procure ENCs or hydrographic maps each time either. These maps can be obtained for a valid period of three, six or nine months or one year,” a senior NARA spokesperson told The Island.

The official pointed out that the ill-fated container carrier X-Press Pearl that visited Colombo in January and March 2021 and was destroyed during its third voyage in May/June 2021 as a result of a fire as an example. NARA declared that the total amount of annual revenue that can be earned by selling ENCs and hydrographic maps is very much less than the Minister’s calculations, based on seriously flawed information.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Justice Minister Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe, PC, recently lashed out at the National Aquatic Resources Research and Development Agency (NARA) over its opposition to the proposed enactment of the National Hydrographic Bill.

Making a special statement in Parliament, the former President of the Bar Association questioned the apex national institute vested with the responsibility of carrying out and coordinating research, development and management activities of aquatic resources in the country regarding its bid to thwart the new Bill.

Dr. Rajapakshe was responding on Nov 08, 2023 to NARA statement issued at a media briefing held at its head office at Crow Island, Mattakkuliya, the previous day (NARA hits back at Justice Minister, alleges Navy making bid to take over its functions, The Island, Nov 08, 2023)

Displaying a copy of The Island, the outspoken politician didn’t mince his words when he questioned the motive of NARA Scientists’ Association President Upul Liyanage, its Joint Secretary Nilupa Samarakoon and D.V.S. P. Bandara, of its Technology Transfer Division, who alleged attempts were being made by interested parties to establish another setup similar to NARA at the expense of an institution that served the country for well over two decades. Bandara is the President of the Jathika Sevaka Sangamaya (JSS, NARA). The JSS has sought UNP leader President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s immediate intervention in late January this year as it realized the move to enact a new law. Nevertheless, the Cabinet, at a meeting headed by the President, has given approval to the Justice Minister to go ahead.

NARA has since declared that it has moved the Supreme Court against the Bill. The institution expressed confidence that the country’s apex court would do justice to their petition. Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapakse on Nov 07, 2023 announced in Parliament that Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena has received copies of three petitions filed in terms of the article 121(1) of the Constitution against the proposed National Hydrographic Bill.

Minister Rajapakshe raised the contentious issue of NARA employees pursuing an agenda beneficial to them regardless of consequences, especially to the country. Rajapakshe launched a no holds barred attack on NARA, an institution coming under the purview of Fisheries Minister Douglas Devananada, who still remains silent on the developments. Perhaps, he should state his position in Parliament. The Justice Minister emphasized that NARA, established by Parliament Act No 54 of 1981 and amended in 1996, had failed to achieve its primary objective, hence the urgent need to enact a new law.

Responding to NARA spokespersons, Minister Rajapakshe explained to the House how the proposed Bill, if enacted, could help Sri Lanka to stabilize the national economy. The Minister reiterated his original accusations against NARA and reiterated assertions pertaining to the losses suffered under the current dispensation and projected profits through the proposed Bill made at a media briefing held at his Ministry on Oct 31, 2023 (Justice Minister alleges NATA causes massive revenue losses, opposes remedial measures, The Island, Nov 1, 2023)

At the media briefing, as well as in Parliament, the Justice Minister emphasized that if the Navy is constitutionally granted an opportunity to prepare Electronic Navigation Charts (ENC) and Nautical Charts required by foreign vessels passing through Sri Lankan territorial waters, the bankrupt country could benefit immensely. The Minister estimated that as much as USD 200 mn (over Rs 60 bn) could be earned annually whereas at the moment only those who worked for NARA and their external benefactor made money – an extremely serious accusation that should be examined independently without delay. Dr. Rajapakshe asserted that NARA couldn’t be run for the benefit of its employees at the expense of the country’s national interest and economy.

In fact, Parliament should intervene in this matter especially against the backdrop of its pathetic failure to ensure transparency and accountability in the public sector and turning a blind eye to private sector corruption that finally compelled the government to admit bankruptcy. The recent suspension of the USD 2.9 bn bailout package primarily over Sri Lanka’s failure to meet revenue targets again highlighted the failure on the part of Parliament to meet its mandatory obligations.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) in March 2023 approved a 48-month, USD 2.9 billion extended arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) to support Sri Lanka’s economic policies and reforms.

NARA-UK agreement upgraded

State Defence Minister Pramitha Bandara Tennakoon in May, 2023 declared that the Navy would undertake the task of providing ENCs and Nautical Charts – an assignment that would strengthen the national economy. The Matale District lawmaker declared that an annual revenue of USD 200 mn could be achieved. The Minister discussed this issue on the state-run Independent Television Network (ITN) after the Cabinet-of-Ministers received the draft National Hydrographic Bill. Since then, the Cabinet has approved the Bill, now hotly contested by NARA.

Obviously Justice Minister Rajapakshe and State Defence Minister Tennakoon are on the same page as regards the high profile project. Minister Tennakoon, in his interview with ITN declared that the Navy would be entrusted with the daunting task to be completed within two years.

Both ministers are confident that the Navy can undertake the challenge. Minister Rajapakshe pointed out that the Navy, with 37 qualified personnel, could carry out the project. NARA has questioned the Navy’s competency in this regard. The Institute insists that under the current arrangement where it provided data to UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO) and which in turn sold the ENCs/Hydrographic maps, should continue.

The accusations and counter allegations and the move to enact the National Hydrographic Act should be examined taking into consideration an agreement between NARA and UKHO affiliated to the Defence Ministry there. The issues at hand seem quite complicated, and therefore need to be dealt with carefully.

Unfortunately, in a situation the country is trapped in political, economic and social chaos, the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government seems incapable of addressing multiple crises. The Opposition, too, seems to be in a flux unable to cope up with rapid developments taking place. The Opposition is yet to pay attention to the continuing controversy over the alleged Navy bid to take over NARA’s functions.

Actually, the UKHO is the marine agency of the British Defence Ministry and plays a vital part in their overall strategy. On Oct. 11, 2019 during the last presidential polls campaign NARA entered into two bilateral agreements with UKHO for the production and distribution of Nautical Charts and Electronic Navigational Charts. The then NARA Chairman Eng. E.A.S.K. Edirishinghe and CEO of UKHO Rear Admiral Tim Lowe signed the agreements.

They first entered into an agreement in 2002. Dr. Rajapakshe should ask Attorney General Sanjay Rajaratnam, PC, whether NARA obtained the AG’s Department consent to sign the first agreement in 2002 and then the expanded pact in late 2019.

Professor M.J.S. Wijeyaratne succeeded Eng. Edirisinghe as NARA Chairman in early February 2022. Rear Admiral Tim Lowe was compelled to step down as the boss of the UK Defence Ministry marine agency in Sept. 2020 after the government found fault with him for exposing his Union Jack-emblazoned boxer shorts at the end of a work video call.

The British media reported how the decorated officer, who received CBE in 2017, stood up at the end of an online meeting with his colleagues to reveal his underwear. Lowe received the appointment in 2019, the year he visited Colombo to sign two bilateral agreements.

Rear Admiral Lowe was succeeded by Rear Admiral Peter Sparkes as the new Chief Executive and Accounting Officer.

The UK has sought to strengthen its bilateral relationship with Sri Lanka in the field of hydrography. After the change of government in July last year as a result of the elected president being forced to flee the country by violent protests, Rear Admiral Rhett Hatcher, the National Hydrographer and Deputy Chief Executive of UKHO and Tim Lewis the Head of partnering and engagement Middle East and Africa visited Colombo in the second week of Nov 2022. They met Rear Admiral Prasad Kariyapperuma, the joint Chief Hydrographer to the Government of Sri Lanka and Chief Hydrographer of the Sri Lanka Navy at Sri Lanka Navy Hydrographic Service. Colonel Paul Clayton, Defence Advisor to the British High commission was present on the occasion.

Developing conflict

NARA seems to be on a collision course with the Navy though they work together. The establishment of the Naval Wing of National Hydrographic Office at NARA premises in early August 2017 was meant to enhance cooperation. Inquiries made by The Island in general as well as at the NARA media briefing revealed that the civil institute resented the Navy though its only research vessel RV Samudrika is now operated by the Navy. In addition to the agreement on RV Samudrika signed in 2019, NARA’s relations with the Navy is governed by an agreement they finalized in 2016.

These agreements have enabled NARA to provide data required by UKHO. As the only ‘authority’ here recognized by UKHO, NARA is able to furnish the required data. NARA received 12 percent of the sales done by the UKHO but following the Navy involvement in the project, revenue recorded a significant increase. Although NARA’s percentage increased to 17 percent, Minister Rajapakshe is of the view that the country should make a determined effort to significantly increase its share.

There cannot be any difficulty in NARA having a cordial relationship with the Navy and cooperating fully with the government’s efforts to streamline operations, especially against the backdrop of agreements with the British Defence Ministry outfit.

It would be the responsibility of the government to bring all local stakeholders to the negotiating table and thrash out all issues at hand. The powers that be should examine the circumstances leading to NARA moving the Supreme Court against a decision taken by the government. It would be a grave mistake on the part of those in authority to allow an issue that should be rationally discussed at the Cabinet level to end up in the apex court.

The government must also take into consideration that the British marine agency is directly affiliated to its Defence Ministry and headed by a senior officer holding the rank of Rear Admiral.

In the absence of a proper dialogue among those involved in the continuing controversy, The Island inquired into the circumstances a Multi-beam echo sounder (MBES), an advanced sonar that is used to map the seabed was discarded under controversial circumstances. Towards the end of the NARA media briefing, the institute stressed that the only MBES available to the country was damaged when the RV Sayuri mounted with this equipment was caught up in the Dec 2004 tsunami. NARA declared that its efforts to repair the MBES hadn’t been successful.

However, some claimed that the MBES had been mounted on RV Samudrika, now operated by the Navy. On a request made by NARA, the expensive equipment had been removed and the allegation is that it hadn’t been used at all and subsequently discarded. The government should establish what really happened to MBES and set the record straight.

Sri Lanka acquired the 25-metre long and six-metre wide RV Samudrika during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s second term. The vessel was built in Taiwan.

The Navy Hydrographic Service in Feb 2019 declared that RV Samudrika is equipped with state-of-the-art survey equipment and technology including, MBES, Single Beam Echo Sounder systems, Sub-bottom Profiler, Side Scan Sonar, ADCP systems, DGPS system, etc. which could cater for hydrographic surveys, oceanographic surveys and scientific researches. If MBES that had been received from Germany as a grant was discarded following the Dec 2004 tsunami, there couldn’t have been similar equipment onboard RV Samudrika.

NARA has expressed fears that the proposed new law is meant to pave the way for an expanded role for India in the Ocean surveys in Sri Lankan waters. The government must act swiftly to discuss the entire gamut of issues with concerned parties here to prevent further deterioration of relations between NARA and the Navy. Of course, the overall Indian strategy pertaining to bankrupt Sri Lanka and ‘interventions’ should be examined against the backdrop of (1) Indo-Lanka bilateral engagement (2) India being a member of US-led ‘Quad’ which includes Australia and Japan (3) Sri Lanka’s growing dependence on India for financial/material support and critical assistance provided to the military and (4) the Chinese factor.

Let me remind the readers of the launch of joint hydrographic surveys by Indian and the US Navies during the Yahapalana administration (March 29, 2017 to May 12, 2017).

The Indian Navy Hydrographic Department spearheaded the survey from Colombo to Sangamankanda. This was during the then Vice Admiral Ravi Wijegunaratne’s tenure as the Commander of the Navy. Indian Naval Survey Ship INS Dharshak carried out the surveying of ‘Colombo to Sangamankanda’ and ‘Weligama Bay’ within six weeks. The surveyed area covered approximately 41,600 square kilometres (12,150 square nautical miles).

The second phase of the survey was conducted (Oct 26– Dec 19, 2017) from Colombo to Galle. This was meant to identify changes in the wake of the Dec 2004 tsunami. The third phase was conducted in 2018 covering the area between Great Basses lighthouse off Yala and Sangamankanda.

In early February 2020 the Indian Navy Hydrographic Survey Ship, INS Jamuna (J 16) was deployed off the Southwest coast. The Navy had the opportunity to participate in the survey. And for the first time a helicopter was used in support of the survey. The vessel’s helicopter was utilized during the survey – the second Indian deployment here. Sandhayak-class INS Jamuna was here for a period of two months.

In the wake of the X-Press Pearl disaster off the Colombo port in May-June 2021, Sri Lanka sought immediate Indian intervention to survey three areas off Colombo in the vicinity of the ill-fated vessel. Sri Lanka lacked the capacity to undertake such an operation. NARA’s only research vessel simply couldn’t have undertaken such an operation. The Navy and NARA also participated in this effort conducted in late June 2021in line with India’s supposed vision of Safety and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR).

The X-Press Pearl disaster is the single worst incident of plastic marine pollution in the world. The ship caught fire off Colombo on May 20, 2021 and sank, leaking its cargo that contained 25 metric tons of nitric acid and some 50 billion plastic pellets.

India has declared that its swift intervention has showcased India’s ‘Neighbourhood First’ policy. The Indian High Commission, in a statement dated July 2, 2021 explained the operation undertaken by INS Sarvekshak. “The vessel progressed 807 miles of Side Scan Sonar survey utilizing integral sensors and two survey boats in adverse weather conditions, which could have otherwise been delayed to post monsoon in October due to rough seas. The ship’s team worked overnight to process gigabytes of data collected during the day, to meet the timelines. Post the survey, the ship identified 54 underwater debris and also one ship-wreck. The survey data would be invaluable in issuing advisories to mariners and fishermen which would later assist in the removal of debris by the Salvior to achieve safety of navigation.”

The government, without further delay, should address this issue. Let us hope no one plays politics with such a nationally important issue and a firm decision is made taking into consideration all factors. The bankrupt government cannot delay taking prompt action on revenue generation measures.

Sri Lanka Cricket is not the only issue at hand. Unfortunately, the handling of high profile SLC issues exposed the government badly that its interests weren’t definitely those dear to the public.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Midweek Review

Raid on ‘Millennium City’ DMI safe-house:

Published

on

Having served as the Commander of the Army, 2000 to 2004, during his 39-year career, Lionel Balagalle passed away in Oct. 2023. He is the founding father of military intelligence

A forgotten story (part 1)

Colombo High Court Judge Adithya Patabendi, on March 27, 2025, acquitted former ASP Kulasiri Udugampola, who had been indicted over the Kandy police raid on a safe house run by the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) at the Millennium City housing complex, Athurugiriya. The raid, conducted in the first week of January 2002, sent shock waves through the defence establishment. Delivering the judgment, 23 years after the raid, Patabendi declared that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary election was conducted at the height of the war in the North. Having gained the upper hand in the battlefield, the LTTE was working on a Ceasefire Agreement with Norway. The country was in turmoil with President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, who survived an LTTE suicide blast at the final rally of her Dec. 1999 presidential election campaign, struggling to overcome a sustained UNP offensive.

In the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 parliamentary polls, UNP leader, Ranil Wickremesinghe accused the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) of planning to assassinate him. The UNPer claimed that the DMI was training Tamil terrorists at the Panaluwa Army Testing Range to mount an attack on his campaign bus, as well as his political rallies.

The unprecedented accusation placed the war-weary Army in an extremely embarrassing position when it was actually turning tables on the enemy using its own tactics in areas considered by then as being off limits for security forces. The UNP, with no shame, brazenly exploited the made-up threat as the main Opposition party and its allies, including a treacherous section of the media, stepped-up pressure on the Army to no end.

On the instructions of Wickremesinghe, UNP Chairman Charitha Ratwatte and Deputy Chairman Daya Palpola wrote a hard-hitting letter to Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle warning that he would be held responsible ‘in the event of an unfortunate incident’. The UNP duo accused the Army chief of training personnel to engage in a destabilisation campaign against the UNP.

An irate Army Commander, Lt. Gen. Balagalle in reply addressed a letter to Ratwatte and Palpola dismissing their accusations. The Island, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Army chief says no truth in UNP claims,’ in its Nov, 11, 2001 edition that revealed the exchange between Army headquarters and Sirikotha.

The report was based on what Lt. Gen. Balagalle had told this writer the previous evening. The Army chief, himself a one-time head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI), said that there was absolutely no basis for the UNP allegation that a hit squad was undergoing training in the use of high explosives and thermobaric weapons to attack Wickremesinghe.

The UNP ignored the Army chief’s letter. The allegation was repeated throughout the campaign. The raid on the DMI safe-house should be examined against the backdrop of the exchange between the Army commander and Sirikotha.

It was somewhat reminiscent of the JVP tactic to tarnish all others who had ruled the country since independence as being A Grade crooks to come to power with a record majority they couldn’t have even dreamt of knowing their sordid past. The trick was to repeat a lie long enough with the help of Western funded international and local NGO quislings and the gullible masses believed it.

Amidst a furore over the UNP allegation that the Army conspired to assassinate Wickremesinghe, Army operatives blew up a truck behind enemy lines killing five LTTE cadres on Dec. 11, 2001. Then again, they destroyed an LTTE bunker, at the entrance to a base used by Karuna, in the Kokkadicholai area, on Dec. 21, 2001.

Although the Army had conducted a successful small group operation in the Batticaloa District, targeting a key LTTE operative identified as David, way back in 1992, there was no attempt on the part of the military to develop the capability further. But some officers had been keen to promote small group operations to weaken the LTTE and beat it at its own game.

Commenting on the elimination of David, a veteran in clandestine operations told the writer of the deep penetrations ops: “Three personnel took part in the targeted killing of David. They returned to base after achieving the given task. Such operations caused chaos in enemy territory which gave us the psychological advantage over them. We knew of the importance as well as the need to strike within the enemy-controlled areas, though a special strategy on clandestine operations was adopted only in 2001, almost a decade after the hit on David.”

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the soft-spoken official explained the circumstances under which the Army launched deep penetration units soon after one-time Director of the DMI Lionel Balagalle had been appointed Commander of the Army.

Balagalle couldn’t resist the temptation to explore the possibility of infiltrating areas outside government controlled regions to launch attacks. “It was a tremendous task. Those who volunteered to join the operation realised the risks they were taking. They were among the best and they courageously adopted the new doctrine, which enabled us to carry out targeted killings. It was nothing but a high risk operation, though it produced results. They had to curtail their movements, particularly in the Eastern Province, where we used Batticaloa as the centre of our operations.”

Then Brigadier Kapila Hendarawithana executed the operation in his capacity as Director of DMI.

The LTTE realised the danger. Within months after the launch of the first DMI raid in the Batticaloa District, the LTTE pushed for the suspension of the DMI operation. The February 23, 2002 Ceasefire Agreement (CFA), arranged by the Norwegians, included a clause which specifically dealt with DMI action. The CFA called for the suspension of operations behind LTTE lines. While the LTTE had been successful in its negotiations with the Norwegians and the then inept UNP government with Executive President Chandrika Kumaratunga reduced to more or less a figurehead, the DMI suffered a debilitating setback when that regime with hardly any feelings for our valiant fighting men risking their lives day and night, ordered a police raid on an Army safe-house used by a deep penetration team at Athurugiriya.

The UNP-led United National Front (UNF) emerged victorious at the Dec. 5, 2001 general election with 109 seats, while the defeated PA managed to secure 77 seats. The remaining seats were shared by the JVP (16), the TNA (15), the SLMC (5), the EPDP (2) and the DPLF (01).

Balgalle on ops behind enemy lines

It had been one of the bloodiest elections with the five-week campaign claiming the lives of almost 50 people, with the polls day massacre of a group of SLMC supporters at Udathalawinna being the single worst incident. This massacre carried out by troops attached to the Vijayaba Infantry Regiment (VIR) who had been brought to Kandy at the behest of de facto Defence Minister Anuruddha Ratwatte was used as an excuse by a vindictive UNP leadership to order the raid on the safe house used by the DMI situated at Millennium City, Athurugiriya, on Jan. 2, 2002, which changed the course of the conflict. The UNF cited intelligence reports that Anuruddha Ratwatte’s sons, wanted in connection with the Udathalawinna massacre, were taking refuge at Athurugiriya.

Had the UNP leadership been a little cautious, it would never have publicly accused the Army of an assassination plot. Lt. Gen. Balagalle discussed the issues at hand with the writer. Operating hit squads behind enemy lines had been a key element in the Army’s strategy to give it a taste of its own medicine, the Army chief said at that time, alleging the then Opposition had failed to grasp what was going on. The Island quoted Lt. Gen. Balagalle as having said: “Had they quietly raised the issue with us and sought a clarification without playing politics with national security, the Athurugiriya fiasco could have been averted. Even ex-LTTE cadres were brought in for operations along with valuable input from civilian informants. We were successful due to many reasons such as training from Pakistani instructors. We also accommodated troops from other fighting battalions to engage in operations behind enemy lines, though the Special Forces and Army Commandos spearheaded the campaign.”

At the time troops had been undergoing training in Pakistan, Balagalle functioned as Security Forces Commander, Jaffna.

The Athurugiriya raid ruptured relations between the UNP and the Army. It caused irreparable damage to national security. At the behest of the UNP, a section of the media, including the Colombo-based correspondents working for international news agencies, highlighted the Athurugiriya raid speculating the Army’s alleged involvement in anti-government activities. Investigating officers alleged that those who had been based at Athurugiriya were involved in the alleged attempt to assassinate Wickremesinghe. Subsequently, the DMI was accused of planning attacks in the city and its suburbs to sabotage the Norwegian-led peace process.

The UNP allegations had the desired impact in the wake of state television showing recovered items, which included 66 sets of LTTE uniforms, four thermobaric weapons, seven claymore mines each weighing 10 kgs, 10 claymore mines, each weighing one kg each, three T-56 assault rifles along with 400 rounds of ammunition, 10 anti-tank weapons, detonators, cyanide capsules, exploders, remote controlled devices and wire rolls.

While a section of the media lashed out at the Army, in a front-page exclusive headlined ‘Controversy over police raid on army officers Millennium City residence,’ on Jan 4, 2002, The Island revealed that a police team from Kandy, led by die-hard UNP loyalist, Kulasiri Udugampola, had raided an Army safe house. The raid also involved a team of CCMP (Ceylon Corps of Military Police).

In spite of both Lt. Gen. Balagalle and the then Director of DMI, Brigadier Kapila Hendawitharana (later served as Chief of National Intelligence, before quitting in 2015) reassuring the government of the legitimacy of operations undertaken by the DMI, the police was let loose on covert operatives. Regardless of Balagalle rushing Hendarawithana, who later figured in many controversies to the scene, Udugampola went ahead with the raid. The police had obtained permission from courts to search the premises.

Udugampola had the backing of the then Interior Minister, John Amaratunga. IGP Lucky Kodituwakku, though being convinced of the legitimacy of the DMI operation, couldn’t do anything. He was helpless.

Army takes firm stand

The Kandy police raided the safe house shortly after the officer-in-charge of the DMI operation had handed over part of their arsenal. Those involved in the hit-and-run operations in LTTE held-areas had returned to Colombo on Dec. 27, 2001, in the wake of the Wickremesinghe administration declaring its readiness to go ahead with a Norwegian initiative to sign a one-sided CFA clearly favourable to the LTTE. The Kandy police also accused the Army of planting two claymore mines targeting a UNP candidate along the Wattegama-Panwila road, in the run-up to the Dec. 5, 2001 polls.

The then security forces spokesman, Brig. Sanath Karunaratne emphasised that those who operated from Athurugiriya were involved in ‘Army duties’ (The Island Jan. 4, 2002). Regardless of protests by the Army, those arrested were taken away to the Narahenpita CMP headquarters before being transferred to Kandy. They were treated like criminals and held under humiliating conditions. Six of them, including an officer, were held in one room. For two weeks, the media reported all sorts of conspiracy theories.

Let me stress that the Athurugiriya betrayal, in a way divided the Army. An influential section of the Army obviously cooperated with the conspirators.

Those who had been arrested were held for almost two weeks before being granted bail. The police raid would never have been possible without an influential section within the Army cooperating with the political establishment to undermine a vital operation, which brought the LTTE under immense pressure.

The UNP and the police justified Udugampola’s raid. Asked whether he had used the safe house to accommodate his sons, one-time Defence chief, Anuruddha Ratwatte, candidly acknowledged that he hadn’t been among those who knew of the existence of that particular rear base, though the Army kept him informed of operations undertaken by the DMI. (Feb. 1 issue of The Island, 2002)

Marapana to the rescue

Then Defence Minister, Tilak Marapana, a one-time Attorney General, to his credit did not play politics with such an important issue and thwarted an attempt by the Kandy police to prolong the detention of DMI operatives using the provisions of the PTA to please their then political masters in the UNP. The bid to neutralize the DMI was made ahead of the signing of the CFA. The Wickremesinghe administration didn’t even bother to consult the armed forces and police top brass regarding the provisions of the agreement. Then Navy Commander, Vice Admiral Daya Sandagiri told the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) how then Defence Secretary, Austin Fernando, had bypassed them with regard to sensitive military issues.

Fernando, in an article captioned ‘The Peace Process and Security Issues’ (Negotiating Peace in Sri Lanka: Efforts, Failures and Lessons) admitted that the refusal on the part of the then government to consult the military had been a failure. Fernando said (page 42): “The military chiefs weren’t consulted in the drafting of the CFA. Of course, a casual opportunity was given to them to discuss the draft with Ministers of Defence (Tilak Marapana) and Constitutional Affairs (Prof. G.L. Peiris). This wasn’t considered adequate by them as they didn’t get an opportunity to discuss the CFA with their senior officers”.

The CFA declared that ACTIVITIES BY DEEP PENETRATION UNITS should be ceased along with the cessation of all military action. The LTTE wouldn’t have demanded a ban on DMI operations unless the group acknowledged the growing threat posed by DMI. The LTTE had been vulnerable to those hunting them in their own backyard. Obviously, the LTTE wouldn’t have bothered about the DMI had the latter been stalking Wickremesinghe in the run-up to the Dec. 2001 polls.

Retired Senior DIG Merril Gunaratne, who had been Defence Advisor to Wickremesinghe during the CFA, exposed the UNP leadership in his ‘COP IN THE CROSSFIRE.’ The first book of its kind, written by one-time Director General of Intelligence, revealed how the top UNP leadership took security issues lightly at the expense of the country as well as the party. Asked whether he had been involved in the operation to move the Kandy police against the DMI, Gunaratne told the writer at that time he categorically opposed the move. “I was convinced the PA government wouldn’t target Wickremesinghe, thereby allowing the UNP to benefit from the sympathy vote. Unfortunately, Wickremesinghe and his top advisors felt the Army was hell bent on destroying the UNP.”

Ex-LTTE’s among the slain

The Athurugiriya raid had a catastrophic impact on the armed forces, which experienced untold hardships due to miscalculations on the part of political and military leaders. Following the betrayal of the DMI, the LTTE unleashed a series of operations in the city, its suburbs and in the Eastern Province. Altogether, over 50 military personnel, Tamil informants as well as ex-LTTE cadres working for the Army, died at the hands of the LTTE as their identities were revealed owing to the raid on the army safe house. Wijayanadan Widyatharan, alias Vidya, of Sea Road, Navakkudah, was the first operative killed by the LTTE after exposure of the Athurugiriya operation. Vaidya was abducted on January 20, 2002, over two weeks after the raid.

The dead included two senior military officers, both killed in Colombo. Although the two military officials, holding the rank of Major and Colonel could have been on a hit list, regardless of the Athurugiriya fiasco, the LTTE exploited the situation to demoralise the Army. Daring operations directed at the DMI and police intelligence helped boost the LTTE’s image. The military was placed in an unenviable position as the suspension of the PTA effectively neutralised counter-measures directed at LTTE hit squads.

Inspector Dale Gunaratne, the then President of the Police Inspectors’ Association, was perhaps the only law enforcement officer publicly critical of the UNP’s response to the LTTE threat. (Having retired years ago, Gunaratne now serves as an Attorney-at-Law) Although his superiors reacted angrily, Gunaratne lashed out at the government for allowing the LTTE to exploit the CFA to its advantage. Citing the killing of Inspector Thabrew at the Dehiwela Police Station, in July 2003, IP Gunaratne alleged that the suspension of the PTA in keeping with the CFA was nothing but a grievous threat to those fighting terrorism. He kept on lambasting the UNP and his own superiors for not taking action to neutralise the LTTE threat. But the UNP was determined to salvage the crumbling peace process at any cost. For those at the helm of the government, the lives of security forces and police didn’t matter, as long as they believed the LTTE would remain in the negotiating process. Politicians felt whatever the provocations, the peace process should continue.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Universal in a Catastrophe

Published

on

Survivors of the South-East Asian tragedy,

Triggered by nature’s stern promptings,

Somehow reining-in suffocating sorrow,

Are leaving no unhinged stone unturned,

To salvage the remains of those held dear,

In fresh testimony of love’s staying power,

But it speaks well for the untouched majority,

That unstinted succor is pouring in,

To render some solace to the hapless,

Although no amount of fellow feeling,

Could make up for the wrenching sorrow,

Of parting from a priceless presence.

By Lynn Ockersz

Continue Reading

Midweek Review

Batalanda and complexities of paramilitary operations

Published

on

Former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recent combative ‘Head-to-Head’ interview with British-American Mehdi Hasan on Al Jazeera has opened a can of worms. As to why Hasan raised the Batalanda Presidential Commission report, during a 49-minute interview conducted at the London’s Conway Hall, with a clearly pro LTTE audience, remains a mystery. This must be yet another notorious way to show how even-handed they are as in the case of its coverage of Russia, China, Palestine or Ukraine for their gullible viewers.

Recorded in February and aired in March 2025, the interview is definitely the most controversial the UNP leader, who is also an Attorney-at-Law, ever faced during his political career; always used to getting kid glove treatment, especially after taking over the party in 1994.

The continuing public discourse on Batalanda should provoke a wider discussion on Sri Lanka’s response to separatist Tamil terrorism, since the cold blooded murder of Jaffna SLFP Mayor Alfred Duriappah, which signalled the beginning of the LTTE terror campaign that ended in May 2009 with the crushing military defeat of the Tigers on the banks of the Nathikadal lagoon, as well as two southern insurgencies in 1971 and 1987-1990.

As Nandana Gunatilleke (one time JVP General Secretary and ex-MP), Dr. Wasantha Bandara (ex-JVPer and close associate of the slain JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera), Indrananda de Silva (ex-JVPer, incumbent Central Committee member of Frontline Socialist Party [FSP] and ex-military photographer) and Uvindu Wijeweera (Rohana Wijeweera’s son and leader of Dewana Parapura) agreed during the recent Hiru ‘Balaya’ discussion, conducted by Madushan de Silva, the Batalanda operation was in line with the overall counter-terrorist/insurgency strategy of the then government.

The issues at hand cannot be discussed at all without taking into consideration the JVP terrorism that, at one-time, almost overwhelmed the UNP’s unbroken rule, since 1977, carried out while openly brushing aside most of the universally accepted genuine parliamentary norms. The country’s second Republican constitution, promulgated by the UNP regime with a 5/6 majority in Parliament, in 1978, had been amended no less than 13 times by the time they were finally ousted in 1995. This was mainly to facilitate their continuous rule. Unfortunately, all stakeholders have sought to take advantage of Batalanda, thereby preventing a proper dialogue. Quite surprisingly, none of the guests, nor the interviewer, bothered, at least, to make a reference to the JVP bid on President J.R. Jayewardene’s life in Parliament on the morning of July 18, 1987. At the time, JVPer Ajith Kumara, working in the House as a minor employee, hurled two hand grenades towards JRJ, with the then Prime Minister Ranasinghe Premadasa seated next to JRJ. While one government MP lost his life, several others suffered injuries, including then National Security Minister Lalith Athulathmudali, whose spleen had to be removed.

At one point, Gunatilleke declared that they assassinated UNP MP for Tangalle Jinadasa Weerasinghe on July 3, 1987, in response to the government killing well over 100 people, in Colombo, protesting against the signing of the Indo-Lanka accord on July 29, 1987. The parliamentarian was killed near the Barawakumbuka-Welangahawela bridge on the Colombo-Rathnapura-Embilipitiya Road. The UNPer was killed on his way home after having declined Premier Premadasa’s offer to make an SLAF chopper available for him to reach home safely.

Against the backdrop of MP Weerasinghe’s assassination and the grenade attack on the UNP parliamentary group that claimed the life of Keethi Abeywickrema (MP for Deniyaya), the government had no option but to respond likewise. The operation, established at the Batalanda Housing scheme of the State Fertiliser Corporation, constituted part of the counter-insurgency strategy pursued by the UNP.

Those who called Batalanda complex Batalanda torture camp/ wadakagaraya conveniently forgot during the second JVP inspired insurgency, the military had to utilize many public buildings, including schools, as makeshift accommodation for troops. Of course the UNP established Batalanda under different circumstances with the then Industries Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe providing political authority. Batalanda had been an exclusive police operation though the Army had access to it whenever a requirement arose.

Those who had been suddenly withdrawn from the Northern and Eastern Provinces, to meet the rapidly evolving security threat in the South, required accommodation. FSP CC member Indrananada de Silva had received unhindered access to Batalanda in his capacity as a military photographer and the rest is history.

As to why Indrananda de Silva switched his allegiance to the FSP should be examined, taking into consideration his previous role as a trusted military photographer, formerly a Lance Corporal of the Military Police. An influential section of the JVP, led by Kumar Gunaratnam, formed the FSP in April 2012 though it didn’t receive the much anticipated public support. Both Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke, who aligned himself with the UNP, found fault with the JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) over its handling of the Batalanada issue.

Paramilitary operations

Paramilitary operations had been an integral part of the overall counter-insurgency campaign, directed at the JVP responsible for approximately 6,600 killings. Among those death squads were PRRA primarily drawn from the SLMP (Sri Lanka Mahajana Party) and SRRA (the socialist Revolutionary Red Army). PRRA had close links with the Independent Student Union (ISU) whose leader Daya Pathirana was slain by the JVP. The vast majority of people do not remember that Daya Pathirana, who led the ISU during the turbulent 1985-1986 period, was killed mid-Dec. 1989. The second insurgency hadn’t started at that time though the JVP propagated the lie that they took up arms against the UNP government following the signing of the Indo-Lanka peace accord on July 29, 1987.

In addition to PRRA and SRRA, the government made use of paramilitary groups, namely Kalu balallu, Ukkusso, Rajaliyo, Kaha balallu, Kola koti, Rathu Makaru, Mapila, Gonussa, Nee, Keshara Sinhayo, Le-mappillu and Kalu koti.

The UNP also involved some elements of Indian trained Tamil groups (not of the LTTE) in paramilitary operations. Such operations, that had been backed by respective Cabinet Ministers, were supervised by local law enforcement authorities. Paramilitary operations had been in line with psychological warfare that was meant to cause fear among the JVP, as well as the general population. Military operations that had been combined with paramilitary actions received the blessings of the political leadership at the highest level. In the case of Batalanda (1988-1990) President J.R. Jayewardene and Ranasinghe Premadasa knew of its existence.

Even after the eradication of the top JVP leadership, by Nov. 1989, police, military and paramilitary operations continued unabated. Former JVPers appearing on ‘Balaya’ agreed that counter-insurgency operations were actually brought to an end only after D.B. Wijetunga succeeded President Ranasinghe Premadasa after the latter’s assassination on May Day 1993.

After the LTTE resumed war in June 1990, just a couple of months after the withdrawal of the Indian Army (July 1987-March1990), the UNP authorized paramilitary operations in the northern and eastern areas. Members of TELO, PLOTE, EPRLF as well as EPDP were made part of the overall government security strategy. They operated in large groups. Some paramilitary units were deployed in the Jaffna islands as well. And these groups were represented in Parliament. They enjoyed privileged status not only in the northern and eastern regions but Colombo as well. The government allowed them to carry weapons in the city and its suburbs.

These groups operated armed units in Colombo. The writer had the opportunity to visit EPDP and PLOTE safe houses in Colombo and its suburbs soon after they reached an understanding with President Ranasinghe Premadasa. Overnight at the behest of President Premadasa, the Election Department granted these Tamil groups political recognition. In other words, armed groups were made political parties. The Premadasa government accepted their right to carry weapons while being represented in Parliament.

It would be pertinent to mention that thousands of Tamil paramilitary personnel served the government during that period. There had been many confrontations between them and the LTTE over the years and the latter sought to eliminate key paramilitary personnel. Let me remind you of the circumstances, the EPRLF’s number 02 Thambirajah Subathiran alias Robert was sniped to death in June 2003. Robert was engaged in routine morning exercises on the top floor of the two-storeyed EPRLF office, on the hospital road, Jaffna, when an LTTE sniper took him out from the nearby Vembadi Girls’ high school. The operation of the Norway managed Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) made no difference as the LTTE removed Robert who led the party here in the absence of leader Varatharaja Perumal, the first and the only Chief Minister of the North-Eastern Province.

In terms of the CFA that had been signed by Premier Ranil Wickremesinghe and LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, in Feb. 2002, the government agreed to disarm all paramilitary personnel. Many wouldn’t remember now that during Premadasa’s honeymoon with the LTTE, the Army facilitated the LTTE onslaught on paramilitary groups in selected areas.

Muthaliff’s role

During the ‘Balaya’ discussion, the contentious issue of who shot JVP leader Rohana Wijeweera came up. Nandana Gunatilleke, who contested the 1999 Dec. presidential election. as the JVP candidate, pointing to an article carried in the party organ that dealt with Wijeweera’s assassination said that he wrongly named Gaffoor as one of the persons who shot their leader whereas the actual shooter was Muthaliff. The headline named Thoradeniya and Gaffoor as the perpetrators.

Declaring that he personally wrote that article on the basis of information provided by Indrananda de Silva, Gunatilleke named Asoka Thoradeniya and Tuan Nizam Muthaliff of the Army as the perpetrators of the crime. Thoradeniya served as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner in the Maldives during the Yahapalana administration, while Muthaliff was killed by the LTTE in Colombo in late May 2005. The shooting took place at Polhengoda junction, Narahenpita. Muthaliff was on his way from Manning town, Narahenpita, to the Kotelawala Defence University.

The programme was told that the JVP had over the years developed close relationship with Thoradeniya while Indrananda de Silva accused Dr. Wasantha Bandara of duplicity regarding Muthaliff. How could you recognize Muthaliff, slain by the LTTE, as a war hero as he was actually one of the persons who shot Rohana Wijeweera, the latter asked.

At the time of his assassination, Muthaliff served as the Commanding Officer, 1 st Regiment Sri Lanka Military Intelligence Corps. The then parliamentarian Wimal Weerawansa was among those who paid last respects to Maj. Muthaliff.

At the time of Rohana Wijeweera’s arrest, Muthaliff served as Lieutenant while Thoradeniya was a Major. Indrananda de Silva strongly stressed that atrocities perpetrated by the police and military in the South or in the northern and eastern regions must be dealt with regardless of whom they were conducting operations against. The former JVPer recalled the Army massacre in the east in retaliation for the landmine blast that claimed the lives of Northern Commander Maj. Gen. Denzil Kobbekaduwa and a group of senior officers, including Brigadier Wijaya Wimalaratne, in early Aug. 1990 in Kayts.

Dr. Wasantha Bandara warned of the Western powers taking advantage of what he called false narrative to push for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

It would be pertinent to mention that the LTTE also used the underworld as well as some corrupt Army personnel in planning high profile assassinations. Investigations into the assassination of Muthaliff, as well as Maj. Gen. Parami Kulatunga, killed in a suicide attack at Pannipitiya, in June 2006, revealed the direct involvement of military personnel with the LTTE.

Indrananda de Silva disclosed that soon after Anura Kumara Dissanayake won the presidential election last September, the FSP, in writing, requested the JVP leader to inquire into killings during that period, including that of Rohana Wijeweera. The FSPer alleged that President Dissanayake refrained from even acknowledging their letter. Indrananda de Silva emphasized that Al Jazeera never disclosed anything new as regards Batalanda as he exposed the truth years ago. The former JVPer ridiculed the ruling party tabling the Batalanda Commission report in the wake of Wickremesinghe’s Al Jazeera interview whereas the matter was in the public domain for quite some time.

Indrananda de Silva and Nandana Gunatilleke exchanged words over the latter’s declaration that the JVP, too, was subjected to investigation for violence unleashed during the 1987-1990 period. While the FSPer repeatedly declared that those who carried out directives issued by the party were arrested and in some cases killed, Nandana Gunatilleke took up the position that the party should be held accountable for crimes perpetrated during that period.

The interviewer posed Nandana Gunatilleke the question whether he was betraying his former comrades after joining the UNP. Nandana Gunatilleke shot back that he joined the UNP in 2015 whereas the JVP joined UNP as far back as 2009 to promote retired Army Chef Sarath Fonseka’s presidential ambition even though he wiped out the JVP presence in Trincomalee region during the second insurgency.

JVP’s accountability

Nandana Gunatilleke is adamant that the party should accept responsibility for the killings carried out at that time. The former JVPer declared that Vijaya Kumaratunga (Feb. 16, 1988), first Vice Chancellor of the Colombo University (March 08, 1989) Dr. Stanley Wijesundera, Ven. Kotikawatte Saddhatissa thera (Aug. 03, 1988) and Chairperson of the State Pharmaceutical Corporation Gladys Jayewardene (Sept. 12, 1989) were among those assassinated by the JVP. SPC Chairperson was killed for importing medicine from India, the former Marxist aligned with the UNP said, while actor-turned-politician Kumaratunga’s assassination was attributed to his dealings with President J.R. Jayewardene.

According to Nandana Gunatilleke, except for a few killings such as General Secretaries of the UNP Harsha Abeywickrema (Dec 23, 1987) and Nandalal Fernando (May 20, 1988), the vast majority of others were ordinary people like grama sevakas killed on mere accusation of being informants. The deaths were ordered on the basis of hearsay, Nandana Gunatilleke said, much to the embarrassment of others who represented the interest of the JVP at that time.

One quite extraordinary moment during the ‘Balaya’ programme was when Nandana Gunatilleke revealed their (JVP’s) direct contact with the Indian High Commission at a time the JVP publicly took an extremely anti-Indian stance. In fact, the JVP propagated a strong anti-Indian line during the insurgency. Turning towards Dr. Wasantha Bandara, Gunatilleke disclosed that both of them had been part of the dialogue with the Indian High Commission.

It reminds me of the late Somawansa Amarasinghe’s first public address delivered at a JVP rally in late Nov. 2001 after returning home from 12 years of self-imposed exile. Of the top JVP leadership, Somawansa Amarasinghe, who had been married to a close relative of powerful UNP Minister Sirisena Cooray, was the only one to survive combined police/military/paramilitary operations.

Amarasinghe didn’t mince his words when he declared at a Kalutara rally that his life was saved by Indian Premier V.P. Singh. Soft spoken Amarasinghe profusely thanked India for saving his life. Unfortunately, those who discuss issues at hand conveniently forget crucial information in the public domain. Such lapses can be both deliberate and due to negligence.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

Trending