News
Major political alliances won’t cooperate with EC’s initiative
Marking second and third preferences:
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Election Commission Chairman R.M.A.L. Rathnayake yesterday (16) said that unlike any previous presidential poll, they may have to go for a second count due to there being several prominent candidates in the fray at the 21 September Presidential Election.
Rathnayake said so when The Island asked him whether the EC would launch a special programme to educate the voters regarding the pivotal importance of the second and third preferences. “We are in the process of formulating a programme involving print and electronic media as well as social media,” the Chairman said.
However, top spokespersons for major political parties and alliances told The Island that they wouldn’t support such an endeavour.
Referring to presidential elections held in 1982 (six contestants), 1988 (three contestants), 1994 (six contestants), 1999 (13 contestants), 2005 (13 contestants), 2010 (22 contestants), 2015 (19 contestants) and 2019 (35 contestants), Rathnayake said that second and third preferences hadn’t been an issue at all for want of a ‘serious’ third candidate at any election. However, against the backdrop of post-Aragalaya developments, the forthcoming presidential poll seemed to be different from previous elections.
In terms of the Presidential Election Act No 15 of 1981, the winning candidate must secure 50% of the total number of votes, plus one.
Rathnayake stressed that a collective effort was needed to encourage the electorate to vote for three candidates. Responding to another query, the top EC official said that the support of political parties and alliances in the fray was required to educate the voting public.
With the addition of one million new voters, altogether 17.1 mn are eligible to vote at the first post-Aragalaya national poll.Asserting that counting of second and third preferences seemed inevitable, the EC Chief said that if that happened the releasing of results would definitely be delayed. “We never experienced such a situation before as just a minute percentage of the total vote was shared by contestants other than the two main candidates.
At the last presidential election, JVP candidate Anura Kumara Dissanayake secured a distant third position polling only 418,553 (3.16%) votes. Without making any reference to any candidate, Rathnayake said that the situation was quite different now.
Among the 39 candidates in the fray are President Ranil Wickremesinghe (Independent), Sajith Premadasa (SJB), Anura Kumara Dissanayake (JJB), Namal Rajapaksa (SLPP), Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe (Jathika Prajathanrawadi Peramuna), Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka (Independent) and Roshan Ranasinghe (Independent).
Asked whether the JVP/JJB would join the proposed EC-led campaign to educate the voting public, their top spokesperson Vijitha Herath, MP, said that they wouldn’t, under any circumstances, ask voters to choose second and third preferences. The Gampaha District parliamentarian emphasized that they strongly urged supporters to exercise their franchise in support of Anura Kumara Dissanayake.
Herath emphasized that they wouldn’t want to confuse the electorate by urging them to choose second and third preferences. How could the JVP/JJP do so when others’ policies were contradictory to theirs? “In fact, we’ll campaign against such a move,” MP Herath said.
The Island raised the same issue with SJB General Secretary Ranjith Madduma Bandara, MP, who also simply dismissed the suggestion. The SJB-led alliance wouldn’t ask its supporters to exercise their second and third preferences. The former Minister said that the SJB’s decision in this regard was not negotiable.
UNP General Secretary and former State Minister Palitha Range Bandara said that they were yet to discuss the issue, hence his inability to take a position.
SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam, too, ruled out the possibility of them backing the EC’s initiative. “We believe our candidate Namal Rajapaksa can obtain 50% plus of the total vote. Therefore, we won’t encourage our supporters to vote for any other candidate,” parliamentarian Kariyawasam said
News
Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds
Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.
Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.
The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.
The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).
Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.
Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.
Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy
The Court of Appeal yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.
The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.
Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.
Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.
He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.
The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.
The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.
The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.
Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.
News
UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage
The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.
In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.
According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.
The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.
Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.
The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.
-
News4 days agoRelease of 2025 O/L results likely to be delayed
-
Sports4 days agoTharanga set for high-profile javelin clash in Ostrava
-
Features5 days agoPolitics of protected species
-
News3 days agoBeijing Capital Airlines to resume flights to Colombo signalling boost to tourism
-
News4 days agoTheft of USD 2.5 mn from Treasury: CoPF accused of complicity in NPP cover-up
-
News6 days agoCommonwealth lawyers urge Lanka to uphold rule of law
-
Opinion4 days agoDecoding Trump’s 12.5% “Forced Labor Tariff” on Sri Lanka
-
Opinion4 days agoPalm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka – Part V
