News
STF kept in the dark about foreign intelligence warning, threat posed by Zahran, NTJ, etc., – Ex-SDIG Latheef
Easter Sunday carnage probe:
By Rathindra Kuruwita
Former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando, former Inspector General of Police (IGP) Pujith Jayasundara or former Director of the State Intelligence Service (SIS), Senior DIG Nilantha Jayawardena had not properly conveyed the reliable intelligence information about the possible terrorist attacks to the Special Task Force (STF), retired Commandant of the STF, Senior DIG M.R. Latheef, on Saturday, told the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI) investigating the Easter Sunday attacks.
Latheef said the STF had the experience and the capability of neutralizing threats posed by terrorists. If he had been informed of the reliable intelligence information that the SIS had received on April 20, 2019,. the STF would have been able to lock down the Colombo City, arrest the terrorists and neutralise the threat.
Latheef said that on April 09, 2019, the former IGP had sent a letter informing the STF Headquarter of the foreign information of a possible terror attack and it had been received at 6.45 pm, Latheef said, adding that he had returned to the country, following a training programme in France on April 10. After his return, he had called the IGP before going to office and asked if there were any important developments, SDIG Latheef said. However, Jayasundara had told him that there wasn’t anything special.
However, when he arrived at the office, he had seen the letter sent by the IGP and informed STF officers deployed with VIP security squads including those of the President and the Prime Minister and STF officers in charge of various divisions of the letter.
The Attorney General’s representative leading the evidence asked the witness whether the foreign warning of the possible terror attack, received on April 04, 2019 by the SIS, had been discussed or mentioned when Latheef met the Defence Secretary or the IGP, between April 10 and 20.
Latheef checked his service record book and said that he had met Fernando and Jayasundara on April 11. However, neither of them had spoken to him about the information of the possible terrorist attacks. He also said that certain individuals had told the Parliament Select Committee on the Easter Attacks that they had discussed the developments at issue on April 18, 2019. However, since he was out of the country between April 15 and 18, for a conference on drug eradication, such a meeting could not have happened, the witness said.
SDIG Latheef said that on April 19, SDIG Jayawardena had spoken to him about an incident in Kattankudy, on April 16, where a motorcycle bomb had detonated. “I told him that I had just got back and that I would deploy officers and file a report on this. On April 20, I called Nilantha. I told him that it was a test run and that such an explosion could lead to the loss of many lives. I said an explosives laden bike could be brought to populous areas.”
However, it was only after the April 21 attacks that information on Islamic extremists had been shared with the STF in a systematic and meaningful way, the witness said. If the IGP had reposed any trust in him and the STF, this information could have been shared earlier.
“Others had been told of Zahran Hashim. I only got to know about Zahran and the National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ) only after we were summoned to the National Security Council (NSC) after the attack. I was only given the first report by a foreign intelligence source and it contained limited information. But much more in-depth information was shared between SIS Director and the IGP. Apparently, the names, their connections and their whereabouts had all been shared between senior officers.”
Latheef said that he had asked former ministers Sagala Ratnayake and Ranjith Maddumabandara to invite them to the NSC meetings. At that time, the STF was at the forefront of drug eradication, but it had not been even invited to the Intelligence Coordination Meeting. “If the STF had been properly briefed on April 09, 2019, we would have had almost two weeks to neutralise the threat,” the witness said.
“I called the SIS Director on April 20 to inform him of the bicycle bomb. He didn’t tell me that he had reliable information that a terrorist attack was expected to take place on April 21. If I had been informed of the imminent attack, I would have sealed off Colombo and the Western Province. We could have placed road blocks and implemented contingency plans; we would have been able to arrest one or two and neutralise the threat. I am still perplexed why I wasn’t informed of the warning at least on April 20.”
News
Meeting between Catholic religious leaders and President
A meeting between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Catholic religious leaders, led by His Eminence Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith, Archbishop of Colombo, was held at the Presidential Secretariat on Thursday (10).
Special attention was given to the Government’s programme to strengthen coexistence, peace and reconciliation among all communities in the country and to ensure national unity by preventing any form of racist or religiously motivated hate activity.
The progress of investigations into the Easter Sunday attacks was also discussed.
Lengthy discussions were held on measures that could be taken to prevent environmental damage and destruction affecting the lives of the people.
The Catholic religious leaders commended the measures taken by the Government to safeguard trust among all communities and expressed their fullest support for these efforts.
The issues faced by Catholic communities, including infrastructure development in areas where Catholic people reside, as well as measures that should be taken to address these issues, were also discussed at length.
Rev. Fr. Cyril Gamini, Rev. Fr. Julian Patrick and other priests, as well as Deputy Minister of Religious and Cultural Affairs Muneer Mulaffer, President’s Senior Additional Secretary Roshan Gamage and others, were also present at the meeting.
President’s Media Division (PMD)
News
Sri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM
BY IfhAm NIzAm
Sri Lanka could soon face a new electricity-grid challenge—not from too little power, but from having too much solar generation in the wrong places and at the wrong times, a former Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB) General Manager told The Island.
The former CEB GM who insisted not to be named warned that the rapid growth of rooftop and utility-scale solar could place increasing pressure on CEB and LECO distribution feeders, substations and the national grid unless transmission, storage and grid-management systems are upgraded at the same pace.
“The issue is no longer simply how much solar we can install. The question is whether the grid can absorb those electrons when and where they are produced,” he told The Island.
He said Sri Lanka should learn from China and India, where the enormous expansion of renewable generation is now forcing policymakers to focus increasingly on storage, transmission capacity, intelligent dispatch and grid flexibility.
“China has already exceeded 1.28 TW of installed solar, while India’s grid-connected installed solar capacity stood at around 162.15 GW as of June 30, 2026. The difficult question now is what you actually do with so much solar when everyone is generating at almost the same time,” he said.
For Sri Lanka, he said, the warning is particularly relevant to the distribution network.
A feeder carrying a high concentration of rooftop solar can, during periods of strong sunshine and low local demand, move from the traditional one-way flow of electricity towards consumers to reverse power flow back towards the transformer and upstream network.
“That means the feeder is no longer simply a one-way road for electricity. At certain times of the day, it becomes a two-way road,” he said.
This can create voltage-rise, protection-coordination and transformer-loading issues and could eventually limit the amount of additional rooftop solar that can safely be connected to particular feeders.
“What matters is where those megawatts are connected,” he told The Island.
He said Sri Lanka therefore needs to begin looking at solar hosting capacity feeder by feeder and substation by substation, rather than treating the national grid as having unlimited capacity to absorb new distributed generation.
The problem is compounded by the evening transition, when solar generation falls rapidly just as electricity demand can increase.
“If the system has a lot of solar in the middle of the day and then loses that generation rapidly in the evening, something else has to respond. That is a flexibility problem,” he said.
This is where battery energy storage systems (BESS) are likely to become increasingly important—but the former CEB chief cautioned against allowing cheap imported battery hardware to drive the market.
“Sri Lanka could soon have huge BESS demand, very cheap battery hardware and everyone suddenly becoming a BESS pundit. What could possibly go wrong?” he said.
He cited fire safety, degradation, poor integration, weak energy-management systems, questionable warranties, incorrect sizing, inappropriate grid locations and poor thermal management as major risks.
“A system can look fantastic in Excel on Day One but perform very differently in Year Two,” he told The Island.
He said the future BESS market would therefore be determined less by who could supply the cheapest container and more by who understood the complete system.
“The future BESS business will not be about who can assemble the cheapest container. It will be about who understands battery, PCS, EMS, grid, safety, degradation and dispatch economics as one system,” he said.
For Sri Lanka, storage should also be considered as a distribution-grid asset, rather than solely as a large transmission-level installation.
Strategically located batteries could absorb excess rooftop solar on constrained feeders during the middle of the day and release electricity later when local demand rises, potentially reducing network congestion and improving the value of distributed generation.
“The question is not simply, ‘How many megawatt-hours of batteries do we need?’ The question is, ‘Where does the battery create the greatest system value?’” he said.
He said China’s and India’s experience could broadly be viewed as three stages: Phase One—build solar and wind; Phase Two—build storage; and Phase Three—redesign the grid around renewables.
Sri Lanka, he said, should learn from that progression before renewable penetration makes grid problems significantly more expensive to solve.
“Installing another large amount of solar is one thing. Absorbing those electrons when the sun is shining everywhere at once is quite another,” he said.
“Solar taught us how to generate cheap electrons. BESS and the grid will decide whether those cheap electrons are actually useful when they are needed.”
“That is perhaps the biggest lesson Sri Lanka should take from China and India’s energy transition right now,” he added.
News
SC rules President Sirisena’s pardon of Gnanasara thera invalid
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that former President Maithripala Sirisena’s decision to grant a presidential pardon to Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thera was arbitrary and invalid in law.
A three-judge bench headed by Justice Janak de Silva delivered the judgment in response to fundamental rights petitions filed by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA) and Sandhya Ekneligoda, challenging the former President’s decision to release the monk from prison.
Gnanasara Thera had been sentenced by the Court of Appeal in August 2018 to 19 years’ rigorous imprisonment, to run concurrently as six years, after being found guilty of contempt of court over his conduct inside the Homagama Magistrate’s Court on January 25, 2016, during proceedings related to the disappearance of Prageeth Ekneligoda.
The Supreme Court subsequently upheld the Court of Appeal’s finding of guilt on October 5, 2018.
However, Gnanasara Thera was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after the then President Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon.
The petitioners challenged the legality of the pardon, prompting the Supreme Court to examine the exercise of the President’s constitutional power of clemency.
The Court’s ruling yesterday effectively nullifies the pardon granted to the BBS leader.
Viran Corea, PC, with Luwie Ganeshathasan and Khyati Wikramanayake appeared for the CPA, while Counsel Asthika Devendra, with Pulasthi Hewamanne, instructed by Manjula Balasuriya, appeared for Sandhya Ekneligoda.Counsel Thishya Weragoda, with Sanjaya Marambe and Iresh Senevirathne, appeared for Gnanasara Thera. Faiszer Musthapha, PC, with Pulasthi Rupesinghe, appeared for former President Sirisena.
-
News6 days agoNamal remanded until Sept. 18 over Airbus deal investigation
-
Latest News5 days agoTharanga creates history with Diamond League crown in Brussels
-
News5 days agoDispute which triggered listed company director being detained at BIA resolved
-
Features4 days agoAfter the parade: What a traffic OIC’s walk-out tells us
-
Editorial6 days agoPower vs Equality
-
Editorial4 days agoArrests as theatre
-
Latest News4 days agoHarshitha’s composed knock seals Sri Lanka’s semi-final berth
-
Latest News7 days agoSLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa arrested by CIABOC
