Connect with us

News

Coalition of academics, journalists, feminists and lawyers asks CID not to target Maithree

Published

on

Maithree

A coalition of academics, journalists, feminists, and lawyers has issued a statement expressing concern over reports that former First Lady Professor Maithree Wickremesinghe has been summoned by the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).

The summons is reportedly linked to an ongoing investigation involving her husband, former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, over alleged misuse of public funds to attend a ceremony at the University of Wolverhampton, where Prof. Wickremesinghe was awarded an Honorary Professorship.

The statement emphasises that the honour was awarded in recognition of Prof. Wickremesinghe’s “extensive research, training, and policy work on gender equity and equality.”

Full text of the statement: “We write to express our deep concern regarding reports that Professor Maithree Wickremesinghe has been summoned to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). The summons is reportedly connected to an ongoing case against her husband former President Ranil Wickremesinghe concerning the alleged use of public funds to attend a ceremony at the University of Wolverhampton, where Professor Wickremesinghe was awarded an Honorary Professorship. It is important to recall that the University of Wolverhampton honoured Professor Wickremesinghe as “a leading Sri Lankan Professor” in recognition of her extensive research, training, and policy work on gender equity and equality. This distinction was awarded on the basis of her independent academic achievements and long-standing professional contributions.

“Professor Wickremesinghe (PhD) serves as Chair and Senior Professor of English at the University of Kelaniya and is the founding Director of its Centre for Gender Studies. With more than three decades of teaching and research experience, she has made nationally significant contributions to gender equality policy development, gender sensitisation training, and the evaluation of women’s and gender programmes within Sri Lanka and internationally. Her doctoral work at the Institute of Education, University of London (2007), Making Meaning of Meaning-making: A Case Study of Feminist Research Methodology in Sri Lanka, has been widely cited and published by Routledge, reflecting her standing in global academic scholarship.

“Her professional contributions includes service on national and international advisory bodies, including appointments linked to the University Grants Commission of Sri Lanka, the Association of Commonwealth Universities, and the Commonwealth Secretariat’s Commonwealth Says No More initiative. She has also served on the Board of Trustees of the Asian University for Women and has contributed extensively to academic editorial work, training, and institutional development. Notably, the Centre for Gender Studies she established at the University of Kelaniya has helped catalyse the establishment of similar centres across Sri Lanka’s university system. These achievements should be markers of national pride not disregard and derision. Professor Maithree Wickremesinghe is an independent scholar of recognised integrity and distinction. Any investigative processes relating to matters of public accountability must be conducted fairly, transparently, and in strict adherence to due process. However, it is deeply troubling when a scholar of her standing appears to be drawn into proceedings that are fundamentally political in nature and centred on allegations concerning another individual who is her husband.

“We urge the relevant authorities to ensure that investigative actions do not result in the unwarranted harassment, intimidation, or reputational harm of independent academics. Academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and the protection of scholars from political victimisation are essential pillars of a democratic society. We call for due process to be upheld with fairness and proportionality, & for Professor Wickremesinghe’s professional independence, dignity, & distinguished record of service to be respected at all times.

“The following academics, journalists, feminist activists and lawyers have given consent to include their names in releasing this statement. 1. Amaya Weerasinghe 2. Amithy Alles 3. Annie Kurian 4. Anoma Wijewardhena 5. Bhavani Fonseka – AAL 6. Canchana Abeysekera 7. Champika Amerasinghe 8. Champa Malawaraarachchige 9. Chandev Abeyratne 10. Chandragupta Tenuwara 11. Dammika Kumari Jayasundara 12. Deshamanya Radhika Coomaraswamy 13. Dr. Nimalka Fernando – AAL 14. Dr.Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu 15. Dr. D. U. S. Gunawardena 16. Dr Colin Fernandopulle 17. Dr. Deeghyu Munasinghe 18. Dr. Renuka Pathirana 19. Dr. Subangi Herath 20. Dr. Indi Akurugoda 21. Dr Sarupa Manatunga 22. Dr Sulochana Segara 23. Dr. Raja Wijetunga 24. Ferial Ashroff 25. Gayani Gomez 26. Harsha Gunasena 27. I A Karunaratne 28. Illika Karunaratne 29. Indrani Kusumalatha 30. Jeevanee Kariyawasam – AAL 31. K. P. S. Gunawardena 32. Karu Herath 33. Kularathna, Thushari Gange 34. Kumari Iddamalgama 35. Kusum Silva 36. Kshanika Ratnayake 37. Lakkana Danidu 38. Mallika Samaranayake –AAL 39. Madhu Hettiarachchi 40. Nadira P Mailewa 41. Nalina Ranjan Fernando 42. Nehama Jayawardana 43. Nirmalie Wickramasinghe 44. Nelun Gunasekera 45. Omathage Amalee Prashanthi Perera 46. Padmni Weerasooriya 47. Philip Dissanayake 48. P. T. S. Gunawardena 49. Pradeep Amirthanayagam 50. Priyani Wijesekera –AAL 51. Priyadarshini Ariyarathne 52. Priyani Gunerathne 53. Pradeepa Sudarshani 54. Professor Aminda Methsila 55. Professor Geethani Bulankulama 56. Professor Ruvais 57. Professor Upul Dissanayake 58. Prof. Sivagnanam Jeyasankar 59. Pushpa Ramlani 60. Renuka Fernando 61.Rohan de Silva 62. Saroja Sivachandran 63. Savitri Rodrigo 64. Sagarica Delgoda 65. Shanthini Kongahage 66. Shereen Xavier 67. Shyamalee Wickramasingha 68. Sri Piyasena 69. Sriyani Perera 70. Stella Philips 71. Sudakshina Wimalasekera 72. Sudarshana Gunewardhena -AAL 73. Sunela Jayawardene 74.Sunil Jayasekera 75.Thushani shivanthika 76. Umanga Thammannagoda 77. Udayangani Daluwatte – AAL 78.Vidya Perera 79.Vishaka Darmadasa 80. Zarina Rahim 81. Zohara Aziz 82. Consultant Surgeon Dr Manjula Herath 83. Consultant Surgeon Dr Abeysinghe 84. Consultant Surgeon Dr Seetha Arambepola 85. Consultant Dr. Sujatha Senaratne”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ex-lawmakers group calls for IPU’s intervention to check “irregularities” in Parliament

Published

on

Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka has requested the Inter-Parliamentary Union to inquire into, what the group calls, institutional irregularities in Parliament.

The Association cited the decision taken by the Attorney General not to appear for Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremeratne, in a case filed in the Court of Appeal by sacked Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, to underscore the need for IPU’s intervention.

The following is the text of the letter signed by former JVP MP Premasiri Manage, on behalf of the Association:  We write to Your Excellency on behalf of the Association of Former Members of Parliament of Sri Lanka, an independent body representing former legislators who have served the Parliament of Sri Lanka across successive administrations. The Association is committed to upholding democratic values, parliamentary traditions, institutional integrity, and the rule of law within Sri Lanka’s governance framework. It is with grave concern that we bring to your attention a series of developments that, in our respectful view, seriously undermine parliamentary democracy, administrative fairness, and institutional independence in Sri Lanka.

1. Unlawful Cancellation of Parliamentary Pensions

The present Government of Sri Lanka has, through actions that we consider both unlawful and unethical, cancelled the pension entitlements of former Members of Parliament. This decision appears to have been taken arbitrarily, without adherence to established legal principles, legitimate expectations, or due process, thereby undermining the dignity and security of those who have served in the national legislature.

2. Illegal and Malicious Interdiction of the Deputy Secretary General of Parliament

We wish to draw urgent attention to the interdiction of the Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament, which raises serious concerns regarding abuse of authority and interference in administrative due process. According to material presently before the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka (CA/Writ Application No. 109/2026), the interdiction:

• Was imposed through the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Committee (PSAC), which lacks lawful authority to exercise such disciplinary powers, rendering the action ultra vires;

• Was based on a preliminary inquiry conducted without proper legal mandate, thereby invalidating the process from its inception;

• Was not the result of an independent administrative determination, but was carried out following the direct personal intervention and influence of Speaker, Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne;

• Appears to have been driven by personal and retaliatory considerations, amounting to a malicious exercise of authority rather than a lawful disciplinary process.

Importantly, it is also noted that the Attorney General of Sri Lanka has withdrawn from appearing on behalf of the Hon. Speaker in the related proceedings, reportedly in view of serious procedural irregularities associated with the interdiction process. The Speaker has consequently retained private legal counsel. This development strongly indicates that serious legal and procedural defects exist in the interdiction process, further reinforcing concerns regarding its legality and propriety. It is therefore evident that the lawful disciplinary framework vested in the Secretary General of Parliament was bypassed, resulting in a serious violation of the principles of natural justice, institutional independence, and the rule of law.

3. Discrimination and Harassment within Parliamentary Administration

We are also deeply concerned by credible allegations of discrimination and harassment within the parliamentary administrative structure, which, in our respectful view, have arisen as a result of the interference of the present Speaker in the administrative affairs of Parliament, thereby undermining the independence of the parliamentary administration. These concerns include:

• Discriminatory conduct affecting senior officials, including the Deputy Secretary General;

• Harassment and discriminatory treatment of female staff members within Parliament;

• The resignation of one female officer due to such circumstances;

• Confirmed findings of harassment in respect of another female officer attached to the Information Technology Division, as established by a report submitted by a former High Court Judge.

These incidents indicate a disturbing pattern of administrative misconduct and a failure to ensure a safe, independent, and professional working environment within Parliament.

3. Broader Institutional Concerns

The above matters collectively raise serious concerns regarding:

• The erosion of the independence of parliamentary administration;

• Abuse of authority and concentration of power;

• Undermining of due process and established legal frameworks;

• A broader decline in adherence to democratic governance standards.

 Request for Engagement

In light of the foregoing, we respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:

1. Intervene and monitor the situation;

2. Call for reports and clarifications from the Speaker and senior parliamentary administration;

3. Facilitate independent review and observation of relevant judicial proceedings;

4. Promote accountability and restoration of institutional integrity within Parliament.

Given the IPU’s distinguished role in safeguarding parliamentary democracy and promoting good governance worldwide, we firmly believe that your timely engagement will contribute significantly to restoring institutional integrity and public confidence in Sri Lanka’s Parliament.

Continue Reading

News

Power and Energy Minister, Ministry Secy resign over coal probe

Published

on

Power and Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody and Ministry Secretary Prof. Udayanga Hemapala have resigned from their posts.According to the President’s Media Division (PMD), the two officials submitted their letters of resignation to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake this afternoon.

The resignations come in the wake of a Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry appointed to probe possible unlawful activity and financial irregularities in coal procurement and power generation.

The PMD said the decision was taken to ensure that the Commission’s work proceeds without interference or perceived influence from individuals holding office.

Minister Jayakody, in his resignation letter, noted that following the appointment of the Commission, he had requested that investigations into coal imports, since 2009, be referred to the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), describing it as part of the government’s anti-corruption mandate.

He added that the inquiry should be conducted independently and without bias, and said his continued presence in office could be perceived as an obstacle to the process.

Prof. Hemapala, in his resignation letter, said his decision was intended to facilitate the commencement of investigations and ensure a transparent and independent process, the PMD said.

The Special Presidential Commission was recently appointed to examine allegations of irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation over a prolonged period and to recommend corrective measures.

Continue Reading

News

President appoints Commission to probe irregularities in coal imports from inception of Norochcholai

Published

on

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake yesterday appointed a Presidential Commission of Inquiry to investigate alleged irregularities in coal imports and electricity generation, amid concerns over possible financial losses to the State.

The President’s Office said the Commission would examine transactions from the inception of coal-based power generation in Sri Lanka up to April 16, 2026, focusing on operations linked to the CEB-affiliated Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd., its successors, and private suppliers.

The three-member body is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Justice Adithya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne as members. Former Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena has been appointed Secretary to the Commission.

Appointed under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978, as amended, the Commission has been mandated to scrutinise procurement procedures, supply chains, quality testing, and operational processes connected to coal imports and utilisation.

The Commission has been tasked with the following mandates:

• To determine whether irregularities or illegal acts occurred in the procurement process for coal imports and to assess any resulting financial loss to the government.

• To investigate whether substandard coal was imported during the relevant period and to examine the entire associated workflow, including procurement, supply, quality testing, operational, and utility processes.

• To ascertain whether electricity generation using imported coal reached the expected levels of efficiency and productivity.

• To investigate whether legal or financial irregularities or illegal acts occurred during the power generation process if substandard coal was indeed utilized.

• To examine whether there were any breaches of expressed terms or conditions in these processes and, if so, whether measures such as withholding payments or other compensatory actions were taken.

• To identify the political authorities, government officials, officers of Lanka Coal Company (Pvt) Ltd, suppliers, or their agents responsible for any such incidents and to recommend future action to be taken against them.

• To propose measures to prevent the recurrence of such alleged malpractices or illegal acts in the future and to ensure proper governance and integrity.

In addition to the above, the Commission will also report on any other alleged malpractices or illegal acts related to coal importation and electricity generation, and recommend preventive measures to address such issues.

Continue Reading

Trending