Connect with us

News

Is Dr.N.M.Perera’s Solution of the 1970-75 Economic Crisis the Answer To Today’s Crisis ?

Published

on

Commemoration of Dr.N.M.Perera’s 42nd Death Anniversary.

Sri Lanka’s economy is facing a deep economic crisis. But it is not alone in this situation. The whole world is in crisis. It is a systemic crisis that affects every country periodically, to a greater or lesser extent, at intervals of eight to ten years. These have led to much suffering to the people and the process of emerging from them has been very slow and painful. This is an inherent feature of the capitalist economic system.

Capitalism developed in the womb of feudalism in Europe leading to revolutionary upheavals like those of the French Revolution and the Cromwellian Revolution in England. But in the countries of the Third World like Sri Lanka or India capitalism did not arise from within, but were introduced from capitalist countries like Britain to exploit our human and material resources and markets, using the local (comprador) capitalist class, led by parties like the UNP in Sri Lanka.

Dr. N M Perera and emerging young intellectuals like Colvin R de Silva, Leslie Goonewardena, Philip Gunawardene and Dr. S A Wickremasinghe, when they were abroad recognized that this colonial subjugation would lead to perpetual poverty for the vast majority of the Sri Lankan people. A true understanding of the nature of capitalism and imperialism was achieved through a study of Marxism. They became Marxist revolutionaries committed to the defeat of capitalism and its replacement by socialism globally and thereby in Sri Lanka.

Dr N.M. Perera obtained a BSc, PhD and DSc from the prestigious London School of Economics of the London University. He was a favourite pupil of the legendary Prof. Harold J. Laski, who was also an advisor to the Labour Party, who said that NM had all the qualities needed to be an English Chancellor of the Exchequer (a Finance Minister). Following NMs return to Sri Lanka and his performance here, Sir Ivor Jennings who was then the Vice Chancellor of the only University of Ceylon, said that he had all the qualities required of a Labour Prime Minister in Britain. Instead of rising to great heights serving the British Empire that ruled the world, NM chose to serve the people of Sri Lanka by fighting to win independence from the British.

When NM and these Left leaders returned to Sri Lanka (Ceylon) they helped form the Suriyamal Movement to save the people whom the British rulers allowed to suffer from malaria without medicine and food. Dr. N.M. was referred to as “parippu mahattaya”, as he supplied these needs climbing steep hills by foot despite the presence of leeches and snakes, as there were few roads. In 1935 they (NM, Colvin, Philip, SA and Leslie) formed the Lanka Sama Samaja Party( LSSP). They devoted all their energy and income, day and night, to fight for the rights of our people against the British rulers and their local agents. Their main objective was winning complete independence (unlike the Dominion status that was given by the British to D.S. Senanayake and the UNP in 1948 to continue their exploitation here). Complete independence was finally achieved in 1972, overcoming UNP resistance, through the Republican Constitution drafted by Colvin as Minister of Constitutional Affairs in the Coalition Government led by Sirimavo Bandaranaike. This was 22 years after India as UNP and TNA resistance had to be overcome.

The second objective was to overcome poverty and injustice and narrow the rich minority /poor majority gap, by establishing a society with social equity , a “sama samajaya”. In Sri Lanka, like in the whole world , the rich poor gap is widening and society is becoming more unstable. With the global capitalist crisis, and the fall of the US and western economies and the rise of China purely by trade (without any imperialist conquests) the USA is now gearing for war to lift its economy which depends on arms sales, as it produces 60% of global supply. The aim is also to achieve regime change in China.

The LSSP also fought for 22 other demands and won many of them – free education, free health, the eight hour working day, overtime payment, pension, EPF and other rights. While doing all this, NM found time to attain many achievements; MP for Ruwanwella and Yatiyantota, Leader of the Opposition, Minister of Finance, a co-convenor of the global Group of 77 Ministers of Economics, the Mayor of Colombo and Leader of the LSSP from its inception upto his death. As an economist and political scientist he wrote copiously and was a popular speaker, in Parliament, and at public meetings; he went to all parts of the country and the world. He was a good sportsman and captained Ananda College at cricket.

But among his many achievements perhaps the most valuable is his overcoming the 1970/75 economic crisis in Sri Lanka. The crisis was a result of the adverse trade balance due to the policies of the 1965/70 UNP Government that wasted our limited forex on import of luxury goods as well as local products , hitting our farmers and SMEs. On top of this he was faced with the global capitalist downturn, the rise in the price of fossil fuels by seven times due to action by OPEC. Fertilizer prices rose by 422% in 1974. The world faced the worst drought for about 30 years during this period and food prices soared, with thousands dying in various parts of the world from starvation but no one died in Sri Lanka. The price of rice rose by 60% ( from 35 to 56 pounds per ton), flour by 65%, sugar by 323%.

The prices of food items have not gone up internationally on a similar scale today. It is far lower. The local market price has gone up due to massive profiteering by middlemen in Sri Lanka, specially millers and traders. Further the farmers are in the grip of money lenders as they are in a state of chronic debt. NM took measures to relieve rural debt. All essentials were supplied through a ration card at low prices through the Cooperative system that was functioning well. Producer and Consumer Cooperatives dealt with each other, getting rid of profiteering by middlemen (traders, millers etc.) in the process. We can gain by following NMs policies to tide over the present crisis.

( Prof. Tissa Vitarana)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Bangladesh bank on bowlers in bid to bring India down

Published

on

By

Bangladesh will look to curb Shafali Verma's aggression [cRICINFO]

If Bangladesh take the route of seeking inspiration from the past to bring down heavyweights India on Thursday, they will have to squint their eyes and go back to pre-Covid times for their last victory against them in the Women’s Asia Cup. India have had the better of their neighbours over their last eight meetings, and last lost to Bangladesh in a T20I three years ago, when a very similar-looking Indian batting line-up was kept to 102 for 9.

Before that, Bangladesh had shocked India with back-to-back wins that culminated in their maiden Asia Cup title, by again stifling India to an underwhelming 112 for 9.

The Bangladesh team of today – as their recent fights have shown over the last two World Cups – is a version far improved from the ones of 2018 and 2023. They have scared teams like Australia and England (ODI World Cup) and India (T20 World Cup) in the last 12 months and they recently beat the higher ranked Pakistan in the UK by keeping them to 100 for 8.

It is this bowling strength that Bangladesh must bank on to try and bring down India, whose batting has stuttered every now and then, including a collapse of 8 for 46 against Thailand earlier in the tournament. India have had middle-order issues for a while now – it’s one of the things that kept them from a knockout berth in the last T20 World Cup – and Bangladesh will be itching to strike while the iron is hot.

They have laid the foundations in the last 10 days by routing Indonesia for 58, making Sri Lanka sweat in a chase of 115, and suffocating UAE’s batters to 69 for 9 with semi-finals qualification on the line.

Pratika Rawal,  India’s No. 3 for this tournament in place of the injured Jemimah Rodrigues, hasn’t quite shown the promise in this format that she has in ODIs. Her 36 runs in three innings have come at a strike rate of just 109.09, against some of the lower-ranked teams in the world. Now into the knockouts, the time is ripe for Rawal to step up against one of the stronger bowling attacks of the tournament, especially if one of the openers doesn’t get going.

Swing bowler Marufa Akter is doing Marufa Akter things at this Asia Cup. She has struck in her opening spell in each of her three games so far – including the big scalp of Chamari Athapathuthu for 1. She has made the ball talk with her prodigious swing, and is the top wicket-taker in this Asia Cup among pace bowlers, with an economy rate of 3.27. She will hold the key for Bangladesh as they come up against a top order comprising Smriti Mandhana, Shafali Verma and Rawal.

Team news

After constant chopping and changing during the T20 World Cup in the UK, India have gone unchanged in the three games of this tournament. They will be expected to field the same XI again.

India (probable):  Smriti Mandhana,  Shafali Verma, Pratika Rawal,  Harmanpreet Kaur (capt),  Richa Ghosh (wk),  Bharti Fulmali,  Deepti Sharma,  Prema Rawat, Kranti Gaud,  N Shree Charani,  Nandani Sharma.

Bangladesh have used 14 players, in comparison, including a debut for 17-year-old allrounder Farjana Easmin. They may not make too many changes this time as the two players who came into the XI on Tuesday – Rabeya Khan and Sharmin Akter – played starring roles in beating UAE.

Bangladesh (probable):  Juairiya Ferdous,  Nigar Sultana (capt & wk),  Sobhana Mostary,  Dilara Akter,  Shorna Akter,  Rabeya Khan,  Sharmin Akter,  Nahida Akter,  Sultana Khatun,  Marufa Akter,  Fahima Khatun.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

News

Establishment of National Trade Negotiation Committee (NTFC) and Trade Policy Consultation Committee.

Published

on

By

Approval has been granted at the cabinet meeting held on 24-08-2026 to implement the recommendations submitted by the committee appointed to review Sri Lanka’s current Free Trade Agreements and future course of Free Trade Agreements in Sri Lanka.

Taking into account these recommendations, it has been
recognized the necessity of establishing a National Trade Negotiation Committee and Trade Policy Consultation Committee enabling Sri Lanka to follow a more targeted, sequential, and evidence-based approach in conducting negotiations for Sri Lanka’s future Free Trade Agreements and to ensure a sustainable and meaningful stakeholder consultation process.

The Cabinet of Ministers has approved the resolution furnished by the Minister of Trade, Commercial, Food Security, and Cooperative Development to act as follows.

• Establishment of a National Trade Negotiation Committee to guide trade discussions conducted with potential bilateral or regional trade partners
• Appointment of the Secretary to the Ministry of Trade, Commerce, Food Security, and Cooperative Development as the Chairman of the National Trade Negotiation Committee and
the Chief National Trade Negotiator.
• Establishment of 12 subject specific sub- committees with the required technical working groups under the National Trade Negotiation Committee
• Appointment of Trade Policy Consultative Committee comprising of trade experts, researchers engaged in research relevant to trade field, business community, unions, civil societies and relevant public officers to instruct the National Trade Negotiation Committee on active and technical sectors, to submit the policy recommendations to the Cabinet of Ministers regarding the matters relevant to the trade agreements, to inquire sustainable ideas regarding the Free Trade Agreements, and to ensure the communication mechanism.
• The Minister in charge of the Subject international trade and the Minister in charge of the subject of Industry to serve as Co-Chairpersons of the Trade Policy Advisory Committee.

Continue Reading

News

Justice Minister hits back at CLA

Published

on

Harshana Nanayakkara

By Saman Indrajith

Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara yesterday told Parliament that the Commonwealth Lawyers’ Association (CLA) was not an organisation officially recognised or registered under the Commonwealth Secretariat, but a fee-levying private association.

Responding to a question by Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa on why he had failed to meet CLA representatives, who recently visited Sri Lanka, Nanayakkara said he had offered them a date and time for a meeting, but they had been unable to attend.

The Commonwealth Lawyers Association (CLA) has questioned procedural fairness and other matters of concern in a report that deals with the Supreme Court hearing petitions against the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution. Among the issues raised by CLA President Steven Thiru, is the composition of the five-member bench.

The Minister said the CLA representatives subsequently requested another date, but he had already scheduled official engagements for the proposed day.

Nanayakkara said it was, therefore, incorrect to claim that he had refused to meet the CLA delegation.

“The CLA is not an official body accepted or admitted into the Commonwealth of countries. It is a private club whose members pay fees for membership,” he said.

However, the Minister said he was not suggesting that the organisation was “a bad organisation”, adding that the accuracy of several statements made by CLA members during their visit to Sri Lanka had yet to be established.

Nanayakkara identified lawyer Upul Jayasuriya as the CLA’s local representative and said Jayasuriya had sought a meeting with him.

“I gave him the opportunity, but he came up with the excuse that he could not make it as he was not in Colombo. Therefore, it is wrong to state that I did not give them time,” the Minister said.

Continue Reading

Trending