Midweek Review
New diplomatic postings, current priorities and challenges
Defeated UNP candidate among new appointees
Sri Lanka’s growing dependence on bilateral assistance in addition to the anticipated USD 2.9bn credit facility from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is frightening. A statement issued by the Indian High Commission, in Colombo, on Dec 23, 2022, after the handing over of 125 Sport Utility Vehicles to Public Security Minister, Tiran Alles, emphasized the seriousness of the economic crisis. The supply of the first batch of altogether 500 vehicles, to be procured under a USD 100 mn credit line, made available, some time ago, should be examined against the backdrop of the following: (1) Concessional credit lines worth USD 3.2 bn provided by Delhi in diverse sectors including railways, infrastructure, defence, renewable energy, supply of petroleum products, fertiliser, etc. (2) In addition, Sri Lanka received another concessional credit facility amounting to USD 1 bn, through the State Bank of India, for the procurement of essential items.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The Foreign Ministry, in a press release dated Dec. 27, 2022, announced the appointment of 14 heads of diplomatic missions, and two heads of posts. The new appointees included 13 members of the Sri Lanka Foreign Service (SLFS).
The statement issued by the Public Diplomacy Division appreciated President Ranil Wickremesinghe for giving the lion’s share of appointments to the SLFS. There hadn’t been a previous instance of the Foreign Ministry issuing such a commendation to any of Wickremesinghe’s predecessors.
The FM says it has conducted an orientation programme (Dec. 16-23, 2022) for the group with Foreign Affairs Minister Ali Sabry, PC, discussing his Ministry’s current priorities and foreign policy challenges. Sabry, a close confidant of the ousted President, received the Foreign Affairs portfolio at the expense of academic Prof. G. L. Peiris.
Foreign Secretary Aruni Wijewardane has discussed the leadership role of heads of missions, whereas the orientation programme included discussions on economic, political, security, cultural and consular matters and field visits to the Northern Province, as well as to other government institutions.
Political appointees in the group are Admiral Jayanath Colombage (Indonesia), Udaya Indrarathna (UAE) and Sandith Samarasinghe (Consul General in Melbourne). Sandith Samarasinghe represented the UNP, in Parliament, (2015-2020/Kegalle district). Samarasinghe was one of the few MPs who remained loyal to Wickremesinghe, in the wake of the formation of the Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB), in early 2020. Samarasinghe, like all other UNPers, failed to retain his Kegalle district seat, at the last general election, held later that year. Even Wickremesinghe only managed to enter Parliament, through the sole seat the party secured, via its National seat.
One-time Navy Commander, Colombage, who served as the Additional Secretary (Foreign Affairs) to the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, since Dec., 2019, received the appointment as Foreign Secretary till August 2020. Wimal Weerawansa and sevearl others accused Colombage of pursuing an agenda inimical to Sri Lanka. Colombage earned the wrath of some over his affiliation with the Pathfinder Foundation, founded by our High Commissioner in New Delhi, Milinda Moragoda. It focuses on bilateral relations with China and India. Colombage has strongly denied any wrongdoing.
The incumbent FS Wijewardane was brought in as FS in May, 2020 amidst unprecedented political turmoil, triggered by violent protests, directed at the then President. Wijewardane succeeded Colombage, who has now received a diplomatic posting, to Indonesia, after he lost an opportunity to secure the ambassadorship in Japan.
Had President Gotabaya Rajapaksa realised the gravity of the situation, he wouldn’t have allowed his media team to declare those who launched high profile protest campaign, most probably instigated by hidden hands on March 31, 2022, outside his private residence, at Pangiriwatte, Mirihana, as extremists seeking to stage an ‘Arab Spring’ type revolution without an inclination to stand up to them. The government’s overall lackadaisical response emboldened protests, while the core reason for the crisis, the lack of foreign currency to finance basic needs, remained unaddressed, as it was beyond its means.
Governor of the Central Bank Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe, in the second week of April, 2022, declared what he called a pre-emptive negotiated default as Sri Lanka made unilateral announcement that it wouldn’t repay foreign loans. Dr. Weerasinghe earned the appreciation of the public for making the declaration of bankruptcy, regardless of the consequences. Sabry, who served as the Finance Minister at that time had the courage to accept responsibility for Dr. Weerasinghe’s statement.
However, the declaration of bankruptcy also accelerated anti-government protests. The US threw its weight behind the campaign. US Ambassador to Sri Lanka Julie Chung interfered with the government strategy so much so that she issued a statement on May 09 as well organised mobs with specific intelligence, went on the rampage across the country, mainly against government politicians and their properties, calling on law enforcers not to crack down on peaceful protesters. Lawmaker Wimal Weerawansa, both in and out of Parliament, alleged that President Gotabaya Rajapaksa hesitated to suppress the protest campaign as he didn’t want to antagonize the US.
The current crisis cannot be examined without taking into consideration the overall failure of successive governments, particularly President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s war-winning administration (2005-2014) and the Yahapalana government (2015-2019) and the disastrous President Gotabaya Rajapaksa rule (2019-July 2022). This is not to say that the Chandrika Kumaratunga administration was any better as, under that dispensation, the country, for the first time, even recorded a negative growth.
UNP leader President Ranil Wickremesinghe in July last year received a parliamentary mandate to lead the economic recovery. As President, and the Minister in charge of the Finance portfolio, Wickremesinghe should address political, economic and social issues with an open mind. The continuing crisis is extraordinary, the executive needs the unstinted support of the legislature to ensure successful economic recovery in a reasonable time.
But the Executive President must also ensure that ‘robber barons’ are not allowed to exploit the situation, in the name of capitalism, which he wholeheartedly backs, and he must ensure greater discipline and adherence to fair play by the private sector while it continues to be the engine of growth. Particularly, he must ensure that exporters who have surreptitiously stashed export proceeds abroad bring them back to the country as such practices have exacerbated the foreign exchange crisis here, He also must stamp out the underground banking system that has been stealing billions in foreign exchange, earned by our expatriate workers, through punitive punishment and active crackdown by the law enforcers and the Central Bank. Then there are the professional tax dodgers who with the help of unscrupulous firms of Chartered accountants, have been robbing the country, with the help of the lax legal system, while the honest tax payers are often harassed to the limit.
Unfortunately, the executive and legislature seemed to be pulling in different directions, as underscored by the failure on the part of President Wickremesinghe and his parliamentary sponsor, the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) to reach a consensus on Cabinet appointments.
As many as 12 vacancies remained in the 30-member Cabinet-of-Ministers. Wickremesinghe named his first set of ministers, on July 22, 2022, soon after the SLPP overwhelmingly elected the UNPer as the first President appointed by Parliament.
Irreversible damage
The Foreign Ministry’s success largely depends on the overall political strategy adopted by the government. There is no point in denying the fact that those who caused irreversible and catastrophic damages never accepted responsibility for their actions. The Yahapalana government decision to co-sponsor an accountability resolution against Sri Lanka, in Oct., 2015, is a case in point.
The then Prime Minister Wickremesinghe and President Maithripala Sirisena never absolved themselves of the responsibility for betraying the war-winning armed forces. The Yahapalana government co-sponsored the US-led resolution, in spite of then Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative, in Geneva, Ravinatha Aryasinha, rightfully, and spontaneously, taking a strong stand against it. The career diplomat was, however, ordered by Colombo to toe the then government’s line, soon after, which came as strange news to many, like how the UNP government signed a disastrous one sided ceasefire agreement with the LTTE, in 2001, unknown to many in that regime, including then President Chandrika Kumaratunga, who was the country’s Defence Minister.
Sri Lanka is firmly on the Geneva agenda, though Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government tried to deceive the public by high profile pronouncement that it withdrew from the controversial resolution. The Rajapaksa administration absolutely did nothing to set the record straight, in Geneva. Regardless of promises and accusations, the then Joint Opposition (breakaway faction of the UPFA, led by Mahinda Rajapaksa) directed at the Yahapalana leadership over the handling of Geneva issue, the Rajapaksa administration treacherously refrained from defending the military. The government ensured that the powerful ‘ammunition’, provided by Lord Naseby, way back, in Oct. 2017, and other available ‘evidence’, was never properly utilized. May be the Rajapaksas did not have the required backing from our career diplomatic service as it had been much compromised, especially since 1977.
Rudderless diplomatically, the Rajapaksa administration allowed the Western agenda to continue. In other words, Sri Lanka fully cooperated with those who mercilessly exploited unsubstantiated war crimes allegations to advance their cause. The declaration of Sri Lanka’s bankruptcy status, in April 2022, should be examined against the Western agenda that continuously harassed the country over eradication of terrorism. Some couldn’t obviously stomach Sri Lanka’s triumph over terrorism, hence the persistent campaigning at the UNHRC.
Western powers will unashamedly use trumped up war crimes and unprecedented economic fallout to pressure Sri Lanka to give in. Foreign Minister Sabry never denied Rear Admiral Sarath Weerasekera’s accusation that the President’s Counsel pushed for 21st Amendment on the basis that the finalization of the IMF’s USD 2.9 bn loan depends on the enactment of the new law. What else would the Western powers/IMF demand to help Sri Lanka recover from the economic turmoil?
Premier’s advice
Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena’s Office, in a statement issued on Dec. 26, 2022, quoted the MEP leader as having told a group of newly appointed heads of missions that “traditional diplomacy has changed and today’s top priority is economic diplomacy.”
Addressing the group at Temple Trees, the Premier has stressed the importance of attracting investments, promoting exports, tourism and enhance Sri Lanka’s image as a ‘non-aligned neutral country with friendship towards all.’ The Premier was quoted as having declared: “We have not deviated from that policy and our ports are open to everybody and it is your duty to get this message across to the world.”
SLFS members are Permanent Representative designate to the UN in Geneva Himalee Arunathilaka, Ambassador designate to Bahrain Reethi Wijeratne, High Commissioner designate to Australia Chitranganee Wagiswara, Ambassador designate to Vietnam Dr. Saj Mendis, Ambassador designate to France Manisha Gunasekera, Ambassador designate to Kuwait B. Kandeepan, Ambassador designate to Ethiopia and the Africa Union Theshantha Kumarasiri, Ambassador designate to Germany Varuni Muthukumarana, Ambassador designate to Lebanon Kapila Jayaweera, Ambassador designate to Jordan Priyangika Wijegunasekara, Ambassador designate to the Philippines Dr. Chanaka Talpahewa, Ambassador designate to Israel Nimal Bandara and Consul General designate to Milan Dilani Weerakoon .
Let me appreciate and congratulate Dr. Chanaka Talpahewa again for ‘Peaceful Intervention in intra-state conflicts: Norwegian Involvement in the Sri Lankan Peace Process.’ His work. while being in SLFS, is perhaps the most courageous and fearless response of a career diplomat to a treacherous project that was meant to weaken the Sri Lankan State. Although Sri Lanka emerged victorious in that ‘war’ to save its unitary status, an utterly corrupt and reckless lot had destroyed the country.
Sri Lanka shouldn’t expect a significant improvement in the Foreign Service, regardless of new appointments. That should be obvious. The Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government cannot be so stupid as to believe that a change of heads of missions/filling vacancies may result in major changes. Regardless of President Wickremesinghe repeatedly assuring his administration wouldn’t take sides, in international and regional ‘conflicts,’ controversy over high-tech Chinese research ship, Yuan Wang 5, visit to the Hambantota Port, last August, underscored Sri Lanka’s predicament, with India kicking up a fuss, trying to treat Sri Lanka as a vassal state.
Colombo struggling to cope up with political turmoil, in the wake of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster, delayed the visit by about a week following India’s objections. Debt-ridden Sri Lanka needs to address concerns of both India and China, two major bilateral creditors and generous donors, whose cooperation is vital for the successful conclusion of debt restructuring talks. In fact, the whole process, in spite of this being Sri Lanka’s 17th IMF facility, has been delayed for want of approval by New Delhi and Beijing.
India’s membership, in the US-led four-nation grouping, meant to counter China, has further complicated matters for hapless Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka recklessly caused irreparable damage to her relations with Japan by unilaterally cancelling the Japan-funded light train transit system, in Sept. 2020. An angry Japanese leadership, smarting from that incident, ignored Sri Lanka’s plea for urgently required financial assistance, at the onset of the financial crisis, though Tokyo seemed to have changed its approach, after the change of government. The four-member grouping, includes the US, Japan, Australia and India.
Sri Lanka’s relations with Australia remain quite friendly with both countries, in spite of political upheaval here, cooperating closely to block illegal refugees. Australia has extended extraordinary support for Sri Lanka’s efforts by paying for fuel required by the cash-strapped Navy, and Air Force, to maintain sufficient patrols.
However, India’s stand on the continuing Ukraine war should be a case study for poorly led Sri Lanka. After gaining independence, over seven decades ago, the country is in the hands of a pathetic lot whose capabilities are highlighted in the Auditor General’s reports to Parliament.
Necessity for reappraisal of policy
Sri Lanka needs to reappraise the whole gamut of issues, ranging from continuing destructive Indian fishers, poaching in Sri Lankan waters, to humiliating failure to convince Singapore to extradite former Governor of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Arjuna Mahendran, despite President Wickremesinghe wanting to go ahead with the hastily concluded free trade agreement between the two countries.
Sri Lanka’s stand on the Access and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA), that the Yahapalana government entered into, in August 2017, as well as Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Compact and Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), should be made public. Although the previous UNP-led administration discussed MCC and SOFA, they never materilized. The possibility of the US seeking to revive MCC and SOFA cannot be ruled out as the developing situation can take a turn for the worse.
The signing of an energy agreement with the US-based New Fortress Energy, in September 2022, under controversial circumstances, and the subsequent declaration made by the then CEB Chairman M.M.C. Ferdinando, regarding Indian Premier Narendra Modi’s intervention, on behalf of the Adani Group, should prompt a thorough examination of such ‘deals’ to prevent recurrence. The deal with New Fortress Energy led to the breaking up of the SLPP parliamentary group, with a small section of the Cabinet-of-Ministers moving the Supreme Court, unsuccessfully, against the transaction whereas Ferdinando denied making allegations against Modi on the basis of what President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had told him.
The signing of the one-sided Ceasefire Agreement, in Feb. 2002, co-sponsorship of accountability resolution, in Oct. 2015, as well as the Singapore-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement (SSLFTA), in January 2018, highlighted the absence of at least basic decision-making process. Perhaps, the Foreign Ministry, at least now, should undertake a study of its failures/inadequacies with the focus on major developments over the years.
The cancellation
No less a person than Foreign Minister Sabry has disclosed how President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, on the advice of those near and dear to him allowed the collapse of the economy.
The Minister didn’t mince his words when he named the culprits by their positions during an exclusive live interview on Swarnavahini, in June, last year. But, that doesn’t clear him of the often repeated collective responsibility of the Cabinet-of-Ministers in case relevant issues had been taken up therein.
The reckless ban on fertiliser, agrochemicals, cancellation of the Light Train Transit System and refusal to engage the IMF on the 17th loan facility, needed by Sri Lanka at the correct time led to the ruination of the economy.
Having ruined the economy, those at the helm now expect a miracle to save the country. The much-touted economic diplomacy seems part of the deception as the crisis deepens with no tangible solutions in sight.
Midweek Review
Unexpected focus on ‘pieces of tin’ worn by military men
Second Lieutenant S.U. Aladeniya, the first recipient of the Parama Weera Vibhushanaya, died fighting the LTTE in the second week of July, 1990. The young commanding officer of the isolated Kokavil Army detachment refused an opportunity to leave his wounded colleagues. Instead, he chose to set an extraordinary example. The fate of the Kokavil detachment, as well as the unprecedented military debacle that forced the Army to vacate the Kandy–Jaffna A9 road, north of Vavuniya, in 1990, happened due to the late President Ranasinghe Premadasa’s folly. Premadasa trusted the LTTE to such an extent, he ordered several hundred police officers, in the East, to surrender to appease the LTTE. The rest is history.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Additional Solicitor General Dileepa Peiris recently questioned in court as to why retired Air Force officer Shantha Jayathilake appeared in court wearing armed forces medals.
The highly decorated war hero Flight Lieutenant Jayathilake represented himself under Section 260 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the trial of Maj. Gen. Suresh Sallay, the alleged mastermind of the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage.
During his submission, Dileepa Pieris looked at the medals worn by the retired officer and said: “He comes wearing pieces of tin.”
When Jayathilake objected to the ASG’s remark, Magistrate Pasan Amarasena warned the ex-officer not to interrupt proceedings. Then Peiris said that he couldn’t see Jayathilake’s medals properly. Jayathilake is the recipient of Weewa Wickrema Vibhushanaya (WWV), the second highest gallantry medal awarded to Sri Lankan military. The PWV is the highest gallantry decoration that can be received by a living military man. Jayathilake who joined the Air Force in 1989 at the height of the JVP-led insurgency, retired in 1999, and was also the recipient of the Rana Sura Padakkama (RSP).
Senior President’s Counsel Maithree Gunaratne, who represented Sallay in court, said: “The problem is not with your eyes, but with the red-tinted glasses you are wearing. You wore blue-tinted glasses for a while, and now you wear red-tinted glasses, so the gallantry medals, earned with blood, sweat, and tears for the country, look like pieces of tin to you”
Gunaratne requested that Pieris’s comments on the ex-officer be formally recorded in court records. This happened in the Fort Magistrate’s court on 2 July, 2026. The court proceedings caused controversy with various interested parties expressing differing views on Jayathilake wearing medals to a courtroom.
Some found fault with him for wearing medals while others strongly backed him. The issue at hand received social media attention. Obviously some sought political advantage at the expense of the government and the Attorney General’s Department. Others lambasted the former State Intelligence Service (SIS) Chief Sallay (2029-2024) for causing unnecessary developments. However, the gallantry medals worn by military, both officers and men, cannot be ridiculed by anyone, regardless of his/her position in the society. Gallantry medals remind the country of immense and untold sacrifices made by the military, during the war, and any attempt to dilute them should be strongly opposed.
Those who silently backed or publicly take action against war-winning Army Chief General (retd.) Sarath Fonseka, in 2010, after his defeat at the 2010 January presidential election, shouldn’t see the incident at the Fort Magistrate court as an opportunity.
Although Sri Lanka has been deeply divided over investigations into the conduct of armed forces during the war and after, no issue caused controversy like the arrest of Sallay, a post-war head of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) over the 2019 Easter Sunday carnage. Sallay served as the Director of State Intelligence Service (SIS) from 2019 to 2024 before President Anura Kumara Dissanayake replaced him. Perhaps President Gotabaya Rajapaksa shouldn’t have brought Sallay as Director, SIS, contrary to the practice of SIS always being headed by a senior police officer or he was quite right in bringing in a serving military officer with a proven intelligence track record, knowing the shameful behaviour of responsible top police officers in the run up to the Easter Sunday suicide attacks, despite there having been adequate advance intelligence warnings to prevent them.
The intervention made by the retired Air Force officer triggered an unexpected reaction from the Attorney General’s top representative and the subsequent continuing controversy influenced The Island to discuss the awarding of gallantry medals, namely Parama Weera Vibhushanaya (PWV), the highest, followed by Weera Wickrema Vibhushanaya (WWV), Rana Wickrema Padakkama (RWP) and Rana Sura Padakkama (RSP). The fourth medal, Weeradhara Vibhushanaya, is awarded for bravery, regardless of the risks to one’s own life, but for voluntary interventions outside the battlefield.
Bravery of an exceptional kind
During the war, Sri Lanka awarded 32 PVWs posthumously. The Army, Navy and Air Force shared 29, 2 and 1, respectively. The PVW is awarded to all ranks of armed forces, both regular and volunteer, for individual acts of bravery in the face of enemy, disregarding the risks to one’s own life. Of the 32 recipients of the PVW, the extraordinary case of Maj. J.A.L. Jayasinghe (Lalith Jayasinghe), posthumously promoted to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, captured unprecedented public attention.
On many occasions, PWVs were awarded posthumously for sacrifices made in defensive action, while the armed forces were responding to enemy action. However, Lalith had initiated action deep within the enemy-held territory and his efforts reflected the overall military strategy.
The 29 recipients consisted of 27 Army: Second Lieutenant S.U Aladeniya, Lance Corporal (LC) Y.G.G. Kularatne (Hasalaka Gamini), Second Lt. K.W.T. Nishshanka, Staff Sgt. H.P.B. Gunasekera, LC W.I.M. Seneviratne, Lt. Col. A.F Lafir, Capt. G.S. Jayanath, Maj. J.A.L. Jayasinghe, Maj. K.A. Gamage, Capt. U.G.A.S. Samaranayake, H.G.M.K.I. Megawarna, Sgt H.G.S. Bandara, Corporal P.N. Suranga, Corporal P.M.N. Pushpakumara, Corporal D.N\M.S. Chandrasiri Bandara, LC K. Chandana, Private R.M.D.M. Ratnayake, LC A.M.M.P. Abeysinghe, recruit A.M.B.H.G. Abeyratne Banda, private T.G.R. Dayananda, Lt. P.N. Punsiri, Second Lt W.D. Jayathilake, Sgt. K.G.N.L.R. Perera, Corporal K.P.D.T. Gunasekera, LC H.A. Nilantha Kumara, LC S.V.A.M. Pushpamal. Navy: Lt. J.L.D.S. Wijetunga, Petty Officer K.G. Shantha and Air Force: Squadron Leader T.D.S. Silvapulle.
Although Jayasinghe paid the supreme sacrifice, while serving the Special Forces, he had been a proud member of the Gemunu Watch (GW). GW veteran Maj. Gen. K.B. Egodawele in his Hewayekuge Mathaka Satahan (Memories of a soldier), first launched in 2012, declared that Jayasinghe had been among four GW personnel, namely Captain U.G.A.S. Samaranayake, Captain H.P.M.K. Meghawardena and Corporal D.M.A.M. Pushpakumara to receive the PWV, posthumously.
All of them received the highest gallantry award for actions on the Vanni east region during Eelam War IV (2006 August to 2009 May).
Jayasinghe’s wife Kaushalya accepted the PVW on 19 May, 2012, at the annual Victory Day parade. Maj. Gen. Kamal Gunaratne read the awardee’s official citation. Kaushalya had been five months pregnant at the time Jayasinghe mounted a raid deep inside the LTTE-held territory in the Vanni east region. Gunaratne, the wartime General Officer Commanding (GoC) of the 53 Division declared that Jayasinghe had been in command of an LRRP (Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol)/Deep Penetration Unit tasked to eliminate LTTE leaders. That unit had moved about 40 kms into the enemy held territory in Oddusuddan and was positioned alongside the Mankulam-Oddusuddan road to kill LTTE leaders, on 26 November, 2008.
Suddenly, Jayasinghe had fallen sick but joined other members of the LLRP to fight the enemy after fierce fighting erupted between the two sides. In spite of having an opportunity to retreat, Jayasinghe, hero of many previous battles, suffered grievous injuries during the battle and succumbed to his injuries.
Jayasinghe had been an extraordinary soldier and was the recipient of the second highest gallantry medal, WWV, on three or four occasions. In one such occasion, Jayasinghe had received two WWVs at one ceremony and recalled retired Maj. Gen. Dhammi Hewage, who received the RSP at the same event. Hewage spoke admirably about what he called high risk and extraordinary LRRP operations undertaken by Jayasinghe over a period of time. Let me give you an opportunity to know more about Hewage whose no holds barred examination of the Army during the war received public attention ( https://island.lk/a-special-forces-officers-narrative/)
Those who risked their lives to earn battlefield recognition played a significant role in transforming the armed forces, particularly the Army. Gallantry medals had been earned by armed forces officers and men in various circumstances but the deadly LRRP strikes, deep within the LTTE held territory, made quite a difference in the overall direction of the war. Those who operated in enemy territory in a way functioned as suicide cadres/units as the probability of them being intercepted by the LTTE was very high. But, regardless of severe risks, they ventured out of government-held areas to infiltrate deep inside enemy held territory to carry out operations. The LRRP team, led by Jayasinghe, is a case in point.
Clandestine operations received public attention in the run-up to the 2001 December parliamentary election when UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe all of a sudden alleged that the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) was planning to assassinate him. Within weeks after the UNP victory at the parliamentary election, the UNP unleashed the police on the DMI. The police raided the DMI safe house at Millennium City, Athurugiriya. In spite of Army Chief, the late Lt. Gen. Lionel Balagalle, personally assuring the UNP that there was absolutely no basis for such claims, Wickremesinghe was not prepared to change his political strategy. He gave Minister John Amaratunga in charge of police the go ahead for planned action.
The January 2, 2002, raid led to the arrest of Captain Mohamed Nilam, Staff Sgt. P. Ananda Udulagama, Staff Sergeant I. Edirisinghe Jayamanne, Corporal H.M. Nissanka Herath, Lance Corporal H. Mohamed Hilmy and an LTTE operative identified as Niyaz/Subashkaran. Others involved in that particular operation had been living in the East and were called into join operations, depending on the requirement. On the instructions of Lt. Gen. Balagalle, those tasked with carrying out attacks on selected targets received the opportunity to train under Special Forces instructors from Maduru Oya. They underwent training at the Panaluwa Test Firing Range, where firing special weapons was a key element in the training schedule.
In a bid to ensure secrecy, those operatives mostly operated on their own, and had their own arsenal, which included a range of weapons, including claymore mines. In fact, those involved in such operations functioned on a need-to-know basis. Even senior DMI officials, as well as the Army top brass, except a few, hadn’t been aware of what was going on. Even the then powerful Deputy Defence Minister, the late Anuruddha Ratwatte, hadn’t been told of the Millennium City safe-house, though he knew of the ongoing hits behind enemy lines.
Shortly after the exposure of the DMI operation, Balagalle met Premier Wickremesinghe to explain the secret operations undertaken against the LTTE. The Army chief had been accompanied by officials, including Hendarawithana, while one-time Attorney General Tilak Marapana, National List MP holding the Defence portfolio, and Minister Milinda Moragoda, too, were present.
“Except for Minister Moragoda, the others obviously didn’t realise what we were doing. They acted as if we were conspiring to do away with the political leadership so as to undermine the Norwegian initiative,” a source familiar with the dynamics of the project said. “We quickly realised we were up against a government, which simply wanted to negotiate a deal with the LTTE at any cost. The LTTE and the Norwegians exploited the situation to the hilt.”

Success in the East
Hitting the enemy in the area under its control had been Balagalle’s idea. The DMI hadn’t been successful in its first and the second attempts to take two specific targets. The targeted area had been Batticaloa south and the first and the second operations were mounted on 18 July 2001 and 12 September 2001. But both actions went awry and the targeted men identified as Jim Kelly (commander of Jeyanthan regiment) and Jeevan escaped death.
But, they succeeded on 17 September 2001. Operatives carried out a successful attack on ‘Major’ Mano Master, who was at that time in charge of the communications network in the Ampara-Batticaloa area.
But immediately after the UNP’s victory, the government terminated all such operations. The treacherous government betrayed those who risked their lives for the country. Ex-LTTEers and others who worked for the Army were exposed and the LTTE hunted them down. Scores of men were killed. Some were tortured and killed.
Apart from Mano Master, the secret raids claimed the lives of Batticaloa District Intelligence Head Lt. Col Nizam and Capt. Thevathasan.
Among those killed in the north were LTTE Air Wing Head Col. Shankar (Vaithilingam Sornalingam) and Sea Tiger Deputy Commander Lt. Col Kangai Amaran.
S.P. Thamilselvan, his Deputy Major S. Thangan, Vavuniya Special Commander Col. Jeyam and Deputy Military Chief Col. Balraj were believed to have been targeted in the North but escaped. In the East, among those who escaped targeted killings, were Col. Karuna, Karikalan, Jim Kelly and Intelligence Chief Lt. Col. Ramanan.
In spite of the LTTEers, particularly its leaders on a heightened state of alert, the Army ambushed Karikalan’s vehicle on 18 October, 2001. The destruction of the vehicle fuelled speculation of Karikalan’s demise, with a section of the media reporting him killed in a special operation. Shortly before the attack on Karikalan’s vehicle, the Army intercepted a radio conversation between Karikalan and his wife, a medical doctor by profession, serving in the Northern Province. “She simply begged him to leave Batticaloa and take refuge in the North to avoid the Army’s deep penetration operations,” a source familiar with LRRP operations told the writer many years ago.
The Army struck again on 26 November, 2001. ‘Major’ Swarnaseelan and ‘Captain’ Devadas were eliminated in the Pulipanjikkal area. It was the last operation before the December 5 General Election.
The UNP terminated the operation. But, the Army revived the strategy after the eruption of hostilities in 2005.
It would be pertinent to mention that hit and run attacks, deep within the LTTE held territory, troubled them to such an extent, they took up the issue with Norway. Fearing a relentless campaign, the LTTE got Norway to include LRRP operations in their negotiations, leading to a one-sided Ceasefire Agreement (CFA) signed in February 2002 by the Wickremesinghe regime. That CFA revealed the existence of a secret Army project to target the LTTE in their own area. The CFA called for termination of LRRP operations.
Three PVWs
Lieutenant J.L.D.S. Wijetunga was the first Navy recipient of the Parama Weera Vibhushanaya (PWV), Sri Lanka’s highest gallantry award given posthumously. Wijetunga, Commanding Officer of the Israeli built Dvora Fast Attack Craft (FAC), maneuvered his vessel to intercept an explosives-laden Sea Tiger suicide boat approaching a troop transport ship off Point Pedro on 30 March, 1996. Wijetunga, in spite of knowing his action was suicidal, went ahead with the risky maneuver that saved the lives of a large contingent of off duty servicemen on their way to Trincomalee from Kankesanthurai (KKS).
The Navy earned its second PWV on 1 November, 2008, off Point Pedro, during the Eelam war IV. A Petty Officer of elite Special Boat Squadron K.G. Shantha rammed an explosives-laden Sea Tiger suicide craft with his Arrow boat (Z-142 ). Shantha and his three SBS colleagues were blasted to smithereens, though their action saved an Inshore Patrol Craft (IPC) carrying a dozen SBS personnel.
Wing Commander T.D.S. Silvapulle received the nation’s highest gallantry award PWV for attacking Sea Tiger boats firing at Army defences south-east of Elephant Pass on 19 December, 1999. Silvapulle, flying a Mi 24 helicopter gunship in adverse weather conditions, regardless of the threat posed by surface-to-air missiles, engaged the enemy craft. Silvapulle compelled the enemy to flee but was hit during the confrontation. His individual act of gallantry was recognized in 2012, four years after the eradication of the LTTE. The then President Mahinda Rajapaksa conferred the PWV at a ceremony held on 19 May, 2012. Maj. Lalith Jayasinghe received his PWV at the same ceremony.
The betrayal of the armed forces in October, 2015, at the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, by the treacherous Sirisena-Wickremesinghe regime, underscored the mentality of those who wielded political power. The calling of gallantry medals ‘pieces of tin’ reminded the country of the pathetic and disgraceful state of affairs.
Midweek Review
Poor, little upper-middle income country
“Sri Lanka has been ranked among the least happy countries in the latest World Happiness Report 2026…standing alongside Ethiopia”- The Sunday Island March 2026
Sri Lanka was officially declared an Upper-Middle Income country by the World Bank in July 2026, regaining the classification it had in 2019.
On the 30th of June, the IMF delegation meeting the President at the Presidential Secretariat praised the government: “…IMF praised the government’s economic programme and noted that Sri Lanka has made greater progress than many other countries implementing IMF-supported programmes. The delegation commended the government for maintaining macroeconomic stability despite a series of external shocks and for remaining firmly committed to its reform agenda…” (Presidential Media Division, 30 June 2026)
Meanwhile, a UN-backed World Happiness Report 2026 compiled by the Wellbeing Research Centre at the University of Oxford, ranked Sri Lanka 134th out of 147 nations. A daily newspaper which ran the story on the 19th of March 2026, added that the report showed that “Sri Lanka has slipped one place from its 133rd ranking in 2025, now standing alongside Ethiopia. The country also trails behind its South Asian neighbours, with India ranked 116th, Pakistan and Bangladesh positioned significantly higher.”
Good News, Bad News
The Upper-Middle Income classification was declared by the World Bank during the Yahapalana government in July 2019. 6 months later, the Yahapalana government was swept out at elections.
Only 2 years later, in April 2022, the country was declared bankrupt, and by July that year the newly elected President was toppled by a people’s uprising for the first time in the country’s history.
To fill the vacuum, an unlikely combination of an unelected MP from the Opposition who was made President by the Parliament and an unpopular government that had barely survived the uprising, governed the country together. It was massively defeated by the people only 2 years later in 2024, despite ‘stabilising’ the economy.
An Upper-Middle Income status may give the impression of a prosperous people, but prosperous people are not an unhappy people. The World Bank report 2026 (World Bank, Sri Lanka Development Update) notes the anomaly: “the recovery is unfinished and has not translated into widespread improvements in welfare.”
The report adds:
* Real output remains below 2018 levels.
* Although poverty is projected to decline in 2025, it remains double the 2019 levels.
* Vulnerability remains high with an additional 10 percent of the population living just above the poverty line.
* Malnutrition continues to be elevated.
* The labour market recovery is slow with real wages and labor force participation well below 2019 levels.
The World Bank’s Poverty and Equity Brief (October 2025) sheds further light:
* Poverty is projected at 22.3-22.4 percent in 2025 and around 20 percent until 2027 without stronger inclusive growth.
* Real earnings remain below pre-crisis levels.
So, are Top of the Class in the IMF index and almost Bottom of the Class in the Happiness Index related?
As a friend who is a highly-placed economist explained to me, if people are poorer, undernourished, indebted, and insecure after stabilisation, then reserves, inflation, and primary balances alone cannot be relied on to judge the next IMF programme. Sri Lanka needs a national programme whose success metric is household recovery, jobs, nutrition, and productive capacity.
From the praise heaped on the President and this government’s strong leadership by the IMF for their performance thus far, sticking closely to the IMF conditionalities, we can only infer that things for the unhappy citizens will hardly get better as they negotiate the 18th IMF programme.
The AKD administration doesn’t haggle on behalf of the people. They see the rewards of that approach in fiscal consolidation and macroeconomic stability. This however, is not the only kind of stability they have to bear in mind, given recent history.
By the People, But Not for the People?
The new or renewed (from July 2019) ‘Upper-Middle Income’ classification has served to remind people where the government has failed, been weak, as much as where it has been strong and succeeded. The economy in the abstract is better off, but the majority of the people who gave the government a two thirds majority, are much worse off in material reality.
To return to my top economist friend, she explained that Sri Lanka should not reject fiscal discipline, but it must own the design of fiscal adjustment. The country needs a fairer tax mix, better tax administration, public investment discipline, and protection of health, education, nutrition, and climate-resilient infrastructure. Otherwise, fiscal discipline becomes socially brittle and growth-reducing.
The direction she recommended is hardly where the government is heading. The World Bank warns that the on-going reliance on regressive indirect taxes could worsen the poverty outlook, while the primary expenditure ceiling of 13 percent of GDP can constrain public investment and service delivery.
A leading financial daily (6 July) reported that at the CA Sri Lanka’s 5th Annual Economic and Tax Symposium, both the Government’s tax policies and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) “came under sustained criticism from leading private sector tax professionals”. Gajma & Co. Senior Partner N.R. Gajendran argued that “…higher revenues had come largely from imposing a heavier burden on existing taxpayers rather than widening the tax base.”
He said that “When taxes become excessive and unbearable, and it is not coming from the widening of the base, it is coming from the same taxpayer, it erodes expenditure capabilities, it erodes saving capabilities, and it erodes investment capabilities,” warning that “sustained over-taxation ultimately weakens consumption, investment, and long-term economic growth.”
Sri Lanka has already lost a large number of skilled professionals who migrated in droves in the last two years. Factum reports (April 2026) that the annual departures for foreign employment have hovered above the 310,000 mark. This includes Healthcare Professionals (Doctors, nurses), Academics and Researchers (including 80-90% of State University graduates), Technologists and Engineers.
Will the Lawyers be next? The Island editorial of 6 July 2026 strongly supports the stand that the BASL has taken, (endorsed by the Colombo Law Society, Colombo High Court Lawyers Association, LAWASIA and the Commonwealth Lawyers Association) opposing the government’s effort to move a constitutional amendment to extend the retirement age of judges of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, denouncing political interference in the judiciary and urging the government to avoid a Zimbabwean crisis.
None of this makes for a happy citizen, stability notwithstanding.
By the People, for the Creditors
So, what of all those promises made with such passion to do better than all previous governments since Independence in 1948?
The World Food Programme has this to report:
* Households unable to meet essential food needs increased from 14 percent in 2024 to 20 percent in 2026.
* If price trends continue, another 1.3 million people could be unable to afford essential food needs, including nearly 300,000 urban poor.
* Child nutrition remains worrying: stunting 10.1 percent, wasting 8.6 percent, and underweight 16.1 percent. (WFP, Food Security Under Pressure)
Economists warn that a programme that ‘stabilises’ the economy while households sell assets, cut food, reduce education and health spending, and slide into coping strategies, i.e., de-stabilises the household economy and lives, will not be socially, politically or developmentally sustainable.
Those who care for the people recommend that Sri Lanka’s own programme must place adaptive social protection, nutrition, and livelihoods at the very centre.
The promised re-negotiation of the 17th IMF package to make the necessary economic recovery less taxing (pun intended) for the people, less painful, and more sustainable overall, never happened. The government acted as if it was elected by the People for the Creditors.
We have been warned that Sri Lanka’s shift toward commercial borrowing and ISBs changed the debt-risk profile, with ISBs carrying high interest rates and short maturities. The government’s promised negotiations didn’t resemble anything like what was expected by the people, and went the way of the ISB holders who celebrated the victory in Canary Wharf toasting our President in absentia.
IMF Country Report No 26/111 indicates that even after restructuring, debt sustainability risks remain high. Public debt is projected at around 100.1 percent of GDP in 2026, with central government gross financing needs at 19.8 percent of GDP.
Economists remind us that Sri Lanka’s recent graduation to the Upper Middle-Income classification means that we will have to pay more in debt repayments as per the macro-linked bond of the debt restructuring settlement with the creditors.
IMF 18, going on 19?
Who’d have thought it? In the last 77 years, the most pro-people, pro-poor administration has certainly not been the AKD government. There were much better ones, even during the 30 year war, when policies were more enlightened and served the people; were undertaken with confidence and determination, and some still continue to provide the foreign exchange to pay for subsequent errors of judgment. And with the courage of their convictions and confidence in their capacity to deliver, those leaders didn’t feel the need to postpone any elections.
Stabilisation was an immediate necessity. But my economist friend spoke for us all when she told me “Sri Lanka cannot stabilise its way to prosperity. It should not risk turning emergency discipline into a permanent development model”.
With the current state of play, is that what we are looking at? There is little evidence that this administration has the capacity to design an independent programme, not subject to the whims and fancies of IFIs, but as my friend put it, “our own programme: fiscally responsible, socially protective, production-oriented, climate-resilient, and politically owned. The IMF can support that programme, but it cannot be the programme.”
An unhappy people is surely as much of an indicator of the real health of the economy, as the Gross National Income per capita calculated in US dollars by the World Bank. A Sunday newspaper quoted a young economist, Rehana Thowfeek, co-founder/director at Arutha Research, who says: “There is no point in celebrating becoming an upper-middle-income country while 1 in 4 of our people is in poverty, two out of every 5 Sri Lankans cannot afford a healthy diet and 1 out of 3 of our children under 5 years is malnourished.”
This is not a situation that should be allowed to prevail by an allegedly pro-people government, or indeed any government that has been granted the privilege to govern, through the people’s vote. The planning, the policy choices are all in the hands of the government. Will they choose a better path?
People are not unhappy because they are too mean to acknowledge what a wonderful job this government is doing, and give praise to this administration like the IMF at the Presidential Secretariat. It is because they are in pain, they are suffering, they are hungry, they cannot pay the bills, and they are looking at a future where none of these things are going away, but is set to get much worse, as the government slouches towards its next IMF programme and the next debt repayment.

by Sanja de Silva Jayatilleka
Midweek Review
Her Humiliation Remains
In the brave new wired world,
With the cyber bully and fraudster,
She needs to constantly contend,
Which should set the sensible thinking,
Whether in its basic essentials,
For Her the world has changed,
And let’s also see the message,
That’s understood but not voiced,
That Her cause has suffered dire neglect…
That the whip is in the grasp of the patriarch.
By Lynn Ockersz
-
News4 days agoSingapore-based Buddhist monk marks nearly four decades of humanitarian service
-
News5 days agoFreedom 250: US Embassy celebrates America’s 250th Independence Day through magic of American cinema
-
News6 days agoCIABOC to question Harak Kata on Rs. 200 mn bribery allegation
-
News6 days agoSLAF conducts successful rescue mission under UN command in Central African Republic
-
News3 days agoAI concerned over proposed SL military deployment in Haiti
-
News5 days agoUNEP support pledged to strengthen Sri Lanka’s Environmental Priorities
-
Business6 days ago‘Dialog Air Fibre powers a new era of Ultra Fast Home WiFi’
-
Features4 days agoThe NPP’s New Challenge: Balancing Easter Lawfare and Economic Welfare
