Connect with us

News

COPE takes GSMB to task for irregularities

Published

on

The Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB) had not paid royalty to the Treasury for many years, Prof. Charitha Herath, Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) noted when officials of the GSMB Technical Services (pvt) Ltd, affiliated to the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau, were summoned before COPE on 23 February.

Instead of transferring funds to the Treasury, officials had deposited the money in the fixed deposit accounts of the Bureau. Although the royalty collected by the Bureau from the year 2016 to 2021 was Rs. 16,591,075,088 only Rs. 8,520,235,812 has been transferred to the Treasury.

The watchdog Committee also looked into salaries paid by the Bureau to employees of GSMB Technical Services (pvt) Ltd. A number of staff members had been recruited in excess of the approved cardre and the Chairman of the COPE instructed the Secretary to the Ministry to conduct an inquiry into the matter. The COPE Chairman said that if there was a shortage of staff in the Bureau, it should inform the Department of Management Services and obtain approval.

The COPE noted that the Action Plan prepared for the Bureau for the years 2019-2023, at a cost of Rs. 2,581,633, had not yet been properly submitted to the board of directors for approval. It also took into account the shortfall in the number of Audit Committee meetings held by the Bureau in the recent past, and stressed the need for conducting proper audit meetings.

Prof. Herath also drew attention to the fact that Parliament had not been informed of the progress of the implementation of the recommendations made by the COPE on the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau dated 18 September 2019. The members of the committee emphasized that Parliament be made aware of the implementation of the recommendations made by the parliamentary watchdog.

The two institutions are due to be called before COPE again in another month’s time.

In addition, the first report of the Committee on Public Enterprises of the Second Session of the Ninth Parliament was tabled for the approval of the Members of the Committee. The third report of the first session could not be tabled in Parliament and the committee members agreed to table it on 25 Feb.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

New Court of Appeal Judge Sajeewani Dilka Lakmali Sworn In

Published

on

By

Ms Sajeewani Dilka Lakmali Karunannayake was sworn in as a Judge of the Court of Appeal before President Anura Kumara Dissanayake at the Presidential Secretariat this afternoon (03).

She previously served as an Additional Solicitor General at the Attorney General’s Department.

The appointment has been made to fill a vacancy on the Court of Appeal.

Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake was also present on the occasion.

(President’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

Latest News

Sun directly overhead Madampe, Thorayaya, Thotagamuwa, Rattota and Kalavanchikudy about 12.09 noon today (03)

Published

on

By

The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from 28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.

The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (03) are Madampe, Thorayaya, Thotagamuwa, Rattota and
Kalavanchikudy about 12.09 noon.

Continue Reading

News

22A: SC urged to suspend hearing, appoint full bench

Published

on

Attorney-at-Law Sugandhika Fernando, on behalf of the Vinivida Foundation, petitioned the Supreme Court yesterday (02), seeking a full bench, excluding Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, to hear the petitions challenging the 22nd Amendment Bill. She also requested that the hearing be suspended immediately until the matter was fully heard and determined.

Among the respondents are Chief Justice Surasena, the first respondent, and Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe. Justices Yasantha Kodagoda, Shiran Gooneratne, Achala Wengappuli and Priyantha Fernando have also been named as respondents.

The petitioner has sought to have quashed the decision of the first respondent to appoint a five-member bench, which she alleged was made in violation of the norms of public law. She also sought a bench comprising all Supreme Court judges, excluding those cited as respondents, to hear the special determination applications on the 22nd Amendment.

The petitioner further contended that Chief Justice Surasena, who is due to retire on December 1, 2026, would be the main beneficiary of the 22nd Amendment.

The hearing of the petitions continued for a second day yesterday (02) before a five-member Supreme Court bench comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli, Arjuna Obeyesekere, Sampath Abeykoon and Gihan Kulatunga.

The hearing, which commenced on Tuesday morning, continued for nearly 12 hours, until 10:30 p.m.

Solicitor General Viraj Dayaratne, appearing for the Attorney General, submitted yesterday that the Government had presented the 22nd Amendment Bill to the Constitution and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill with the objective of expanding and streamlining the country’s judicial system.

After the Solicitor General’s submissions concluded, counsel representing the petitioners requested an opportunity to respond to the Solicitor General and the intervening petitioners. However, the Chief Justice declined to allow the petitioners’ counsel to make further oral submissions, concluded the determination hearing and directed them to file written submissions instead.

Continue Reading

Trending