Connect with us

News

Implementing PCOI recommendations will be detrimental to judicial independence — Lawyers’ Forum for the People

Published

on

by Saman Indrajith

The implementation of the recommendations of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into political victimization (PCOI) would have a huge effect on the independence of the judiciary and its function in search of justice, says the Lawyers’ Forum for the People.

“This is a real danger to democracy and the country’s democratic institutions and processes”, Co-Convener of the Forum, Attorney-at-Law Senaka Perera told a news conference at the Dr. NM Perera Center last week.

“The recommendations, if implemented, will inflict irrevocable damage on the judiciary and impact adversely on democracy. Politicians can come and go. They appoint commissions as a means to their political ends, but the judiciary is not so. The Judiciary is not there to serve the politicians to achieve their political goals but to serve all people alike”, he noted.

The present government recognized the PCoI and thereby what had been done during the former regime as political victimization. Who can give a guarantee that the next government would not do the same? And what would be the end of this if these recommendations are implemented,” Perera queried.

He said that there are reports that the PCoI had identified the anti-corruption committee of the former government as ‘an illegal outfit’ and recommended legal action against its members.

“Legal action has been recommended against a list of politicians including JVP Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake, former Minister Patali Champika Ranawaka, TNA leader R. Sampanthan, MA Sumanthiran, Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka etc. Why is the PCoI silent about former President Maithripala Sirisena who chaired the anti-corruption committee? Doesn’t this point to a targeted witch hunt?” Perera asked.

Attorney-at-Law Namal Rajapakshe said that implementing the recommendations of the PCoI would place Sri Lanka on par with Myanmar. The government has no regard to the rule of law. It is making use of the law for its political witch hunt. People should protest against this injustice, he said while urging the government not to implement the recommendations of the PCoI in the name of democracy,” he said.

Attorney-at-Law Achala Seneviratne said that the government has appointed another committee to give legitimacy to the PCoI’s plans to suppress the voices of the opposition. The PCoI’s parameters of identifying victims need to be clarified because the PCoI has recommended tough legal action against respondents in the complaints – including police officers, former commanders of the military, MPs, former ministers and deputy ministers and prosecutors attached to the Attorney General’s Department.

Attorney-at-Law Tambiah Jeyaratnaraja said that the recommendations of the PCoI amounted to contempt of court. “The recommendations exert undue influence on the judiciary. The PCoI recommends putting an end to hearing 79 cases pending before courts. What mandate does a PCoI have to make such recommendations?” he asked.

Attorney-at-Law Chula Adikari said that the PCoI has also recommended compensation for complainants facing trial for murder, kidnapping and extortion in High Courts, that includes, inter alia, back pay, promotions, foreign workshops and popular school or university enrollment for their children.

“One of the cases recommended to be dropped is against Yoshitha Rajapaksa investigating how he raised funds to start CSN TV channel. The other one is the Mig deal involving Udayanga Weeratunga. Then there is another case in the list against Thiru Nadesan who is the husband of Nirupama Rajapaksa. Another case recommended to be dropped is against Jaliya Wickramasuriya, brother of the Prime Minister’s wife. All these 79 cases have a common factor- they are against members of a single family and its friends and relatives. Those cases are against misappropriating of trillions of public funds,” he alleged.

“Who is a political victim? We have clear examples, Lasantha Wickramatunga, Keith Noyahr, Upali Tennakoon, Eknaligoda and other journalists whose limbs had been broken. They were political victims. Now according to the PCoI there is a list of political victims who had been charged of extortion, killing, abduction, assaulting journalists, defrauding public funds etc,” Adikari said.

Attorneys-at-Law Upali Ratnayake and Manju Sri Chandrasena also addressed the press.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Fast Attack Craft P 4447 recovered in successful salvage operation

Published

on

By

The Sri Lanka Navy successfully recovered its Fast Attack Craft P 4447 following a successful salvage operation, bringing a multi-stage emergency response to a close.

The craft, which ran into distress during a routine patrol on 15th August 2026 off Angulana, was brought to the surface on 11th September, from a depth of approximately 80 feet. It was
subsequently towed to the Colombo Dockyard premises.
The initial phase of the operation immediately following the incident focused on search and rescue. A joint effort involving the Navy, Air Force, Police, and local fishermen from Angulana
resulted in the rescue of 11 crew members. The search and rescue phase drew to a close with the recovery of the remains of the Second in Command of the craft, on 4th September.

Following the search and rescue phase, specialized Navy diving and salvage teams launched a dedicated recovery phase against rough sea conditions and underwater challenges, adhering to
strict safety protocols. The Navy’s marine, hull, electrical, and electronic engineering teams utilized specialized technical know-how and equipment to raise the vessel in stages.

Thus, the salvage operation marked an outstanding achievement attained through the professionalism, technical expertise of Navy divers, and coordinated contribution of all
engineering and technical branches of the Sri Lanka Navy. Technical support and specialized expertise were also extended by the Sri Lanka Ports Authority and Colombo Dockyard PLC.

Continue Reading

News

CIABOC member’s appointment: Controversy over Speaker under probe heading selection process

Published

on

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Opposition should intensity its focus on the forthcoming selection of a member of the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) and remain vigilant as Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, MP, the head of the Constitutional Council (CC) tasked with making the relevant recommendation, is under investigation by the CIABOC, sources familiar with the ongoing inquiry told The Island.

Chethiya Goonasekara, PC, is expected to complete his three-year term on Dec 31, 2026. Sources pointed out that CIABOC Commissioners are appointed by the President on the recommendation made by the 10-member Constitutional Council.

The CIABOC initiated the investigation following a complaint lodged by suspended Chief of Staff and Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne in early February this year. Sources said that as Goonasekera is scheduled to complete his term toward the end of 2026, the CC would have to call applications soon to choose the successor.

Goonasekara received his appointment from President Ranil Wickremesinghe in January 2024. A Justice W. M. N. P. Iddawala was appointed Chairman of the CIABOC. The other commissioner is K. Bernard Rajapakse.

Asked whether Iddawala and Rajapakse, too, would complete their terms soon, sources said that in terms of the Anti-Corruption Act No 09 of 2023, the Chairman of CIABOC would hold office for a period of five years, second commissioner (K. Bernard Rajapakse) for four years and the third commissioner (Chethiya Goonasekara) for a period of three years.

Sources said that the Opposition as well as civil society representatives in the CC should take up the issue of Speaker facing an investigation by the CIABOC taking part in the forthcoming selection process. Responding to queries, sources emphasized that the issue was whether in terms of Section 107 of the Anti-Corruption Act the participation of the Speaker in the selection process amounted to a violation of the Act itself.

The current members of the CC are Dr Jagath Wickramaratne, Speaker and Chairman of the Constitutional Council, Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Prime Minister, Sajith Premadasa, Leader of the Opposition, Bimal Rathnayake, MP, Aboobucker Athambawa, MP, Ajith P. Perera, MP, Sivagnanam Shritharan, MP, Austin Fernando, Civil society representative, Prof. Wasantha Seneviratne, Civil society representative and Ranjith Ariyaratne, Civil society representative.

Sources pointed out that in spite of the sensitivity of the case, the CIABOC recorded Kularatne’s statement in the second week of August, six months after he lodged the complaint.

The CIABOC on 3, 8 and 10 Sept recorded the statements from the Transport Officer, Deputy Director, Administration and Assistant Director, Finance regarding the use of facilities by the Speaker, those assigned to his staff and other relevant matters.

The NPP named Dr. Wickramaratne as the Speaker after Asoka Ranwala resigned over controversy regarding his higher education qualifications.

SJB lawmaker Dayasiri Jayaskera has repeatedly raised the issues concerning the Speaker with the focus also on the Speaker using two government-managed residences, relevant staff in addition to expenditure on food, transport and fuel provided to the Speaker’s private secretary.

Political sources said that trouble erupted after the Parliamentary Staff Advisory Council in late January sacked Kularatne accusing him of providing false information to secure his appointment. Before being appointed as the Deputy Secretary-General of Parliament in 2023, Kularatne held several high-ranking positions, including Secretary to the Chief Government Whip, Additional Secretary to the President, Additional Secretary to the Prime Minister, and Additional Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition.

The SJB declared in Parliament that Ranwala should be brought back as the Speaker as they have no faith in Wickramaratne. MP Mujibur Rahuman jokingly told parliament that the Opposition wouldn’t raise Ranwala’s educational qualifications.

Continue Reading

News

GMOA: Countrywide cadre revision not done since 2015

Published

on

Dhammika

The Government Medical Officers’ Association (GMOA) has stressed the need to conduct a comprehensive countrywide cadre revision urgently.

GMOA spokesman Dr. Lasitha Dhammika told The Island that the failure on the part of successive governments to conduct cadre revision caused the deterioration of the public sector health services. Due to the absence of required statistics, they hadn’t been able to fully comprehend the situation on the ground and to ascertain the requirements of the public.

Dr. Dhammika pointed out the expansion of the services without supporting statistics and the need to initiate an immediate cadre revision. According to him, the GMOA had raised this issue with successive governments without success. The GMOA spokesman said that they also sought relevant information from the Health Ministry in terms of the Right to Information (RTI) Act two weeks ago but was yet to receive response.

(SF)

Continue Reading

Trending