Business
US court rules many of Trump’s global tariffs are illegal
A US appeals court has ruled that most tariffs issued by US President Donald Trump are illegal, setting up a potential legal showdown that could upend his foreign policy agenda.
The ruling affects Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs, imposed on most countries around the world, as well as other tariffs slapped on China, Mexico and Canada.
In a 7-4 decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected Trump’s argument that the tariffs were permitted under an emergency economic powers act, calling them “invalid as contrary to law”.
The ruling will not take effect until 14 October to give the administration time to ask the Supreme Court to take up the case.
Trump criticised the appeals court and its ruling on Truth Social, saying: “If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America.”
“Today a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end,” he wrote.
“If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country. It would make us financially weak, and we have to be strong.”
Trump had justified the tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president the power to act against “unusual and extraordinary” threats.
Trump has declared a national emergency on trade, arguing that a trade imbalance is harmful to US national security. But the court ruled that imposing tariffs is not within the president’s mandate, and that setting levies is “a core Congressional power”.
In its judgement, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rejected Trump’s argument that the tariffs were permitted under his emergency economic powers, calling the levies “invalid as contrary to law”.
The 127-page ruling says that the IEEPA “neither mentions tariffs (or any of its synonyms) nor has procedural safeguards that contain clear limits on the President’s power to impose tariffs”.
The power to impose taxes and tariffs therefore continues to belong to Congress, the court ruled, and the IEEPA does not override this.
The court wrote that it is unlikely that when Congress passed the law in 1977, it was intended to “depart from its past practice and grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs”.
“Whenever Congress intends to delegate to the President the authority to impose tariffs, it does so explicitly, either by using unequivocal terms like tariff and duty, or via an overall structure which makes clear that Congress is referring to tariffs,” the judges wrote.
The ruling comes in response to two lawsuits filed by small businesses and a coalition of US states.
The lawsuits were filed after Trump’s executive orders in April, which imposed a baseline 10% tariff on almost every country in the world, as well as “reciprocal” tariffs on dozens of countries. Trump declared the date to be America’s “liberation day” from unfair trade policies.
In May, the New York-based Court of International Trade declared the tariffs were unlawful. That decision was put on hold during the appeal process.
In addition to those tariffs, Friday’s ruling also strikes down tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, which Trump argues are necessary to stop the importation of drugs.
However, the decision does not apply to other tariffs, like those imposed on steel and aluminium, which were brought in under a different presidential authority.
Ahead of the ruling, lawyers for the White House argued that invalidating the tariffs would lead to a 1929-style financial collapse, a stock market crash which led to the Great Depression.
“Suddenly revoking the President’s tariff authority under IEEPA would have catastrophic consequences for our national security, foreign policy, and economy,” they wrote in a letter.
“The President believes that our country would not be able to pay back the trillions of dollars that other countries have already committed to pay, which could lead to financial ruin.”
The ruling also raises questions about deals some nations agreed with the US for reduced tariffs rates.
The latest development means the case is now almost certain to head to the US Supreme Court, which has in recent years taken a sceptical view toward presidents who try to implement sweeping new policies that are not directly authorised by Congress.
During Joe Biden’s presidency, the court expanded on what it called the “major questions doctrine” to invalidate Democratic efforts to use existing laws to limit greenhouse gas emissions by power plants and to forgive student loan debt for millions of Americans.
The top court’s nine justices, if they agree to consider the case, could weigh whether Trump’s expansive tariff programme is another example of presidential overreach or if it is sufficiently grounded in law and presidential authority.
Even though the appellate court handed the president a defeat, the White House may take solace in the fact that only three of the court’s 11 judges were appointed by Republicans.
The Supreme Court has six Republican appointees, including three who were selected by Trump himself.
Business
CEB successor company breaks into top three in competitive BESS tender
By Ifham Nizam
National Transmission Network Service Provider (Pvt) Ltd. (NTNSP), has secured third place in Sri Lanka’s fiercely contested 160 MW/640 MWh Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) tender, beating a number of established private-sector energy players in a major competitive procurement exercise just six months after the restructuring of the Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB).
The result marks a significant early indication that a newly restructured CEB successor company can compete on a commercial footing with established players in the rapidly expanding energy market, Senior Engineer Pubudhu Niroshan told The Island Financial Review.
More significantly, Niroshan said NTNSP’s entry into the tender helped intensify competition and contributed to a roughly 10% reduction in the lowest bid compared with the previous 160 MW/640 MWh BESS procurement, potentially delivering a more favourable outcome for electricity consumers.
“Entering such a highly competitive bidding process within just six months of restructuring and emerging third is by no means an easy task, Niroshan said.
He said the achievement had to be viewed in the context of the calibre and number of competitors involved in the process, adding that NTNSP had demonstrated that a successor company emerging from the CEB restructuring could step into a competitive commercial environment and hold its own against established businesses.
The significance of NTNSP’s participation, however, extended beyond its third-place ranking.
According to Niroshan, the company’s decision to enter the BESS procurement created an additional layer of competition, forcing other bidders to sharpen their commercial offers.
‘The first and second-ranked bidders had NTNSP as another competitor. That itself created additional competitive pressure, he said.
The BESS procurement involved a total capacity of 160 MW/640 MWh, with the programme divided into individual projects.
The procurement was designed to bring private and other eligible project proponents into the development and operation of battery storage facilities, providing an important mechanism for integrating renewable energy and strengthening the electricity system.
The outcome, he said, was particularly important for electricity consumers because greater competition in procurement could ultimately translate into lower costs for the power system.
‘Once you have several serious players competing, offering a fair and competitive price becomes essential. That is ultimately good for the consumer, he said.
Niroshan also referred to concerns previously raised by NTNSP before the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) regarding prices submitted for BESS projects under the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) mechanism.
He said subsequent market developments had provided support for the view that some of the prices submitted under the FiT mechanism were comparatively high.
For Niroshan, the experience also demonstrated why competition must remain at the heart of the restructuring of the electricity sector.
Business
Hundred farming elders witness Sacred Dalada Perahera
Serendib Flour Mills continued its longstanding commitment to rural communities through the fifth edition of Serendib Uththama Dalada, more than 100 elderly mothers and fathers from remote farming communities to experience the sacred Sri Dalada Perahera in Kandy.
Held on 26 August 2026, the initiative brought together elderly parents from Mahalakotuwa, Elahera and Attanakadawala, many of whom have spent a lifetime engaged in agriculture and contributing towards sustaining communities across the country. For these elders, the initiative offered an opportunity to undertake a deeply meaningful spiritual journey and witness one of Sri Lanka’s most revered religious and cultural traditions.
Conducted under the campaign thought, “Nourishing the hearts of elderly parents with spiritual merits, who once nourished a generation,” Serendib Uththama Dalada recognises the lifelong contribution and sacrifices of farming mothers and fathers while creating an experience that may otherwise remain beyond their reach.
Serendib Flour Mills facilitated the entire journey, providing safe and comfortable return transportation to Kandy aboard three dedicated buses. Special arrangements were also made to enable the participants to worship at the Sri Dalada Maligawa, followed by reserved seating at a specially erected VIP stand, allowing them to comfortably witness the grandeur of the Dalada Perahera.
Business
Siyapatha Finance records ‘exceptional financial performance for 1H2026’
Siyapatha Finance PLC, the largest fully-owned finance company of the Sampath Bank Group, delivered an exceptional financial performance for the six months ended 30 June 2026, reflecting the Company’s continued strategic growth initiatives, resilient asset quality, and unwavering commitment to sustainable value creation.
The Company recorded a profit after tax (PAT) of Rs. 1,007 million, a robust 43 percent increase from Rs. 706 million in the corresponding period of 2025, while profit before taxes (PBT) grew 38 percent to Rs. 2,334 million from Rs. 1,689 million, demonstrating sustained market and customer confidence in the Company’s core operations.
“Our performance in the first half of 2026 is a clear reflection of Siyapatha Finance’s strategic foresight and our unwavering commitment to sustainable growth,” said Siyapatha Finance Chief Executive Officer Mathisha Hewawitharana. “Surpassing the Rs. 104 billion mark in total assets while significantly improving our asset quality underscores the strength of our core operations and the deep trust our customers place in us. As we navigate the evolving macroeconomic landscape, we remain focused on prudent risk management and delivering enhanced value to our stakeholders.”
The Company’s core business operations continued to yield strong returns, with total interest income growing to Rs. 7,719 million from Rs. 5,272 million a year earlier, driving net interest income up to Rs. 3,487 million from Rs. 2,629 million, signifying the Company’s efficient management of assets and liabilities. Other income strengthened to Rs. 1,054 million from Rs. 826 million, reinforcing the effectiveness of the Company’s revenue diversification strategy. The cost-to-income ratio improved to 49 percent from 54 percent, a testament to the Company’s continued focus on operational efficiency and process optimization.
Asset quality strengthened markedly during the period, underscoring the success of Siyapatha Finance’s prudent credit risk management and proactive recovery initiatives. The gross stage 3 loans ratio improved to 4 percent from 8 percent a year earlier, while the net stage 3 loans ratio declined to 2 percent from 3 percent.
-
News6 days agoDenied of promotion to SC despite vacancies, justice Gurusinghe retires
-
Latest News6 days agoGrade 5 scholarship exam results released
-
News6 days ago22A: SC urged to suspend hearing, appoint full bench
-
Midweek Review7 days agoThe local and global dynamics of Sri Lanka’s 22nd Amendment
-
News4 days agoNamal remanded until Sept. 18 over Airbus deal investigation
-
Latest News3 days agoTharanga creates history with Diamond League crown in Brussels
-
News6 days agoGovt. seeks NATO assistance
-
News7 days ago40 professional organisations and TU oppose proposed 22A
