News
Press freedom under fire, says HRCSL
The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) has expressed serious concern over what it describes as growing threats to freedom of expression in the country, particularly the targeting of journalists through police investigations into alleged defamation.
In a statement, the Commission cited the recent summoning of journalist Tharindu Jayawardena for a police inquiry without disclosure of reasons, later revealed to be linked to complaints over his reporting on alleged corruption, involving public funds. The HRCSL said the failure to inform him of the reasons for the summons violated a circular issued by the Inspector General of Police in July 2025.
Full text of HRCSL statement: The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) is deeply concerned about emerging threats to the freedom of expression in Sri Lanka, and particularly the freedom of journalists to engage in their profession without interference. It is particularly disturbed by a trend in which law enforcement officials have launched investigations into allegedly defamatory speech, including by journalists. In a recent egregious example, Mr. Tharindu Jayawardena, a journalist and member of the Commission’s Sub-Committee on the Freedom of Expression, was summoned for a police inquiry without proper disclosure of the reasons for such summoning. It later transpired that the summoning was due to a complaint that Mr. Jayawardena had made allegedly defamatory remarks in his publications about corruption in the use of public funds. The Commission also notes that any failure of the police to inform a person of the reasons for summoning such person is a breach of Circular RTM 101/CRTM 61 issued by the Inspector General of Police on 2 July 2025 directing all investigating officers to inform persons of the reasons for summoning them.
The freedom of expression in Sri Lanka is guaranteed by article 14(1)(a) of the Sri Lankan Constitution. It is a fundamental right that is crucial to all citizens for the purpose of expressing their thoughts and opinions, and participating in democracy. The right protects expressions in all forms made through any medium, including online platforms. According to the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, the right protects ‘not only information or ideas that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive…but also those that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population’.
The freedom of expression may be subject to certain restrictions, but these must only be by law in accordance with article 15(2) and article 15(7) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court has clearly held that each restriction on the freedom of expression must meet the standards of necessity, proportionality, and reasonableness. The Commission also notes the societal danger in unnecessary, disproportionate, and unreasonable restrictions on the freedom of expression, as such restrictions can lead to public frustration and even unrest.
One of the grounds on which the freedom of expression can be restricted under article 15(2) is defamation. Necessary, proportionate, and reasonable restrictions may, therefore, be imposed to guarantee to every person the right to their reputation and privacy, and to protect persons from defamation. Orders and judgments in this respect by civil courts are examples of such restrictions. Moreover, all persons, including journalists and editors, have ‘special duties and responsibilities’ with respect to the rights and reputations of others when exercising their freedom of expression. This norm is clearly articulated in article 19(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Therefore, journalists and editors should ensure that published content is checked for accuracy and should provide all parties an opportunity to comment on or respond to allegations made against them. Where inaccuracies are found to be published, retractions and apologies should be issued without delay.
However, there is a common misconception that restrictions on the freedom of expression on the grounds of preventing defamation can be in the form of criminal sanctions. On the contrary, any restriction on a person’s speech on the grounds that it constitutes defamation remains the exclusive province of civil courts. No offence with respect to defamation currently exists under Sri Lankan criminal law. In fact, the Penal Code (Amendment) Act, No. 12 of 2002, completely repealed Chapter XIX of the Penal Code of Sri Lanka, i.e., the Chapter on Defamation. Therefore, Sri Lanka Police has no jurisdiction whatsoever to investigate complaints with respect to defamation. It should neither entertain nor investigate complaints concerning defamation. Any citizen aggrieved by an alleged act of defamation can only seek a remedy before the civil courts of Sri Lanka and may not file criminal complaints in this regard.
The Commission observes a trend where political actors and influential persons have sought to file complaints with the Criminal Investigation Department or other divisions of Sri Lanka Police, including the Computer Crime Investigation Division, alleging that citizens have made false or defamatory statements about them, often on online platforms. The Commission recalls that international human rights standards require that public figures, such as political leaders and state officials, must tolerate more criticism than private individuals. The reliance on law enforcement officials to launch investigations into allegedly defamatory statements should be especially avoided by such public figures, as they have special responsibilities to respect the freedom of expression of members of the public. Often, inaccurate or unfair statements may be made about such public figures. However, it is their responsibility to respond to such statements through proportionate means, such as issuing official clarifications, rather than reliance on law enforcement officials. The Commission has also recognised in the past that commentary on women in political office, both on social and legacy media, has often been harmful in the country. Addressing this egregious issue, however, requires long term societal interventions, and not the abuse of criminal law.
In this context, the Commission wishes to make several observations with respect to the Online Safety Act, No. 9 of 2024 (OSA). The Commission has previously noted in a letter to the former Speaker that the current Act does not fully comply with the Supreme Court’s Determination on the Online Safety Bill, and that the current Act could have been enacted only with a special majority in Parliament. In this context, the use of this Act to suppress the freedom of expression of any citizen, including for the purported purpose of preventing defamation, raises serious questions of constitutionality.
The Commission observes that online safety is a legitimate aim and the regulation of online platforms for the genuine purpose of online safety, particularly of vulnerable users, may be necessary. However, the current OSA does not achieve this aim. Its provisions replicate colonial-era criminal offences found in the Penal Code and fails to appropriately deal with a number of genuine online safety issues, such as phishing, spyware, malware, denial-of-service attacks, and hacking. The Commission recently held a consultation with civil society actors and noted a wide consensus that the OSA should be repealed. Any process of drafting new legal provisions on online safety should be consultative and draw on relevant experience and expertise to ensure that such provisions are fit for purpose.
The Commission recommends that the Government of Sri Lanka and relevant authorities adopt the following measures to ensure the respect for and protection of the freedom of expression in full compliance with the Sri Lankan Constitution and relevant international human rights law: 1. The Ministry of Justice should declare a moratorium on the use of the Online Safety Act until its repeal and replacement with fit-for-purpose legislative provisions; 2. The Inspector General of Police should issue directions to all divisions and police stations of Sri Lanka Police reminding them that defamation is not a criminal offence in Sri Lanka, and to refrain from recording or investigating complaints purely relating to alleged defamation where no other offence is reasonably suspected; and 3. Political leaders should refrain from filing complaints with law enforcement officials with regard to any statement that is allegedly false or defamatory, as such a statement does not constitute a criminal offence.
Business
Focus on developing the Coconut and Food & Beverage export industries into a USD 3 billion economy within the next two years
A discussion was held on Friday (26) afternoon at the Presidential Secretariat between President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and industrialists in the coconut and food and beverage manufacturing sectors on developing the coconut and food and beverage export industries into a USD 3 billion economy within the next two years.
Accordingly, the objective is to expand the coconut-based export industry into a USD 2 billion sector and the food and beverage export industry into a USD 1 billion sector, and extensive discussions were held on the plans required to achieve these targets.
The President stated that the Government is prepared to provide every possible form of incentive necessary to promote export diversification and encourage value-added products.
Proposals and suggestions aimed at developing these industries were also presented during the meeting, and the President further noted that future plans would be formulated after taking all such proposals and recommendations into consideration.
The President also expressed agreement to provide incentives for establishing industries in the Northern Province and assured that the Government would extend its fullest support for setting up coconut-based manufacturing industries in the region.
Attention was also focused on plans to streamline the importation of raw materials required for export production while safeguarding domestic producers. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake further stated that his Government’s objective is to build the country’s economy into an export-oriented production economy by strengthening domestic supply chains.
Minister of Labour and Deputy Minister of Finance and Planning Anil Jayantha Fernando; Secretary to the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, Dr Harshana Suriyapperuma; Secretary to the Ministry of Industry and Entrepreneurship Development, Thilaka Jayasundara; and Chairman of the Export Development Board, Mangala Wijesinghe, were among those present.
The President of the Sri Lanka Food Processors Association, Aruna Senanayake; Vice President Rasika Seneviratne; Managing Director of CBL Group, Shyamali Wickramasinghe; Chief Executive Officer of SriLankan Catering Ltd, Mangala Wijesekera; Managing Director of Ma’s Tropical Food Processing (Pvt) Ltd, Mario D. Alwis; Chairman of the Consumer Foods Sector of John Keells Food Holdings PLC, Daminda Gamlath; together with a number of leading business leaders from the food production sector were also present.
President’s Media Division (PMD)
News
Another 1,132 Sri Lankan Personnel to be deployed for United Nations Peacekeeping Missions
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake joined the ceremony held on Friday (26) morning at the Sri Lanka Infantry Regimental Centre in Panagoda to extend his best wishes to members of the Sri Lanka Army and the Sri Lanka Police Special Task Force who are set to depart on United Nations peacekeeping missions.
This marks the largest contingent of personnel ever to depart from Sri Lanka at a single time for United Nations peacekeeping operations. It is also significant as the first occasion on which a President has attended in person to extend his good wishes to the departing contingent.
Addressing the gathering, the President stated that this demonstrates to the world that Sri Lanka possesses forces prepared to stand for the protection, democracy and human rights of oppressed people wherever they may be. The President noted that this is a tremendous source of pride and honour for the nation. The President further pointed out that, although it may be difficult for Sri Lanka to become the wealthiest country in the world, it can nevertheless become one of the world’s most respected and dignified nations.
The President also emphasised that all those departing on peacekeeping missions carry the pride of the nation upon their shoulders and that it is the responsibility of every individual to safeguard the country’s honour and dignity by performing their duties with dedication and professionalism.
In order to help ease the current crisis in Haiti and support efforts to establish peace and stability in that country, the Government of Sri Lanka is scheduled to deploy this Gang Suppression Force (GSF) to Haiti in August.
The contingent comprises 900 Army personnel drawn from various regiments, 189 officers of the Police Special Task Force, and, for the first time in Sri Lanka’s military history, 43 female Army personnel specially trained in demining and explosive ordnance disposal operations. In addition, the battalion has been equipped with armoured vehicles, locally manufactured Uni Buffel vehicles, as well as two specialised bulletproof vehicles provided by the Presidential Security Division.
Following is the speech delivered by the President;
“We know that all of you gathered here today are preparing to undertake an extremely important mission in the service of world peace, carrying with you the reputation and pride of our nation. What is it that you take with you as you leave our country? First and foremost, we believe that you depart bearing the honour and dignity of Sri Lanka upon your shoulders. Each of you carries a profound responsibility to safeguard our motherland, its esteem and its pride in the course of your duties. This is because we must transform our country into one that enjoys great international respect and prestige. We all understand one thing: we may not become the richest nation in the world. However, we can become one of the world’s most dignified and honourable nations.
To achieve that, there are many tasks that we must undertake and fulfill. In doing so, we know that we must build a state whose economy does not collapse in the manner we have experienced before. When a country suffers economic collapse, its pride, reputation and dignity are also diminished in the eyes of the international community. If we are a nation unable to repay its debts, if we are a nation that has gone bankrupt, then we become a state that has lost its self-respect. Therefore, one of our greatest challenges is determining how to transform Sri Lanka into a strong and resilient economy.
In that regard, I believe we have already achieved several significant successes. One of them is that our economy has developed the capacity to withstand internal shocks, including floods, cyclones and other disasters. You are aware that cyclone Ditwah that struck during the November–December period last year became one of the most economically devastating cyclones in Sri Lanka’s recent history. That was an internal challenge. Yet we possessed the capability to build an economy strong enough to confront such an internal crisis. As a result, we were able to allocate Rs. 500 billion for recovery without printing new money or obtaining fresh loans. Consequently, by January, February and March, our economy remained stable and continued to record growth. Had that not been the case, we would not have achieved an economic growth rate of 5.1 per cent. Our ability to respond swiftly was made possible by the economic strength we had built.
Similarly, with the recent conflict in the Middle East, many people began to speculate that our country would once again come to a standstill. There were discussions about possible fuel shortages, power cuts, import restrictions and the suspension of vehicle imports, among many other concerns. Yet, in response to the impact of that conflict, we allocated Rs. 100 billion, to provide relief to the people. What does this demonstrate? It shows that we have strengthened an economy capable of withstanding internal shocks.
I believe our principal challenge now lies in how we respond to external shocks. How do we mitigate the effects on our economy arising from wars and conflicts elsewhere in the world? To address this, I believe we require a strategic plan.
We have engaged in extensive discussions on this matter and have already taken a number of important steps towards preparing ourselves for such external disruptions.
Your service, as you depart today, is in the interest of both our nation and global peace.
Next, if a nation is to attain true dignity and honour, the rule of law and the supremacy of law must be firmly established. Every citizen must respect the law and submit to it. However, our country long maintained a culture in which certain groups neither feared the law nor obeyed it. They possessed the means to evade justice through their wealth and influence. How can a nation achieve international respect, honour and prestige under such circumstances? A country cannot progress when one law applies to the wealthy and powerful and another to the poor and vulnerable.
Therefore, I firmly believe that one of the most important foundations of national dignity and honour is breathing life into the principle that all are equal before the law. Society must have confidence that the law will be applied equally to everyone whenever wrongdoing occurs. Internationally, Sri Lanka must be recognised as a country that respects the rule of law.
I believe that we have already taken considerable strides in this regard. We are building a state in which everyone is subject to the law. This is not easy, because old habits and entrenched influences continue to exert pressure. Nevertheless, we remain determined to establish the principle that every person must be accountable under the law.
In that endeavour, our armed forces and our Special Task Force have a vital role to play. We have every confidence that you will fulfill the unique responsibility entrusted to you in upholding the rule of law and the authority of the state in our country.
At the same time, we must safeguard the freedom of our citizens. No citizen of this nation should have to live in fear of those who govern them.
Yet, for a long period, the citizens of our country did live in fear of their rulers. A nation cannot move forward under such circumstances. A state cannot progress when its people live in fear of, and in subservience to, those in power. What, then, must we do? Citizens must have the right to criticise those who govern them. They must have the right to organise themselves in defence of their rights in opposition to the governing authorities. If the people have entrusted us with the office of President, then the people have the right to question me. We must build a state that safeguards such freedoms and human rights. That is an essential foundation for a nation’s progress and for earning an honourable reputation in the world.
In this regard, we know that our armed forces and our distinguished officers have rendered immense service to our country over many years. However, there have at times been reports, both domestically and internationally, raising certain doubts concerning some aspects of that service.
Nevertheless, I wish to state clearly that, from the ordinary soldier at the lowest rank to the Commander of the Army and from the police constable on the ground to the Inspector General of Police, if any action has been taken in defence of this country, its people and the security of the state, then we, as a government, are duty-bound to protect and uphold every such action. If anyone, anywhere, has carried out duties in the interests of national security, the freedom of our people and the protection of the state, then we have a responsibility to protect all those who stood in support of those efforts.
At the same time, we also have a responsibility to investigate any actions that may have harmed the reputation of our armed forces or undermined their responsibilities in pursuit of the ambitions of a small group. If, in furtherance of the interests of a very small faction, things inappropriate for the armed forces have been done, or acts have been committed that fall outside what is expected of them, then, for the sake of the reputation of the military, the protection of victims and the dignity of our nation, we are prepared to act and indeed we must act. None of this constitutes personal vengeance or political persecution. We must rebuild a strong and respected reputation for our armed forces.
If a small group, in pursuit of narrow interests, has abandoned the honour, values and commitment that the military owes to the people and to the state, then I believe that, for the sake of the dignity and reputation of the armed forces themselves, such matters must be investigated, examined and made known to society. Our honour does not rest upon burying crimes in the sand; it rests solely upon conducting proper investigations and bringing the truth to light. That is the conviction we hold. Therefore, I believe that the mission upon which you are about to embark today is one of immense responsibility. It will bring honour and prestige to our country.
The people of Haiti are facing an internal crisis that requires the easing of conflict, the safeguarding of their fundamental rights and the creation of an opportunity for them to choose a strong government through democratic elections. What has happened there is that the state itself has found it difficult to protect its own democracy, freedom and the lives of its citizens. Consequently, the United Nations has had to intervene. For what purpose? To uphold the freedom, democracy and human rights of the people of that country.
So, for what purpose are you departing today? You are leaving Sri Lanka to help safeguard the freedoms, democracy and rights of the citizens of another nation. What a source of pride and honour this is for us as a country. You are setting out from Sri Lanka to uphold the freedom of the people of another land. You are departing to strengthen democracy in another country. You are leaving to protect the rights of another people. You are going to safeguard the lives of citizens in another nation. I believe this is among the highest honours and greatest sources of pride that we can attain as a country.
You are demonstrating to the world that we possess an armed force and a Special Task Force that are prepared to stand for the protection, democracy and human rights of oppressed people wherever they may be in the world. That is of great importance. Moreover, Sri Lanka has, for many years, served alongside United Nations peacekeeping forces and on every occasion has earned distinction and respect. Today, you depart bearing the honour of a nation that has long performed its duties within UN peacekeeping missions with exemplary discipline and professionalism.
Your predecessors and the contingents that served before you protected that honour in those lands. I believe that, as you prepare to depart for Haiti, you carry with you not only the honour of the nation but also the reputation of your senior officers. Therefore, you are setting out to safeguard both the dignity of the country and the esteem of those who served before you.
Your parents, too, must feel immense pride. If there is a profession in this country that exemplifies discipline, it is the military and the police service. Generally speaking, a tendency has emerged among the younger generation to shy away from disciplined professions. Many are more attracted to unstructured lifestyles and less inclined towards orderly and regulated forms of work. Consequently, many young people today show a preference for informal employment rather than careers founded upon discipline and structure.
It is in such circumstances that you chose to join the armed forces and the Special Task Force of Sri Lanka, embracing a life of discipline. Your uniform, your appearance, your grooming, the time at which you rise and your daily duties are all governed by a structured code of conduct. Your parents have entrusted their children to a profession founded upon discipline and they must undoubtedly take great pride in that. The uniform you wear represents the honour and dignity of our nation and the fact that their child wears it is a source of great distinction for the country.
Moreover, your role becomes especially significant in times of war or disaster. Whenever a disaster occurs, the first person I contact is the Secretary to the Ministry of Defence. Whether it was the recent fire at an elderly care home in Horana, a building fire, or the emergence of instability or conflict, it is to the Defence Secretary that we turn. Not only during natural disasters such as landslides and floods, but even in times of conflict, is it upon you that we first rely. We have great confidence that you will respond swiftly and take the necessary action.
Your parents have raised and guided you to become the professionals we need whenever disaster strikes this country. We need young people who are prepared to work to help the nation recover from any calamity. That, too, is a source of immense pride for parents. Today, you are not only protecting the freedom, democracy, and human rights of your own motherland, but are also departing to stand for the security and liberty of the people of another country. Reflect for a moment on how proud your parents must be that their child is travelling far from home to serve in defence of the safety and well-being of another people. It is a tremendous honour and source of pride for parents and equally a matter of national pride.
Therefore, this moment of your departure is an occasion on which all of us feel renewed respect and admiration for you. My final appeal to you is this: remember that you carry our national flag upon your shoulders. In every duty you perform and in every step you take, this motherland and your parents are watching you. Consequently, I believe that all of us bear a responsibility to act with the utmost seriousness, dedication and sense of duty. I look forward to meeting you again in Sri Lanka after you have fulfilled that responsibility. I sincerely wish you every success in this important mission. Thank you very much, everyone”.
President’s Media Division (PMD)
News
FSP complains of irregularities in a Guinness World Record event held in Sri Lanka
The Jana Aragala Sandhanaya yesterday lodged a complaint with the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC), calling for an investigation into Deputy Minister Sundaralingam Pradeep over alleged irregularities related to a Guinness World Record event held in Sri Lanka.
The organisation alleged that state patronage had been extended to a private company for the event and that large sums of money had been collected from around 5,000 families of participating students.
Speaking to the media, after submitting the complaint, Jana Aragala Sandhanaya National Executive Council member and Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) Secretary, Duminda Nagamuwa, alleged that the government had promoted the Bharatanatyam workshop, held on June 14, as an event that secured a Guinness World Record for the participation of the largest number of students.
He said a government politician had taken the lead in organising the event, attended by Deputy Minister Mahinda Jayasinghe.
Nagamuwa questioned the decision to provide state support for an event organised by a private entity, claiming that the Guinness certificate issued for the achievement had been awarded not to Sri Lanka or a state institution, but to a company.
“Why did the government provide state patronage to a private institution’s programme?” he asked.
He alleged that each of the approximately 5,000 participating students had paid Rs. 5,000, resulting in the collection of a substantial amount of money. He claimed that parents were also asked to pay additional amounts of Rs. 3,450 for logos and Rs. 2,350 for certificates.
Nagamuwa alleged that many families, from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, had incurred heavy expenses travelling to Colombo and staying there for several days for the event, with some families spending around Rs. 30,000 each.
-
Features6 days agoNanda Pethiyagoda Wanasundara as three generations of family saw her
-
Features5 days agoSri Lanka developing independent hydrographic capabilities
-
Opinion4 days agoRanasinghe Premadasa: The man who would not take ‘No’ for an answer
-
Editorial6 days agoFuel crisis: Beyond price debate
-
Latest News6 days agoSooryavanshi thumps fastest List A fifty as India A win tri-series
-
News4 days agoUS Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs meets President
-
Features6 days agoThe Sirisena – Ranil conflict and events leading to MR’s return as PM
-
Business5 days agoUniversity of West London opens Sri Lanka’s first full UK university branch campus
