Connect with us

Opinion

Is nationalism the measles of mankind?

Published

on

Albert Einstein (L) / Bearnard Shaw (R)

Palitha Senanayake

Albert Einstein is on record stating that “Nationalism is an infantile disease and it is the measles of mankind.” And then it was George Bernard Shaw who observed that, ‘You’ll never have a quiet world unless you knock patriotism out of the human race”.

These however are statements made in particular contexts and in situations where the negativity of extremist nationalism /patriotism have brought malevolent results. Thus, we may enjoy the comfort of such thinking only if we fail to realise that extremism, in anything, whether it is nourishment or religion, always proves negative. Ironically, both these legendary men graced the world in early 20th century and thus, obviously their observations may have been heavily influenced by the events of WW1 and WW 11.

In the current era however, nationalism could be taken in the context where it is defined and upheld by the United Nations, whose name in itself prescribed nations as entities, the conglomeration of which, is summoned to preserve the peace and prosperity of mankind on this planet.

The United Nations (UN) describes a nation, or “state”, according to a traditional definition in international law. This definition states that an entity is a state if it has the following: A permanent population, A defined territory, A government, and the ability to enter into relations. The UN Charter states that membership in the organization is open to “peace-loving states” that accept the obligations of the charter and are able to carry them out. The UN Security Council recommends the states for membership, and the General Assembly then votes on whether to admit them by a two-thirds majority. In principle, only sovereign states can join the UN, and all current members are sovereign. However, initially five members were not sovereign when they joined between 1946 and 1991, but they too later became independent and thus sovereign.

In this context, let us now face the positive aspects of nationalism in the current global scenario for if nationalism is a sickness, then nation building must be a crime every country should bring legislation to prohibit. As against this, the UN encourages nation building and the maintenance of peace within and among nations. Towards this effort the UN has evolved certain laws and one such law is to grant the right to control dissention or terrorism within states to the central government. This conveys the message that a particular nation has to exude the characteristics of the state’s majority while accommodating the minority aspirations within that framework. It is in this environment that these new states that are often categorised as ‘developing’ are expected to eventually reach the developed state.

However, the post UN era is not devoid of imperialism and hence in this global milieu when newly independent nations try to assert their independence or work towards that process, powerful nations may, covertly and overtly, view and treat such efforts with disdain and could even interpret those as ‘crimes, human rights violations, etc.’ The irony here is that, it is those very same powerful nations that have brought nationalism to this level of condemnation, by their own conduct of war and pillage to maintain national superiority and then domination over smaller nations.

Sri Lanka’s recent effort to integrate the privileged Tamil minority in to mainstream politics is an example of how a small nation has to work towards nation building against the shenanigans of powerful nations. The Sri Lankan Tamil minority was extraordinarily educated and empowered backed by a globalised Diaspora by the British colonialist to maintain their ‘divide and rule’ colonial administration during their 150-year domain over Celon.

However today in Sri Lanka, in the wake of the upcoming Presidential election, the terms ‘nationalism’ and ‘patriotism’ have been politicised to a point to justify the derogatory sentiment that ‘nationalism/patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel’. This is very much the work of the anti-national elements who had to remain in political wilderness when the nation experienced an aura of nationalism after the defeat of the LTTE. The current economic woes no doubt is the principal factor that helped these anti- nationalists in their resurgence.

The issue at the center of this current controversy on nationalism in Sri Lanka is the politically expedient attempt to hover all Rajapakse family short comings around nationalism. This level of thinking is actively patronized by these anti-national elements who seek to reflect all the sins of Rajapakses’ on nationalism to make nationalism anathema. The truth however is that the politically combative Rajapakses’ were thrust in to an option less war by the LTTE in 2007 and the resulting fight that exposed the anti- national myths that surrounded the LTTE’s ‘invincibility’ up to then, made the Rajapakse regime victorious. Thus, Rajapakse’s become the symbol of nationalistic by circumstances and noy by choice.

There are a few categories of strong anti-national elements within the Sri Lankan nation. The first among these, is the Sri Lankan ruling class that were brought up with colonial values and then became heirs to rule after British abdication. This category finds their social position increasingly threatened in a nation on its forward march. The second is newly educated left ideologist who believe in a proletariat type global community to which nationalism is again anathema. This category too appears slow in learning that proletarianism too belongs to global political history.

Among the current candidates who vie for Presidency RW belongs to the first category while AKD belongs to the second. The other categories are the ethnic and religious minorities who believe that dethroning the Sinhala Buddhist values will benefit their own expansionist agendas.

However, the bottom line for a nation’s well-being is that it should enjoy peace and stability to enable its forward march. Nationalism based on accommodative Sinhala Buddhism could just provide just that whereas anti nationalism based on multi-faceted agendas manoeuvered by global imperialism could spell doom and disharmony again.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Role of children’s stories in learning English and their impact on children

Published

on

Children’s stories have always been an important part of childhood. From traditional fairy tales to modern picture books, stories entertain children while also helping them understand the world around them. When children are learning English as a language, stories become an especially valuable tool because they provide a natural, enjoyable, and meaningful way to develop language skills. Through characters, plots, and imaginative situations, children’s stories support vocabulary development, improve communication abilities, and encourage confidence in using English.

One of the greatest benefits of children’s stories in English language learning is that they introduce children to new vocabulary in a meaningful context. Instead of memorising isolated words from a list, children learn words through situations and actions within a story. For example, a story about a farm may introduce words such as “animal,” “field,” “farmer,” and “plant” while showing how these words relate to each other. This contextual learning helps children understand and remember new vocabulary more effectively.

Stories also improve children’s listening skills. When teachers, parents, or other speakers read stories aloud, children hear correct pronunciation, sentence structures, and natural expressions in English. Regular exposure to spoken English helps children become familiar with the rhythm, sounds, and patterns of the language. Even when children do not understand every word, they can often follow the meaning through pictures, gestures, and the events of the story. Over time, this develops their ability to understand spoken English in different situations.

Another important impact of children’s stories is the development of speaking skills. Stories encourage children to talk about characters, describe events, answer questions, and share their own ideas. Activities such as retelling a story, acting out scenes, or discussing what might happen next give children opportunities to practise English in a relaxed environment. Because stories are enjoyable and engaging, children are often more willing to participate and communicate without fear of making mistakes.

Children’s stories also support the development of grammar skills. Through repeated exposure to well-formed sentences, children gradually recognize how English works. They learn common sentence patterns, verb forms, and ways of expressing ideas. For young learners, grammar is often easier to understand when it is presented through a story rather than through direct explanations. For example, a story that describes past events naturally introduces the use of past tense verbs, allowing children to observe grammar in action.

In addition to language development, stories have a strong influence on children’s imagination and creativity. Stories allow children to enter different worlds, meet interesting characters, and explore new ideas. When learning English, imagination makes the language experience more meaningful. A child who becomes interested in a story about a brave character or a magical adventure is more likely to remember the words and expressions connected with that experience. Creativity also encourages children to create their own stories, which further strengthens their ability to use English.

Children’s stories can also help develop cultural awareness. Language is closely connected with culture, and stories often introduce children to different traditions, lifestyles, and values. English stories from different countries allow children to learn about people and places beyond their own experiences. This helps them understand that English is not only a subject to study but also a way to communicate with people around the world.

Reading stories in English can also increase children’s motivation and positive attitudes toward learning. Many children may find learning a new language challenging, especially when they focus only on textbooks or exercises. Stories make learning more enjoyable because they combine education with entertainment. When children associate English with fun and creativity, they are more likely to develop curiosity and continue learning.

The emotional impact of stories should not be overlooked. Many children’s stories contain themes such as friendship, kindness, courage, and problem-solving. Through characters and situations, children can learn important social and emotional lessons. Discussing these themes in English gives children opportunities to express feelings, opinions, and personal experiences. This not only improves language ability but also supports emotional growth.

Teachers play an important role in using stories effectively in English language classrooms. Selecting stories that match children’s age, interests, and language levels is essential. Teachers can support understanding by using pictures, asking questions, encouraging predictions, and connecting the story to children’s lives. Repetition is also valuable, as hearing the same story several times allows children to become more familiar with vocabulary and sentence structures.

Parents can also encourage language learning through storytelling at home. Reading English stories together, listening to audiobooks, or watching story-based programs can provide additional exposure to the language. A supportive environment where children feel comfortable experimenting with English can greatly improve their confidence and progress.

In conclusion, children’s stories have a powerful impact on learning English as a language. They provide children with opportunities to develop vocabulary, listening, speaking, reading, and grammar skills in an enjoyable and meaningful way. Beyond language learning, stories encourage imagination, creativity, cultural understanding, and emotional development. By making English learning engaging and enjoyable, children’s stories help young learners build a strong foundation for future communication and lifelong learning.

Saumya Aloysius

(A children’s writer contributing to both local and foreign newspapers as a freelance writer)

Continue Reading

Opinion

When governments destroy mangroves

Published

on

Any government that comes into power is a caretaker – of its people, environment and security. This is another glaring occasion where their lack of knowledge, or blatant disregard to the environment is causing long-lasting damage to this country.

After the devastation of the tsunami, then governments took the initiative to raise natural protection of the island by undertaking massive projects to plant mangroves. It was a long-term project, spanning 20 years, by the armed forces, to get these barriers up. Now the same army is used by this government to chop down these mangroves!!

This is happening right now in the Trincomalee lagoon. Nearly 40 lorry loads of mangrove forest have been taken away already. The excuse used for this is dengue control, a circular issued by the presidential secretariat in June. The ignorance is here; the seawater mixed lagoon does NOT breed mosquitoes. Trincomalee does not pop up in the dengue demographics, even as a high risk area. Yes, there is garbage, and plastic thrown into the mangroves that can be breeding grounds for mosquitoes. These can be cleared away in a clean-up operations, without harming the mangrove trees. It has been done a few times before, by previous government authorities, like coast conservation, who know the value of the mangrove belts. The local rumour becomes believable, that this deplorable act is done to please some local business partners of the area who run pleasure boats in the lagoon.

Yes, unhealthy mangroves can breed mosquitoes. But mangroves are ‘decease swamps’ is a dangerous myth. That mangroves are dirty, stagnant swamps teeming with decease carrying mosquitoes is a misconception that promotes harmful policies to control dengue outbreaks. This top myth justifies the illegal coastal clearance today in Trincomalee. It is destroying an important ecological asset of this country, mangroves, while failing to address the true root of dengue transmission. Where is the coast conservation department in this situ? Have they got CCD permission to carry out this butchery?

Healthy mangroves do not breed dengue mosquitoes, especially the one’s closely connected to the sea like in Trincomalee. The larvae needs completely still unmoving water to breathe at the surface, and mature. The power of tidal flushing which keeps water circulating in the mangroves makes this impossible. Also the daily ebb and flow of ocean tides keeps the water moving in the mangroves and frequently drains the forest floor. The natural hydrology of healthy mangroves, acts as an automatic self-regulating barrier against stagnant water collection, making viable breeding sites virtually impossible.

Also mangroves contain nature’s exterminators. It hosts a massive army of mosquito predators. These mangroves are not dead swamps but vibrant nurseries. Young Fish, dragon flies, crusteasians, and insectivorous birds are natural mosquito predators. Clearing mangroves collapses this natural food web, removing this natural pest control.

In fact, clearing mangroves is counterproductive and will backfire with worsened dengue cases. The heavy machinery will leave a scarred landscape with deep tyre tracks in the marshy soil making stagnant water pools and disrupted drainage. When rainwater fills these artificial depressions it will create perfect stagnant, predator free, fresh water pools, Ideal breeding grounds for Aedes aegypti. Also clearing this kind of buffers can bring in the urban sprawl with its people, housing, and garbage, to the new degraded land.

The collateral damage is even bigger. Destroying mangroves in the name of pest control leaves coastal populations poorer, hungrier, and highly vulnerable to extreme weather. One would have thought at least the people in the coast conservation department were knowledgeable enough about the loss of wave attenuation with removal of mangroves and the risk of flooding and storm surge damages to the coastal areas. Collapse of these fish nurseries should ring alarm bells in the fisheries department. Reduced fish harvest and loss of livelihood for the local fishermen should have had fisheries department people rushing to the site. But neither of the mentioned government departments have raised a murmur, in the face of political influence. This is the sad truth of the country at the moment. Sri Lanka’s climate resilience has been compromised by release of stored ‘blue carbon’ and a loss of natural buffer against rising sea levels, while the responsible people in the government are silent in front of an ignorant political hierarchy.

This is an appeal to the highest authority in the country to stop this environmentally insensitive projects of this nature being coughed up by ignorant municipal members. Clearing these forests directly violates so many policies on conservation. Our local fishermen depend entirely on healthy mangrove root systems—such as those being chopped down. From a health perspective, medical professionals have repeatedly assured us that under the current National Policy Framework, marshy lands and mangrove ecosystems pose no threat of dengue. We request your guidance and intervention to ensure our environment is not sacrificed.

Citizen S

Continue Reading

Opinion

Lankan hotels and price discrimination

Published

on

In planning a long trip to Sri Lanka from the UK, I was disappointed to see different hotel pricing for foreign visitors when compared to local rates. Like many travellers, I prefer to book directly with hotels, rather than international hotel consolidators, as more money goes to local businesses. But the assumption that foreigners should pay more is simply distasteful. As such, I’ve chosen another long-haul destination that does not follow such practices, and hope that Sri Lanka will change its approach to overseas visitors in the near future.

Neil Roskilly Wetherlee UK

Continue Reading

Trending