Connect with us

News

Parliament prorogued on Friday night

Published

on

President says cabinet agreeable to fully implementing 13 A until party leaders decide whether or not to abolish the Amendment

Parliament was prorogued from midnight Friday (27) by President Ranil Wickremesinghe under powers vested in him by Article 70 of the Constitution, parliamentary sources said on Friday.

The Department of Government Printing was due to issue the relevant notification on Friday night but it was not out as this edition went to print.However the President’ Media Division (PMD) confirmed the prorogation on Friday evening saying that President Wickremesinghe “is expected” to make a policy statement based on the decisions taken after the 75th Independence anniversary when parliament recommences on Feb.8.

A separate bulletin said that the president had informed the party leaders Conference on Reconciliation that the cabinet was agreeable to “fully implementing (the) 13th Amendment until party leaders decide whether or not to abolish the Amendment.”

Parliamentary sources explained that a prorogation which is a temporary recess of parliament, should not extend to a period of more than two months, However, such date for summoning parliament may be advanced by another presidential proclamation provided it is summoned for a date not less than three days from the date of such fresh proclamation.

Political observers believe that the prorogation is related to the president’s effort to secure as wide a consensus as possible on the National Question. They dismissed speculation that it is related to the scheduled local elections. This issue was clarified by the PMD bulletin.

When parliament is prorogued, the proclamation should notify the date of the commencement of the new session of parliament under Article 70 of the Constitution.During the prorogation the speaker continues to function and MPs retain their membership of the legislature even though they do not attend meetings of the House.

The effect of a prorogation is to suspend all current business before the House and all proceedings pending at the time are quashed except impeachments.A Bill, motion or question of the same substance cannot be introduced for a second time during the same session. However, it could be carried forward at a subsequent session after a prorogation.

“All matters which having been duly brought before parliament, have not been disposed of at the time of the prorogation, may be proceeded with during the next session,” states the paragraph (4) of article 70 of the constitution.

In the light of this constitutional provision, a prorogation does not result in an end to pending business. Thus, a pending matter may be proceeded with from that stage onwards after the commencement of the new session.

At the beginning of a new session all items of business which were in the order paper need to be re-listed, if it is desired to continue with them.At the end of a prorogation a new session begins and is ceremonially declared open by the president.

He is empowered under the constitution to make a statement of government policy at the commencement of each session of parliament and to preside at ceremonial sittings of parliament in terms of the provisions of paragraph (2) of article 33 of the constitution.The president is empowered to make a statement of government policy at the commencement of each new session. In the past, it was known as the Throne Speech which was delivered by the Governor-General.



News

Customs asked to resume probe or face legal action

Published

on

Nagananda / Liyanagama

Rs. 16 bn BMW revenue fraud:

Public interest litigation activist Nagananda Kodituwakku has said he will initiate appropriate proceedings against Director General of Customs, Wimal S.K. Liyanagama, in terms of the Anti-Corruption Act No 9 of 2023, unless the Customs carries out a revenue fraud inquiry to recover approximately Rs 16 bn in lost government revenue.

General Secretary of Vinivida Foundation, and former Customs officer, Kodituwakku said that though the Department, in response to his request for a meeting to discuss the issue, in writing, assured them that the investigation was underway, they found that the actual situation was not so.

Kodituwakku alleged that the Customs Chief had neglected what he called statutory duties under the Customs Ordinance, by disregarding his request for a meeting.

Kodituwakku said the investigation into the importation of 1,728 brand new BMW vehicles, under the concessionary duty permits issued by the government for the public servants, between 2011 and 2014, had been stalled.

The civil society activist said that investigations had revealed the vehicles hadn’t been imported by the permit holders themselves but others. It also transpired that the value of the imported vehicles, mentioned in the commercial invoices, proforma invoices and the CusDecs, tendered to Customs in the names of the permit holders, were not the actual values for the vehicles in question.

The high-profile case has been handled by the Central Investigation Directorate, at that time headed by Murugesu Thayabaran, a batchmate of Kodituwakku.

The ex-Customs officer said that he had appeared as counsel for Thayabaran in Court of Appeal and was determined to bring the case to a successful conclusion. According to him, the importer, over the years, had been represented by nine President’s Counsel as the case dragged on from the time of P.S.M. Charles, Director General, Customs.

Kodituwakku made available letters he wrote to the Customs and other parties on this issue, to The Island. Pointing out that the Court of Appeal on 7 May, 2024, dismissed the importer’s final appeal regarding the case pertaining to the revenue loss of Rs. 16 bn, Kodituwakku said that although the court had cleared the way for the Customs probe, no action had been taken.

However, the Court of Appeal ruling was given before Liyanagama succeeded Seevali Arukgoda as DG Customs on 6 May, 2026. Liyanagama served as Director General of the Department of Management Services at the Treasury before the new appointment.

Kodituwakku said that he had also brought the Customs case to the attention of the Commission to Investigate Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Emphasising the failure on the part of the Opposition to raise this issue, both in and outside Parliament, Kodituwakku said that since the exposure of the BMW scam, during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s presidency, there had been four presidents, namely Maithripala Sirisena, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, Ranil Wickremesinghe and incumbent Anura Kumara Dissanayake. Unfortunately, successive administrations had allowed the interested parties to drag the case. The lack of interest shown by political parties revealed that they not only protected those responsible but encouraged corrupt practices of allowing third parties to import vehicles in terms of permits issued to legitimate recipients of such permits.

Having campaigned on an anti-corruption platform, during the presidential and parliamentary polls in 2024, the NPP couldn’t, under any circumstances, turn a blind eye to this situation, Kodituwakku said, adding that even the IMF should be concerned of the failure on the part of successive governments to recover the money.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Outgoing Chinese Ambassador Qi Zhenhong bids farewell to Mahanayake Theras

Published

on

The outgoing Ambassador visiting the Maha Nayake Theras

Outgoing Chinese Ambassador to Sri Lanka, Qi Zhenhong, who is scheduled to conclude his tenure on July 31, visited Kandy on the afternoon of July 18 to pay respects and receive blessings from the Mahanayake Theras of the Malwathu and Asgiriya Chapters.

During the visit, the Most Venerable Thibbotuwawe Sri Sumangala Mahanayake Thera of the Malwathu Chapter and the Most Venerable Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Mahanayake Thera of the Asgiriya Chapter hailed the Ambassador’s dedicated service to the country.

The Malwathu Mahanayake Thera noted that Ambassador Qi had performed his duties as a diplomat to the highest possible standard. He stated that the Ambassador’s contributions during his nearly six year tenure, including assistance during natural disasters and support for economic, educational, cultural, and religious sectors, would never be forgotten.

Expressing his appreciation, the Mahanayake Thera remarked that he would like the Ambassador to remain in Sri Lanka even after retirement.

The Asgiriya Mahanayake Thera, Most Venerable Warakagoda Sri Gnanarathana Thera, also commended the Ambassador’s efforts in supporting infrastructure development during various natural disasters and praised his initiatives in strengthening the bilateral relations between China and Sri Lanka.

Reflecting on his tenure, Ambassador Qi Zhenhong stated that the Sri Lankan economy is gradually improving under the new government. He noted that the Chinese government fully supports the current government’s focus on industrial policy, state owned enterprise reform, and exports.

The Ambassador highlighted several ongoing collaborative projects, including an agreement to provide school uniforms, the reconstruction of 14 bridges destroyed by cyclones, and the upcoming arrival of the first batch of electric buses and vehicles.

“Sri Lanka feels like my second home,” the Ambassador said, adding that he is grateful for the generous support and sincere friendship extended to him by the people of Sri Lanka. He confirmed that while his tenure ends on July 31, he will continue to engage with Sri Lanka whenever possible.

The Ambassador also visited the Senior Member of the Asgiriya Chapter, Most Venerable Godagama Sri Mangala Thera, to receive further blessings, with other prominent members of the Maha Sangha also in attendance.

By S.K. Samaranayake

Continue Reading

News

Move to extend retirement age of top judges: BASL asks govt. to stop process pending meaningful consultations

Published

on

(From left: Rienzie Arsecularatne, Rajieev Amarasuriya and Pasindu Silva

President of the Bar Association Rajeev Amarasuriya yesterday (21) briefed the media regarding the action taken by them to discourage the NPP government from increasing the retirement age of superior court judges.

Amarasuriya, flanked by BASL Deputy President Rienzie Arsecularatne (right) and Treasurer Pasindu Silva reiterated their strong opposition to the alleged move. The briefing took place at Dr. H.W. Jayawardene QC Auditorium, BASL Secretariat, Mihindu Mawatha.

Pointing out that the move to bring in a constitutional amendment to facilitate the project would be detrimental to the judiciary and the country, the BASL requested an opportunity to meet Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara to discuss the issues at hand.

The BASL proposed that the delegation would consist of members of the Executive Committee, President’s Counsel and senior members of the legal fraternity.

Amarasuriya said that the BASL was willing to assist the Justice and National Integration Ministry in a consultative process in case the government decided to do so. “We sincerely hope that no further steps will be taken in relation to this proposal until meaningful consultation has taken place with the principal stakeholders of the justice sector,” Amarasuriya said.

Continue Reading

Trending