News
Sumanthiran’s privilege issue referred to Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee
By Saman Indrajith
Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena yesterday announced that TNA parliamentarian M. A. Sumanthiran’s complaint that he had been wrongly accused of evading sessions of the Presidential Commission of inquiry into political victimisation could be referred to the Parliamentary Committee on Ethics and Privileges.
The Speaker said that a motion could be permitted to refer to the privilege matter raised by MP Sumanthiran on Nov 28, 2020.
On Nov 28, 2020, MP Sumanthiran raised a privilege issue as regards the Commission of inquiry into political victimization and announced that he would be named for evading the commission proceedings. “I have received from time to time summons from the commission to attend before the commissions. I have been named a respondent in that summons. Since they were in the Sinhala language I wrote to the commission that I be provided with the material to respond and to send an English to Tamil translations of those matters. I appeared twice before the said commission and made the same request. There the Commissioner ordered that I be provided with material and their translations. Nothing of the sort happened.
“Last week, I received another summons very late after I went home from parliament sittings, and I responded to the Commissioner concerned the following day informing him of the fact that the material had not been provided to me in English or Tamil and I was not able to appear before the Commission when there were parliament sittings. Later, I read in the newspapers that Commissioner of Inquiry Upali Abeyratne had said some MPs, including me were not coming before the commission and we would be named. This is in breach of my privileges. I urge the Speaker to inform the Commission of Inquiry that I should not be named since I was attending parliament.”
Earlier in the day, the Samagi Jana Balavegaya called on Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to intervene in restoring STF security accorded to TNA Jaffna District MP M.A. Sumanthiran.
Chief Opposition Whip and Kandy District MP Lakshman Kiriella said that MP Sumanthiran’s life had been exposed to danger and the latter’s security should be restored without further delay. “We know the results of removing the security of political leaders who are in danger. When Janaka Perera contested for the Chief Minister post of the North Central Province, his security detail was removed. There was only one bodyguard left with him on the day he was killed. That was a very unfortunate incident. We have lost many good Tamil political leaders. It is our duty to protect the minorities and we call on the Speaker to take action to restore MP Sumanthiran’s security.”
MP Kiriella said that an MP’s security should not be removed just because that MP attended a protest march. “When Mahinda Rajapaksa participated in Pada Yathra his security was not removed.”
Gampaha District SJB MP Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka said that it was wrong to state a court order had been taken against the march. “As far as we know that the court order had been taken against violating the quarantine laws. You cannot remove the security of an MP on the charge of violating quarantine laws. It is wrong to describe our attempt to restore security of MP Sumanthiran as an attempt to give security to a terrorist. Then what about the security accorded to Karuna Amman and Pillayan? Who is Pillayan? He used to come to my office on all fours. Now, he has bodyguards. Sumanthiran was always against terrorism. It is unfair for you to lump him with the terrorists.”
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa: MP Sumanthiran was given special security owing to threats to his life. That has been removed now. However threats prevail even now. I therefore request the Speaker to intervene in this matter to restore MP Sumanthiran’s security.
News
Govt. confident of 2/3 majority despite NPP split speculation
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The ruling NPP yesterday (21) dismissed claims of a widening rift, within the government, over the proposed 22nd Amendment. Asked whether the NPP was concerned over a section of the Opposition alleging Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and two dozen MPs taking a view contrary to that of the party in this regard, authoritative party sources said some persons were propagating speculation for their own interest.
Declaring that there was absolutely no issue regarding the controversial Amendment, sources emphasised once it was tabled in Parliament, it would be passed with 2/3 majority.
Sources dismissed claims that out of its 159-member parliamentary group a section of NPPers was opposed to the government move. According to an influential Opposition activist, there are 57 JVPers and 66 NPPers in the government group and the rest contested the last parliamentary polls, having aligned with the JVP.
Ministerial sources told The Island that the government was confident of going ahead with the 22nd Amendment and Judicature (Amendment) Bills. Sources said that the NPP was not bothered about the Opposition protests in and outside Parliament.
Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne is expected to disclose the confidential ruling that he received from the Supreme Court in respect of more than 65 petitions for and against the 22nd Amendment and Judicial Amendment Bills. The enactment of the 22nd Amendment would pave the way for extending the retirement age of Supreme Court judges, from 65 to 67 years, and Court of Appeal judges, from 63 to 65 years.
News
Justice Corea appointed Acting President of the Court of Appeal
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has appointed Court of Appeal Judge Mayadunna Sri Mevan Anthony Edirimannasuriya Corea as the Acting President of the Court of Appeal.
The appointment has been made as President’s Counsel Nalin Rohantha Abeysuriya, who currently serves as President of the Court of Appeal, will be overseas until the 24th.
Accordingly Justice Mayadunna Corea was sworn in as Acting President of the Court of Appeal before President Anura Kumara Dissanayake at the Presidential secretariat last morning (21).
Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake was also present at the occasion.
News
Protest against setting up of cement factory in highly populated area near BIA
… school alleges deception
What began quietly as a single-storey tourist hotel, on the edge of Katunayake-Seeduwa has, five years later, morphed into a looming five-storey cement factory and with it, a storm of fear, anger and unanswered questions.
At a media briefing held on 19 September at St. Thomas International School, Seeduwa, the community finally found its voice. The gathering included priests, school principals, environmental defenders, and parents whose children study within a few hundred metres of the site.
The briefing was led by Rev. Fr. Jude Chrishantha Fernando, Director of National and Archdiocesan Catholic Social Communications, Rev. Fr. Nilantha Heshan, Director of the Archdiocesan Sethsarana Institute, Dinusha Nanayakkara, Convener of the Archdiocesan Committee for the Protection of Muthurajawela, and Attorney-at-Law Ms. Isuri Rodrigo.
Their message was clear: This is not a campaign against development.
“We Are Not Against Cement. We Are Against Deception.”
“Cement is an essential raw material for the country. We have no opposition to any such factory or production plant,” they told the media. “But what we cannot agree to is a project of this magnitude, in this location, without any proper environmental assessment.”
The speakers alleged a textbook case of deception, obtaining approvals for a low-impact tourist hotel, in one of the most densely populated educational zones in the Katunayake-Seeduwa Municipal Council area, and then transforming it into a heavy industrial plant.
“In an area where thousands of schoolchildren study, to show one thing on paper and build another is a highly fraudulent procedure. It is clear that the real environmental damage and the truth have been hidden from the people,” they said.
With the sea and lagoon winds that sweep across Seeduwa, experts fear these fine particles will not stay confined to the factory walls. They will drift across classrooms, homes, and the Katunayake Free Trade Zone, where thousands of workers, representing all 25 districts of Sri Lanka, work every day.
“The risk is not local. It is national. We are talking about a future generation of children with respiratory illnesses, and workers developing chronic breathing disorders,” one speaker warned.

Rev. Fr. Jude Chrishantha Fernando, Director of National & Archdiocesan Catholic Social Communications, responding to journalists
Then there is the proximity that defies logic, just 500 metres from the Bandaranaike International Airport.
The panel presented a scientific concern that has aviation experts worried: a significant drop in air quality around the airport and its runway, and the severe risk to highly sensitive aircraft engines when they ingest air mixed with cement dust. What is at stake, they argued, is not just health but the economy itself.
“When you weigh it deeply, the economic contribution of an international airport is far higher than that of a cement factory. If international airlines start to avoid Katunayake due to safety and air quality concerns, it will be a fatal blow to our country’s economy,” they emphasised.
A few minutes away lies another victim the Negombo Lagoon and the Muthurajawela wetlands, Sri Lanka’s largest and most sensitive coastal ecosystem.
The panel warned that cement dust settling on the mangrove system could degrade water quality, disrupt the delicate salinity balance, and directly interfere with fish breeding grounds. For the fishing communities of Negombo, whose lives depend on the lagoon, this is an existential threat.
“The lagoon is a nursery. If its water quality drops, fish will not breed. If fish do not breed, an entire fishing community collapses,” they said.
The speakers alleged that while the developers claim to have approvals from various state institutions, many of the mandatory clearances, particularly comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessments and feasibility reports, have not been obtained.
They stressed they are not calling for an end to investment, but for it to be done right.
“We have no objection to this factory being started in another suitable location where it will not cause these environmental impacts, based on proper feasibility and assessment reports. Stop this construction here and move it,” was the unanimous demand.
The appeal has now been directed again to the President, the government, and all responsible state institutions and officials.
As the briefing ended, one image lingered — a school playground, a lagoon, and a towering cement structure rising between them. It is a scary picture for the people of Seeduwa; they asks a simple question: What price are we willing to pay for development that doesn’t breathe?
-
News5 days agoUS embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid
-
News4 days agoBid for Basil’s extradition nears final stage: Police
-
News3 days agoShanakiyan urges urgent action over reported death sentence for Lankan in Saudi Arabia
-
Business5 days agoAll-new Bolero MaXX unveiled in Sri Lanka
-
News2 days agoNamal Rajapaksa Buddhist gambit fails, bail denied
-
Opinion5 days agoA journalist who wrote across the divide
-
Editorial6 days agoMore fuel price shocks shrouded in secrecy
-
Sports6 days agoMAS Holdings, official clothing sponsor of Sri Lanka team at Aichi–Nagoya 2026 Asian Games
