Connect with us

Sports

Protecting the Whistle: Time to End the Unfair Blame Game in Sri Lanka’s School Rugby

Published

on

In Sri Lanka, school rugby has transcended sport—it is a social movement driven by fierce loyalty, historic rivalries, and deep-rooted pride. Old boys, parents, extended families, and loyal supporters turn up in numbers, passionately backing their alma maters. This vibrant culture is one of Sri Lankan rugby’s greatest assets—but when misdirected, it becomes one of its greatest threats.

One disturbing trend that continues to grow unchecked is the targeting of referees, especially after closely contested matches. When a team loses by a narrow margin, the first finger of blame often points—not to missed tackles or tactical errors—but to the referee. Social media explodes with criticism, conspiracy theories are floated, and reputations are unfairly tarnished.

One common accusation is that some referees have not played rugby at school or national level. But the notion that you must be an ex-player to become a good referee is both outdated and inaccurate. Across the world, many of the most respected match officials have never played elite-level rugby. What makes a referee effective is their knowledge of the laws, fitness, decision-making under pressure, and passion for the game. These qualities—not their playing history—define their competency.

The days when former players voluntarily took up the whistle are largely over. Today, the abuse referees face—from the sidelines and online—has discouraged even passionate rugby minds from joining the officiating ranks. This is not unique to Sri Lanka. It is a global issue faced by unions across the rugby world, including Tier 1 nations.

In an ironic twist, some stakeholders have even gone so far as to request foreign referees for local school matches. This raises a serious question: What makes a foreign referee automatically better? Is it their accent? Passport? Skin color?

Recent international matches hosted in Sri Lanka offer some clarity. Referees from the Asia Rugby Panel officiated several high-stakes games. Spectators had the opportunity to observe them closely—and what they saw were officials making difficult calls under pressure, not immune to error. Were they flawless? No. Were they better than local referees? That’s debatable at best. The idea that foreign referees are inherently superior is a myth, and one that insults the dedication and professionalism of our own officials.

Sri Lankan referees operate within a robust system of governance. They undergo fitness testing, receive continuous education, attend law workshops, and engage in regular match reviews. Referees’ societies in Sri Lanka maintain an internal accountability structure that interacts with coaches and administrators constructively to improve standards.

Yet in every match, human error is a possibility—by players, coaches, and referees alike. A referee may miss a knock-on; a player may miss a tackle; a coach may select the wrong strategy. But while the latter two are often excused or ignored, the referee is relentlessly singled out. Worse, coaches and officials sometimes use refereeing decisions to deflect criticism from their own failings.
Let’s also be honest about the statistics. In most close games, when you weigh the team’s own errors—missed conversions, defensive lapses, poor decision-making—against the referee’s marginal calls, it’s usually the former that cost the game. But this truth rarely makes it to social media posts or old boys’ forums.

If Sri Lanka truly wants to build a sustainable future for rugby, we must protect those who make the game possible. That starts with respecting referees—not just with words, but with action.
“Referees are not perfect. But without them, there is no game. I know—I’ve played, I’ve captained, and I’ve officiated. The pressure in the middle is immense. It’s time our rugby culture evolved to support, not scapegoat, the whistle,”

— said a former Sri Lanka player turned referee, speaking to The Island.

“We must:Educate players, coaches, and supporters on the laws of the game.

Discourage personal attacks on referees and match officials.

Create pathways for passionate rugby minds—playing or non-playing—to take up the whistle.

Celebrate referees who uphold the spirit of the game.

Without referees, there is no rugby. It’s time we stop blaming them—and start backing them.”

By Ifham Nizam



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Thomians crawl to 203/4 on slow opening day

Published

on

S. Thomas’ College adopted an ultra-cautious approach to reach 203 for four wickets at stumps on the opening day of the historic Battle of the Blues against arch rivals Royal College at the SSC Ground on Thursday.

‎After being put in to bat, the Thomian top order proceeded at a snail’s pace as they consumed a large number of overs to build their innings.

‎Openers Jaden Amaraweera and Avinash Fernando laid the foundation with a patient first wicket stand of 110 runs, occupying as many as 40 overs on either side of the lunch interval. The pair could have been separated earlier when Royal’s Vimath Dinsara dropped Avinash when the score was 85. Avinash, who was then on 39, was given a reprieve off the bowling of Gagan Gamage.

‎Making full use of the chance, Avinash went on to complete a half century. He faced 145 balls for his 50 which included five boundaries before being caught by Yasindu Dissanayake off the bowling of Gamage.

‎Amaraweera was the first to depart after compiling a patient 52 off 109 deliveries with seven fours. He was caught by Mahiru Kodituwakku off the bowling of spinner Himaru Deshan.

‎Following the two wickets that fell within the space of two overs, Methuka Gunarathna and Aaron Kodituwakku attempted to steady the innings with another long vigil at the crease. The pair batted for 28 overs but managed to add only 37 runs.

‎Aaron endured a long stay for his 12 runs, facing 89 balls before falling to the spin of Ramiru Perera. Methuka contributed 44 runs off 116 balls with six boundaries before being dismissed later in the day.

‎At the close of play, Reshon Solomon remained unbeaten on 19 after facing 70 balls, while Raphael Hettige was not out on 12 as the Thomians ended a slow but steady first day on 203 for four. (RF)

Continue Reading

Sports

Mathishan continues impressive run with the ball

Published

on

Spinner Damesh Mathishan continued his remarkable run with the ball, claiming another impressive match haul of 13 wickets, but St. Joseph Vaz’s College had to settle for conceding first innings points to St. Sebastian’s College, Katuneriya in their Under-19 Division I Tier ‘B’ cricket encounter which concluded on Wednesday.

‎It was the fourth occasion this season that Mathishan captured ten wickets or more in a match, underlining his consistency as one of the standout bowlers in the tournament.

‎While Mathishan dominated with the ball, Deneth Sithumina produced the most notable batting performance of the day, carrying his bat for an unbeaten 154 for Moratu Vidyalaya in their Tier ‘B’ clash against St. Thomas’ College, Matara. Sithumina faced 242 deliveries and struck ten fours and five sixes in a patient and commanding innings.

‎The Matara side earlier compiled 332 runs in their first innings with Thathsara Dewmith making a valuable contribution of 107. In reply, Moratu Vidyalaya posted a solid 340 for six wickets.

‎The most impressive team performance of the day came from Isipatana College, who secured a four-wicket victory over St. Sylvester’s College. Spinners Thithira Sansira and Menula Dambakumbura made excellent use of the conditions at the BRC ground to dominate the match. Sansira finished with an outstanding match haul of 11 wickets while Dambakumbura supported well with seven scalps.

‎For the visitors, a fighting knock of 140 by Vidusara Ganegoda proved to be in vain.

‎Meanwhile in the Under-19 Division I Tier ‘A’ tournament, Nalanda College and Mahanama College recorded first innings victories in their respective matches.

‎The match between Nalanda (351/9) and Richmond College (244) featured an unusual coincidence as a batsman from each side was dismissed in the nineties. Ranmith Denuwara fell agonisingly short of a century with 99 in the Nalanda innings, while Ameesha Rasanjana was dismissed for 96 in Richmond’s reply. Nalanda later progressed to 130 for four in their second innings.

‎Mahanama College, considered one of the strongest teams in the Tier ‘A’ competition this season, also secured first innings points against Maris Stella College, scoring 289 in reply to Maris Stella’s 264. (RF)

Continue Reading

Latest News

Jemimah Rodrigues, Harmanpreet Kaur, Mitchell Starc and Kuldeep Yadav among ESPNcricinfo award winners for 2025

Published

on

By

We're all winners here: Harmanpreet Kaur, Smriti Mandhana and Jemimah Rodrigues won big in 2025 [Cricinfo]

India’s players swept all the women’s categories in ESPNcricinfo’s annual awards for individual performances in 2025, reflecting a year in which the team won their first World Cup title.

While Jemimah Rodrigues won the women’s ODI batting honours for her awe-inspiring, cramp-battling century that knocked Australia out of the World Cup. Deepti  Sharma grabbed the ODI bowling award for her match turning five for in the final against South Africa. And Harmanpreet Kaur took the captain’s award for winning the world title and for sealing white-ball series (ODIs and T20Is) in England and winning her second WPL title with Mumbai Indians. Her title clinching 66in the WPL final against Delhi Capitals took the women’s T20 leagues batting award.

South Africa Women had to deal with the bitter heartbreak of losing yet another World Cup final, but the men, who for long fell agonizingly short of the big prizes, took home the World Test Championship,  eating Australia by five wickets in the final at Lord’s. They were rewarded by our jurors too:Aiden Markram won the Test batting award for his epic fourth-innings hundred in that final, while Temba Bavuma,  who made a vital 66 while nursing a hamstring injury during that chase, was picked as the men’s captain of the year for leading his side to the WTC mace, to a sweep of India in Tests in India, and for ODI series wins in Australia and England.

Fast bowler Marco Jansen, one of the bowling architects of South Africa’s 2-0 win in India, narrowly lost the Test bowling award to the incandescent Mitchell Starc, who decimated England with 7 for 58 in Perth on the opening day of the Ashes.

Another seven-for took the men’s T20 leagues bowling award: Taskin Ahmed’s 7 for 19 fro Durbar Rajshahi against Dhakar Capital in the BPL. The batting prize in that category went to Hobart Hurricanes opener Mitchell Owen, whose  39 ball century against Sydney Thunder – which equalled the tournament record for the fastest hundred – took his side to their maiden BBL title.

The women’s T20 leagues bowling award, like the one for batting, also came against Delhi Capitals in the WPL: 21-year-old UP Warriorz fast bowler Kranti Gaud,  in her first season, took 4 for 25, including the wickets of Rodrigues, Meg Lanning and Shafali Verma.

The Champions Trophy was the headline event in men’s cricket in 2025 and the winning ODI performances came from that tournament: in Lahore, Ibrahim Zadran broke records for the highest individual score for Afghanistan in ODIs and for the highest score in the Champions Trophy overall with his majestic 177,  which knocked England out of the tournament. The ODI bowling award was picked up by India legspinner Varun Chakravarthy who took 5 for 42 against New Zealand in Dubai, where a week later India won the Champions Trophy.

Six months later, at the same ground, India also won the T20 Asia Cup. In the final against Pakistan, the dismantler-in-chief was our men’s T20I bowling award winner, another legspinner, Kuldeep Yadav, who took 4 for 30, including three wickets in his final over.

The men’s T20I batting award went to England’s Phil Salt, whose 141 not out off 60 balls against South Africa at Old Trafford was not only England’s fastest T20I hundred, but also their highest individual score in the format; and it took them to their highest team total – 304.

Australian allrounder Beau Webster, who scored four half-centuries, including a series-sealing one in his first Test, in Sydney against India, and took eight wickets in seven Tests, was named the men’s debutant of the year. The women’s debutant award went to India fast bowler N Shree Charani who showed remarkable temperament at the age of 20 to pick up a four for on T20I debut in England. She went on to take 14 wickets in the ODI World Cup, second highest for India after Deepti.

Charani, like Harmanpreet, won two awards. Her other one, for women’s T20I bowling, came for her four wickets against England at Trent Bridge, in a match where opener Smriti Mandhana’s maiden T20I hundred played a vital role in setting up India’s win. Mandhana won the women’s T20I batting award for that performance.

The men’s Associate batting award went to Max O’Dowd for masterminding Netherlands’ 370-run chase – the third-highest successful one in all ODIs -against Scotland in Dundee. His 158 not out came off only 130 balls and trumped George Munsey’s 191 in the same match. The men’s Associate bowling award was picked up by seamer Harry Manenti, whose 5 for 31 against Scotland in the qualifier in The Hague, played a big role in Italy qualifying for the 2026 T20 World Cup.

THE JURY : Ian Bishop, Sambit Bal, Shane Bond, Aakash Chopra, Andrew Fernando, Andy Flower, Nagraj Gollapudi, Mohammad Isam, Isobel Joyce, Raunak Kapoor, Nick Knight, Farveez Maharoof, Andrew McGlashan, Andrew Miller, Sidharth Monga, Tom Moody, Firdose Moonda, Urooj Mumtaz, Vernon Philander, Matt Roller, Osman Samiuddin, Dale Steyn

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Trending