Connect with us

Opinion

Pelwatte and Sevenagala Sugar Distilleries – Economic Disaster

Published

on

A friend had sent me an extract of a statement made by the State Minister for Investment Promotion Dilum Amunugama. The statement was titled ‘Sri Lanka state sugar firms drowned in unsold ethanol.’

The two sugar firms referred to are Pelwatte and Sevenagala Sugar factories. They are supposed to carry a stock of 1.3 million litres unable to sell.

The Minister attributes this problem to economic crisis and tax hikes.

In 1968 I took over as Distillery Manager at the then government owned Distillery at the Kantale Sugar Factory. That is the reason for my friend to refer this to me for comment.

There were other comments that the Minister had made. (i) Legal alcohol companies showed that some have suffered sales falls as much as 70 percent at times (ii) In Sri Lanka sugar and ethanol is protected by import taxes and domestic production is price competitive (iii) We cannot export as our cost of production is high, (iv) Due to the high taxes illegal alcohol sales have appeared to have increased, (v) Sri Lanka’s alcohol demand usually recovers as disposable income recover about two years after the currency crisis ends.

Mr. Minister, I regret to say that whoever provided the above information had misled you.

All this indicate the lack of professionalism among those who decide on the country’s economic policy. See “Legal alcohol companies showed that some have suffered sales falls as much as 70 percent at times.” The loss of income to the Govt. as Excise taxes, VAT and others must have run into Trillions of Rupees already.

From 1956 to about 1995, this country had a unit to plan the country’s economic policy. It was composed of technocrats from varying specialities. In the mid-1990s this unit was disbanded. That is where the problem started.

Another factor that contributed would have been providing aurthority to the Ministers to appoint public servants and disciplining them.

Since the departure of Mr. Ronnie de Mel, the Ministry itself was manned by politicians with no known background in economic theory. Resulting from the above ad-hoc decisions had been taken, which had led to the present pathetic pass.

The information I possess is that about four years ago the government decided to ban the import of alcohol forcing those that bottle – the so-called legal alcohol – to purchase their requirements from the local manufacturers. The local manufacturers are supposed to have raised their prices to Rs 1,000 per litre. Though the prices had been reduced recently the damage had been done already.

It is useless to blame the State-Owned Enterprises; this decision had been taken by the political masters. These are decisions that should be taken after an in-depth study of the proposal. That does not seem to have been the case.

I for one do not think this problem has any connection with the currency crisis. An individual who wishes to have a drink will buy his drink- even a smaller quantity than usual.

Developed countries that this country is attempting to ape, provide for individuals to produce their liquor subjected to limits; home-brewed spirits cannot be sold. This is very good, because

(i) I wonder how many could remember the incident where 32 tipplers fell sick or passed away after imbibing Methyl alcohol. I remember this to have happened in Batticaloa. (ii) The same unfortunate incident took place at Matara and the hospital authorities were searching for an anti- dote – Brandy.

We cannot export as our cost of production is high. That is a bogus explanation.

The biggest cost centre at an alcohol distillery (high strength alcohol as those produced at Pelwatte and Sevenagala) is the cost of fuel.

The cost to the Lanka Sugar Company Distilleries ( Pelwatte and Sevenagala ) in the purchase of fuel oil must be in the region of Rs 1,000,000,000 per year.

Ethanol at high strength (purity in the 90% or above) could be produced where fuel oil requirement would be at Rs ZERO or there about..

Since I joined the distillery at Kantale I have been searching for ways and means of reducing or completely eliminating the fuel oil requirement at the distillery. I found that most if not all the oil burnt was going down the drain as effluent.

About seven years ago I joined a university to conduct doctoral studies, to reduce the requirement of fuel oil to near Rs. Zero or thereabout. This work required funds for the equipment and for supporting staff ( the work will have to proceed 24 hrs a day may be for two weeks at least).

The university sought funds from parties, that would be beneficiaries, but nothing came. They directed the university to another institution that had connected interest.

The Director of this institute claimed, on two occasions, that he had no chance to read the request. Well he has had no chance during the past seven years.

That is the interest that our institutions pay to such research.

This study would have made our alcohol highly exportable. With this process proposed the quality would not have been a problem.

Taxes on alcohol is based on four grounds –(i) Income to the state (ii) To discourage people from imbibing alcohol (iii) On religious grounds. (iv) Objections from the spouse.

Dear Mr. Minister, (ii) and (iii) have no relationship to the ground situation. The objections from the spouse is irrelevant from the day I developed the ISLANDER’S RED RUM. The clientele for Islander’s Red Rum were the female imbiber. It was introduced during the harvesting period, with the highest sales being reported from Anuradhapura. It also sold well at the hotels.

Consuming arrack, whiskey, vodka, gin, rum, or even kasippu will leave one’s breath smelling of alcohol. Islander’s Red Rum freed one from this exposure. Ladies were reported to be very appreciative of this character, both the sophisticated Colombo crowd and rural crowd.

No body sings the song Sealed bottle…. Sealed Botale…” now.

This is Sri Lanka- please do not grumble.

S. P. Upali S. Wickramasinghe

spupalisw@yahoo.com



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Role of children’s stories in learning English and their impact on children

Published

on

Children’s stories have always been an important part of childhood. From traditional fairy tales to modern picture books, stories entertain children while also helping them understand the world around them. When children are learning English as a language, stories become an especially valuable tool because they provide a natural, enjoyable, and meaningful way to develop language skills. Through characters, plots, and imaginative situations, children’s stories support vocabulary development, improve communication abilities, and encourage confidence in using English.

One of the greatest benefits of children’s stories in English language learning is that they introduce children to new vocabulary in a meaningful context. Instead of memorising isolated words from a list, children learn words through situations and actions within a story. For example, a story about a farm may introduce words such as “animal,” “field,” “farmer,” and “plant” while showing how these words relate to each other. This contextual learning helps children understand and remember new vocabulary more effectively.

Stories also improve children’s listening skills. When teachers, parents, or other speakers read stories aloud, children hear correct pronunciation, sentence structures, and natural expressions in English. Regular exposure to spoken English helps children become familiar with the rhythm, sounds, and patterns of the language. Even when children do not understand every word, they can often follow the meaning through pictures, gestures, and the events of the story. Over time, this develops their ability to understand spoken English in different situations.

Another important impact of children’s stories is the development of speaking skills. Stories encourage children to talk about characters, describe events, answer questions, and share their own ideas. Activities such as retelling a story, acting out scenes, or discussing what might happen next give children opportunities to practise English in a relaxed environment. Because stories are enjoyable and engaging, children are often more willing to participate and communicate without fear of making mistakes.

Children’s stories also support the development of grammar skills. Through repeated exposure to well-formed sentences, children gradually recognize how English works. They learn common sentence patterns, verb forms, and ways of expressing ideas. For young learners, grammar is often easier to understand when it is presented through a story rather than through direct explanations. For example, a story that describes past events naturally introduces the use of past tense verbs, allowing children to observe grammar in action.

In addition to language development, stories have a strong influence on children’s imagination and creativity. Stories allow children to enter different worlds, meet interesting characters, and explore new ideas. When learning English, imagination makes the language experience more meaningful. A child who becomes interested in a story about a brave character or a magical adventure is more likely to remember the words and expressions connected with that experience. Creativity also encourages children to create their own stories, which further strengthens their ability to use English.

Children’s stories can also help develop cultural awareness. Language is closely connected with culture, and stories often introduce children to different traditions, lifestyles, and values. English stories from different countries allow children to learn about people and places beyond their own experiences. This helps them understand that English is not only a subject to study but also a way to communicate with people around the world.

Reading stories in English can also increase children’s motivation and positive attitudes toward learning. Many children may find learning a new language challenging, especially when they focus only on textbooks or exercises. Stories make learning more enjoyable because they combine education with entertainment. When children associate English with fun and creativity, they are more likely to develop curiosity and continue learning.

The emotional impact of stories should not be overlooked. Many children’s stories contain themes such as friendship, kindness, courage, and problem-solving. Through characters and situations, children can learn important social and emotional lessons. Discussing these themes in English gives children opportunities to express feelings, opinions, and personal experiences. This not only improves language ability but also supports emotional growth.

Teachers play an important role in using stories effectively in English language classrooms. Selecting stories that match children’s age, interests, and language levels is essential. Teachers can support understanding by using pictures, asking questions, encouraging predictions, and connecting the story to children’s lives. Repetition is also valuable, as hearing the same story several times allows children to become more familiar with vocabulary and sentence structures.

Parents can also encourage language learning through storytelling at home. Reading English stories together, listening to audiobooks, or watching story-based programs can provide additional exposure to the language. A supportive environment where children feel comfortable experimenting with English can greatly improve their confidence and progress.

In conclusion, children’s stories have a powerful impact on learning English as a language. They provide children with opportunities to develop vocabulary, listening, speaking, reading, and grammar skills in an enjoyable and meaningful way. Beyond language learning, stories encourage imagination, creativity, cultural understanding, and emotional development. By making English learning engaging and enjoyable, children’s stories help young learners build a strong foundation for future communication and lifelong learning.

Saumya Aloysius

(A children’s writer contributing to both local and foreign newspapers as a freelance writer)

Continue Reading

Opinion

When governments destroy mangroves

Published

on

Any government that comes into power is a caretaker – of its people, environment and security. This is another glaring occasion where their lack of knowledge, or blatant disregard to the environment is causing long-lasting damage to this country.

After the devastation of the tsunami, then governments took the initiative to raise natural protection of the island by undertaking massive projects to plant mangroves. It was a long-term project, spanning 20 years, by the armed forces, to get these barriers up. Now the same army is used by this government to chop down these mangroves!!

This is happening right now in the Trincomalee lagoon. Nearly 40 lorry loads of mangrove forest have been taken away already. The excuse used for this is dengue control, a circular issued by the presidential secretariat in June. The ignorance is here; the seawater mixed lagoon does NOT breed mosquitoes. Trincomalee does not pop up in the dengue demographics, even as a high risk area. Yes, there is garbage, and plastic thrown into the mangroves that can be breeding grounds for mosquitoes. These can be cleared away in a clean-up operations, without harming the mangrove trees. It has been done a few times before, by previous government authorities, like coast conservation, who know the value of the mangrove belts. The local rumour becomes believable, that this deplorable act is done to please some local business partners of the area who run pleasure boats in the lagoon.

Yes, unhealthy mangroves can breed mosquitoes. But mangroves are ‘decease swamps’ is a dangerous myth. That mangroves are dirty, stagnant swamps teeming with decease carrying mosquitoes is a misconception that promotes harmful policies to control dengue outbreaks. This top myth justifies the illegal coastal clearance today in Trincomalee. It is destroying an important ecological asset of this country, mangroves, while failing to address the true root of dengue transmission. Where is the coast conservation department in this situ? Have they got CCD permission to carry out this butchery?

Healthy mangroves do not breed dengue mosquitoes, especially the one’s closely connected to the sea like in Trincomalee. The larvae needs completely still unmoving water to breathe at the surface, and mature. The power of tidal flushing which keeps water circulating in the mangroves makes this impossible. Also the daily ebb and flow of ocean tides keeps the water moving in the mangroves and frequently drains the forest floor. The natural hydrology of healthy mangroves, acts as an automatic self-regulating barrier against stagnant water collection, making viable breeding sites virtually impossible.

Also mangroves contain nature’s exterminators. It hosts a massive army of mosquito predators. These mangroves are not dead swamps but vibrant nurseries. Young Fish, dragon flies, crusteasians, and insectivorous birds are natural mosquito predators. Clearing mangroves collapses this natural food web, removing this natural pest control.

In fact, clearing mangroves is counterproductive and will backfire with worsened dengue cases. The heavy machinery will leave a scarred landscape with deep tyre tracks in the marshy soil making stagnant water pools and disrupted drainage. When rainwater fills these artificial depressions it will create perfect stagnant, predator free, fresh water pools, Ideal breeding grounds for Aedes aegypti. Also clearing this kind of buffers can bring in the urban sprawl with its people, housing, and garbage, to the new degraded land.

The collateral damage is even bigger. Destroying mangroves in the name of pest control leaves coastal populations poorer, hungrier, and highly vulnerable to extreme weather. One would have thought at least the people in the coast conservation department were knowledgeable enough about the loss of wave attenuation with removal of mangroves and the risk of flooding and storm surge damages to the coastal areas. Collapse of these fish nurseries should ring alarm bells in the fisheries department. Reduced fish harvest and loss of livelihood for the local fishermen should have had fisheries department people rushing to the site. But neither of the mentioned government departments have raised a murmur, in the face of political influence. This is the sad truth of the country at the moment. Sri Lanka’s climate resilience has been compromised by release of stored ‘blue carbon’ and a loss of natural buffer against rising sea levels, while the responsible people in the government are silent in front of an ignorant political hierarchy.

This is an appeal to the highest authority in the country to stop this environmentally insensitive projects of this nature being coughed up by ignorant municipal members. Clearing these forests directly violates so many policies on conservation. Our local fishermen depend entirely on healthy mangrove root systems—such as those being chopped down. From a health perspective, medical professionals have repeatedly assured us that under the current National Policy Framework, marshy lands and mangrove ecosystems pose no threat of dengue. We request your guidance and intervention to ensure our environment is not sacrificed.

Citizen S

Continue Reading

Opinion

Lankan hotels and price discrimination

Published

on

In planning a long trip to Sri Lanka from the UK, I was disappointed to see different hotel pricing for foreign visitors when compared to local rates. Like many travellers, I prefer to book directly with hotels, rather than international hotel consolidators, as more money goes to local businesses. But the assumption that foreigners should pay more is simply distasteful. As such, I’ve chosen another long-haul destination that does not follow such practices, and hope that Sri Lanka will change its approach to overseas visitors in the near future.

Neil Roskilly Wetherlee UK

Continue Reading

Trending