Features
Who’s afraid of a tobacco-free generation?
by Dr. Dineth Bandara
Something curious happens whenever someone proposes keeping cigarettes away from children. The cigarette suddenly acquires defenders. They seldom defend the product. Instead, they defend the country. Its legal system, its economy, its institutions, all of which the proposal will supposedly put at risk. The method, we are told, is too risky, too simple, too likely to backfire, and the wise course is to do something else, later, more slowly.
There have been several media articles against the proposed tobacco-free generation policy, curiously with the same spurious arguments to frighten policy makers and to mislead the readers. We can agree only on one of the statements that such articles make – that tobacco kills about 22,000 Sri Lankans a year We part ways on almost everything after that. These fear inducing lies need to be exposed for what they really are. So, in the spirit of friendly debate, here is the case for the defence of our children.
First, what is actually being proposed
The proposal would prohibit the sale of tobacco to anyone born on or after 1 January 2010. It places the obligation on sellers. It does not make criminals of young people.
Actually, nobody in this cohort can legally buy cigarettes today. The NATA Act of 2006 already prohibits sales to anyone under 21, so the oldest members of the 2010 cohort will not reach the current legal age until 2031. For the next five years, this law changes nothing on the ground. After that, the line simply moves forward one year at a time. There is no overnight shock and no sudden vacuum for criminals to fill. That matters, because almost every argument against this policy depends on one.
Exhibit A: New Zealand, where the policy “failed” by never happening
We are told that the tobacco-free ban was abandoned by its pioneering country. What is politely left out is why. It did not fail. It never started. It was repealed before a single cigarette went unsold.
The government that proposed the law lost an election. Not because of the proposed law, but for different reasons, as anyone even casually acquainted with international politics, and those who follow international news are well aware of. A coalition partner of the incoming government made sure that the law was not implemented.
By the way, New Zealand did not invent the idea. The tobacco-free generation was proposed by researchers in Singapore.
Meanwhile, other countries have gone ahead. Our neighbour the Maldives has enforced a generational ban since 1 November 2025, covering everyone born on or after 1 January 2007.
The United Kingdom’s Tobacco and Vapes Act received Royal Assent on 29 April 2026, and from 1 January 2027 it will end tobacco sales to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009. Vietnam’s Ministry of Health has proposed the very same 2010 cut-off that Sri Lanka is considering.
At subnational level, the prestigious medical journal the Lancet recently published an article showing that around 20 municipalities (all in Massachusetts, US) have already implemented nicotine-free generation laws, and that multiple that US States are now considering statewide legislation. It also states that these efforts are being fiercely opposed tobacco and the vaping industries.
Exhibit B: Bhutan and South Africa, or the case against a policy nobody proposed
Then there are stories come from Bhutan and South Africa. Both banned tobacco for everyone. This is a totally different story from what is proposed in our country.
Bhutan had a long and porous land border, where tobacco products were freely available on the other side. South Africa did it overnight, during a pandemic, to millions of addicted adults. Unsurprisingly, the smugglers had a wonderful time in both countries. As perceptive readers would have already guessed, these are stories about enforcement capacity, not about a generational policy.
It is also funny in the sense that it is an argument against a proposal Sri Lanka isn’t considering. A tobacco-free generation policy takes cigarettes away from no adult who can legally buy them today. The man who has smoked since 1985 can keep buying until he, or his lungs, heart or other organs, retire, whichever comes first.
Smuggling is used as a bogey for many effective tobacco control measures, and not only in Sri Lanka. Unsurprisingly and unimaginatively, it is used against policy as too – more as a knee-jerk reaction than as a well-thought-out argument.
Exhibit C: The dreaded forbidden fruit that will unhinge tobacco control measures
It is also argued that inability to buy cigarettes will make it a forbidden fruit for the young. Sri Lankan youth have lived under the NATA Act’s age-21 rule for twenty years. Where is the great rebellion? Where are the teen smoking riots? Instead, Sri Lanka has one of the lowest youth smoking rates in the world.
The “forbidden fruit” argument also has a chequered history. It was a favourite of the tobacco industry, whose own “youth smoking prevention” campaigns framed smoking as an adult choice. Independent evaluations found those campaigns ineffective at best and counterproductive – promoted smoking – at worst.
Exhibit D: Numbers from the wolf itself
The warning about a growing illicit market in Sri Lanka are usually quoted from the cigarette monopoly’s annual report. So, when we need an impartial assessment of whether tobacco control is dangerous, we ask the cigarette monopoly in Sri Lanka! But apart from this utterly reliable source, independent data show that illicit cigarettes constitute a miniscule market in Sri Lanka.
An absurdly, the price of cigarettes in Sri Lanka is also brought into the argument- with statements indicating the cigarette prices are already high (and of course because of that smugglers are thriving).
We have seen the argument on price repeatedly used against tobacco taxation. It would be quite obvious to our readers that a tobacco-free generation policy does not change the price of a single cigarette. Apparently, the those arguing against this policy are quite unaware of this. Therefore, the alleged high prices of cigarettes in this country is just an irrelevant and alarmist argument against this policy.
Exhibit E: Systems thinking, applied consistently
Think of smoking in Sri Lanka as a bathtub. The water in the tub is everyone who smokes today. Water leaves through the drain when people quit when healthy or due to disease, or, sadly, die. New water pours in from the tap every time someone starts smoking, and almost everyone who starts does so young. Education and taxes turn the tap down a little. A tobacco-free generation turns it off.
There are also peculiar warnings that a future government might reverse a long-term policy. That is true of almost everything. By the same reasoning, we should give up on pensions, climate targets and repaying the national debt.
The best protection against reversal is broad public understanding and support, which is exactly what this debate helps build.
Exhibit F: The Nordic story, with the missing pages
Sweden, Iceland and Norway are held up as proof that smoking can be defeated the gentle way, with taxes, quit services and education. It is a charming story, but a few pages are missing.
Sweden’s low smoking rate owes a great deal to men swapping cigarettes for snus, a pouch of tobacco tucked under the lip. That is less a triumph of culture than one tobacco product elbowing another aside, and it is not a path Sri Lanka should want to follow.
Iceland’s celebrated success with young people came from changing the environment young people grow up in, not from handing out leaflets. That is an argument for shaping the environment, which is precisely what a tobacco-free generation policy does.
And Norway is not a warning against ambitious goals. It is an example of one. One of the main objectives of Norway’s official tobacco control strategy states that children born in 2010 and later should not use tobacco or nicotine products.
That is the same cohort Sri Lanka is now considering. So, to our amazement, a country officially working towards one is shown as evidence against a tobacco-free generation policy.
Most importantly, none of these countries ever claimed you had to choose. Taxes, cessation services, education, enforcement and a tobacco-free generation are not rival teams. They play on the same side.
The United Kingdom’s new Act combines a generational sales ban with retail licensing, stronger powers against illicit tobacco and vapes, powers to restrict vape advertising and packaging aimed at children, and support for smokers who want to quit.
So, will it backfire?
Usually, the arguments close with a serious warning – that this policy will enrich the very people we want to shut out. On one point we agree. Someone does stand to lose money. It is no surprise that it is the business that must recruit a fresh batch of young victims every day to replace the 22,000 Sri Lankans its products kill every year, in order to keep its sales intact. If this policy fires on anyone, it will be on them.
Features
Combining local resources,traditional knowledge and science to build a food-secure Sri Lanka
World Food Day 2026: Innovating today for a better food future
by Dr. Kaushalya Wijayasekara
What will be on the Sri Lankan dinner table ten years from now? Will our children be able to get nutritious food at a price their families can afford? Will farmers be able to grow enough despite changing weather and rising costs? And how much of the food we produce will actually reach the consumer, instead of being lost or wasted along the way?
These questions can’t wait. A farmer faces unpredictable weather. A family faces rising food costs. Fruit goes unsold after a good harvest. Some children do not get enough nutrition. The future of food is tied to the future of Sri Lanka itself.
World Food Day 2026 is a chance to look beyond the immediate problems and ask whether we can build a food system that feeds our people well, gives farmers better opportunities, protects the environment and makes better use of what we already have. The answer can be yes, but we will have to think differently.
We are not starting from zero. Sri Lanka has diverse crops, fisheries, traditional food knowledge, indigenous varieties, research institutions, universities and a young generation able to create new solutions. What we need is to bring these together and act. Producing more will not secure our food future on its own. It will depend on how intelligently we produce, process, preserve, distribute and consume food.
Making more of what we already have
Innovation does not always mean inventing something new. Often it means finding better uses for the resources we have.
Sri Lanka grows traditional rice varieties, kurakkan, green gram, cowpea, jackfruit, breadfruit, cassava, sweet potato, coconut and palmyrah. All of them have great potential for modern, nutritious, value-added foods. Jackfruit and breadfruit can be made into flour and other convenient products. Traditional rice varieties can go into new foods that suit changing consumer needs. Palmyrah, with its strong cultural heritage, can create new income through better processing, packaging, quality assurance and market development.
The aim is to connect our traditional food knowledge with modern consumer needs and technology, while keeping our food heritage.
Stop wasting the food we produce
Reducing food loss and waste should be a major priority. Seasonal fruits such as mango, banana, papaya and pineapple can be lost in large quantities when production exceeds demand or when storage, transport and processing facilities are inadequate. With suitable technology, these fruits can become dried products, pulps, powders, beverages and other shelf-stable foods.
Agricultural and fisheries by-products are resources too. They could be turned into food ingredients, animal feed, bio-based products and other useful materials, which would move us toward a more circular food economy.
Technology alone is not enough. We need stronger local processing facilities, cold storage, efficient transport, collection centres and market information systems, especially close to where food is produced. Cutting food loss raises the value of what our farmers and fishers already produce.
Nutrition and food safety come first
Food security means more than having enough food. People also need food that is safe and nutritious.
Sri Lanka can develop affordable, nutritious foods from local pulses, grains, vegetables, fruits and fish. Children and other vulnerable groups should get particular attention. Schoolchildren in particular deserve a focus: safe, nutritious, locally sourced products for school feeding programs would support child nutrition, local farmers and domestic food industries at the same time.
Food safety must stay at the centre of food innovation. Good hygiene, quality control, laboratory testing, traceability and appropriate food safety systems are what make new products safe as well as attractive and nutritious.
A food system that can cope with climate change
Climate change is already affecting agricultural production, water availability, crop yields and food prices. We need food systems that can handle changing conditions. That means climate-resilient crops, efficient water use, soil and water conservation, better storage and resource-efficient food processing.
Traditional knowledge matters here. Generations of Sri Lankan farmers have developed practices suited to local climates and ecosystems. Combining that experience with modern science can give us solutions that fit local conditions and are sustainable. Technology alone will not build the future of food. Science, experience and local knowledge together can.
Give young people a bigger role
Sri Lanka’s universities have an important part to play in shaping our food future. Young people should be encouraged to identify real problems in the food system and work on practical solutions in areas such as food waste, sustainable packaging, nutrition, food safety, modernising traditional foods and digital technologies.
A good research project should not always end as a research paper. Where appropriate, research should be supported to move on to products, technologies, enterprises and community solutions. That needs stronger partnerships between universities and industry, along with mentoring, research funding, business support and market connections. If young researchers and entrepreneurs can turn their ideas into viable food innovations, both consumers and producers will benefit.
A pathway designed for Sri Lanka
We do not need to copy food-system models from other countries. We can build a pathway that suits our own resources, culture and needs. It would bring together local resources, traditional knowledge, scientific research, appropriate technology and entrepreneurship, with farmers, fishers, universities, research institutions, food industries, entrepreneurs and policymakers working side by side.
The goal goes beyond selling raw materials. We need to create more value, reduce waste, improve nutrition, generate jobs and strengthen rural livelihoods. This matters especially for small and medium-scale food enterprises, which can drive local economic development when they get the right technical, financial and market support.
The choices we make today
The food future will not create itself. It will be shaped by what we grow, what we research, what we process, what we consume and what we choose not to waste.
So, the question for World Food Day 2026 is this: what can we do today so that every Sri Lankan has safe, nutritious, affordable and sustainable food tomorrow?
The answers are already around us, in our farms, fisheries, food businesses, universities, laboratories and communities. We have the resources, the traditional knowledge, the scientific expertise and talented young people. What we need now is to connect them and act.
A better food future begins with the choices we make today.
Dr. Kaushalya Wijayasekara
Senior Lecturer, Department of Biosystems Technology, Faculty of Technology, University of Ruhuna
Features
20th Anniversary of Digampathana blast – the day Sri Lanka Navy cried
By Admiral Ravindra C Wijegunaratne
WV, RWP and Bar, RSP, VSV, USP, NI (M) (Pakistan), ndc, psn, Bsc
(Hons) (War Studies) (Karachi) MPhil (Madras)
Former Navy Commander and Former Chief of Defence Staff
Former Chairman, Trincomalee Petroleum Terminals Ltd
Former Managing Director Ceylon Petroleum Corporation
Former High Commissioner to Pakistan
The Digampathana suicide truck attack on 16th October 2006 remains the deadliest single strike in Sri Lanka Navy history, leaving scars that time cannot erase.
It was a seemingly ordinary Monday morning on 16 October 2006, but the calm of that day would soon be shattered in a way none of us could have imagined. As the Commandant of the Naval and Maritime Academy and Flag Officer Commanding Naval Fleet at Trincomalee, I was aware that a number of my cadets were travelling that morning, part of a convoy of fifteen buses carrying naval personnel from Trincomalee, Colombo, and other bases, heading toward Dambulla to rendezvous with another group. The convoy also included trucks and escort vehicles, a routine movement planned and coordinated with the army to ensure the roads were clear. The morning started quietly. Some personnel greeted friends, handed over their weapons, or strolled to a nearby tea shop. It all seemed so ordinary—too ordinary for what would come next.

Sri Lanka Navy sunk LTTE Ships carrying arms, ammunition and warlike materials thousand miles away from Sri Lanka in Indian Ocean in September and October 2007.
By late morning, both convoys had reached the small ground at Digampathana, near the Sigiriya junction, and personnel mingled briefly, unaware that a carefully orchestrated act of terror was waiting. Then, suddenly, an empty half-truck veered directly into the convoy. It exploded with a ferocity I can still recall as if it were yesterday. Nuts, bolts, and high explosives tore through the air. Pandemonium erupted instantly. I later learned that 107 of our naval personnel were killed on the spot and another 153 critically injured. The scene was indescribable—bodies scattered, vehicles mangled, personal effects strewn across the ground. I remember later hearing that the head of the suicide bomber was recovered more than 100 meters away from the blast, a grim testament to the sheer force of the explosion.
I was in my office at the Naval and Maritime Academy when my mobile phone rang. A young midshipman from the 21st intake called, his voice trembling: “Sir, there was a huge explosion at the convoy point! Many are dead … my batch mate Wijesundara is among them.” I immediately jumped into my jeep with my escort Chief Petty Officer and driver and rushed to Digampathana, relying on every ounce of my driving skill to reach the scene. The journey, which usually took little more than an hour, felt endless that day, each passing mile weighed down by dread.
When I arrived, I was confronted with a sight that no training can prepare you for. The injured were being rushed to Dambulla Hospital, where doctors and nurses worked tirelessly, improvising in ways that saved lives despite the overwhelming chaos. I went back to the site after visiting the hospital. The remains of our naval personnel were scattered across the ground, and someone had begun collecting weapons and protective gear. I immediately contacted Surgeon Rear Admiral Nico Jayasekara and received his instructions: collect all body parts in separate bags and transport them to the Trincomalee Naval Hospital mortuary. This gruesome work had to be done with care and dignity, and it filled the icebox in my vehicle. Through DNA testing initiated by Rear Admiral Nico, we were able to identify every naval personnel lost that day, bringing some closure to grieving families.
The Navy Commander at the time, Vice Admiral Wasantha Karannagoda, was devastated. I had worked closely with him and knew how deeply he cared for his men. He ensured that the fallen were honoured with full ceremonial naval funerals at Welisara Naval Base, attended by families and comrades. Sixty-seven funerals were conducted in a single day—a number that still haunts me.
The Digampathana attack remains the largest single loss of naval life in our history. It was a day of sorrow, but also a day that reinforced our resolve. The tragedy galvanized the Navy to target the LTTE Sea Tiger wing with renewed determination and reshaped our maritime operations forever. Every time I think of that day, I remember not just the lives lost, but the courage, professionalism, and dedication of those who survived, those who treated the injured, and those who ensured the fallen were honored properly. May the souls of our naval hero’s rest in peace, their sacrifice guiding us and inspiring generations of naval personnel to come.
Features
‘Murder at Whitby Abbey’
Tales of Mystery and Suspense – 24
I was intrigued by the title of a book I found in a book drop at the condominium of a friend, Murder at Whitby Abbey, and I brought it home with me though I will not be able to return it in the near future. It was described on the cover page as ‘a standout in the crowded medieval mystery field’, though I fear I do not know of other books in this field, apart from the Cadfael series, which I have dealt with earlier.
The book, by Cassandra Clark, is set during the reign of Richard II and has as a backdrop his precarious position, which led to his being replaced, and murdered, by his cousin Henry, who reigned as Henry IV. It is a gloomy book, the action taking place in the twelve days of Christmas leading up to the Epiphany. And the gloom is pervasive, even though this is supposed to be a time of festivity, with mummers performing, and many of those in the guest house where the heroine stays going to town to enjoy themselves, with much drinking and much music, which also fills the guesthouse.
The heroine Hildegarde is a nun, sent to try to acquire a relic being sold by Whitby Abbey, though this was also a penance set by the Abbot of the monastery that governed her abbess because she had had sex with a man. Soon after she and her companions reach the Abbey set high on a cliff, she finds that there are other bidders, and soon suspects that the hierarchy, not perhaps the Abbot who seems a weakling, but his rapacious bursar, is determined to make money, and not above creating false relics to sell to several aspirants.
After Hildegarde and her Cistercian companions – Whitby is a Benedictine Foundation – two monks, Gregory and Egbert, and a young priest Mark, reach the abbey, they find that Aelwyn, a monk they had met on their way to the guesthouse had died. This was in the apple store, and they realize, when they find the surplices of novices stuffed into the air vents, that he had been left to suffocate in the overwhelming scent of apples.
The Cistercians are asked to look into the death, perhaps because they are likely to get no cooperation from the Abbey folk, but perhaps because those in charge are keen to know what happened. And the infirmarer, an old monk, suggests Hildegarde talk to a man called Edred who worked for the bursar, and had been a friend of Aelwyn’s. But Edred too is killed, before he can keep an appointment he had made with Hildegarde, drowned in a pool near the farmhouse of the Abbey.
Meanwhile tensions arise between the fisherfolk and the abbey for the bursar wants to charge them for using the beach that technically belongs to the abbey to dry their fish and their nets. This leads to physical battles, when the guards used by the abbey, under the command it seems of the bursar whose determination to make money is not resisted by the abbot and the prior, try to storm the area where the fishermen live.
Hildegard finds out more about what had happened through two youngsters, one of whom Torold is the son of Aelwyn by a woman who worked as a prostitute for a cartel, and with whom Mark fell in love. The other works on the farm and had seen Edred meet someone near the pool, after which that someone left the place by himself. And the boy had also found in the pool a sort of dagger with the seal of the abbey.
He and his dog, and Torold who follows her, rescue Hildegarde from a man at arms who has waylaid her and tries to rape her earlier. Escaping into the abbey she was nearly been raped then by the bursar, but she managed to escape, in the process setting fire to him and the muniments room, which led, when he was rescued, to the discovery of a box with the money he said had been stolen, blame being cast on both Aelwyn and Edred.
Matters come to a head when the fisherfolk try to storm the abbey, being resisted by the men at arms stationed on the towers. But then Hildegarde realizes that behind the murders was the bursar’s clerk, whom she pursued to the cathedral. There is great drama then as she escapes from him when he tries to kill her, and then from the man at arms who had tried to both rape and kill her, but they both fall from the scaffolding she had climbed, the latter coming from a tower where he had been stationed.
Both of them think they run the rapacity of the abbey, the latter claiming to work for the nobles opposed to Richard, who is presented throughout the book as devoted to his subjects, not to power or money. But though the villains die, the bursar continues, having got over the hysteria the fire had caused and his acknowledgment then of guilt – and though the abbot and the prior seem less vicious, whether they will be able to assert themselves is questionable.
Before the climax, when the others in the guesthouse were leaving, Hildegarde found that two of them were in possession of the relic, for which they seem to have paid well. Hildegarde herself had made a derisory offer, but before she leaves the abbot gives her the relic, perhaps in gratitude for what she and her fellow Cistercians had discovered, the abbey having made as much money as it needed and more from the gullible other buyers.
Mark’s inamorata is saved from the stews because she moves in with Edred’s widow whom the bursar had thrown out of the rooms he occupied when her husband was found dead. Hildegarde had paid for lodgings, in a house run by the man who ran the brothels, but he had a kindly side and was going to finance them to make nets for the fishermen.
So, the Cistercians set off for their home as swiftly as they can to get there on the day of the Epiphany, having stopped en route to pray for King Richard whose birthday it was.
-
News6 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
News7 days agoNPP govt. reminded of its responsibilities as US warship leaves Colombo
-
Latest News7 days agoFarhan, Sadaqat help Pakistan ace 183 chase to go 1-0 up
-
Latest News5 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
News6 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
-
Latest News3 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
Features5 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour
-
News7 days agoInterdicted top House official Kularatne receives special recognition in Mexican Parliament

