Connect with us

Features

Are we planting a bomb in the Colombo Port?

Published

on

Lessons from the blast in Beirut 

By Eng. Parakrama Jayasinghe

( parajayasinghe@gmail.com)

The world is shocked by the recent tremendous explosion, in Lebanon claiming the lives of some 135 people and hundreds more grievously injured – in addition to the billions of dollars’ worth of property damage. This blast, estimated to be as powerful as a Richter Scale 3.5 earthquake, has resulted in the total destruction of the Beirut harbour. This is reportedly the lifeline for the whole of Lebanon, already battered by decades of strife. The immediate impact on maintaining the day-to-day needs for the life of the citizens, as well as the long-term impact by the loss of the harbour can only be conjectured.

We, in Sri Lanka, perhaps due to the preoccupation with the general election, which no doubt has swept all other issues out of sight, have paid scant attention to this tragedy. Perhaps, the fact that only eight Sri Lankans were directly affected did not warrant much attention of the media, too.

But, it is very important to realize that this tragedy has delivered a very important, and timely, message to us in Sri Lanka.

Needless to say a commercial harbour is the epicentre of most economic activities, being the gateway for all exports as well as for essential imports. While we are fortunate to have the recently developed Hambantota Harbour, and several smaller harbours the pivotal role played by the Colombo harbour, in the above context, cannot be denied.

Therefore, the strategic importance of the Colombo harbour, behooves us to ensure its safety, at all costs, which must be paramount in planning any projects which could be of detrimental impact on this responsibility.

Under these circumstances, many Sri Lankans would not be aware of a most dangerous proposal that is on the cards, to use the Colombo harbour to anchor a Floating Storage and Regasification Unit (FSRU). This is the central facility required if we are to diversify the sources of energy for power generation, which the CEB has been touting for, ever since their attempts to expand the coal power generation was proven unviable by the PUCSL.

While the most dubious attempt to force an unsolicited proposal by a Korean Company SK with the blessings of the former President with the same intent of siting the FSRU in the Colombo Port seems to have been averted, a new project of similar nature is being promoted. Ostensibly, several MOUs have been signed, in 2018, to form a joint venture company, consisting of Petronet LNG Limited, Sojitz Corporation, Mitsubishi Corporation, and Sri Lanka Gas Terminal Co. Ltd. to implement a Gas Infrastructure proposing Development Project.

The central facility of this project, too, would be an FSRU to be installed on the east side of the western breakwater of the Colombo harbour. Gas pipelines are to be led from the FSRU across the harbour, to the Kelanitissa Power plant, and to the Kerawalapitiya power complex, where a new LNG power plant is to be built. These will run through the harbour premises and densely populated areas.

It is not clear how a project of such national importance has been given to a set of private sector companies, some of whom have no track record of ever managing an FSRU, without a proper tender procedure as called for by the Electricity Act. A call has been made already for public comments on an EIA report, prepared by a Japanese Consulting Company, selected by the developers. One would expect a major project of this nature, with wide national implications to have been reviewed, in depth, with feasibility studies, and an EIA being conducted by an independent consultant selected by the CEA with a well thought out Terms of Reference.

The author and several other professionals submitted responses to this EIA, highlighting glaring omissions of not considering feasible alternatives and, particularly, the proposal to set up the FSRU within the Colombo harbour. The most casual manner with which the potential hazards and safety issues have been addressed in the EIA were highlighted.

These have not even been acknowledged.

There are many other ways that the proposed LNG import facility can be implemented, without such a short-sighted approach. We are fortunate to have our own Sri Lankan experts in the field, who have submitted many reports and made presentations, highlighting the need for care and possible ways of mitigating any risks which are inevitable.

With the present state of disarray in the energy sector, there are many other issues which need to be clarified.

Who has the responsibility for the supply of LNG to the power plant which we hope wou

ld be awarded soon for the 300 MW LNG power plant at Kerawalapitiya?

Will the supply be in place by the time the power plant is commissioned, which could be as short as two years? Or, will we allow the plant to be built, with no firm and acceptable solution for the LNG supply being in place, so that the plant would be run on diesel, and for how long? Who will bear the extra cost?

What will be the price to be paid for LNG delivered to the power plant and variations over the years?

How many LNG plants will be erected?

What are the plans for monetising our own gas resources in Mannar?

Do the plans for LNG infra structure permit the changeover to Mannar Gas on an equitable basis?

At a recent seminar, conducted by the Sri Lanka Energy Managers Association, the Additional General Manager of the CEB, made a presentation on the CEB’s plans for the LNG option, wherein an FSRU was proposed to be installed offshore at Kerawalapitiya. This is a far more acceptable solution than planting a potential bomb in the Colombo Port. Are we planning to do ourselves what the LTTE and Prabhakaran were prevented from doing?

The video evidence of the type of disaster that has occurred by gas explorations was displayed at the above seminar, highlighting this danger by Eng. Nalin Gunasekera, a world renowned expert in the field of FSRU deployment over many decades. These can be viewed at

The first is on a gas plant in Mexico, which is what the FSRU amounts to and the second is on a pipeline in Taiwan. We are exposing Sri Lanka to both these dangers. The third is on a gas platform in the North Sea. The fourth is on the explosion in Beirut.

We would like the people of Sri Lanka to compare these photographs with those published in the media of the Disaster in Lebanon. Is there are any difference? The gas explosion could be even more devastating.

Explosion of Ammonium Nitrate

Store in Beirut

We have had a taste of the type of destruction that can be caused by such explosions in the Salawa ammunition store. But this is a mere fire cracker in comparison to a gas explosion.

Under these circumstances, a most dangerous project should not be allowed to proceed further to a point of no return, due to any agreements signed without due process by the previous government.

My appeal to the President, the Prime Minister and the newly elected government is to review this project very carefully, particularly in respect of the grave danger posed to one of our most valuable economic nerve centres–the Colombo Port.

 



Features

Cyclones, greed and philosophy for a new world order

Published

on

Floods caused by Cyclone Ditwah in Sri Lanka

Further to my earlier letter titled, “Psychology of Greed and Philosophy for a New World Order” (The Island 26.11.2025) it may not be far-fetched to say that the cause of the devastating cyclones that hit Sri Lanka and Indonesia last week could be traced back to human greed. Cyclones of this magnitude are said to be unusual in the equatorial region but, according to experts, the raised sea surface temperatures created the conditions for their occurrence. This is directly due to global warming which is caused by excessive emission of Greenhouse gases due to burning of fossil fuels and other activities. These activities cannot be brought under control as the rich, greedy Western powers do not want to abide by the terms and conditions agreed upon at the Paris Agreement of 2015, as was seen at the COP30 meeting in Brazil recently. Is there hope for third world countries? This is why the Global South must develop a New World Order. For this purpose, the proposed contentment/sufficiency philosophy based on morals like dhana, seela, bhavana, may provide the necessary foundation.

Further, such a philosophy need not be parochial and isolationist. It may not be  necessary to adopt systems that existed in the past that suited the times but develop a system that would be practical and also pragmatic in the context of the modern world.

It must be reiterated that without controlling the force of collective greed the present destructive socioeconomic system cannot be changed. Hence the need for a philosophy that incorporates the means of controlling greed. Dhana, seela, bhavana may suit Sri Lanka and most of the East which, as mentioned in my earlier letter, share a similar philosophical heritage. The rest of the world also may have to adopt a contentment / sufficiency philosophy with  strong and effective tenets that suit their culture, to bring under control the evil of greed. If not, there is no hope for the existence of the world. Global warming will destroy it with cyclones, forest fires, droughts, floods, crop failure and famine.

Leading economists had commented on the damaging effect of greed on the economy while philosophers, ancient as well as modern, had spoken about its degenerating influence on the inborn human morals. Ancient philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus all spoke about greed, viewing it as a destructive force that hindered a good life. They believed greed was rooted in personal immorality and prevented individuals from achieving true happiness by focusing on endless material accumulation rather than the limited wealth needed for natural needs.

Jeffry Sachs argues that greed is a destructive force that undermines social and environmental well-being, citing it as a major driver of climate change and economic inequality, referencing the ideas of Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes, etc. Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Laureate economist, has criticised neoliberal ideology in similar terms.

In my earlier letter, I have discussed how contentment / sufficiency philosophy could effectively transform the socioeconomic system to one that prioritises collective well-being and sufficiency over rampant consumerism and greed, potentially leading to more sustainable economic models.

Obviously, these changes cannot be brought about without a change of attitude, morals and commitment of the rulers and the government. This cannot be achieved without a mass movement; people must realise the need for change. Such a movement would need  leadership. In this regard a critical responsibility lies with the educated middle class. It is they who must give leadership to the movement that would have the goal of getting rid of the evil of excessive greed. It is they who must educate the entire nation about the need for these changes.

The middle class would be the vanguard of change. It is the middle class that has the capacity to bring about change. It is the middle class that perform as a vibrant component of the society for political stability. It is the group which supplies political philosophy, ideology, movements, guidance and leaders for the rest of the society. The poor, who are the majority, need the political wisdom and leadership of the middle class.

Further, the middle class is the font of culture, creativity, literature, art and music. Thinkers, writers, artistes, musicians are fostered by the middle class. Cultural activity of the middle class could pervade down to the poor groups and have an effect on their cultural development as well. Similarly, education of a country depends on how educated the middle class is. It is the responsibility of the middle class to provide education to the poor people.

Most importantly, the morals of a society are imbued in the middle class and it is they who foster them. As morals are crucial in the battle against  greed, the middle class assume greater credentials to spearhead the movement against greed and bring in sustainable development and growth. Contentment sufficiency philosophy, based on morals, would form the strong foundation necessary for achieving the goal of a new world order. Thus, it is seen that the middle class is eminently suitable to be the vehicle that could adopt and disseminate a contentment/ sufficiency philosophy and lead the movement against the evil neo-liberal system that is destroying the world.

The Global South, which comprises the majority of the world’s poor, may have to realise, before it is too late, that it is they who are the most vulnerable to climate change though they may not be the greatest offenders who cause it. Yet, if they are to survive, they must get together and help each other to achieve self-sufficiency in the essential needs, like food, energy and medicine. Trade must not be via exploitative and weaponised currency but by means of a barter system, based on purchase power parity (PPP). The union of these countries could be an expansion of organisations,like BRICS, ASEAN, SCO, AU, etc., which already have the trade and financial arrangements though in a rudimentary state but with great potential, if only they could sort out their bilateral issues and work towards a Global South which is neither rich nor poor but sufficient, contented and safe, a lesson to the Global North. China, India and South Africa must play the lead role in this venture. They would need the support of a strong philosophy that has the capacity to fight the evil of greed, for they cannot achieve these goals if fettered by greed. The proposed contentment / sufficient philosophy would form a strong philosophical foundation for the Global South, to unite, fight greed and develop a new world order which, above all, will make it safe for life.

by Prof. N. A. de S. Amaratunga 
PHD, DSc, DLITT

Continue Reading

Features

SINHARAJA: The Living Cathedral of Sri Lanka’s Rainforest Heritage

Published

on

Damp and thick undergrowth

When Senior biodiversity scientist Vimukthi Weeratunga speaks of Sinharaja, his voice carries the weight of four decades spent beneath its dripping emerald canopy. To him, Sri Lanka’s last great rainforest is not merely a protected area—it is “a cathedral of life,” a sanctuary where evolution whispers through every leaf, stream and shadow.

 “Sinharaja is the largest and most precious tropical rainforest we have,” Weeratunga said.

“Sixty to seventy percent of the plants and animals found here exist nowhere else on Earth. This forest is the heart of endemic biodiversity in Sri Lanka.”

A Magnet for the World’s Naturalists

Sinharaja’s allure lies not in charismatic megafauna but in the world of the small and extraordinary—tiny, jewel-toned frogs; iridescent butterflies; shy serpents; and canopy birds whose songs drift like threads of silver through the mist.

“You must walk slowly in Sinharaja,” Weeratunga smiled.

“Its beauty reveals itself only to those who are patient and observant.”

For global travellers fascinated by natural history, Sinharaja remains a top draw. Nearly 90% of nature-focused visitors to Sri Lanka place Sinharaja at the top of their itinerary, generating a deep economic pulse for surrounding communities.

A Forest Etched in History

Centuries before conservationists championed its cause, Sinharaja captured the imagination of explorers and scholars. British and Dutch botanists, venturing into the island’s interior from the 17th century onward, mapped streams, documented rare orchids, and penned some of the earliest scientific records of Sri Lanka’s natural heritage.

Smallest cat

These chronicles now form the backbone of our understanding of the island’s unique ecology.

The Great Forest War: Saving Sinharaja

But Sinharaja nearly vanished.

In the 1970s, the government—guided by a timber-driven development mindset—greenlit a Canadian-assisted logging project. Forests around Sinharaja fell first; then, the chainsaws approached the ancient core.

 “There was very little scientific data to counter the felling,” Weeratunga recalled.

“But people knew instinctively this was a national treasure.”

The public responded with one of the greatest environmental uprisings in Sri Lankan history. Conservation icons Thilo Hoffmann and Neluwe Gunananda Thera led a national movement. After seven tense years, the new government of 1977 halted the project.

What followed was a scientific renaissance. Leading researchers—including Prof. Savithri Gunathilake and Prof. Nimal Gunathilaka, Prof. Sarath Kottagama, and others—descended into the depths of Sinharaja, documenting every possible facet of its biodiversity.

Thilak

 “Those studies paved the way for Sinharaja to become Sri Lanka’s very first natural World Heritage Site,” Weeratunga noted proudly.

A Book Woven From 30 Years of Field Wisdom

For Weeratunga, Sinharaja is more than academic terrain—it is home. Since joining the Forest Department in 1985 as a young researcher, he has trekked, photographed, documented and celebrated its secrets.

Now, decades later, he joins Dr. Thilak Jayaratne, the late Dr. Janaka Gallangoda, and Nadika Hapuarachchi in producing, what he calls, the most comprehensive book ever written on Sinharaja.

 “This will be the first major publication on Sinharaja since the early 1980s,” he said.

“It covers ecology, history, flora, fauna—and includes rare photographs taken over nearly 30 years.”

Some images were captured after weeks of waiting. Others after years—like the mysterious mass-flowering episodes where clusters of forest giants bloom in synchrony, or the delicate jewels of the understory: tiny jumping spiders, elusive amphibians, and canopy dwellers glimpsed only once in a lifetime.

The book even includes underwater photography from Sinharaja’s crystal-clear streams—worlds unseen by most visitors.

A Tribute to a Departed Friend

Halfway through the project, tragedy struck: co-author Dr. Janaka Gallangoda passed away.

 “We stopped the project for a while,” Weeratunga said quietly.

“But Dr. Thilak Jayaratne reminded us that Janaka lived for this forest. So we completed the book in his memory. One of our authors now watches over Sinharaja from above.”

Jumping spide

An Invitation to the Public

A special exhibition, showcasing highlights from the book, will be held on 13–14 December, 2025, in Colombo.

“We cannot show Sinharaja in one gallery,” he laughed.

“But we can show a single drop of its beauty—enough to spark curiosity.”

A Forest That Must Endure

What makes the book special, he emphasises, is its accessibility.

“We wrote it in simple, clear language—no heavy jargon—so that everyone can understand why Sinharaja is irreplaceable,” Weeratunga said.

“If people know its value, they will protect it.”

To him, Sinharaja is more than a rainforest.

It is Sri Lanka’s living heritage.

A sanctuary of evolution.

A sacred, breathing cathedral that must endure for generations to come.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Features

How Knuckles was sold out

Published

on

Knuckles range

Leaked RTI Files Reveal Conflicting Approvals, Missing Assessments, and Silent Officials

“This Was Not Mismanagement — It Was a Structured Failure”— CEJ’s Dilena Pathragoda

An investigation, backed by newly released Right to Information (RTI) files, exposes a troubling sequence of events in which multiple state agencies appear to have enabled — or quietly tolerated — unauthorised road construction inside the Knuckles Conservation Forest, a UNESCO World Heritage site.

At the centre of the unfolding scandal is a trail of contradictory letters, unexplained delays, unsigned inspection reports, and sudden reversals by key government offices.

“What these documents show is not confusion or oversight. It is a structured failure,” said Dilena Pathragoda, Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), who has been analysing the leaked records.

“Officials knew the legal requirements. They ignored them. They knew the ecological risks. They dismissed them. The evidence points to a deliberate weakening of safeguards meant to protect one of Sri Lanka’s most fragile ecosystems.”

A Paper Trail of Contradictions

RTI disclosures obtained by activists reveal:

Approvals issued before mandatory field inspections were carried out

Three departments claiming they “did not authorise” the same section of the road

A suspiciously backdated letter clearing a segment already under construction

Internal memos flagging “missing evaluation data” that were never addressed

“No-objection” notes do not hold any legal weight for work inside protected areas, experts say.

One senior officer’s signature appears on two letters with opposing conclusions, sent just three weeks apart — a discrepancy that has raised serious questions within the conservation community.

“This is the kind of documentation that usually surfaces only after damage is done,” Pathragoda said. “It shows a chain of administrative behaviour designed to delay scrutiny until the bulldozers moved in.”

The Silence of the Agencies

Perhaps, more alarming is the behaviour of the regulatory bodies.

Multiple departments — including those legally mandated to halt unauthorised work — acknowledged concerns in internal exchanges but issued no public warnings, took no enforcement action, and allowed machinery to continue operating.

“That silence is the real red flag,” Pathragoda noted.

“Silence is rarely accidental in cases like this. Silence protects someone.”

On the Ground: Damage Already Visible

Independent field teams report:

Fresh erosion scars on steep slopes

Sediment-laden water in downstream streams

Disturbed buffer zones

Workers claiming that they were instructed to “complete the section quickly”

Satellite images from the past two months show accelerated clearing around the contested route.

Environmental experts warn that once the hydrology of the Knuckles slopes is altered, the consequences could be irreversible.

CEJ: “Name Every Official Involved”

CEJ is preparing a formal complaint demanding a multi-agency investigation.

Pathragoda insists that responsibility must be traced along the entire chain — from field officers to approving authorities.

“Every signature, every omission, every backdated approval must be examined,” she said.

“If laws were violated, then prosecutions must follow. Not warnings. Not transfers. Prosecutions.”

A Scandal Still Unfolding

More RTI documents are expected to come out next week, including internal audits and communication logs that could deepen the crisis for several agencies.

As the paper trail widens, one thing is increasingly clear: what happened in Knuckles is not an isolated act — it is an institutional failure, executed quietly, and revealed only because citizens insisted on answers.

by Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Trending