Editorial
Don’t ignore biomass
In the context of the prevailing cooking gas shortage which has assumed crisis proportions, the government caved in on Thursday permitting Laugfs Gas a substantial price increase while pledging that Litro will continue selling at the old price. This is not going to be possible for very long. Obviously consumers will opt for the cheaper alternative and the pressure on Litro, widely apparent with Laugfs out of stocks, will continue in the short term. As it is Litro is totally unable to cope with the demand with only a fraction of it met. As for Laugfs, “No Gas” labels have sprouted countrywide like mushrooms after the rain and television news bulletins are full of pictures of lines of blue cylinder-carrying consumers waiting for unavailable gas supplies. Laugfs has said that it hope to bring in stocks within a week, while the company’s chairman, Mr. W.J.H. Wegapitiya, has estimated that it will take about a month to bridge the supply gap.
But the chapter will not close even then. With cheaper supplies not get-table, consumers will be compelled to buy the more expensive alternative even reluctantly. But most Laugfs customers will not have Litro cylinders to get refilled. That problem exists even now. Obviously it is only a matter of time – really a matter of short time – before Litro too will be permitted to increase its prices. It, along with Laugfs, has for quite some time being pushing for a price increase. If the government compels a state-controlled company to sell at a loss, eventually the people as a whole must pay the price. It is impossible for any commercial venture to continue selling below procurement prices. However much Trade Minister Bandula Gunawardene keeps saying that businesses that have had good times must live with bad times, that’s not something that’s possible for long.
Although ours is a country notorious for the short memories of its people, many readers will remember there was a price difference in fuel between the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation and LIOC (Lanka Indian Oil Corporation) not so long ago. The difference was only a few rupees and LIOC obviously lost business to CPC. But the Indian company which is quoted on the Colombo Stock Exchange and has thousands of local shareholders did not care overmuch though their dealers did as it hurt their pockets. That was because the less diesel – particularly – LIOC sold, the better for the company because of the gap between procurement prices and the prices at which they were permitted to sell. Even now motorists may notice that the cheapest 92 octane petrol is not freely available at many filling stations because of what clearly appears to be an effort to push premium products.
It is in the gas shortage context that we draw attention to an article we run in today’s issue of our newspaper. Readers in urban centers will know that the once ubiquitous firewood carts seen on the streets are today almost as rare as the rickshaws of yore. This is because most urban dwellers cook by gas and the once popular dara lipa (firewood hearth) is now no more even in the least affluent homes in the towns. But this is not the case in rural areas where firewood continues to be used as a cooking fuel. The writer of the article under reference, Engineer R,M. Amarasekera, complains bitterly about the lack of attention to biomass in our energy scene which seems to only encompass solar, wind and hydro in the renewable sector and coal and fossil fuel in the non-renewable segment. This engineer who’s a retired as director of the Sustainable Energy Authority (SEA) and has extensive experience in biomass sees this as the “dark side” of the country’s energy sector.
Unlike those living in rural areas, urban dwellers cannot gather firewood and must depend mostly on gas. Today even the once popular kerosene stoves are a thing of the past and there is no talk whatever of the once encouraged energy saving clay stoves. According to Amarasekera, the biomass energy demand in the country ran at 46.2% followed by petroleum (41%) and electricity (12.3%). These are the figures published by the SEA’s ‘Energy Balance’ documentation of 2018, he says. According to these figures, biomass (64.9%) is the main source of energy in households and industry (74.7%). “This highlights its importance as the lifeblood of the rural sector comprising 81% of the total population,” he says adding that it is evident that the burden of meeting rural energy needs have been met by the rural people themselves led by women, and not by the government.
As with other energy sources, biomass has its own problems. Plantations firing tea factory boilers with firewood have woodlots but this is nowhere enough. Smoke inhalation is a problem though Amarasekera says that women who do the cooking in nearly all homes have a life expectancy of over 80 years. Other means of generating energy also have such problems. Solar panels that were expensive to begin with have since become more affordable. Thermal sources (coal, fossil fuel etc.) have enormous environmental consequences. Amarasekera attributes the negative image of biomass to be associated with factors like deforestation, climate change, under-development, poverty and negative health effects. That is correct. But his argument that this image steers policy makers against replacing other fuels with biomass, rather than improving its sustainability, rings a bell. This is certainly worth thinking about.
Editorial
A world order defined by sheer madness
Monday 2nd March, 2026
We are witnessing a new world order that is anything but rules-based. The US has once again demonstrated that might is right. Big powers have placed themselves above international law and reduced the UN to a mere spectator.
US President Donald Trump has graduated from abductions to assassinations in dealing for foreign leaders he considers hostile. The US and Israel seem to think they have succeeded in engineering a regime collapse in Iran by assassinating Supreme Iranian Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and scores of others in a series of air strikes on Saturday. Those killings must be condemned unreservedly. President Trump has audaciously claimed in a social media post that a wicked man was eliminated. The question is whether those who ordered Saturday’s air strikes, killing many Iranian civilians, including schoolgirls, can consider themselves any less wicked.
If history is anything to go by, air strikes alone cannot bring down long-established systems, and there is no guarantee that the toppling of a repressive regime always yields positive results and helps bring order out of chaos. Iraq and Libya may serve as examples. They remain fragmented and are in a far worse situation than they were under Saddam Hussain and Muammar Gadhafi respectively. The US and its allies plunged those two countries into anarchy in the name of eliminating repressive regimes.
The US and Israel are accused of waging a diversionary war for the benefit of President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both of them are facing scandals at home. Trump is troubled by a renewed scrutiny of the Epstein files and a Supreme Court judgment preventing him from imposing tariffs according to his whims and fancies. Netanyahu is facing bribery and fraud charges, and will be in serious trouble if voted out of power. He has to cling on to power at any cost. Fighting wars purportedly to save Israel seems to be the only way he thinks he can keep his political enemies at bay at home.
Iran has threatened to destroy Israel and the US, but its military capabilities are limited, as is known to military experts. It would never have taken on the US militarily or done anything fraught with the danger of triggering disproportionate military retaliation. It has been nowhere near developing nuclear weapons. The casus belli that Trump and Netanyahu used to attack Iran reminds us of the falsified intelligence dossiers President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair unashamedly produced in a bid to justify the invasion of Iraq. They said Saddam Hussain had stockpiled weapons of mass destruction, but they could not trace any.
The current Iranian regime, whose crackdown on protesters claimed thousands of lives, has weakened international opposition to US aggression significantly. However, some prominent Democrats have already condemned Trump’s bombing spree. U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin has pointed out that Trump’s military action is illegal in that according to the US Constitution, if the President wants to start a war, the Congress, elected by the people, needs to sign off on it. He has said the Senate needs to come back immediately to vote on Trump’s senseless and illegal bombings. The Republicans have defended Trump’s military aggression, claiming that it is in the interests of the Iranian people.
One can only hope that the US Congress and judiciary will make Trump act with restraint.
****
Adopt QR remedy
The escalation of the Middle East conflict has triggered panic buying of fuel in Sri Lanka. Long lines of vehicles could be seen near fuel stations in various parts of the country at the time of going to press. The Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC) had to step up fuel supply yesterday while claiming to have fuel stocks sufficient for more than one month and urging the public not to panic. The raging conflict is bound to affect the global fuel supply, and this is why Sri Lankans have panicked.
There is no reason to doubt the veracity of the CPC’s claim that it has sufficient fuel stocks, but panic buyers are impervious to reason. Unless hoarders are kept at bay, the CPC will run out of its stocks soon. One may recall that during the 2022 economic crisis, pumps ran dry at most filling stations mainly due to excessive hoarding. Rationing helped bring the situation under control.
The only way to stem the current wave of panic buying of fuel is to activate the QR-based fuel issuance system. Unless the government adopts that method forthwith and arrests panic buying, hoarders will have a field day and create a fuel shortage.
Editorial
Caught, released and caught again
Arumahandi Janith Madushanka de Silva alias Podi Lassi, a dangerous underworld character, who was arrested in India, was brought back to Sri Lanka yesterday. On watching his arrival at the BIA, Citizen Perera must have uttered the same words as Mr. Bumble in Oliver Twist: “The law is an ass”. Criminals are caught, released and caught again. Arresting an underworld figure is no walk in the park. It takes months of meticulous planning to nab powerful criminals protected by private armies. The crime busters who risk life and limb to track down criminals are demoralised when the suspects they arrest get bail and flee the country.
Podi Lasi was arrested in 2020 and detained in the Boossa high-security prison, together with some other dangerous criminals. He secured bail in 2024. It was obvious that he would flee the country. He played the victim card, claiming that the STF was planning to kill him. His lawyers even demanded that he be given protection. He disappeared soon afterwards, and no one was surprised.
Many an eyebrow was raised when Podi Lassi was enlarged on bail, for he had even issued death threats to the then President and the Defence Secretary. In 2020, while in detention, Podi Lasi and two other underworld characters known as Kosgoda Tharaka and Pitigala Keuma threatened to harm the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Defence Secretary General Kamal Gunaratne, and some senior prison officers. Podi Lassi bragged that his hit squads were capable of taking any target. Those who are charged with less serious offences than drug smuggling and underworld activities are denied bail in this country to prevent them from intimidating witnesses and fleeing overseas.
One may recall that a notorious drug dealer named Mohommad Najim Mohommad Imran alias Kanjipani Imran obtained bail in 2022. Everybody knew that he would flee the country, and he did so a couple of weeks later. The then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles claimed that some unscrupulous lawyers had facilitated Imran’s escape and that of another criminal called Ganemulle Sanjeewa. Imran had been arrested in Dubai together with Sri Lanka’s Napoleon of Crime, Samarasinghe Arachchige Madush Lakshitha alias Makandure Madush in 2019, and brought back to Colombo. Madush perished allegedly in a crossfire between the police and an underworld gang while in custody. Imran has been running his crime syndicate here from overseas. He is believed to have masterminded the murder of Wasantha Perera or Club Wasantha in 2024. Ganemulle Sanjeewa was gunned down inside a courtroom in Colombo in 2025.
Some underworld kingpins have turned this country into a narcotic hub, for all intents and purposes, if the sheer amounts of dangerous drugs frequently taken into custody are any indication. They are capable of killing anyone anywhere. A lawyer and his wife were gunned down near the defence headquarters complex, Akuregoda, recently.
It is public knowledge that whenever a drug czar is netted, a well-coordinated operation gets underway to secure his release, with lawyers, politicians, and some rogue elements in the police and other state institutions such as the Government Analyst’s Department springing into action. In September 2023, Nadun Chinthaka Wickremaratne alias Harak Kata almost escaped from the CID headquarters where he was detained and interrogated. If not for some vigilant STF personnel, his crime syndicate would have been able to launch a spectacular operation with the help of some commandos and spring him free. Salindu Malshitha alias Kudu Salindu, arrested with Harak Kata in Madagascar, and extradited to Sri Lanka in 2023 also fled the country after obtaining bail.
Sri Lanka’s anti-narcotic laws are characterised by glaring inadequacies that allow clever lawyers appearing for wealthy drug lords to drive a coach and horses through them. They have done so on numerous occasions much to the dismay of the police and the public. The need for laws with stronger teeth to deal with drug lords and other such criminals firmly and make this country safe for the ordinary citizens cannot be overemphasised.
Editorial
Contest of attrition in health sector
Saturday 28th February, 2026
The JVP-NPP government is practising the very antithesis of what it promised workers during its election campaigns. Pledging to look after workers’ interests, the JVP/NPP leaders said there would be no need for labour struggles under an NPP government. But they are now emulating their predecessors who mismanaged labour issues and suppressed trade unions.
The government has locked horns with the GMOA (Government Medical Officers’ Association). They are engaged in a contest of attrition, which is not likely to end any time soon, given the intransigence of both sides. The government is determined to wear down the GMOA, and vice versa. The warring doctors have withdrawn from health camps and outreach programmes and threatened to intensify their trade union action. One wonders whether the medical professionals in the NPP parliamentary group have sought to settle old scores with the GMOA, which they are not well disposed towards; instead of making a serious attempt to resolve the ongoing trade union dispute amicably, they keep on provoking the protesting doctors.
The GMOA has put forth several demands, including the establishment of a special service category called the “Sri Lanka Medical Service,” for all doctors, updating the Disturbance, Availability and Transport (DAT) allowance, resolving transportation issues in line with Circular 22/99, converting the additional duty allowance into a fixed allowance, resolving issues related to research allowances, addressing concerns of doctors engaged in postgraduate studies, updating the approved cadre of doctors in the health sector and initiating time-bound discussions with the Ministry of Finance on the doctors’ demands.
What is up the government’s sleeve is not difficult to guess. The JVP/NPP is all out to tame the trade union sector, which is strong enough to act as a countervailing force against it. The GMOA is one of the most powerful trade unions, and the government’s battle plan seems to be suppressing it in a bid to intimidate all others into submission. The JVP/NPP leaders have apparently learnt from how the LSSP, as a constituent of the SLFP-led United Front government, broke the bank employees’ strike in 1972. The J. R. Jayewardene government crushed a general strike in a brutal manner in July 1980 by sacking tens of thousands of strikers, and thereby effectively neutralised the trade union sector. All governments with steamroller majorities succumb to the arrogance of power, which drives them to ride roughshod over trade unions and professional associations that refuse to obey their dictates.
Opinion may be divided on the GMOA’s demands, and in fact it may not be possible to meet some of them for pecuniary reasons, but it defies comprehension why the government refuses to listen to the protesting doctors, and adopt a compromise formula. Political muscle flexing will only make an already bad situation far worse in the health sector. The government should not dupe itself into believing that tactics such as astroturfing and social media attacks will help tame trade unions.
Labour disputes tend to snowball and cause hardships to the public. Hence the need for swift action to resolve them. It behoves the government, which came to power, promising to look after the interests of workers, to invite the GMOA to the negotiating table and try to prevent the escalation of the ongoing dispute.
-
Opinion4 days agoJamming and re-setting the world: What is the role of Donald Trump?
-
Features4 days agoAn innocent bystander or a passive onlooker?
-
Features6 days agoBuilding on Sand: The Indian market trap
-
Features5 days agoRatmalana Airport: The Truth, The Whole Truth, And Nothing But The Truth
-
Opinion6 days agoFuture must be won
-
Business6 days agoDialog partners with Xiaomi to introduce Redmi Note 15 5G Series in Sri Lanka
-
Business5 days agoIRCSL transforms Sri Lanka’s insurance industry with first-ever Centralized Insurance Data Repository
-
Sports7 days agoCEA halts development at Mandativu grounds until EIA completion
