Connect with us

News

‘Free Lawyers’ opposes govt. move to extend retirement age of superior court judges

Published

on

Civil society group Free Lawyers has opposed a government move to extend the retirement ages of Superior Court judges.

The text of their statement: “Free Lawyers expresses deep concern over the government’s continued delay in filling vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal, alongside reported moves to extend the retirement age of judges in these courts by two years. These actions risk undermining judicial independence, exacerbating case backlogs, and eroding public trust in the justice system.

The Government argues for a “bottom-up” strategy, prioritising recruitment of magistrates and lower court judges before addressing the four vacancies in each of the superior courts. It claims this is essential for systemic sustainability and denies that vacancies are being used as leverage.

While lower court vacancies must be addressed, prolonged understaffing of the apex courts cannot be justified. Over six months of vacancies have already caused serious delays in justice delivery, increased pressure on sitting judges, and affected high-stakes constitutional and appellate matters. The Constitution demands timely appointments to superior courts; using lower court needs as an excuse for inaction at the highest levels weakens the entire judicial hierarchy rather than strengthening it.

The Government suggests the Supreme Court cadre does not require all positions to be filled simultaneously and that current workloads do not warrant urgency.

This view underestimates the real impact on the administration of justice. Even a few vacancies at the apex level create bottlenecks, delay precedent-setting decisions, and diminish public access to timely remedies. Normalising understaffing sets a dangerous precedent and cannot substitute for prompt, transparent appointments.

The Government contends that raising the retirement age (Supreme Court from 65 to 67 years; Court of Appeal from 63 to 65 years) will retain experienced judges longer and allow them to serve in higher courts, addressing promotion gaps for career judicial officers.

This proposal fails on its own terms. Judges nearing promotion who currently miss out due to vacancies will face the identical situation if retirement ages are extended across the board. They will merely serve two additional years without gaining promotion. The net effect is not improved succession or experience utilisation but a blanket prolongation of tenure that offers no structural solution. More critically, such an extension — requiring constitutional amendment — is likely to be perceived as an inducement to sitting judges, compromising their independence and public confidence. It contradicts the principles of judicial tenure and the “system change” commitments made by the Government.

Free Lawyers warns that these moves, taken together, create a concerning pattern that threatens the separation of powers. ‘Free Lawyers Sri Lanka’ urges the Government to:

• Immediately commence transparent processes to fill all vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal.

• Abandon the proposed constitutional amendment to extend retirement ages.

• Engage constructively with the Bar Association of Sri Lanka, the judiciary, and civil society for genuine reforms that enhance efficiency while safeguarding independence.

The independence of the judiciary is non-negotiable. Delays in appointments and politically timed tenure changes undermine the rule of law and the public’s fundamental right to justice.Free Lawyers Sri Lanka calls upon all stakeholders to defend these democratic safeguards.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

22A: Exclusion of 8 petitions questioned, action filed against SC Registrar, others

Published

on

The Supreme Court has been petitioned seeking an explanation as to how eight petitions filed against the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution were not listed for hearing . Two of the petitioners, namely Dias Bandaralage Ajith Shantha Kumara Jayathilaka and Gunathilakage Dakum Dulara Gunathilaka, have requested an opportunity to examine the official Registry and parliamentary records so that all material facts may be objectively established. They said that their petitions that had been registered by the Supreme Court should have been heard along with other petitions.

The Registrar of the Supreme Court, Secretary General of Parliament, Speaker and the Attorney General have been named as the respondents.

The five-member bench that heard the petitions consisted of Chief Justice P. Padman Surasena, Achala Wengappuli, J, Arjuna Obeyesekere, J, Sampath B. Abayakoon, J and K.M.G.H. Kulatunga, J.

The petitioners sought the explanation in the absence of any judicial order dismissing, rejecting, striking out, terminating or otherwise disposing the said petitions. They have requested the disclosure of the complete procedural history of the unlisted cases.

The second petitioner Gunathilaka has referred to a speech by Jaffna District Independent MP Ramanathan Archuna in Parliament, on 21 August, 2026, regarding X-Press Pearl, a container carrier that sank off the port of Colombo, and related matters.

They have sought leave to proceed under Articles 17 and 126 of the Constitution and asked for a full Bench of the Supreme Court, or the widest Bench, constitutionally permissible.

They also requested that the Chief Justice and Achala Wengappuli refrain from participating in the hearing and determination of their application, having regard to the objective-appearance issue arising from their prior constitutional and judicial participation in matters forming part of the factual subject matter now requiring examination.

Meanwhile, General Secretary of Vinivida Foundation, Nagananda Kodituwakku, has requested the Supreme Court Registrar not to proceed with the determination of 22nd Amendment process, pending the hearing of fundamental rights petition filed by Chairman of the Vinivida Foundation lawyer, Sugandhika Fernando, seeking a full bench, excluding Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, to hear the petitions challenging the 22nd Amendment Bill. She also requested that the hearing be suspended immediately until the matter was fully heard and determined.

Among the respondents are Chief Justice Surasena, the first respondent, and Attorney General Parinda Ranasinghe. Justices Yasantha Kodagoda, Shiran Gooneratne, Achala Wengappuli and Priyantha Fernando.

(SF)

Continue Reading

News

Thailand shuts door on undesirables from Sri Lanka

Published

on

Sri Lankan passport holders travelling to Thailand wouldn’t be eligible for visa-free entry from 15 September, 2026, according to a new visa notice issued by the Royal Thai Embassy in Colombo.

Under the new measures, all Sri Lankan travellers will be required to obtain a Thai visa before departing for Thailand. Visa applications must be submitted online through Thailand’s official e-Visa system.

The Royal Thai Embassy in Colombo has also clarified that it will not accept visa applications submitted in person or in physical form.

According to the Embassy, tourist visa applications submitted by Sri Lankan passport holders are expected to take approximately 3–7 working days, calculated from the date on which all required documents have been duly completed and submitted.

Processing times for Non-Immigrant Visa and DTV (Destination Thailand Visa) applications may take longer.

Foreign nationals residing in Sri Lanka or the Maldives who hold valid work or residence permits may also require additional processing time.

The Embassy has cautioned applicants that it reserves the right to request additional documents or information when necessary. Applicants may also be asked to attend a visa interview on a case-by-case basis.

The new requirement represents a significant change for Sri Lankan travellers, who will need to complete the visa process before travelling to Thailand from September 15 onward.

The Embassy has urged applicants to rely only on its official communication channels for the latest visa requirements, procedures and updates.

Continue Reading

News

Expertise France and the EU launch media project to strengthen environmental journalism in Sri Lanka

Published

on

Representatives from Expertise France and CFI mark the signing of the partnership agreement at the Expertise France headquarters in Paris to implement the EU-funded Media Capacity Building Programme in Sri Lanka. From left: Mariam Gbané, Louis Bonneau, Florence Minery from CFI; alongside representatives from Expertise France Anna Krainc, Cynthia Anno, and Laura Cavert

A comprehensive new media initiative is officially underway in Sri Lanka following the official signing of agreements with the French media development agency, Canal France International (CFI), and the Sri Lanka Press Institute (SLPI) yesterday. Backed by the European Union-funded Green Recovery Facility programme, the “Media Capacity Building Programme for the Promotion of the Green Transition” aims to strengthen the reporting of environmental, climate, and economic stories across the country.

Environmental journalism in Sri Lanka has traditionally given significant attention to natural disasters and their impacts. This initiative provides an opportunity for journalists to broaden this coverage by exploring a wider range of environmental issues, including climate finance, green investment, sustainable development, biodiversity, and the policy and economic dimensions of the green transition.

The programme will support journalists in strengthening their technical and investigative skills to explore these issues in greater depth and produce sustained, evidence-based reporting. Participants will be equipped with tools to analyse complex climate finance issues, examine public policies, and follow the flow and impact of green investments.

For Sri Lanka, ‘green transition’ is not an abstract concept; it is a pathway to urgently needed macroeconomic stability and sustainable growth. However, for this transition to succeed, the public must be well-informed, and institutions must be held accountable.

By empowering reporters to translate highly technical financial and governance concepts into accessible public-interest narratives, this project ensures that everyday citizens understand how green policies impact their livelihoods, energy prices, and communities. Crucially, it aims to mainstream the lens of ‘just transition’ and gender equity by encouraging the voices and perspectives of women and vulnerable populations to be heard, considered, and taken into account in the national environmental discourse.

The programme is designed to deliver high-impact, nationwide action. Implemented by Expertise France (EF), in partnership with Canal France International (CFI), the Sri Lanka Press Institute (SLPI), and the Ministry of Mass Media as the primary institutional beneficiary, it moves beyond traditional classroom-based learning.

Key highlights of the initiative include:

Trilingual Foundation Training: Intensive capacity building for 60 journalists across Sinhala, Tamil, and English media to ensure nationwide reach and inclusivity.

Mentored “Story Labs”: The rollout of six intensive Story Labs where journalists will receive direct editorial mentoring to investigate, produce, and publish high-quality, data-driven green transition stories

Youth Outreach: Engaging journalism students and young media practitioners through university and youth activities to develop stories on green transition and public policy issues.

Learning and Sharing Networking Event: Bringing together journalists, experts, policymakers, and key stakeholders to share learning, showcase stories produced through the programme, reflect on knowledge gained, and develop future story ideas on green transition issues.

Continue Reading

Trending