News
Sallay’s wife pleads: Don’t extend detention order
The wife of former military intelligence chief Major General (Retd.) Suresh Sallay has urged President Anura Kumara Dissanayake not to extend his detention order, warning that his continued detention and possible transfer from hospital to CID custody could pose a grave risk to his life.
In an appeal to the President, S. B. M. S. B. Sallay said her husband’s health had deteriorated to a “life-threatening level” during his detention and that he had recently undergone a cardiac procedure in which an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) was implanted.
Full text of her appeal: With reference to my previous letter dated 18th May 2026, I write to Your Excellency once again, with the utmost respect and with grave concern for the life and health of my husband, Major General (Retd.) Suresh Sallay, who continues to be detained under a Detention Order issued under Your Excellency’s authority as the Hon. Minister of Defence.
I respectfully bring to Your Excellency’s urgent attention the fact that, since my previous appeal, my husband’s health has deteriorated to an extremely serious and life-threatening level.
Following the deterioration of his health during his detention, particularly after he commenced a hunger strike in protest of his continued detention and the circumstances surrounding his incarceration, my husband was transferred to the National Hospital of Sri Lanka on 7th June 2026 for medical treatment.
Thereafter, owing to the deterioration of his condition and the emergence of abnormal cardiac conditions, he was transferred to the Cardiology Unit of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka on 27th June 2026. He has remained under the care and treatment of the medical specialists attached to the Cardiology Unit since then.
I have now been informed that, due to the continuing failure and serious impairment of his heart function, my husband was required to undergo a cardiac procedure during which an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in his heart.
The implantation of an ICD is a serious medical intervention undertaken to manage potentially life-threatening abnormalities of the heart and to protect a patient from dangerous cardiac arrhythmias. My husband is presently in a particularly vulnerable condition following this procedure and requires close, continuous and specialised medical observation and attention.
In these circumstances, the continued extension of the Detention Order and any attempt to remove him from the controlled medical environment of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka and return him to the custody of the Criminal Investigation Department would, in my respectful submission, expose him to an immediate and grave risk to his life.
Your Excellency, my husband has already suffered a significant deterioration of his physical condition during his detention. His present cardiac condition is substantially more serious than it was at the time of my previous appeal. He has now undergone major cardiac treatment and has an implanted ICD which requires appropriate medical supervision.
It is therefore my deepest fear that, if he is transferred from the National Hospital and placed once again in CID custody in his present condition, his health will deteriorate further and that such deterioration may result in a massive and potentially irreversible threat to his life.
I respectfully submit that, at this stage, the question is no longer merely one concerning the conditions of his detention. It is a matter concerning the preservation of his life and the State’s obligation to ensure that a person in its custody is not exposed to a foreseeable and avoidable risk of serious harm.
Your Excellency is already aware, from my previous representation and the matters brought before the learned Magistrate, of the concerns regarding my husband’s treatment and physical and psychological condition during his detention. Those concerns have now become even more serious in view of his present cardiac condition and the surgical implantation of an ICD.
I therefore most respectfully urge Your Excellency not to extend the present Detention Order upon its expiry.
I further respectfully request that my husband be released from detention under the Detention Order and transferred to remand custody under the supervision of the competent judicial authority, so that his liberty and the continuation of the investigation may remain subject to judicial supervision while, at the same time, his immediate medical needs can be properly addressed.
I wish to make it abundantly clear that neither my husband nor our family has any intention whatsoever of obstructing, delaying, or interfering with any lawful investigation. We are prepared to extend our fullest cooperation and support to any investigation conducted by the relevant authorities in accordance with the law. My husband is also willing to comply with any lawful requirement of the investigating authorities and the Court.
Accordingly, the conclusion of the Detention Order and the transfer of my husband to remand custody should not in any manner be interpreted as an attempt to frustrate or impede the investigation. Any necessary investigation, questioning, recording of statements, or other lawful steps may be undertaken in accordance with the law and, where necessary, after the Detention Order is brought to an end, while ensuring that his serious medical condition is given the paramount consideration it requires.
Your Excellency, I respectfully appeal to your sense of humanity and responsibility as the Head of State and the Minister responsible for Defence. Whatever may be the allegations against my husband, he remains a human being whose life and health must be protected while he remains under the authority and custody of the State.
In particular, at a time when Your Excellency and the Government are considering replacing the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) by introducing the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Bill (PSTB), with a view to reforming or replacing the more draconian provisions of the existing law, I am confident that Your Excellency would not find it necessary to rely on such provisions of the PTA to justify a further extension of the Detention Order in my husband’s case, especially in light of his present and critical medical condition.
At present, my husband is not merely a detainee suffering from an ordinary medical condition. He is a cardiac patient who has suffered serious heart failure and has undergone a procedure involving the implantation of an ICD. His condition requires specialised medical care and close monitoring.
Any decision to extend the Detention Order in these circumstances, followed by his removal from the National Hospital and transfer to CID custody, would create an entirely foreseeable and unacceptable risk to his life. I therefore earnestly and respectfully request Your Excellency to exercise your lawful authority and humanitarian discretion to:
a. Decline to extend the present Detention Order upon its expiry;
b. Direct that my husband be transferred to remand custody under judicial supervision, rather than being returned to CID custody;
c. Ensure that he continues to receive the specialised cardiac treatment, medical supervision and post-operative care required following the implantation of the ICD;
d. Ensure that no step is taken which would expose him to an avoidable or foreseeable risk of further deterioration or loss of life; and
e. Permit and facilitate the continuation of any lawful investigation, to which my husband and our family will extend our fullest cooperation, without compromising his health, safety and fundamental rights.
Your Excellency, I make this appeal not merely as a wife seeking the release of her husband, but as a wife who is deeply concerned that the continued detention of her husband in his present medical condition may result in a tragic and irreversible consequence.
I therefore humbly appeal to Your Excellency to consider the present medical circumstances with the utmost urgency and compassion and to ensure that no further extension of the Detention Order places my husband’s life at unnecessary risk.
I place my faith in Your Excellency’s office and respectfully request your immediate intervention in the interests of humanity, justice, fairness and the preservation of life.
News
PSTA worse than PTA: FSP
The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).
FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.
He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.
Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.
He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.
The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.
Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.
Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.
“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.
He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.
“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.
Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.
He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.
News
Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.
Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.
According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.
The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.
CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.
Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.
She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.
Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.
News
Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail
Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).
Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.
The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.
-
Editorial7 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
Features5 days agoThe first woman in the foreign service or Ceylon Overseas Service it was then called
-
Editorial6 days agoFuelling discontent and protest
-
News4 days agoGeneva takes up Sallay’s case and govt. ignores opportunity to answer accusations
-
Foreign News5 days agoTen injured after car crashes into rugby supporters in Australia
-
Latest News6 days agoTharindu Rathnayake, bowlers secure Asian Games Bronze for Sri Lanka
-
News5 days agoNearly 20 Iranian tankers stranded off Lanka amid US sanctions
-
Features4 days agoSri Lanka Cricket Bill: Governance reform is not yet a cricket strategy
