Connect with us

Features

Mr. JR Jayewardene’s passport

Published

on

(Excerpted from In Pursuit of Governance, autobiography of MDD Peiris, Secretary to the PM)

Mr. JR Jayewardene was one of the most senior Members of Parliament, Leader of the United National Party and the Leader of the Opposition. During this time, due to the extremely adverse foreign exchange situation, very tight exchange control regulations were in place, and the government was almost obsessed with this question. Those leaving the country only received an allowance of £ 3.50, which was barely sufficient for a sandwich and a cup of tea. In order to go abroad, proof had to be shown to the Exchange Control authorities, that someone from abroad was sponsoring your journey and stay in that particular country.

There was a special Court sitting in order to try exchange control offences, and a section of the Criminal Investigations Department of the Police was working full time, tracking down violations. Superintendent of Police Tyrell Goonetilleke, an able and experienced investigator was in charge of this section. When on an investigation, Tyrell was a single minded and relentless pursuer of anybody and anything. He was a trained “bloodhound.”

One morning at about 9 a.m. I dropped in at Temple Trees, on my way to the Republic Square Office. I had with me two urgent and important letters, which I had drafted the previous evening and taken home, with the idea of obtaining the Prime Minister’s signature the first thing next morning. This was the reason for my unscheduled visit to Temple Trees.

When I got down from the car under the main portico, I saw the Prime Minister seated at the dining table from where she often worked. Seated besides her was Tyrell Goonetilleke. She, seeing me walking into the verandah asked me to come in. I said. I would wait until she finished, but she wanted me to come and join the discussion.

To my astonishment, Tyrell was saying that the Leader of the Opposition, Mr. JR Jayewardene was due to arrive at Katunayake shortly, from Bangkok, after a visit to Australia: that he suspected that he had committed exchange control offences; that he had already stationed senior CID officers at the airport; and that he urgently required the Prime Minister’s approval to take over his passport at the airport, the moment lie landed.

It was clear that the Prime Minister was also taken aback by this request. She was not inclined to grant permission. Tyrell kept on insisting. He was now the “bloodhound” on the trail oblivious to all other considerations. The Prime Minister suggested that if he wanted to see Mr. Jayewardene’s passport, he could go to his Ward Place residence, once he reached home and ask for it.

But Tyrell was now in a near trance. He said that unless the passport was taken into custody the moment Mr. Jayewardene landed, he might if given time suspect something and destroy the passport. I was now in an invidious position. I was there by pure accident. Tyrell had sought this confidential appointment with the Prime Minister. But I could see that she needed support in her reluctance to agree to the course of action suggested.

A couple of times, whilst this conversation was going on. I looked hard at the Prime Minister and signaled with my eyes that she should not agree. Tyrell kept on pressing. He was saying that the plane was due in half an hour and that he had to alert his people at the airport within the next 15 minutes. The Prime Minister then thought of discussing this matter with her Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs, Mr. WT Jayasinghe. She wanted a call put through to him. But his number was engaged, and the switchboard could not get through.

She then asked me to immediately go to the Ministry, which was just a five-minute drive away, speak to WT and get him to call her over the telephone. I kept my two letters with her and went to the Ministry. WT was at a meeting of the Security Council, presided over that day by Mr. Lakshman Jayakody, the Deputy Minister. I hastily scribbled a note and sent it in requesting him to come out immediately. When he did so, we went to an unoccupied room and I briefed him.

He, like me, thought the whole project reckless and not supportable. He thought the Prime Minister was quite right in refusing to accede to this request. In the meantime, he rang up the Immigration Counter at the Airport and inquired as to when the flight would be landing. The Immigration Officer replied that the flight was already landing. It had arrived about ten minutes ahead of schedule. This solved the problem. There was now, no time to get back to the Prime Minister, in order for her to take a decision. We just kept her informed of the situation. One could feel the considerable relief, which this latest turn of events gave her.

It later transpired that the UNP had suspected that there could be some incident when Mr. Jayewardene arrived and the airport had been thronged with party supporters. If there had been any attempt to seize his passport, an ugly situation would undoubtedly have developed. Later, when Mr. Jayewardene had got to know details of what might have happened, he was furious. and in this mood he had telephoned the quite innocent WT and given him a telling off.

Since it was WT’s nature that in such circumstances, he maintained a resigned and stoic silence, Mr. Jayewardene might well have believed that he was an active participant in this whole episode. Therefore, when the government changed and Mr. Jayewardene became Prime Minister, WT had cleared his table and was waiting to be sent home on retirement.

But Mr. Menikdiwela, Mr. Jayewardene’s Secretary had briefed him on what an honourable person WT was, and as a result much to his surprise, the new Prime Minister offered him a choice of being Secretary either in Defence or Foreign Affairs, because for the first time since independence, the new government was going to separate the two functions in separate Ministries. WT chose Foreign Affairs.

This was not the end of the matter. The new government appointed a special Judicial Tribunal and leveled several charges against Mrs. Bandaranaike. One such charge was her alleged complicity in the passport affair. I was summoned as a witness and appeared before the Tribunal consisting of Justices Sharvananda, Weeraratne and L.H. de Alwis. I was subjected to searching cross-examination by prosecution counsel Mr. Bunty de Zoysa who had a reputation for aggressive cross-examination.

In the end, I could not be shaken, because I was telling the truth. There was however, a matter which deserves comment. I had taken an oath to “Tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” I had no problem with telling the truth, nor did I have a problem with “Nothing but the truth,” because I did not lie. But I had a problem with the words “The whole truth.”

Telling the whole truth would have entailed my recitation of certain statements made by Mr. Tyrell Goonetillake in order to exert pressure on the Prime Minister for the purpose of obtaining her consent for the impounding of Mr. Jayewardene’s passport. If I had accurately recalled some of those words and phrases, his future career would have been in serious jeopardy. Holding back on some of those, made my position, under cross-examination that much more difficult.

I, whilst, trying to safeguard Tyrell’s career, had also to keep in mind that the position of the innocent party, Mrs. Bandaranaike was not affected. Proceeding in this manner, created one or two opportunities for Mr. de Zoysa’s sarcastic comments at my expense.

Mr. JR Jayewardene’s passport

Mr. JR Jayewardene was one of the most senior Members of Parliament, Leader of the United National Party and the Leader of the Opposition. During this time, due to the extremely adverse foreign exchange situation, very tight exchange control regulations were in place, and the government was almost obsessed with this question. Those leaving the country only received an allowance of £ 3.50, which was barely sufficient for a sandwich and a cup of tea. In order to go abroad, proof had to be shown to the Exchange Control authorities, that someone from abroad was sponsoring your journey and stay in that particular country.

There was a special Court sitting in order to try exchange control offences, and a section of the Criminal Investigations Department of the Police was working full time, tracking down violations. Superintendent of Police Tyrell Goonetilleke, an able and experienced investigator was in charge of this section. When on an investigation, Tyrell was a single minded and relentless pursuer of anybody and anything. He was a trained “bloodhound.”

One morning at about 9 a.m. I dropped in at Temple Trees, on my way to the Republic Square Office. I had with me two urgent and important letters, which I had drafted the previous evening and taken home, with the idea of obtaining the Prime Minister’s signature the first thing next morning. This was the reason for my unscheduled visit to Temple Trees.

When I got down from the car under the main portico, I saw the Prime Minister seated at the dining table from where she often worked. Seated besides her was Tyrell Goonetilleke. She, seeing me walking into the verandah asked me to come in. I said. I would wait until she finished, but she wanted me to come and join the discussion.

To my astonishment, Tyrell was saying that the Leader of the Opposition, Mr. JR Jayewardene was due to arrive at Katunayake shortly, from Bangkok, after a visit to Australia: that he suspected that he had committed exchange control offences; that he had already stationed senior CID officers at the airport; and that he urgently required the Prime Minister’s approval to take over his passport at the airport, the moment lie landed.

It was clear that the Prime Minister was also taken aback by this request. She was not inclined to grant permission. Tyrell kept on insisting. He was now the “bloodhound” on the trail oblivious to all other considerations. The Prime Minister suggested that if he wanted to see Mr. Jayewardene’s passport, he could go to his Ward Place residence, once he reached home and ask for it.

But Tyrell was now in a near trance. He said that unless the passport was taken into custody the moment Mr. Jayewardene landed, he might if given time suspect something and destroy the passport. I was now in an invidious position. I was there by pure accident. Tyrell had sought this confidential appointment with the Prime Minister. But I could see that she needed support in her reluctance to agree to the course of action suggested.

A couple of times, whilst this conversation was going on. I looked hard at the Prime Minister and signaled with my eyes that she should not agree. Tyrell kept on pressing. He was saying that the plane was due in half an hour and that he had to alert his people at the airport within the next 15 minutes. The Prime Minister then thought of discussing this matter with her Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs, Mr. WT Jayasinghe. She wanted a call put through to him. But his number was engaged, and the switchboard could not get through.

She then asked me to immediately go to the Ministry, which was just a five-minute drive away, speak to WT and get him to call her over the telephone. I kept my two letters with her and went to the Ministry. WT was at a meeting of the Security Council, presided over that day by Mr. Lakshman Jayakody, the Deputy Minister. I hastily scribbled a note and sent it in requesting him to come out immediately. When he did so, we went to an unoccupied room and I briefed him.

He, like me, thought the whole project reckless and not supportable. He thought the Prime Minister was quite right in refusing to accede to this request. In the meantime, he rang up the Immigration Counter at the Airport and inquired as to when the flight would be landing. The Immigration Officer replied that the flight was already landing. It had arrived about ten minutes ahead of schedule. This solved the problem. There was now, no time to get back to the Prime Minister, in order for her to take a decision. We just kept her informed of the situation. One could feel the considerable relief, which this latest turn of events gave her.

It later transpired that the UNP had suspected that there could be some incident when Mr. Jayewardene arrived and the airport had been thronged with party supporters. If there had been any attempt to seize his passport, an ugly situation would undoubtedly have developed. Later, when Mr. Jayewardene had got to know details of what might have happened, he was furious. and in this mood he had telephoned the quite innocent WT and given him a telling off.

Since it was WT’s nature that in such circumstances, he maintained a resigned and stoic silence, Mr. Jayewardene might well have believed that he was an active participant in this whole episode. Therefore, when the government changed and Mr. Jayewardene became Prime Minister, WT had cleared his table and was waiting to be sent home on retirement.

But Mr. Menikdiwela, Mr. Jayewardene’s Secretary had briefed him on what an honourable person WT was, and as a result much to his surprise, the new Prime Minister offered him a choice of being Secretary either in Defence or Foreign Affairs, because for the first time since independence, the new government was going to separate the two functions in separate Ministries. WT chose Foreign Affairs.

This was not the end of the matter. The new government appointed a special Judicial Tribunal and leveled several charges against Mrs. Bandaranaike. One such charge was her alleged complicity in the passport affair. I was summoned as a witness and appeared before the Tribunal consisting of Justices Sharvananda, Weeraratne and L.H. de Alwis. I was subjected to searching cross-examination by prosecution counsel Mr. Bunty de Zoysa who had a reputation for aggressive cross-examination.

In the end, I could not be shaken, because I was telling the truth. There was however, a matter which deserves comment. I had taken an oath to “Tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” I had no problem with telling the truth, nor did I have a problem with “Nothing but the truth,” because I did not lie. But I had a problem with the words “The whole truth.”

Telling the whole truth would have entailed my recitation of certain statements made by Mr. Tyrell Goonetillake in order to exert pressure on the Prime Minister for the purpose of obtaining her consent for the impounding of Mr. Jayewardene’s passport. If I had accurately recalled some of those words and phrases, his future career would have been in serious jeopardy. Holding back on some of those, made my position, under cross-examination that much more difficult.

I, whilst, trying to safeguard Tyrell’s career, had also to keep in mind that the position of the innocent party, Mrs. Bandaranaike was not affected. Proceeding in this manner, created one or two opportunities for Mr. de Zoysa’s sarcastic comments at my expense.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Cricket and the National Interest

Published

on

The appointment of former minister Eran Wickremaratne to chair the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee is significant for more than the future of cricket. It signals a possible shift in the culture of governance even as it offers Sri Lankan cricket a fighting possibility to get out of the doldrums of failure. There have been glorious patches for the national cricket team since the epochal 1996 World Cup triumph. But these patches of brightness have been few and far between and virtually non-existent over the past decade. At the centre of this disaster has been the failures of governance within Sri Lanka Cricket which are not unlike the larger failures of governance within the country itself. The appointment of a new reform oriented committee therefore carries significance beyond cricket. It reflects the wider challenge facing the country which is to restore trust in public institutions for better management.

The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne brings a professional administrator with a proven track record into the cricket arena. He has several strengths that many of his immediate predecessors lacked. Before the ascent of the present government leadership to positions of power, Eran Wickremaratne was among the handful of government ministers who did not have allegations of corruption attached to their names. His reputation for financial professionalism and integrity has remained intact over many years in public life. With him in the Cricket Transformation Committee are also respected former cricketers Kumar Sangakkara, Roshan Mahanama and Sidath Wettimuny together with professionals from legal and business backgrounds. They have been tasked with introducing structural reforms and improving transparency and accountability within cricket administration.

A second reason for this appointment to be significant is that this is possibly the first occasion on which the NPP government has reached out to someone associated with the opposition to obtain assistance in an area of national importance. The commitment to bipartisanship has been a constant demand from politically non-partisan civic groups and political analysts. They have voiced the opinion that the government needs to be more inclusive in its choice of appointments to decision making authorities. The NPP government’s practice so far has largely been to limit appointments to those within the ruling party or those considered loyalists even at the cost of proven expertise. The government’s decision in this case therefore marks a potentially important departure.

National Interest

There are areas of public life where national interest should transcend party divisions and cricket, beloved of the people, is one of them. Sri Lanka cannot afford to continue treating every institution as an arena for political competition when institutions themselves are in crisis and public confidence has become fragile. It is therefore unfortunate that when the government has moved positively in the direction of drawing on expertise from outside its own ranks there should be a negative response from sections of the opposition. This is indicative of the absence of a culture of bipartisanship even on issues that concern the national interest. The SJB, of which the newly appointed cricket committee chairman was a member objected on the grounds that politicians should not hold positions in sports administration and asked him to resign from the party. There is a need to recognise the distinction between partisan political control and the temporary use of experienced administrators to carry out reform and institutional restructuring. In other countries those in politics often join academia and civil society on a temporary basis and vice versa.

More disturbing has been the insidious campaign carried out against the new cricket committee and its chairman on the grounds of religious affiliation. This is an unacceptable denial of the reality that Sri Lanka is a plural, multi ethnic and multi religious society. The interim committee reflects this diversity to a reasonable extent. The country’s long history of ethnic conflict should have taught all political actors the dangers of mobilising communal prejudice for short term political gain. Sri Lanka paid a very heavy price for decades of mistrust and division. It would be tragic if even cricket administration became another arena for communal suspicion and hostility. The present government represents an important departure from the sectarian rhetoric that was employed by previous governments. They have repeatedly pledged to protect the equal rights of all citizens and not permit discrimination or extremism in any form.

The recent international peace march in Sri Lanka led by the Venerable Bhikkhu Thich Paññākāra from Vietnam with its message of loving kindness and mindfulness to all resonated strongly with the masses of people as seen by the crowds who thronged the roadsides to obtain blessings and show respect. This message stands in contrast to the sectarian resentment manifested by those who seek to use the cricket appointments as a weapon to attack the government at the present time. The challenges before the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee parallel the larger challenges before the government in developing the national economy and respecting ethnic and religious diversity. Plugging the leaks and restoring systems will take time and effort. It cannot be done overnight and it cannot succeed without public patience and support.

New Recognition

There is also a need for realism. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee does not guarantee success. Reforming deeply flawed institutions is always difficult. Besides, Sri Lanka is a small country with a relatively small population compared to many other cricket playing nations. It is also a country still recovering from the economic breakdown of 2022 which pushed the majority of people into hardship and severely weakened public institutions. The country continues to face unprecedented challenges including the damage caused by Cyclone Ditwah and the wider global economic uncertainties linked to conflict in the Middle East. Under these difficult circumstances Sri Lanka has fewer resources than many larger countries to devote to both cricket and economic development.

When resources are scarce they cannot be wasted through corruption or incompetence. Drawing upon the strengths of all those who are competent for the tasks at hand regardless of party affiliation or ethnic or religious identity is necessary if improvement is to come sooner rather than later. The burden of rebuilding the country cannot rest only on the government. The crisis facing the country is too deep for any single party or government to solve alone. National recovery requires capable individuals from across society and from different sectors such as business and civil society to work together in areas where the national interest transcends party politics. There is also a responsibility on opposition political parties to support initiatives that are politically neutral and genuinely in the national interest. Not every issue needs to become a partisan battle.

Sri Lanka cricket occupies a special place in the national consciousness. At its best it once united the country and gave Sri Lankans a sense of pride and international recognition. Restoring integrity and professionalism to cricket administration can therefore become part of the larger task of national renewal. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee, while it does not guarantee success, is a sign that the political leadership and people of the country may be beginning to mature in their approach to governance. In recognising the need for competence, integrity and bipartisan cooperation and extending it beyond cricket into other areas of national life, Sri Lanka may find the way towards more stable and successful governance..

by Jehan Perera

Continue Reading

Features

From Dhaka to Sri Lanka, three wheels that drive our economies

Published

on

Court vacation this year came with an unexpected lesson, not from a courtroom but from the streets of Dhaka — a city that moves, quite literally, on three wheels.

Above the traffic, a modern metro line glides past concrete pillars and crowded rooftops. It is efficient, clean and frequently cited as a symbol of progress in Bangladesh. For a visitor from Sri Lanka, it inevitably brings to mind our own abandoned light rail plans — a project debated, politicised and ultimately set aside.

But Dhaka’s real story is not in the air. It is on the ground.

Beneath the elevated tracks, the streets belong to three-wheelers. Known locally as CNGs, they cluster at junctions, line the edges of markets and pour into narrow roads that larger vehicles avoid. Even with a functioning rail system, these three-wheelers remain the city’s most dependable form of everyday transport.

Within hours of arriving, their importance becomes obvious. The train may take you across the city, but the journey does not end there. The last mile — often the most complicated part — belongs entirely to the three-wheeler. It is the vehicle that gets you home, to a meeting or simply through streets that no bus route properly serves.

There is a rhythm to using them. A destination is mentioned, a price is suggested and a brief negotiation follows. Then the ride begins, edging into traffic that feels permanently compressed. Drivers move with instinct, adjusting routes and squeezing through gaps with a confidence built over years.

It is not polished. But it works.

And that is where the comparison with Sri Lanka becomes less about what we lack and more about what we already have.

Back home, the three-wheeler has long been part of daily life — so familiar that it is often discussed only in terms of its problems. There are frequent complaints about fares, refusals or the absence of meters. More recently, the industry itself has become entangled in politics — from fuel subsidies to regulatory debates, from election-time promises to periodic crackdowns.

In that process, the conversation has shifted. The three-wheeler is often treated as a problem to be managed, rather than a service to be strengthened.

Yet, seen through the experience of Dhaka, Sri Lanka’s system begins to look far more settled — and, in many ways, ahead.

There is a growing structure in place. Meters, while not perfect, are widely recognised. Ride-hailing apps have added transparency and reduced uncertainty for passengers. There are clearer expectations on both sides — driver and commuter alike. Even small details, such as designated parking areas in parts of Colombo or the increasing standard of vehicles, point to an industry slowly moving towards professionalism.

Just as importantly, there is a human element that remains intact.

In Sri Lanka, a three-wheeler ride is rarely just a transaction. Drivers talk. They offer directions, comment on the day’s news, or share local knowledge. The ride becomes part of the social fabric, not just a means of getting from one point to another.

In Dhaka, the scale of the city leaves less room for that. The interaction is quicker, more direct, shaped by urgency. The service is essential, but it is under constant pressure.

What stands out, across both countries, is that the three-wheeler is not a temporary or outdated mode of transport. It is a necessity in dense, fast-growing Asian cities — one that fills gaps no rail or bus system can fully address.

Large infrastructure projects, like light rail, are important. They bring efficiency and long-term capacity. But they cannot replace the flexibility of a three-wheeler. They cannot reach into narrow streets, respond instantly to demand or provide that crucial last-mile connection.

That is why, even in a city that has invested heavily in modern rail, Dhaka still runs on three wheels.

For Sri Lanka, the lesson is not simply about what could have been built, but about what should be better managed and valued.

The three-wheeler industry does not need to be politicised at every turn. It needs steady regulation — clear fare systems, proper licensing, safety standards — alongside encouragement and recognition. It needs to be seen as part of the solution to urban transport, not as a side issue.

Because for thousands of drivers, it is a livelihood. And for millions of passengers, it is the most immediate and reliable form of mobility.

The tuk-tuk may not feature in grand policy speeches or infrastructure blueprints. It does not run on elevated tracks or attract international attention. But on the ground, where daily life unfolds, it continues to do what larger systems often struggle to do — show up, adapt and keep moving.

And after watching Dhaka’s streets — crowded, relentless, yet functioning — that small, three-wheeled vehicle feels less like something to argue over and more like something to get right.

(The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with over a decade of experience specialising in civil law, a former Board Member of the Office of Missing Persons and a former Legal Director of the Central Cultural Fund. He holds an LLM in International Business Law)

 

by Sampath Perera recently in Dhaka, Bangladesh 

Continue Reading

Features

Dubai scene … opening up

Published

on

Seven Notes: Operating in Dubai

According to reports coming my way, the entertainment scene, in Dubai, is very much opening up, and buzzing again!

After a quieter few months, May is packed with entertainment and the whole scene, they say, is shifting back into full swing.

The Seven Notes band, made up of Sri Lankans, based in Dubai, are back in the spotlight, after a short hiatus, due to the ongoing Middle East problems.

On 18th April they did Legends Night at Mercure Hotel Dubai Barsha Heights; on Thursday, 9th May, they will be at the Sports Bar of the Mercure Hotel for 70s/80s Retro Night; on 6th June, they will be at Al Jadaf Dubai to provide the music for Sandun Perera live in concert … and with more dates to follow.

These events are expected to showcase the band’s evolving sound, tighter stage coordination, and stronger audience engagement.

With each performance, the band aims to refine its identity and build a loyal following within Dubai’s vibrant nightlife and event scene.

Pasindu Umayanga: The group’s new vocalist

What makes Seven Notes standout is their versatility which has made the band a dynamic and promising act.

With a growing performance calendar, new talent integration, and international ambitions, the band is definitely entering a defining phase of its journey.

Dubai’s music industry, I’m told, thrives on diversity, energy, and audience connection, with live bands playing a crucial role in elevating events—from corporate shows to private concerts. Against this backdrop, Seven Notes is positioning itself not just as another band, but as a performance-driven musical unit focused on consistency and growth.

Adding fresh momentum to the group is Pasindu Umayanga who joins Seven Notes as their new vocalist. This move signals a strategic upgrade—not just filling a role, but strengthening the band’s front-line presence.

Looking beyond local stages, Seven Notes is preparing for an international tour, to Korea, in July.

Bassist Niluk Uswaththa: Spokesperson for Seven Notes

According to bassist Niluk Uswaththa, taking a band abroad means: Your sound must hold up against unfamiliar audiences, your performance must translate beyond language, and your discipline must be at a professional level.

“If executed well, this tour could redefine Seven Notes from a local band into an emerging international act,” added Niluk.

He went on to say that Dubai is not an easy market. It’s saturated with highly experienced, multi-genre bands that can adapt instantly to any crowd.

“To stand out consistently you need to have tight rehearsal discipline, unique sound identity (not just covers), strong stage chemistry, audience retention – not just applause.”

No doubt, Seven Notes is entering a critical growth phase—new member, multiple shows, and an international tour on the horizon. The opportunity is real, but so is the pressure.

However, there is talk that Seven Notes will soon be a recognised name in the regional music scene.

Continue Reading

Trending