Connect with us

News

CP warns of catastrophic consequences of extending retirement age of top judges

Published

on

CP General Secy. Weerasinghe

The Communist Party has urged the NPP government not to extend the retirement age of superior court judges, under the false pretext of speeding up of adjudication and reducing the huge backlog of cases. CP General Secretary Dr. G. Weerasinghe warned that if implemented the consequences would be far reaching and devastating.

The following is the text of the statement issued by CP General Secretary: “The Government’s announcement that it intends to bring a Constitutional Amendment to extend the retirement ages of judges, purportedly to speed up adjudication and reduce the huge backlog of cases, is deeply flawed and politically misguided. The Communist Party of Sri Lanka (CPSL) rejects this proposal in its present form and calls for a transparent, evidence-based approach that protects judicial independence while addressing the real causes of delay in our courts.

The government’s proposal, as publicly reported, would amend constitutional retirement ages as follows:

= Supreme Court judges: from 65 to 67.

= Court of Appeal judges: from 63 to 65

= High Court judges: proposed changes shifting retirement ages

= Trial/District and Magistrate Court judges: proposals to extend retirement ages

These changes affect constitutional provisions and therefore require not only thorough parliamentary scrutiny but also broad public consultation and engagement with judicial stakeholders. The CPSL notes the following problems with the government’s approach and rationale:

· Data and targeted diagnosis are missing. The government has not presented a scientifically grounded breakdown of the backlog (by court type, region or case category) necessary to tailor effective remedies.

· The proposal addresses a symptom, not the cause. Sri Lanka’s backlog (reported at over 1,134,000 pending cases by June 2025) reflects structural shortages and administrative failures. Extending retirement ages will not substitute for expanding judicial capacity or modernising court administration.

· Serious vacancies remain unaddressed. The Supreme Court bench should number 16, but only 12 judges currently sit; the Court of Appeal should have 19 but has 15. These vacancies have not been filled promptly, indicating executive inaction rather than a shortage of experienced personnel.

· The amendment process lacks transparency and stakeholder consultation. Constitutional amendments touching the judiciary require informed public debate and participation by legal professionals, judicial officers, civil society and affected communities.

· The proposal risks politicizing the judiciary. Constitutional changes that alter judicial terms (even when ostensibly administrative) carry political implications and can undermine public confidence unless clearly justified, transparently processed and insulated from partisan influence. The perception that this measure is a quick political fix will aggravate distrust.

CPSL position and demands

(A). We oppose the proposed constitutional amendment as presently conceived and will not participate in or endorse any rushed change designed to paper over deeper structural failures.

(B). Any change to the Constitution affecting judicial terms must follow a full parliamentary process, including robust public consultation, and secure input from leading professional groups, including the Sri Lanka Bar Association, Judicial Service associations and independent experts.

(C). The Government must prioritize structural, administrative and resourcing solutions:

– promptly fill vacancies

– implement scientific case-mapping to identify where backlogs are concentrated

– expand the number of courts and judges where needed

– creating specialised benches

– extend court hours or introduce shifts where feasible

– adopt modern case-management and digital filing systems

– use transparent temporary hiring or contract arrangements if necessary

(D) We call on all progressive forces, legal professionals and the public to resist any constitutional amendment made without proper consultation, data, and assurances that it serves the public interest rather than short-term political ends.

The Communist Party reiterates its commitment to a judiciary that is independent, effective, and accountable. We stand for measures that expand access to justice, protect citizens’ rights, and strengthen institutions, not measures that risk politicizing constitutional provisions or creating the appearance of interference.”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Steps will be taken to implement a new National Youth Policy in Sri Lanka in the first quarter of 2027 – PM

Published

on

By

Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya stated that the new National Youth Policy, being formulated to address the current challenges faced by Sri Lanka’s youth and fulfill their aspirations for the future, is scheduled to be finalised and implemented by the first quarter of 2027.

The Prime Minister made these remarks on Wednesday [September 16], while addressing the 1st National Research Symposium on Youth Development – NRSYD 2026, jointly organised by the Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL) and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, held at the Water Supply and Drainage Board Auditorium in Ratmalana.

The symposium was held under the theme, ​“Young People as Right Holders and Change-Makers: Asset-based Pathways for Social Transformation.” Research papers are being presented under nine key thematic areas.

These areas include youth empowerment and leadership; education, vocational training and skills development; health, mental well-being and nutrition; youth entrepreneurship and economic participation; technology, digitalisation and innovation; climate change and sustainable development; minorities, social integration and the rule of law; youth migration and international relations; and arts, culture and creative expression.

The official publication of the symposium was presented to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and other distinguished guests by Deputy Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Dinindu Saman Hennayake and Secretary to the Ministry A.M.H.U. Aruna Bandara.

Speaking at the event, Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya sated:

“Although a draft National Youth Policy was prepared in 2014, it was not implemented. Therefore, a new policy is currently being formulated with the participation of all stakeholders, taking into consideration the current changes in technology, the economy and the employment market.

Under the Government’s Public Investment Programme, Rs. 145 million has been allocated for research and development activities in the youth and sports sectors. Rs. 5 million has been allocated for this symposium. This allocation is a good beginning. It clearly demonstrates the seriousness with which we view evidence-based policymaking.

In the face of technological advancement and digitalisation, providing young people with academic knowledge alone is not sufficient. It is essential to equip them with practical, technical and vocational skills alongside knowledge. For this purpose, curricula within the existing education system must be updated in line with new technologies and global demand.

As for the Government, youth development is a cross-cutting issue that concerns all sectors. Our intention is to establish a unified policy framework that can provide guidelines and recommendations to address the challenges faced by young people in a scientific and sustainable manner.

Formulating a policy is only the beginning. The success of the National Youth Policy will depend on its implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Our objective should be to develop young people who are resilient and capable of facing changes, while also enabling them to become a generation that leads positive changes taking place in the world”.

The Prime Minister further stated that there is a proposal to hold the research symposium as an international conference next year, which would provide Sri Lankan researchers with significant opportunities to establish connections at regional and international levels.

The occasion was attended by the Minister of Youth Affairs and Sports Sunil Kumara Gamage, Vice Chancellor of the Open University of Sri Lanka Senior Professor P.M.C. Thilakarathne, along with a large number of researchers, academics and young people.

[Prime Minister’s Media Division]

Continue Reading

News

US embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid

Published

on

Drugs taken into custody (pic courtesy US Embassy)

… America-Pakistan developed required ‘intel’ for operation

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The US Embassy in Colombo declined to comment on a special police probe into the recent narcotics detection, jointly made at the China-managed Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) by the US Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka Police..

US Embassy spokesperson said that the mission wouldn’t add to their press release, issued on 2 Sept., in the immediate aftermath of the raid.

Police Headquarters, on 11 Sept., declared that the Central Crime Investigation Bureau (CCIB) was conducting investigations into the recovery of 473 kg of Crystal Methamphetamine (‘Ice’). Police never acknowledged the role played by the US in the operation.

According to Police Headquarters, on a directive given by IGP Priyantha Weerasooriya, the Special Investigation Unit has launched an internal probe into, what it called, shortcomings and irregularities in the Colombo Port raid.

The Island:

Have you (relevant US authorities) received an update of Sri Lanka’s investigations from the Police?

US Embassy:

U.S. and Sri Lankan law enforcement authorities maintain close and ongoing cooperation on counternarcotics matters, including the exchange of information that helps both countries combat transnational drug trafficking. We don’t have anything further to share on communications with Sri Lankan authorities beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.

The Island:

Did the Police seek clarification regarding DEA, New Delhi Country Office role in the successful raid?

US Embassy:

As the Embassy noted publicly following the seizure, cooperation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration contributed to the Sri Lanka Police Narcotics Bureau’s successful seizure of approximately 463 kilograms of methamphetamine at the Port of Colombo.

The seizure demonstrates the value of close U.S.-Sri Lankan cooperation in disrupting transnational narcotics trafficking.

The Island:

Before we raised this issue were you aware of the internal investigation into the drug bust which was also raised in Parliament last week?

The US Embassy:

We don’t have anything further to share beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.

Our focus remains on the strong U.S.-Sri Lanka law enforcement partnership and the concrete results our cooperation can deliver—disrupting transnational criminal organisations, cutting off the profits that fuel illicit drug trafficking, and protecting our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.

The US Embassy attributed the success of the counternarcotics operation to the US-Sri Lanka partnership

The US Embassy statement, dated 2 Sept: The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka’s Police Narcotics Bureau (PNB) conducted a successful joint operation disrupting a Pakistan-based narcotrafficking network attempting to smuggle crystal methamphetamine through Sri Lanka to international markets.

Acting on intelligence developed by DEA’s Foreign Counterparts Unit Pakistan Anti-Narcotics Force Special Investigations Cell between August 14–29 on suspicious maritime containers moving from Pakistan to Colombo, PNB seized approximately 463 kg of crystal methamphetamine with a street value of $21 million, concealed in bath towels, and arrested several suspects, including Pakistani nationals. This operation underscores the strength of the U.S.-Sri Lanka partnership in dismantling transnational criminal organisations that fund terrorism and threaten communities in both our countries. This cooperation builds on long-standing training and technical assistance provided through the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) to the Sri Lanka Police and Customs. The United States remains committed to working with Sri Lanka and regional partners to aggressively pursue transnational criminal organizations, deny them the revenue from illicit drug trafficking, and protect our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.”

SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa, in Parliament, raised questions about the internal investigation into the raid. However, Rajapaksa, too, hasn’t mentioned the US role in the operation. The Special Investigation Unit has recorded a statement from Senior DIG Ranmal Kodituwakku regarding the Colombo Port raid.

MP Rajapaksa questioned the rationale behind questioning the officer who led the raid against the backdrop of controversial releasing of 323 containers from the Colombo Port in January 2025. The failure to question those responsible for the releasing of 323 containers indicated who was behind that operation, MP Rajapaksa told Parliament.

Continue Reading

News

Gnanasara Thera declares outside High Court that he wouldn’t flee

Published

on

Gnanasara Thera

Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera appeared before the Colombo High Court yesterday in a case filed by the Attorney General over statements allegedly insulting Islam.

The case was taken up before Colombo High Court Judge Buddhika C. Ragala, who ordered that it be called again on September 30.

His appearance came six days after the Supreme Court invalidated the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in 2019.

Speaking to journalists outside the court, Gnanasara Thera said he was prepared to face the legal process and would abide by the law, rejecting reports that he had gone into hiding following the Supreme Court judgment.

“It is the weak who disappear and flee. We worked for the country and are facing the consequences for that. We are not afraid and will not flee,” he said, noting that he would surrender to the court and face whatever legal consequences following the Supreme Court decision.

The Supreme Court, on September 10, ruled that the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by Sirisena was invalid. The judgment followed fundamental rights petitions challenging the legality of the pardon. A three-judge bench, comprising Justices Janak de Silva, Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath Abeykoon, delivered the ruling.

Gnanasara Thera was convicted by the Court of Appeal in 2018 for contempt of court and sentenced to a total of 19 years’ imprisonment to run concurrently as six years. The conviction related to his conduct during proceedings at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court concerning the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda.

He was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after then President Maithripala Sirisena had granted him a presidential pardon.

The Supreme Court found the pardon to be arbitrary and invalid in law, following its consideration of the petitions challenging the exercise of the presidential power of clemency.

Meanwhile, police have said they are awaiting the Supreme Court judgment before determining what further action should be taken following the invalidation of the pardon.

The proceedings before the Colombo High Court yesterday are separate from the contempt of court case that resulted in the six-year sentence. They concern alleged statements made by Gnanasara Thera regarding Islam.

In June this year, the Colombo High Court rejected an appeal by Gnanasara Thera against a nine-month prison sentence imposed by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court in connection with statements made at a 2016 media briefing that were found to have disrupted religious coexistence.

The latest High Court proceedings, therefore, form part of separate legal action concerning his alleged remarks about Islam, while the Supreme Court ruling relates specifically to the legality of the 2019 presidential pardon granted in connection with his contempt of court conviction.

The case before the Colombo High Court will be called again on September 30.

Continue Reading

Trending