Connect with us

News

EC can’t verify citizenship of candidates: Ratnayake

Published

on

Saman Sri Ratnayake

By Rathindra Kuruwita

The Elections Commission (EC) was in no position to determine whether a candidate is a citizen of another country, Commissioner General of Elections, Saman Sri Ratnayake said yesterday. He said so when he was asked why the EC had not been able to find out that Diana Gamage was a British citizen when the SJB filed nominations in 2020.

Ratnayake added that the nomination board appointed by the Commission only had a very short period of time to verify information given on the day of nominations.

“The board usually has a few hours to verify everything. They only look at a few things, i.e., whether the candidate has signed the nomination papers, whether the party has signed them, whether a JP has certified details of a candidate, etc.,” he said.

Those on the nomination boards could not even independently verify the signatures of candidates, Ratnayake said.

“Even if another party objects saying a candidate is a citizen of another country, there is nothing we can do. How could we determine this? Only courts can look into such claims and make decisions.”

Ratnayake said the EC also did not inquire into the citizenship of the office-bearers of a political party.

The laws only prohibited non Sri Lankans contesting certain elections and holding certain positions, he said. “Political parties belong to their members. The Election Commission plays no role in the internal affairs of political parties. When office-bearers are appointed, we only look at whether that has been done according to the Constitution of a party.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Patient raped in Tellippalai hospital ward

Published

on

Tellippalai hospital staff have handed over a minor worker who is alleged to have raped a 35-year-old woman receiving treatment at the Tellippalai hospital.

Jaffna sources said that the incident happened on the night of 11 March. The patient had been warded at ward number 3 to undergo some tests and the alleged rape took place in that ward.

Continue Reading

News

Govt. calls for action against ex-Speaker

Published

on

Bimal

By Saman Indrajith

Leader of the House and Transport Minister Bimal Ratnayake yesterday called on Speaker Jagath Wickramaratne to look into the possibility of taking action against the former Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, former Deputy Speaker Ajith Rajapaksa, and former Deputy Chairman of Committees Angajan Ramanathan for alleged excessive use of vehicles and fuel during their tenures.

Ratnayake said that following his exposure on 23 February, regarding the cost of fuel, vehicle use, electricity and water bills of former Speaker Abeywardena, the latter had issued a statement denying the matters exposed.

“As such, I believe it is my duty to further clarify the situation. In February 2023, I tabled some documents to support my claims. Today, I am tabling documents certified by the Director of Finance of Parliament, G. Sarath Kumara, detailing the costs incurred by Abeywardena, Deputy Speaker Rajapaksa, and former Deputy Chairman of Committees Ramanathan during the years 2022, 2023, and the first nine months of 2024,” Ratnayake said.

“For the first nine months of 2024, from 01 January to 30 September, former Speaker Abeywardena used nine vehicles and spent Rs. 34 million on fuel. Deputy Speaker Rajapaksa used six vehicles and spent Rs. 13 million on fuel, while former Deputy Chairman of Committees Ramanathan used four vehicles, incurring a cost of Rs. 7.2 million on fuel.

“For the 12 months from 01 January, 2023, to 31 December, 2023, Abeywardena used eight vehicles and spent Rs. 26 million on fuel. Deputy Speaker Rajapaksa used six vehicles and spent Rs. 14 million on fuel, while DCC Ramanathan used four vehicles and spent Rs. 7.8 million on fuel.

“This is the people’s money, and we must be accountable to the people. We are obligated to give an account to the people.

“Today, I also table some documents on the use of electricity, water, and food by Abeywardena during these years to be included in the Hansard.

“The documents I am tabling today have been certified by the Finance Director of Parliament. I request the Speaker to call for an audit or investigate the possibility of acting against these individuals,” Ratnayake said.

Continue Reading

News

Top management of DMT rapped, clarification on illegal vehicle registration demanded

Published

on

Top management of the Department of Motor Traffic (DMT) before the Committee on Public Accounts (COPA). Pic courtesy Parliament

The top management of the Department of Motor Traffic (DMT) has claimed that they didn’t have relevant information when the Committee of Public Accounts (COPA) recently questioned them regarding illegal vehicle registrations that had taken place, prior to the integration with the Customs computer system.

Having rapped the DMT for failing to address specific concerns raised by the Auditor General with regard to such registrations, COPA declared that they would be called again. They were asked to come prepared, according a statement issued by Parliament yesterday.

The DMT management appeared before COPA on 10 March. MP Aravinda Senarath chaired the meeting, called to discuss the Auditor General’s reports for the years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, as well as the Department’s current performance.

During the meeting, the Committee inquired into the implementation of directives issued during previous meetings. In particular, the Auditor General had presented 25 observations regarding illegal vehicle registrations that had taken place prior to the integration with the Customs computer system. The Committee expected a report detailing the investigations conducted on these matters and the disciplinary actions taken against the responsible officials. However, the Auditor General pointed out that such a report had not been submitted.

Although the officials present claimed that a report had been provided, the Auditor General stated that he had not received it. A copy of the purported report was tabled during the session, but upon examination, the Auditor General informed the Committee that it was entirely unsatisfactory. As a result, the Committee conducted an extensive inquiry into the matter, but the officials failed to provide satisfactory responses. They stated that they did not possess the relevant information dating back.

Continue Reading

Trending