Connect with us

Sports

Cricket needs IPL money, but is it good for the future of the game?

Published

on

GMR Group, owners of Delhi Capitals, are reportedly buying a stake in Southern Brave, opening the door for IPL franchises to buy into both county cricket and the Hundred [Cricinfo]

BY IAN CHAPPELL

If cricket needed another red-light warning for the game to tread warily, it came with the simple announcement of the IPL’s entry into the English game.

It was explained that the GMR group – co owners of the IPL’s Delhi Capitals – was bidding to acquire the Hampshire County Cricket Club. With bidding soon to begin on the purchase of a large share of teams in the Hundred, this was never going to be the last splurge from an IPL conglomerate.

None of this is surprising as county teams are desperate for money and the IPL owners are extremely rich.

However, it’s worth recalling that back in the mid-1990s Kerry Packer, the former boss of World Series Cricket, uttered the immortal words “Don’t let a media company run your sport.”

The trend of successful companies having a greater say in the running of the game is increasing rapidly as IPL owners already own large stakes in T20 teams playing in the UAE, USA, South Africa, and the Caribbean. The shrewd owners are also starting to sign top-rated players to longer contracts and that should be a warning to cricket administrations.

The better players could become beholden to an IPL owner rather than their own cricket board. That is when conflict of interest becomes a divisive issue.

This isn’t a surprise as the game in most countries desperately needs money and the IPL owners are financially flush.

Cricket administrators must accept the blame for not producing a long-term blueprint for the game a couple of decades ago. That way they could at least have had a viable plan for the game to deal with this issue. That is unless cricket administrators worldwide are convinced the future is purely the T20 game run by rich franchises.

The weaknesses in this theory are more than just “Is this good for cricket?”

Most successful business people don’t achieve their prominent positions by being philanthropists.

Will sufficient funds be channelled back into the game or will a large proportion end up as shareholder bonuses awarded by rich business conglomerates? Do shrewd business people necessarily make good cricket team owners? Will the business people want to have a large say in the on-field product? Are the many unpaid people who serve the game still going to willingly provide their services?

While large financial incentives are inviting to all parties, it’s my experience that business people either don’t understand or don’t care about the important difference between laws and rules.

Business people are prone to manipulating matters their own way regardless. The master statistician Irving Rosenwater stated years ago: cricket has laws that are not meant to be broken.

When the administrators warmly welcomed the T20 craze they had no idea how much power they were acceding to the players. The better players now have both wealth and choice, which is ironic when you consider that for many years they had neither. Former successful Australian opening batter Arthur Morris summed that up best when in retirement he was asked what he gained from cricket. His succinct answer was: “Poverty”.

One of the biggest failings in cricket administration is the lack of utilisation of former top players’ knowledge of the game at the highest level. In Australia this has been a blatant omission.

Cricket administration is a difficult and challenging job with many wide-ranging aspects – so difficult, it’s impossible to satisfy every fan’s wishes. However, the job is made even more difficult by the game not having a visible plan for the future that includes financial security for players, mixed with playing satisfaction. Cricket’s future needs to be a partnership planned by a combination of players and administrators.

I’m no financial or company expert, but it’ll be a sad day if a young player is not able to experience the challenges of long-form cricket. If a player chooses not to play long-form cricket that’s their prerogative, but it would be really sad if that choice is not available.

[Cricinfo]



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Sabalenka the latest French Open shock exit as Shnaider wins quarterfinal

Published

on

By

Aryna Sabalenka reacts to Diana Shnaider during their women's singles quarterfinal tennis match at Roland-Garros in Paris, France [Aljazeera]

Aryna Sabalenka’s bid for a first French Open title has been left in tatters after she fell apart in a bizarre defeat by Russian 25th seed Diana Shnaider in the quarterfinals.

The world number one led by a set and a double break before exiting the tournament on Wednesday in a blaze of unforced errors, collapsing to a 3-6, 7-5, 6-0 loss in blustery conditions on Court Philippe-Chatrier.

Shnaider will face Polish qualifier Maja Chwalinska in the semifinals today [Thursday], with Marta Kostyuk or Mirra Andreeva awaiting the winner in Sunday’s final.

“Well honestly, I’m speechless, I’m super happy. Obviously tough conditions with the wind,” said the 22-year-old Shnaider after beating a top-10 player for only the second time in her career.

“First time playing Aryna, so definitely a lot of nerves, and I feel the first set was trying to adjust to her game.”

Sabalenka was the only Grand Slam champion left in either the men’s or women’s singles draws at Roland-Garros, but belied that status by making a whopping 57 unforced errors.

Shnaider was playing in her first major quarterfinal, but now finds herself a strong favourite to reach the final heading into her last-four tie against world number 114 and fellow left-hander Chwalinska.

“Definitely super happy I managed to finish on a good note rather than start on a good note. Definitely a special tournament for me here,” added the Russian.

“It’s going be a lefty battle, so I’m looking forward [to the semifinal].”

Sabalenka’s scarcely believable defeat was reminiscent of the way she threw away a strong position in last year’s final against Coco Gauff.

The Belarusian was playing in her 14th consecutive Grand Slam quarterfinal, but failed to become the first woman to make seven straight major semis since Serena Williams.

Diana Shnaider celebrates winning match point against Aryna Sabalenka during their Women's Singles quarter-final match
Diana Shnaider celebrates winning match point against Aryna Sabalenka [Aljazeera]

The top seed raced into a 5-1 lead and eventually sealed the opener on her third set point after initially failing to serve it out.

The second set followed a similar pattern at first, as Sabalenka moved 4-1 in front with a double break before throwing away her next service game.

Sabalenka became increasingly frustrated as she gifted Shnaider three break points to level at 4-4.

After some animated remonstrating with her box, she recomposed herself enough to hold.

But the 28-year-old’s game continued to come apart, as a string of unforced errors allowed Shnaider to break again and tie up the set at 5-5, with Sabalenka left to gesticulate wildly towards her coaching staff.

Shnaider could not believe her luck as Sabalenka dumped successive forehands into the bottom of the net to finish off the set and send the match into a decider.

The Russian grew in confidence and moved 2-0 up in the third as Sabalenka sprayed eight unforced errors around Chatrier in the space of two games.

Shnaider cruised to victory from there, fittingly securing a semifinal berth when Sabalenka knocked a routine backhand into the net on the third match point.

A stunned world number one was left to trudge off court after winning just 14 points in the deciding set.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Kusal Mendis, Pathum Nissanka, bowlers put Sri Lanka 1-0 up

Published

on

By

Kusal Mendis celebrates his half-century [Cricinfo]

Kusal Mendis hit 72 off 62 to energise Sri Lanka after a slow start, while Pathum Nissanka, Janith Liyanage and Charith Asalanka produced important innings in Sri Lanka’s  advance to 303 for 7. On a Sabina Park surface that took some turn, their total turned out to be 41 too many for West Indies, who began solidly enough, but were ultimately reined in by Sri Lanka’s spinners.

Maheesh Theekshana returned outstanding figures of 2 for 26 as West Indies’ batters frequently failed to to pick his variations, while Wanidu Hasaranga took 1 for 43. The only West Indies batter to cross fifty was captain Shai Hope, who hit 56 from 66 balls. But although there were other contributions, West Indies never managed to put a long partnership together. While Sri Lanka’s spinners squeezed West Indies, Dushmantha Chameera was the strike bowler, claiming 4 for 67 from his 10 overs.

After the teams exited briefly for bad light when West Indies were nine down in the 49th over, they returned to finish the match, the last wicket going down with four balls to spare. Sri Lanka now go 1-0 up in a three-match series.

Having won the toss in a day game, on a surface that had a green tinge to it, West Indies chose to bowl first and appeared at first to be prospering. Jayden Seales dismissed Sri Lanka’s new opener Kamindu Mendis in the the seventh over, and conceded no more than 32 in the powerplay, as Nissanka played with uncharacteristic caution.

Kusal ramped up the scoring soon after arriving at the crease, however. He took an immediate liking to Gudakesh Motie, hitting four sixes down the ground off him in the space of three overs. In the last of those overs – the 20th of the innings – Kusal hit two sixes and a four, as Sri Lanka plundered 18 in total. Motie never bowled again in the innings, with Roston Chase delivering ten tidy overs for two wickets instead. Kusal motored to a 42-ball half century, and had looked good to push on when he attempted to swipe a Matthew Forde full toss to leg, and somehow top-edged it to short fine leg. The 136-run second-wicket stand with Nissanka had put Sri Lanka firmly on track for a score in excess of 300.

Nissanka seemed to struggle by comparison. He was timing the ball poorly by his own standards, as West Indies’ bowlers discovered the Kingston track rewarded slower bowling. But although he had been dropped first ball at cover by Keacy Carty off the bowling of Seales, Nissanka played a largely sensible innings, running hard between the wickets, and finding what boundaries he could, particularly behind square on the leg side. It took him 71 balls to get to his half century, and he was striking at less than 80 when he was dismissed by Chase (via an unusual pad-bat catch to wicketkeeper Hope) for 79.

The hard-running Asalanka and the innovative Liyanage were then on hand to provide some heft and urgency to the final third of Sri Lanka’s innings. Liyanage produced the better of these knocks, hitting 44 not out off 29. Asalanka made 45 off 44. The two put on 64 for the fifth wicket.

West Indies gave themselves a shot of chasing down 304, though it would have been a ground record if they had. They openers had them rocketing to 50 for no loss after six overs, before an excellent pick up and throw from Liyanage ended John Campbell’s innings. West Indies’ other opener Justin Greaves would be out before the powerplay ended too, bowled by Theekshana who pinged his leg stump after Greaves had backed away. And still, while Hope was at the crease, there was a chance West Indies could make a charge at the total.

Ultimately they just lost too many wickets through the middle overs period that Sri Lanka’s batters had dominated. Keacy Carty was caught brilliantly at short midwicket by a diving Kamindu. Hope himself was fooled by a Chameera slower ball and spooned up a simple catch to backward point. From 167 for 5, and the required rate pushing seven, West Indies were always going to struggle. Though there were moments of resistance from the lower order, they folded eventually.

But it is their bowling that will worry West Indies most after this match. They lacked penetration in the middle overs, and the seamers were also too indisciplined, bowling 12 wides, while also straying too frequently into the pads. Although West Indies had four specialist bowlers, allrounder Chase was likely their best bowler on the day.

SCORES:
Sri Lanka 303 for 7  in 50 overs (Pathum Nissanka 79, Kusal Mendis 72, Charith Asalanka 45, Janith Liyanage 44*; Jayden Seals 2-67, Matthew Forde 2-44, Roston Chase 2-47) beat West Indies 262 in 49.2 overs  ( Justin Greaves 45, Shai Hope 56, Roston Chase 33; Dushmantha Chameera 4-67, Asitha Fernando 1-59, Maheesh Theekshana 2-26, Wanidu Hasaranga 1-43, Charith Asalanka 1-06)  by 41 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Dinara, Yuhansa advance to quarter-finals at SSC ITF J30 Week 2

Published

on

Dinara de Silva (Pix by Kamal Wanniarachchi / Yuhansa Peiris

Sri Lanka’s promising juniors Dinara de Silva and Yuhansa Peiris booked their places in the quarter-finals of the SSC ITF Junior J30 Circuit 2026 Week 2 tournament with commanding second-round victories at the SSC courts.

‎Top local prospect Dinara de Silva produced a flawless performance to outclass India’s Bawyasri ASR in straight sets, 6-0, 6-0 victory. Dinara controlled the match from the outset with aggressive play and did not allow her opponent any opportunity to settle into the contest.

‎Meanwhile, fellow Sri Lankan Yuhansa Peiris also enjoyed a comfortable passage to the last eight, defeating India’s Ilaiyanila Kannan 6-3, 6-0. After a competitive opening set, Yuhansa raised her level significantly in the second set, overwhelming her opponent to seal the win in convincing fashion.

‎The victories ensured strong Sri Lankan representation in the latter stages of the prestigious junior international tournament, with both Dinara and Yuhansa continuing their impressive runs at the SSC ITF Junior J30 Circuit Week 2 competition.

Continue Reading

Trending