Connect with us

News

Chinese Sinopharm jab under fire over ‘safety and efficacy’ concerns

Published

on

Expert panel warns against using the unproven vaccine in SL

by Suresh Perera`

In the backdrop of an independent panel of medical experts cautioning against administering the controversial Chinese manufactured Covid-19 Sinopharm jab over “safety and efficacy” concerns, a key body of eminent medical specialists last week warned of the adverse fallout of using an unproven vaccine in Sri Lanka.

In what was described as a “strong warning”, the Association of Medical Specialists (AMS) drove home the point that adopting the roll out of any vaccine that’s unproven could reflect adversely on the fight against the pandemic.

“As the expert medical panel concluded there was insufficient data provided to make a determination on the safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of the Sinopharm vaccine, it was accordingly concluded that this vaccine should not be used in Sri Lanka under the present circumstances”, Dr. Lalantha Ranasinghe, the president of the prestigious body of medical professionals, said.

“Scientific evidence by experts should form the basis of any move to curb the pandemic”, the powerful Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) stressed.

Despite this clear recommendation of a properly-constituted independent expert advisory panel, we are concerned about reports that a newly reconstituted Board of the NMRA appears to have taken an unprecedented step to disregard the expert panel opinion and allowed the import of the vaccine to be used in Sri Lankans”, Dr. Ranasinghe said.

The independent advisory panel appointed by the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) on candidate vaccines for use in Sri Lanka, comprised Dr. Rajiva de Silva, Prof. Neelika Malavige, Prof. Arunasalam Pathmeswaran, Dr. Ananda Wijewickrema, Dr. Kanthi Nanayakkara, Prof. Channa Ranasinhe, Dr. Hasitha Tissera and Dr. LakKumar Fernando.

In its ‘conclusion’ in relation to Sinopharm based on data forwarded to the NMRA on 01.03.2021 and 15.03.2021 by the vaccine manufacturer, the expert panel was of the opinion that the data submitted was not sufficient to decide on immunogenicity, safety and efficacy of this vaccine at present and therefore recommends not to use the vaccine until more information is made available and evaluated.

The panel submitted the review report titled “SARS-CoV2 vaccine (vero cell) inactivated manufactured by Beijing Institute of Biological Products” to Dr. Kamal Jayasinghe, NMRA’s Chief Executive Officer on March 17, 2021.

The panel found clarifications provided with regard to regulatory and administrative information to be satisfactory. However, important clinical information that has not yet been provided and their significance for easy reference, the report said.

Saying that it is deeply perturbed over conflicting statements by government sources, the NMRA and the media regarding the Chinese manufactured Sinopharm vaccine, the AMS noted that the panel, after reviewing all the data made available by the manufacturer of Sinopharm, concluded that there is insufficient data provided to make a determination on the safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of the vaccine.

It was accordingly concluded that the Sinopharm vaccine should not be used in Sri Lanka under the present circumstances, the AMS said in a statement.

“We also note with great anxiety and dismay of certain arbitrary appointments and removals being made to the NMRA Board. We strongly believe such moves as an attempt to undermine the scientific basis of vaccine approval and hence it’s safety, efficacy and acceptance by the general public”, it noted.

“As specialists doctors working in the frontline, we do understand the pressing need for safe and effective vaccine against Covid-19 However, we do recognize that any decision on the suitability of a Covid-19 vaccine must be taken on sound scientific evidence in line with practices of stringent regulatory authorities and the World Health Organization”, it stressed.

With Sri Lanka having an enviable record in the uptake of immunization, one should be mindful of any action deleteriously impact the confidence and acceptance of vaccines, the professional body of specialists further said.

The AMS is a strong advocate for a careful, timely and transparent review of candidate vaccines by the NMRA with the support of relevant experts. The first step towards this is to ensure the independence of the National Medicines Regulator is maintained, it added.

“Any decision on controlling, mitigating or eradicating a public health emergency should be taken on a scientific, evidence based methodology by experts”, says Dr. Sumith Ananda, GMOA spokesman.

Adopting a vaccine, whether it’s Chinese, Indian or from whatever country, should not be based on political or commercial interests as it’s a health-related issue. Experts should determine the outcome, not laymen, he noted.

Apart from evaluating a manufacturer’s guidelines, it’s imperative to ascertain whether a vaccine has been approved by the WHO and evidence of its use locally and internationally, he explained.

“We should look at the pandemic not from a Sri Lankan viewpoint but from a global perspective”, he added.

Asked for comment, an official knowledgeable on the developments, said the opinion of NMRA’s Advisory Committee on Communicable Diseases was not to administer the jab as the data provided was insufficient.

None of the eleven stringent regulatory authorities recommended by the WHO has given the green light to use the vaccine. Neither has the WHO itself approved it, the official, who asked not be named, asserted.

“It is no secret that there’s geopolitics and vaccine diplomacy involved in these matters. However, as it stands the Sinopharm jab cannot be used in Sri Lanka due to critical safety and efficacy concerns”, the official explained.

The panel of experts looked at evidence, but there was no adequate data received for an indepth scientific evaluation to give the go ahead for the jab, he said.

Chinese nationals living in Sri Lanka will be given priority for the Sinopharm vaccine donated by Beijing last week.



News

US$ 2.5 mn cyber heist exposes system failures

Published

on

COPF final report on USD 2.5 mn cyber fraud recommends action against all responsible

The US$2.5 million loss incurred during Sri Lanka’s foreign debt repayment to Australia was a clear case of a cybercrime and theft, Committee on Public Finance (COPF) Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva told Parliament yesterday.

Presenting the COPF final report on the cyber fraud, Dr. de Silva said the incident amounted to a serious financial crime and called for a comprehensive investigation, by law enforcement authorities, to identify and prosecute all those responsible.

The report revealed serious governance, procedural and operational failures that enabled the fraudulent transfer of public funds, while recommending sweeping reforms to strengthen cybersecurity, financial controls and public debt management systems.

According to the report, officials of the Treasury and the Central Bank bore responsibility for governance lapses that contributed to the failures. It also highlighted the fact that the Ministry of Finance was operating an outdated Microsoft Exchange Server after security support had ended, while basic safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, had not been implemented.

The COPF said suspicious payment instructions linked to debt repayments involving India, the United Kingdom, Germany and Belgium had also been detected, preventing further losses. However, the US$ 2.5 million fraud materialised only in the repayment transaction involving Australia.

The report has noted that officials had failed to verify lender email domains, relied on unverified email communications and lacked adequate internal controls, allowing the fraud to continue for months.

Although the investigation uncovered system-wide weaknesses across several institutions, only four mid-level Finance Ministry officials had been suspended so far, the report said.

The COPF has recommended a special audit of the foreign debt repayment process, strengthened cybersecurity measures across state institutions, updated financial regulations and improvements to public debt management systems.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Opposition signs no-confidence motion against Justice Minister for dereliction of duty over Negombo Prison deaths

Published

on

Opposition and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa signing the no-confidence motion against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara in the presence of Opposition MPs at the Parliamentary complex yesterday

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, together with Opposition MPs, yesterday signed a No-Confidence Motion (NCM) in Parliament against Justice Minister Harshana Nanayakkara.The move comes in response to the unrest at the Negombo Prison, where both prison officers and inmates were killed.

Opposition members said the Minister had failed to fulfill his responsibility and accountability regarding their safety.According to the Opposition group, the NCM seeks to hold the Minister directly accountable for lapses in ensuring protection within the prison system.

Continue Reading

News

AG informs SC of e-visa agreement review  

Published

on

The Attorney General yesterday informed the Supreme Court that the government has decided to review the legality of agreements entered into by the previous administration to hand over the country’s electronic visa issuance operations to private companies.

Additional Solicitor General Viveka Siriwardena, appearing for the Attorney General, made the submission when the Supreme Court took up the fundamental rights petitions filed by former MPs President’s Counsel M.A. Sumanthiran, Patali Champika Ranawaka, and Rauff Hakeem, challenging the previous Cabinet’s decision to outsource the e-visa system.

The petitions were heard before a three-judge bench, comprising Chief Justice Preethi Padman Surasena and Justices Achala Wengappuli and Arjuna Obeyesekere.

The Additional Solicitor General informed court that the current Cabinet had appointed a subcommittee to examine the legality of the agreements with the private companies and requested time to report on its findings, stating that the review was still underway.

President’s Counsel Sumanthiran, appearing as one of the petitioners, told the court that although the present government had indicated its intention to cancel the transaction, the petitioners wished to proceed with the case.

He noted that members of the current Cabinet had been named as respondents in the petitions.The Supreme Court directed the petitioners to issue notice on the members of the current Cabinet, named as respondents, and fixed September 29 for further proceedings.

Continue Reading

Trending