Connect with us

News

Engineers’ union guns for CEB spokesman over his comments on live TV show

Published

on

Noel Priyantha (CEB) media spokesman

by Ifham Nizam

The Ceylon Electricity Board Engineers’ Union (CEBEU) yesterday expressed displeasure at some comments made by CEB Media Spokesman during a live telecast called ‘Big Focus’ on the Derana Television Channel on Tuesday (February 20, 2024).

CEBEU Joint Secretary Buddika Wijeyawardhna said: “We urged the General Manager of the CEB to clarify the stance of the CEB in this regard and immediately issue an official statement apologising to the general public and, especially, to the children,”

The Union believes that the comments made about electricity consumers and the public of Sri Lanka by the Media Spokesperson of the CEB are extremely horrendous and outrageous, and severely damaging the image of the Ceylon Electricity Board and the GoSL.

“As such, we demand your immediate attention to the following disgraceful statements made by the spokesperson of the CEB among other unprofessional comments.

1) He confirmed that he was talking not only as the media spokesperson but as a mix of being a unionist and the spokesperson of the CEB.

2) He deliberately labelled the poor people who work in the tea estates as drunkards and they live gratifying lives.

3) He said electricity is not needed for the education of the children and urged them to use kerosene lamps as he did in his past.

4) He accused the dead father, in Badulla, of being a drunkard, who unfortunately lost his life trying to get an electricity connection from a neighbouring house, so his children could study at night due to his supply disconnection, due to non-payment.

5) He said that he has personally connected 750 MW of Mini Hydro Power Plants, whereas in Sri Lanka we presently have around 430 MW of such Mini Hydro Power Plants

6) He criticized a retired AGM of the CEB for following what has been in an Act of Parliament and which has been clarified by the Attorney General as well

7) He openly challenged to give him the AGM post of Renewable, and if so, he’ll take action to pass all the renewable projects within a month.

We believe that under the rules of disciplinary procedure of the CEB, this misconduct can be categorized as a major offence as per clauses 2, 8, 14 and 20 under the list of major offences in Schedule A. In our opinion, unless the appropriate actions are taken immediately in this regard, this will set a very bad example to all the other employees of the CEB, as well.

Further, we wish to bring to your notice that the CEB Board has decided that employees who hold positions of unions cannot work in specific workplaces in the CEB even violating labour rights of such employees and yet we are surprised to see that this particular person has been allowed to hold the post of media spokesperson when it’s evident that he is abusing that title.”

We believe that it’s your duty as the General Manager of the CEB to clarify the stance of the CEB in this regard and immediately issue an official statement apologizing to the general public and, especially to the children, regarding the disgraceful comments made by the media spokesperson of the CEB. If not, the public may assume that what’s been told by the media spokesperson is the stance of the CEB.

“As a professional trade union representing the engineers at the CEB, we denounced these repulsive and shameful remarks and demanded an immediate explanation from the CEB management regarding the official position and acceptance of these remarks. We also wish to categorically refute all of the false statements made by the aforementioned media spokesperson, including the remarks made about the engineering professionals of the CEB”.

The Union also said that under the rules of disciplinary procedure of the CEB, this misconduct can be categorized as a major offence and demanded appropriate disciplinary actions.

The Joint Secretary added that even though the CEB Board has decided that employees who hold positions of unions cannot work in specific workplaces in the CEB even violating labour rights of such employees and to our surprise this particular person has been allowed to hold the post of media spokesperson when it’s evident that he is abusing that title.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

70,297 persons still in safety centers

Published

on

By

The Situation Report issued by the Disaster Management Center at 06:00AM on 16th December 2025 shows that 70,297 persons belonging to 22,338 house holds are still being housed at 731 safety centers established by the government.

The number of deaths due to the recent disastrous weather  stands at 643 while 183 persons are missing.

Continue Reading

News

MEPA to crack down on marine polluters

Published

on

… Warns would-be polluters of criminal prosecution, hefty fines and even blacklisting

The Marine Environment Protection Authority (MEPA) has warned that ship owners, operators and local entities responsible for marine pollution will face criminal prosecution, heavy financial penalties and possible blacklisting, MEPA Chairman Samantha Gunasekera said yesterday.

Gunasekera told The Island that Sri Lanka would no longer tolerate negligence and regulatory breaches that threaten the country’s marine ecosystems, coastal livelihoods and national economy.

“Any party that pollutes our seas—whether foreign vessels or local operators—should be prepared to face the full force of the law,” Gunasekera said. “There will be no room for excuses, delays or backdoor negotiations when marine pollution is involved.”

He said MEPA has intensified surveillance of major shipping routes, ports and environmentally sensitive zones amid rising maritime traffic through Sri Lankan waters, which remain among the busiest in the Indian Ocean.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

News

SC delegation, headed by CJ Surasena, observes Indian Supreme Court in action

Published

on

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, with Indian judicial officials

A 10-member delegation from Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, departed to New Delhi on the 11th of December, 2025, for an official visit to the Supreme Court of India as part of the ongoing official visit by the delegation to India.

The group was accorded a ceremonial welcome in the Court’s main hall, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant. CJI Kant told the assembled Judges that “the Indian judiciary was honoured to host” their Sri Lankan counterparts, expressing hope that the visit would be “meaningful and very constructive” and underscoring the “close emotional bonds” between the two countries.

The focal point of the programme was a special sitting of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Surasena joined CJI Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi on the bench, presiding over the Court as a guest Justice. He was accompanied by nine other Supreme Court justices from Sri Lanka, who took seats in the well of CJI Kant’s courtroom to observe the day’s proceedings.

Supreme Court Bar Association President Vikas Singh formally greeted the delegation and praised Justice Surasena’s reformist efforts. Singh recalled the Sri Lankan Chief Justice’s own maxim, “If you want something you have never had, then you have got to do something you have never done”, highlighting the bold changes Surasena had introduced to modernise Sri Lanka’s Court system. Singh noted that these initiatives, particularly court digitization, were aimed at eradicating “the persisting problems of law delays” and streamlining case backlogs.

The Sri Lankan Judges spent the morning observing live Supreme Court proceedings in CJI Kant’s courtroom. This first-hand exposure to Indian court operations formed a key part of the programme’s judicial engagement. During the hour-long session, the visiting justices witnessed a range of cases on the Supreme Court’s roster, with Justice Surasena and the delegation following arguments from the front. The experience was designed to be immersive and following the hearing the Sri Lankan Judges were briefed on India’s own initiatives towards a digitalised court system, e-filing and case management systems.

The official programme then shifted to capacity-building and information exchange. In the early afternoon, Indian Supreme Court officials gave the Sri Lankan delegation detailed briefings on India’s technological initiatives. Court registrars demonstrated the e-filing system and other e-initiatives implemented by the Supreme Court of India. Additional presentations outlined the Court’s new case management systems and administrative reforms. These sessions highlighted how digital tools and better case-listing procedures have been used in India to increase efficiency. The Sri Lankan judges asked questions about India’s experience with electronic court records and the integration of technology in daily judicial work, reflecting their own interest in similar reforms back home.

The visit underscored the growing collaboration between the Indian and Sri Lankan judiciaries. Throughout the proceedings, both sides emphasised their shared legal traditions and mutual respect. As Chief Justice Surasena noted during the sitting, India is Sri Lanka’s “closest neighbour,” and historic links, even dating back to ancient epics, form the backdrop for today’s judicial dialogue. CJI Kant remarked that having the chief justices of two vibrant democracies together on the bench was a “significant moment” for the rule of law.

The Sri Lankan delegation continued its programme in Delhi on 12 December with a visit to the Delhi High Court and its International Arbitration and Mediation Centres. The exchange visit is expected to deepen judicial cooperation and provide practical insights for both courts. Officials on both sides say the engagement aimed at sharing best practices in court administration, reinforce legal ties and support ongoing reforms aimed at reducing case backlogs and delays.

Continue Reading

Trending