News
Medical Specialists urge govt. to defer enactment of KDU Bill to allow time for adequate consultation
The Association of Medical Specialists (AMS) yesterday called on the government to defer the enactment of the proposed Kotelawala Defence University Bill, providing an opportunity for adequate consultations from all the relevant stakeholders.
The AMS has, in a media statement ‘Proposed KNDU Bill – more questions than answers’ signed by AMS President Dr. Lakkumar Fernando and AMS General Secretary Dr. R. Gnanasekeram, requested the government not to repeat the same mistakes as predecessors who set up the North Colombo Medical College (NCMC) and SAITM.
Full text of the AMS statement: “As a responsible professional trade union of medical specialists who are concerned about the higher education in general and the QUALITY medical education in particular in our country, we would like to put forward following observations about the much-talked about proposed KNDU bill.
1. KDU is no more a “university established for a specific purpose” (mainly for military recruits) as it has day scholars following wide variety of courses for a fee. Further, the proposed KNDU bill gives powers to recruit “other persons” to KDU with no clear definition of who these other persons are.
2. Since the KDU is funded by the government (even though under different ministry) apparently with huge amount of tax payers’ money, we believe that the QUALITY of their courses (entry, process and exit) should be on par with UGC standards and other guidelines stipulated by relevant regulatory bodies.
3. By giving legal powers to recognize and affiliate other institutions to KDU under this proposed bill, we are going to establish another parallel institution to UGC in our country, funded by the tax payers’ money.
4. With more civilians planning to be recruited to this institution under “other persons “category, majority of the students here eventually will be civilians. Under these circumstances, we feel that the main governing body of this university should have majority of civilian educationists than military hierarchy who could well be political appointees.
5. If the KDU is empowered to recognize courses conducted by outside institutions to the conferment of their own degrees for civilians without the approval of the UGC, it can create an alternative pathway to civilian population to skip the standards of UGC which will undermine the purpose of the whole universities Act and the UGC.
6. If the UGC is given the authority to scrutinize the courses exclusively offered to the military as announced recently, it can undermine the confidentiality of the sensitive military sciences.
7. The role of the regulators of professional courses (eg: Sri Lanka Medical council) will unfairly be undermined leading to passing out of substandard medical and other professionals. It is pertinent to mention here that the minimum standards of medical education were enacted by the present government after a long delay which gave the necessary legal framework for the SLMC to regulate medical education. Hence, any regulation which can possibly by pass these standards will be detrimental to the medical education in Sri Lanka.
On principle, the AMS is not against QUALITY fee levying medical education in our country, if it is regulated and monitored by the UGC and the Sri Lanka Medical Council. However, lack of proper process and transparency will prevent the establishment of such fee levying institutions in Sri Lanka.
After careful consideration of above issues in the proposed bill, we would like to request the government to defer the enactment of this bill till we get the opportunity for adequate consultations from all the relevant stakeholders.
Further, we earnestly request the President and the government not to repeat the same historical mistakes our rulers did in the case of NCMC and SAITM, a few years back. It’s the responsibility of all of us to establish and protect QUALITY university education in our country.”
News
Health authorities on high alert over Nipah Virus threat
Sri Lanka has stepped up efforts to detect and respond to a potential outbreak of the deadly Nipah virus (NiV), with health authorities enhancing surveillance and laboratory readiness amid growing concerns in the region.
The Medical Research Institute (MRI), the country’s premier laboratory, has upgraded its testing capacity with the latest technology to identify the Nipah virus, enabling early detection of suspected cases, an MRI source said.
Nipah virus is a highly infectious zoonotic disease that can spread from animals
to humans and also through human-to-human contact. Fruit bats are the natural hosts of the virus.
First identified in Malaysia in 1988, the virus has since caused deadly outbreaks in countries including India and Bangladesh. Experts warn that Sri Lanka, with its close human-animal interactions and tropical climate, must remain vigilant against such emerging infectious diseases.
The case fatality rate of Nipah virus ranges from 40% to 75%, making it one of the most lethal viral infections affecting humans. There are currently no specific drugs or vaccines, with treatment relying mainly on intensive supportive care, health specialists say.
Symptoms of infection initially include fever, headaches, muscle pain, vomiting, and sore throat, followed by dizziness, drowsiness, altered consciousness, and neurological signs indicating acute encephalitis. Severe cases may progress to atypical pneumonia, acute respiratory distress, seizures, and coma within 24 to 48 hours.Authorities continue to urge heightened awareness and precautionary measures, emphasizing that early detection and rapid response are key to preventing outbreaks.
by Chaminda Silva ✍️
News
Free Media Movement demands govt. accountability on free speech issues
The Free Media Movement (FMM) has demanded government accountability on many freedom of expression issues referred to in a statement issued by the Human Rights Commission in a statement issued last week.
The statement under the hands of FMM Convener Lasantha De Silva and Secretary Dileesha Abeysundera says FMM has paid close attention to the statement issued by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) under reference number HRC/S/i/E/03/02/26. It has also informed that global stakeholders, including the International Federation of Journalists—of which it is a member—that are already closely monitoring this matter.
In its statement, HRC has elaborated at length on the issues that have arisen in Sri Lanka concerning freedom of expression and online safety. It specifically points out that the actions of the Sri Lanka Police have been a major contributing factor to these concerns. The Commission notes that recent conduct of the police has indirectly interfered even with the professional activities of journalists.
HRC has also drawn attention to the practice of summoning journalists and other activists before the police without providing clear reasons, in violation of circulars issued by the IGP. In certain instances, the police have stated that journalists were summoned due to alleged defamation arising from media activities.
However, freedom of expression guaranteed by the Constitution is restricted only within constitutionally prescribed limits. Accordingly, defamation that is no longer a criminal offence cannot be acted upon by the police. Such matters constitute civil offences that must be resolved before courts of law. The Commission further observes that attempts by politicians and others to lodge complaints with the Criminal Investigation Department regarding defamation are efforts to portray defamation as a criminal offence.
The HRC statement also addresses the Online Safety Act. While emphasizing the need to be mindful of online safety, the Commission points out that the current law does not address genuine needs. Therefore, as already demanded by many stakeholders, the government has the option to repeal this Act.
In addition, HRC has outlined a three-pronged approach that should be adopted to safeguard freedom of expression, as guaranteed by the Constitution and in line with Sri Lanka’s commitments under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations.
FMM said it is of the view that the Government of Sri Lanka must give serious consideration to this statement and to the recommendations emphasized therein. “This is a moment in which the accountability of the Sri Lankan government is being questioned. Accordingly, the Free Media Movement urges the government to take immediate steps to implement the recommendations set out in this statement,” it said.
News
Opposition alleges Govt deliberately delaying PC polls
ITAK Batticaloa District MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam accused the government in Parliament on Friday of deliberately delaying Provincial Council elections, pointing to its failure to nominate members to a Parliamentary Select Committee.
The committee, tasked with considering matters related to Provincial Council polls, was announced on 6 January 2026. Opposition parties submitted their nominees promptly.
However, a month later, the government has yet to name its eight members, preventing the committee from being constituted and from commencing its work, Rasamanickam alleged.
Opposition representatives argue that this delay represents intentional inaction aimed at postponing elections. They urged the government to appoint its nominees without further delay to allow the committee to proceed.
-
Business1 day agoZone24x7 enters 2026 with strong momentum, reinforcing its role as an enterprise AI and automation partner
-
Business5 days agoSLIM-Kantar People’s Awards 2026 to recognise Sri Lanka’s most trusted brands and personalities
-
Business6 days agoAll set for Global Synergy Awards 2026 at Waters Edge
-
Business5 days agoAPI-first card issuing and processing platform for Pan Asia Bank
-
Business1 day agoHNB recognized among Top 10 Best Employers of 2025 at the EFC National Best Employer Awards
-
Business1 day agoGREAT 2025–2030: Sri Lanka’s Green ambition meets a grid reality check
-
Editorial3 days agoAll’s not well that ends well?
-
Features3 days agoPhew! The heat …
