Features
Defeating Divisions: Making public university a place of cooperation
by Mahendran Thiruvarangan
We often perceive the public university as a space for intellectual inquiry and knowledge production. While our discussions generally revolve around the academic contribution made by universities and how the education they offer could be improved, we do not lay enough emphasis on the reality that universities are also spaces created out of work and labour and that the welfare and wellbeing of all those who work there is important to the functioning of the system. Sadly, our universities are riddled with divisions and hierarchies. They manifest, for instance, in the thinking among sections of academic staff that they are superior to their ‘non-academic’ colleagues, or the tendency for those who occupy the administrative rungs to impose new responsibilities on academic and non-academic staff without considering the massive workload they already contend with. Such thinking and actions turn the university into a site of conflict and hostility. Today’s edition of Kuppi Talk highlights the need to make the public university a space that nourishes collegiality and cooperation by reflecting upon the recent trade union action (TUA) by the non-academic staff and the failure of the academic staff to engage with this struggle in a spirit of cooperation and solidarity.
Elitism among the Academic Staff
The non-academics’ TUA, which lasted for more than two months, primarily demanded a wage hike in the context of the increasing cost of living in Sri Lanka. While many academics saw this as a reasonable demand, there was very little open support for this TUA by the academic community. In fact, many disparaging comments dismissive of this important struggle emerged from the academic staff who portrayed the TUA as unnecessary, aimlessly long-drawn-out and obstructive. Some academics even argued that it was an infringement on their right to work. A comment made at a press conference by the Federation of the University Teachers’ Association implied that the non-academic staff, when they put forward their demands, should not compare their demand for a hike in the Monthly Compensation Allowance to the demand made by the academic staff for a raise in their academic allowance. Such comments reveal a certain arrogance and elitism on the part of the academic staff. They fail to recognize not just the immense economic suffering that the IMF-driven debt re-structuring process has caused among the people of this country and but also why the welfare of the non-academic staff is necessary for universities to offer quality education.
The non-academic staff play a major role in keeping the public university system functioning. From keeping the classrooms clean to ensuring uninterrupted water supply, from maintaining the equipment in our laboratories to facilitating examinations, from preparing our salaries to organizing the graduation ceremonies, the non-academic staff play a central role in both the academic and non-academic activities of the university. It is because of these important roles they play that the university system came to a standstill for two months when the non-academic staff went on strike. If we had sincerely valued the contribution made by the non-academic staff to the university system or recognized why and how that contribution is indispensable to the academic work we do at the university, we would not have resorted to insulting their TUA or filed a lawsuit against them as happened at one university. Our condescending responses stemmed from our inability to understand the public university as a shared workspace.
The Crafty State
Trade unions are central to the functioning of democracy both within and outside the university system. At a time, when neoliberalization of the economy is happening at an accelerated pace and political repression is on the rise, trade unions should both protect their members and their rights while safeguarding their own existence as a collective. Such moments require increased cooperation and coordination, solidarity and dialogue within and across trade unions. The academic staff taking over responsibilities traditionally assigned to the non-academic staff without holding any prior discussion with the non-academic staff, as we witnessed during the recent TUA, is not a healthy practice. While this may be seen by the non-academic staff as a high-handed act on the part of academics, the state is likely to cite these moves in the future to argue that universities can function with minimal non-academic staff.
At a time when the state is promoting austerity as a solution to the current economic crisis, what we introduce as exigency measures with good intentions are likely to strengthen the state’s attempts to lay off its employees, postpone new recruitment, hire non-academic staff on a contractual basis and even reduce the non-academic carder positions drastically, as has been proposed at some universities. It will not only affect the livelihoods of many but also increase the workload of the academic staff and result in a decline in quality of the education we offer. Our thoughtless moves aimed at finding quick fixes may eventually strengthen the state’s attempts to privatize higher education and render state universities redundant. Therefore, we should have approached the TUA with empathy and caution.
One tried and tested strategy that the crafty state uses to cripple dissent and protest is to pit trade unions against one another. This divisive approach has helped the state maintain the status quo and unleash smear campaigns against those who question its unjust, authoritarian practices. The state divides the workers into two categories: the good, compliant ones who help run the system smoothly and the defiant ones who obstruct the system and, therefore, are labelled as being detrimental to the country’s progress. When a section of the workers, too, become complicit in and re-perpetuate this discourse and undermine the democratic struggles of others, the authoritarian state triumphs. Therefore, we need to explore pathways of solidarity during TUAs. It is important to be mindful that the very state that uses academic staff and their denigrating narratives to sabotage a TUA by the non-academic staff today may coopt the non-academic staff to weaken TUAs initiated by the academic staff in the future.
Directions for the Future
It is true that TUA, whether by the academic staff or the non-academic staff, disrupts academic activities and results in the postponement of examinations and graduation. Assailed by an economic crisis, many of our undergraduates want to finish their education sooner than later and find jobs to support themselves and their families. When a TUA is planned, it is important that those involved in decision-making should take into consideration the ramifications of their action. It is equally important that we identify appropriate exit points and discontinue the TUA when we are on a strong footing during negotiations with the government. This applies to academic staff as well since we, too, have engaged in lengthy TUAs which were marked by blunders and setbacks.
What can be done to promote cooperation between the academic staff and non-academic staff? What should we take into consideration when we plan and engage in TUA in the future? This is where dialogue becomes important. There should be regular conversations between the non-academic and academic staff on the problems we face separately and together and how the two groups can be supportive of one another’s struggles. When we adopt exigency measures which may involve shifts in duties and responsibilities, we must have prior consultations with the non-academic staff, receive their input and make our moves and their purposes transparent.
Those who engage in TUA must try to educate the students and their families and the larger community as to why their TUA is important for public universities to render their services without compromising their quality. One key problem observed during the last TUA by the non-academic is that the public was not fully aware of what the strike was about nor the specific demands they were making. The public saw this TUA as yet another strike when the state had already created a discourse which portrayed strikes and TUAs that have taken place post-Aragalaya as unnecessary and disruptive. In the future, trade unions associated with the university system should take steps and work together to defeat misleading propaganda about their actions by the state. A careful and coordinated planning is necessary here.
Regardless of strikes and other struggles, the trade unions and student bodies within a university should explore how they can collectively make the university space an inclusive and democratic one. Regular discussions, rather than firefighting measures, can help us face extra-ordinary situations and state repression with more effectiveness. Such conversations may be difficult because of the hierarchies that we have built and normalized over the decades. But we should find the will to initiate this dialogue to protect the free public education system.
(Mahendran Thiruvarangan is a Senior Lecturer attached to the Department of Linguistics & English at the University of Jaffna)
Kuppi is a politics and pedagogy happening on the margins of the lecture hall that parodies, subverts, and simultaneously reaffirms social hierarchies.
Features
Illegal solar push ravages Hambantota elephant habitat: Environmentalist warns of deepening crisis
A large-scale move to establish solar power plants in Hambantota has triggered a major environmental and social crisis, with more than 1,000 acres of forest—identified as critical elephant habitat—cleared in violation of the law, environmental activist Sajeewa Chamikara said.
Chamikara, speaking on behalf of the Movement for Land and Agricultural Reform, said that 17 companies have already begun clearing forest land along the boundaries of the Hambantota Elephant Management Reserve. The affected areas include Sanakku Gala, Orukemgala and Kapapu Wewa, which are known to be key elephant habitats and long-used movement corridors.
He said that what is taking place cannot be described as development, but rather as a large-scale destruction of natural ecosystems carried out under the cover of renewable energy expansion.
According to Chamikara, the clearing of forests has been carried out using heavy machinery, while large sections have also been deliberately set on fire to prepare the land for solar installations. He said that electric fences have been erected across wide stretches of land, effectively blocking elephant movement and fragmenting their natural habitat.

“These forests are not empty lands. They are part of a living system that supports wildlife and nearby communities. Once destroyed, they cannot be easily restored,” he said.
The projects in question include a 50 megawatt solar development undertaken by five companies and a larger 150 megawatt project implemented by 12 companies. The larger project is reported to be valued at around 150 million US dollars.
Chamikara stressed that these projects are being carried out in a coordinated manner and involve extensive land clearing on a scale that raises serious environmental concerns.
He further alleged that certain companies had paid about Rs. 14 million to secure support and move ahead with the projects. He said this points to a troubling failure of oversight by state institutions that are expected to protect forests and wildlife habitats.
“This is not only an environmental issue. It is also a serious governance issue. The institutions responsible for protecting these lands have failed in their duty,” he said.
Chamikara pointed out that under the National Environmental Act, any project of this scale must receive prior approval through a proper Environmental Impact Assessment process.
He said that clearing forest land before obtaining such approval is a direct violation of the law.
He added that legal requirements relating to archaeological assessments had also been ignored. Under existing regulations, large-scale land clearing requires prior evaluation to ensure that sites of historical or cultural value are not damaged.

“The law is very clear. You cannot go ahead with projects of this nature without proper approval. What we are seeing is a complete disregard for legal procedure,” Chamikara said.
The environmental impact of these activities is already becoming visible. With their natural habitats destroyed, elephants are increasingly moving into nearby villages in search of food and shelter. This has led to a sharp rise in human-elephant conflict in several areas.
Areas such as Mayurapura, Gonnooruwa, Meegahajandura and Thanamalvila have reported increasing encounters between humans and elephants. According to Chamikara, more than 5,000 farming families in these areas are now facing growing threats to their safety and livelihoods.
He warned that farmers are being forced to abandon their lands due to repeated elephant intrusions, while incidents involving damage to crops and property are rising. There have also been increasing reports of injuries and deaths among both humans and elephants.
“This is turning into a serious social and economic problem. When farmers cannot cultivate their lands, it affects food production, income and rural stability,” he said.
Chamikara also raised concerns about the broader environmental consequences of clearing forests for solar power projects. While renewable energy is promoted as a solution to reduce carbon emissions, he said that destroying forests undermines that goal.
“Forests play a key role in absorbing carbon dioxide. When you clear and burn them, you are increasing emissions, not reducing them. That defeats the purpose of promoting solar energy,” he explained.
He added that large-scale deforestation in dry zone areas such as Hambantota could also affect local weather patterns and reduce rainfall, which would have further negative impacts on agriculture and water resources.

Chamikara called for a shift in policy, urging authorities to focus on more sustainable approaches to solar power development. He said that rooftop solar systems on homes, public buildings and commercial establishments should be given priority, as they do not require clearing large areas of land.
He also recommended that solar projects be located on degraded or abandoned lands, such as areas affected by past mining or other low-value lands, rather than forests or productive agricultural areas.
“Renewable energy development must be done in a way that does not destroy the environment. There are better options available if there is proper planning,” he said.
Chamikara urged the Central Environmental Authority and the Department of Wildlife Conservation to take immediate action to stop ongoing land clearing and investigate the projects. He stressed that all activities carried out without proper approval should be halted until legal requirements are met.
He warned that failure to act now would lead to long-term environmental damage that could not be reversed.
“If this continues, we will lose not only forests and wildlife, but also the balance between people and nature that supports rural life. The consequences will be felt for generations,” he said.
The situation in Hambantota is fast emerging as a critical test of whether development goals can be balanced with environmental protection. As pressure grows, the response of authorities in the coming weeks is likely to determine whether the damage can still be contained or whether it will continue to spread unchecked.

By Ifham Nizam
Features
Why Mahatma Gandhi’s teachings need to be at the heart of conflict resolution
All credit to the Tamil Nadu government for taking concrete measures to perpetuate the memory of the renowned Mahatma Gandhi of India, who on account of his moral teachings stands on par with the likes of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Confucius and Jalaluddin Rumi, to name a few such all-time greats. The time is indeed ripe to draw the world’s attention to the Mahatma’s humanistic legacy which has resonated in the hearts of peace-oriented sections the world over down the decades.
Under its mega developmental blueprint titled ‘ Tamil Nadu 2030’, the Tamil Nadu government, among other things, intends transforming villages into centres of economic growth in conformity with the Mahatma’s vision of making the village the fundamental unit of material and spiritual advancement. Thus will come into being the ‘Uttamar Gandhi Model Villages Project’, which will be initially covering 10 village Panchayats. (Please see page 3 of The Island of March 11, 2026).
The timeliness of remembering and appreciating anew the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi resides in the utter lawlessness that has been allowed to overtake the world over the last few decades by none other than those global powers which took it upon themselves to usher in a world political and economic order based on the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Mainly in ‘the dock’ in this regard are the permanent members of the UN Security Council.
As is plain to see, the international law and order situation has veered out of control. Principal priorities for the international community or what’s left of it is to prevent the current mainly regional war in the Middle East from degenerating dangerously into another world war, coupled with the task of eliminating the possibility of another nuclear holocaust.
The most scorching of ironies is that the world’s ‘number one power’, the US, has virtually lost its way in the ‘Global Disorder’ it has been party to letting lose. For instance, instead of making good its boast of militarily neutralizing Iran and paving the way for the constant flow of fuel and gas from the Strait of Hormus by itself and Israel, it is now appealing to the rest of the West to come to its assistance. Not surprisingly, US allies are indicating their unwillingness to help pull the US’ ‘chestnuts out of the fire’.
Oil and gas are the veritable life blood of countries and going ahead it should not come as a surprise if impatience gets the better of the major powers and the nuclear option is resorted to by some of them under the dangerous illusion that it would be a quick-fix to their growing economic ills and frustrations.
All the above and more are within the realms of the possible and the need is pressing for humanistic voices to take centre stage in the present runaway crisis. As pointed out in this column last week, Realpolitik has overtaken the world and unless the latter is convinced of the self-destructive nature of the major powers’ policy of ‘meeting fire with fire’ to resolve their disputes, annihilation could be the lot of a good part of the world.
For far too long the voice of humanity has been muted and silenced in the affairs of the world by the incendiary threats and counter-threats of the big powers and their allies. No quarter has been bold enough in these blood pressure-hiking slanging matches to speak of the need for brotherly love and compassion among nations and countries. But it’s the language of love and understanding that is the most pressing need currently and the Mahatma in his time did just that against mighty odds.
At present the US and Iran are trading threats and accusations over military-related developments in the Gulf and it’s anybody’s guess as to what turn these events will take. However, calming voices of humanity and moderation would help in deescalating tensions and such voices need to go to the assistance of the UN chief and his team.
The Mahatma used the technique of ‘Satyagraha’ or the policy of non-violent resistance to oppose and dis-empower to a degree the British empire in his time and the current major powers would do well to take a leaf from Gandhi. The latter also integrated into the strategy of non-violent resistance the policy of ‘Ahimsa’ or love and understanding which helped greatly in uniting rather than alienating adversaries. The language of love, it has been proved, speaks to the hearts and minds of people and has a profoundly healing impact.
Mahatma Gandhi defined the ideal of ‘Ahimsa’ thus: ‘In its positive form, “Ahimsa” means the largest love, the greatest charity. If I am a follower of “Ahimsa”, I must love my enemy or a stranger to me as I would my wrong-doing father or son. This active “Ahimsa” necessarily includes truth and fearlessness.’ (See; ‘Modern Indian Political Thought; Text and Context’ by Bidyut Chakrabarty and Rajendra Kumar Pandey, Sage Publications India, Pvt. Ltd., www.sagepub.in).
In the latter publication, the authors also defined the essence of ‘satyagraha’ as ‘protest without rancour’ and this is seen as ‘holding the key to his entire campaign’ of non-violent resistance. From these perspectives, the teaching, ‘hatred begets hatred’ acquires more salience and meaning.
Accordingly, the voice of reason and love needs to come centre stage and take charge of current international political discourse. The UN and allied organizations which advocate conflict resolution by peaceful means need to get together and ensure that their voices are clearly heard and understood. The global South could help in this process by seeing to the vibrant rejuvenation of organizations such as the Non-aligned Movement.
An immediate task for the peace-oriented and well meaning is to make the above projects happen fast. In the process they should underscore afresh the profound importance of the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi, who is acclaimed the world over as a uniting and healing political personality and prophet of peace.
If the Mahatma is universally acclaimed, the reason is plain to see. Put simply, he spoke to the hearts and minds of people everywhere, regardless of man-made barriers. The language of peace and brotherhood, that is, is understood by everyone. The world needs more prophets of peace and reconciliation of the likes of the Mahatma to drown out the voices of discord and war-mongering and ensure that the language of humanity prevails.
Features
Exciting scene awaits them …
The Future Model Hunt extravaganza, organised by Rukmal Senanayake, and advocacy trainer Tharaka Gurukanda, held in late January 2026, has brought into the limelight four outstanding contestants who will participate, at the international level, this year – Sandeepa Sewmini, Demitha Jayawardhana, Diwyanjana Senevirathna, and Nimesha Premachandra.
Nimesha took the honours as Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026 and was featured in The Island of 05th March,
Sandeepa Sewmini was crowned Miss Supranational 2026 and will represent Sri Lanka at the big event to be held in Poland later in the year.
A Business Management and Human Resources student, she will be competing under the guidance of Rukmal Senanayake from the Model With Ruki – Model Academy & Agency.
The Mister Supranational Sri Lanka crown went to Demitha Jayawardhana, a 20-year-old professional model and motocross rider.
Apart from modelling he is engaged in his family business.

Demitha Jayawardhana: Mister Supranational Sri Lanka 2026
Demitha is also a badminton player with a strong passion for sports, fitness and personal growth.
In fact, he is recognised for his strength, discipline, and passion for fitness.
A past student of Wycherley International School and St Peter’s College, Colombo, Demitha is currently in his second year of Economics Management at the Royal Institute of Colombo.
He will represent Sri Lanka at the 10th edition of the Mister Supranational pageant, in Poland, in August, 2026.
Mister and Miss Supranational are annual international beauty pageants, held in Poland, and are designed to discover new talent for the modelling and television industries and produce instant celebrities.
The competition focuses on elegance, intelligence, and social advocacy, with contestants, representing their countries.
The newly appointed Miss Teen International Sri Lanka 2026 is Diwyanjana Senevirathna.
She was crowned at the Future Model Hunt and will represent Sri Lanka at the Miss Teen International 2026 pageant in India.
Diwyanjana is noted for her grace and dedication to representing the country at this prestigious event that aims to celebrate talent, intelligence, charm, and individuality, and provide a platform for young girls to showcase their skills.
-
Business4 days agoBrowns EV launches fast-charging BAW E7 Pro at Rs. 5.8 million
-
Life style5 days agoFrom culture to empowerment: Indonesia’s vision for Sri Lanka
-
News2 days agoCIABOC questions Ex-President GR on house for CJ’s maid
-
Business6 days agoSri Lanka Institute of Information Technology raises the bar for academic excellence
-
Opinion7 days agoM. D. Banda: Memories of Appachchi – II
-
Life style5 days agoRanjith Fernando celebrates cricketing journey with Hob Nails to Spikes
-
Latest News5 days agoQR code system will be implemented for fuel with effect from 06.00 a.m. today (15th)
-
News3 days agoAustralian HC debunks misleading travel risk claims for Sri Lanka
