Connect with us

Features

Sri Lanka Cricket: “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.” (Elanor Roosevelt)

Published

on

By Gamini Jayaweera

In January 2019, former Minister of Sports Harin Fernando appointed Major General Daya Ratnayake as the Chairman of the National Sports Council (NSC), along with 14 executive members, with the goal of uplifting sports in Sri Lanka. At the time, Harin Fernando stated, “As the Minister of Sports, my main focus is to ensure that sports are played clean in the country. Win or lose, playing clean should be the main focus. I want to put a stop to talented youngsters from rural areas being unable to compete and perform due to a lack of basic facilities like a pair of spikes.”

However, in November 2019, Harin Fernando resigned from his ministerial post following the defeat of the UNP candidate in the Presidential election. During the tenure of Harin Fernando and Daya Ratnayake, there was hardly any noteworthy progress in the development of sports generally.

In August 2020, the then Minister of Sports, Namal Rajapakse, appointed the well-respected former cricket captain Mahela Jayawardena as the Chairman of the NSC, which also included several famous former sports personalities as committee members. Upon accepting the Chairmanship of the NSC, Mahela Jayawardena stated, “Our intention is to start from the grass-roots level if we are to raise the standard to the top level. We will prioritize the sports depending on the competition. We will discuss merging sports with the education ministry, which has to work collectively. Apart from these, there is a need for changing the sports law, which is too old. We will look into the legal side of it and develop it to be conducive to us. It is going to be a long process, which I believe can be achieved with the support of the Minister.”

After serving as Chairman of the NSC for 12 months, in August 2021, Mahela officially announced, “Our goal is to felicitate medal-winning athletes at the international level, and Sports Minister Namal Rajapaksa has already given his blessings to execute our plans for the benefit of these athletes.” If Namal had approved Mahela & Co.’s plan, why did Mahela and some other members resign after a further nine months in their positions without implementing the much-needed reforms included in the plan? Interestingly, Mahela and others who resigned from their positions never complained about Namal’s failure to support their initiatives. If so, what went wrong?

Being Chairman of the NSC in Sri Lanka is a full-time job. It appears that Mahela’s casual approach to the NSC and his workload both locally and globally led to his failure to implement the proposals approved by the then Minister of Sports. Make no mistake, Mahela is a very capable and talented individual. He is a world-renowned cricketer and a well-respected cricket coach. In addition to the Chairmanship of the NSC, the Minister had given Mahela full authority to make decisions and appoint coaches.

However, it seems we have not progressed as described in the plans to uplift sports in Sri Lanka. It is surprising that after collaborating very closely with the former Minister of Sports, Namal Rajapaksa, and enjoying financial and other privileges, Mahela & Co. took one year and nine months to realize that the system was corrupt—a system well known to the public for at least the last two decades.

Although Mahela is an incredibly talented and respected individual, it would seem he did not have enough time to devote to developing sports in Sri Lanka due to his other worldwide commitments. It appears that Mahela & Co. failed to give 100% commitment to implementing the plans approved by the then Minister of Sports to uplift sports in Sri Lanka. One wonders whether Mahela had taken on more than he could manage. So, we were back to square one.

NSC Leadership

After Namal Rajapakse, the post of Minister of Sports and Youth Affairs was given to Mr. Roshan Ranasinghe who appointed a new Chairman and 15 committee members to the National Sports Council (NSC). Addressing the gathering at the Sport Auditorium at Torrington grounds, the Minister emphasized the importance of having a formidable team to lead Sri Lanka’s sports development. He highlighted the decision to appoint former World Cup-winning cricket team captain, Arjuna Ranatunga, as the Chairman of the NSC, citing Ranatunga’s decision-making skills, team management capabilities, and straightforwardness as key reasons for the 1996 Cricket World Cup victory.

However, the Roshan Ranasinghe’s statement is subject to debate. Many believe that the 1996 World Cup win was due to a combination of factors: strategic planning by the leadership team (then President Anna Punchihewa, Head Coach Dave Whatmore, and Captain Arjuna Ranatunga), the skill and talent of the cricketers, and the captain’s on-field decisions made in consultation with senior players.

This reasoning is further supported by the team’s performance in the 1999 World Cup in England, where they were eliminated in the first round. After the 1996 victory, Captain Ranatunga’s leadership style changed to a more autocratic approach, which demotivated team members. Some players privately referred to him as “Hitler” indicating dissatisfaction with his leadership. The absence of forward-thinking strategies also contributed to the team’s mediocre performance, as they lost three out of four matches, only managing to defeat Kenya, a weaker team, by 45 runs. The resulting losses, however, suggest that Ranatunga’s decision-making abilities and straightforwardness alone were insufficient for continued success.

The current President dismissed the Minister of Sports, Roshan Ranasinghe due to his inability to diplomatically resolve conflicts. Both the Minister and Arjuna Ranatunga had contentious relationships with local and international members of the ICC (International Cricket Council), causing further issues within the Sri Lankan Cricket Board.

Current Status

Mr Harin Fernando has been appointed once again as the new Minister of Sports following the dismissal of Roshan Ranasinghe. Newly appointed Sports Minister, Harin Fernando has sacked former Sri Lanka Cricket Captain Arjuna Ranatunga as Chairman of the National Sports Council and appointed Dr Maiya Gunasekara who has also already served as a former Chairman of the National Sports Council for seven years. It is a pity that the President of Sri Lanka could not find fresh faces to appoint to these important positions, instead of relying on the same old personalities who have previously failed to elevate Sri Lankan sports to an international level.

Sri Lanka Cricket

As a former cricketer, I am deeply disturbed and hugely disappointed the Minister of Sports, the Chairman of Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC), and the members of the Executive Committee administer our only successful international-level sport. Many Sri Lankans are wondering whether these individuals have the commonsense needed to uplift cricket in Sri Lanka.

Cricket is traditionally known as the gentleman’s game, embodying values such as integrity, discipline, and sportsmanship. However, in recent years, there has been a noticeable shift in the behaviour and attitudes of some Sri Lankan cricketers and managers. This shift has led to concerns about a decline in professionalism and a growing disregard for the principles that once defined this great sport.

Most Recent Performance

Our cricket team participated in the 2023 One Day International (ODI) World Cup in Australia, and it was revealed that some high-profile members of the management and players were attending restaurant promotions during the tournament. Newspaper reports have also revealed that some players were patronizing casinos and engaging in inappropriate activities during the tournament.

The SLC and the then Minister told the nation that they would conduct an official inquiry, publish the report, and punish the culprits. To date, no official or player has been charged except for Danushka Gunathilaka, who was prosecuted I Australia for alleged indecent behaviour. Same old story! Can the new Minister of Sports release this report and let the public know what punishments have been imposed on the officials and the cricketers involved in such misbehaviour?

Press reports suggest that some players and managers participated in an all-night drinking party at the players’ hotel the day before the match against South Africa in the recently concluded T20 World Cup in the USA. Whether these press reports are true or false, one thing is clear that the behaviour and discipline in the national team are well below the standard expected from a professional outfit.

Many of these players and managers seem more focused on personal gains and self-indulgence, prioritizing their desires over their responsibilities to the team and the nation. This lack of discipline and professional outlook has not only affected their performance on the field but has also tarnished Sri Lanka’s reputation as a respected cricketing nation. The consequences of such behaviour extend beyond the sport, bringing shame and disrepute to their fans and the entire country.

It is crucial for the cricketing community and authorities to urgently and thoroughly address these issues, reinstating the values that make cricket a revered sport and ensuring that Sri Lankan cricket regains its esteemed standing in the international arena. Let us hope this is not another attempt to whitewash the irregularities and ill-disciplined behaviour of our national cricketers and the members of the management team.

Way Forward

The recent resignations of Head Coach Chris Silverwood and Consultant Coach Mahela Jayawardena from Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) following the national team’s early exit from the T20 World Cup have prompted a significant restructuring. Sanath Jayasuriya, a full-time cricket consultant who played an influential role with the T20 World Cup squad, has been appointed as the Interim Head Coach of SLC. Jayasuriya has previously served as the Chairman of Selectors from 2013 to 2015 and again from 2016 to 2017, though his tenure saw mixed results.

One of the critical issues SLC faces is the perception among many former players that their past cricketing achievements automatically qualify them for the Head Coach position. However, the role certainly requires more than just a strong cricketing background. The Head Coach must be adept at unifying the team through team-building exercises, training, and open communication to foster a cohesive culture within SLC. This includes possessing a high Intelligence Quotient (IQ), Social and Emotional Quotient (SEQ), and Managerial Quotient (MQ), in addition to cricketing skills, to effectively lead and motivate players, creating an environment where players are inspired to perform at their best.

The previous structure, involving multiple high-level coaches—Head Coach, Consultant Coach, Full-time Cricket Consultant, and Assistant Coach—along with other specialised coaches, has proven problematic. The absence of a single, cohesive leadership has led to a lack of accountability for the team’s mediocre performance. This fragmented leadership has caused confusion among players, negatively impacting their performance by pulling them in different directions.

A unified leadership approach, with a single leader clearly advocating the direction, objectives, strategy, and tactics formulated by top management, is essential for guiding the team effectively. This approach ensures that tasks are performed efficiently and effectively, leading to successful outcomes. It is hoped that the authorities have gained valuable lessons from this experience and will implement changes to foster a more unified and effective leadership structure.

Conclusion

I strongly believe that Eleanor Roosevelt’s insightful quote, “No one can make you feel inferior without your consent,” should serve as a guiding principle for the current Minister of Sports and the Board members of Sri Lanka Cricket. Embracing this wisdom is crucial for restoring decency, competitiveness, and elevating the standards of our beloved sport. By internalising and acting upon this message, these leaders can inspire confidence, foster resilience, and promote a culture of respect and excellence within our sports community.

(The writer is a former cricketer who has played for Issipathana College and SSC. He is a Fellow of the Royal Institution of the Chartered Surveyors and is a holder of Master’s degree in Business Administration from Henley Management College, Oxford.)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

US foreign policy-making enters critical phase as fascist threat heightens globally

Published

on

Greater rapport: President Trump in conversation with President Putin. /The New York Times

It could be quite premature to claim that the US has closed ranks completely with the world’s foremost fascist states: Russia, China and North Korea. But there is no denying that the US is breaking with tradition and perceiving commonality of policy orientation with the mentioned authoritarian states of the East rather than with Europe and its major democracies at present.

Increasingly, it is seemingly becoming evident that the common characterization of the US as the ‘world’s mightiest democracy’, could be a gross misnomer. Moreover, the simple fact that the US is refraining from naming Russia as the aggressor in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and its refusal to perceive Ukraine’s sovereignty as having been violated by Russia, proves that US foreign policy is undergoing a substantive overhaul, as it were. In fact, one could not be faulted, given this backdrop, for seeing the US under President Donald Trump as compromising its democratic credentials very substantially.

Yet, it could be far too early to state that in the traditional East-West polarity in world politics, that the US is now squarely and conclusively with the Eastern camp that comprises in the main, China and Russia. At present, the US is adopting an arguably more nuanced approach to foreign policy formulation and the most recent UN Security Council resolution on Ukraine bears this out to a degree. For instance, the UN resolution in question reportedly ‘calls for a rapid end to the war without naming Russia as the aggressor.’

That is, the onus is being placed on only Ukraine to facilitate an end to the war, whereas Russia too has an obligation to do likewise. But it is plain that the US is reflecting an eagerness in such pronouncements to see an end to the Ukraine conflict. It is clearly not for a prolongation of the wasting war. It could be argued that a negotiated settlement is being given a try, despite current international polarizations.

However, the US could act constructively in the crisis by urging Russia as well to ensure an end to the conflict, now that there is some seemingly friendly rapport between Trump and Putin.

However, more fundamentally, if the US does not see Ukraine’s sovereignty as having been violated by Russia as a result of the latter’s invasion, we are having a situation wherein the fundamental tenets of International Law are going unrecognized by the US. That is, international disorder and lawlessness are being winked at by the US.

It follows that, right now, the US is in cahoots with those powers that are acting autocratically and arbitrarily in international politics rather than with the most democratically vibrant states of the West, although a facile lumping together of the US, Russia and China, is yet not possible.

It is primarily up to the US voting public to take clear cognizance of these developments, draw the necessary inferences and to act on them. Right now, nothing substantive could be done by the US voter to put things right, so to speak, since mid-term US elections are due only next year. But there is ample time for the voting public to put the correct perspective on these fast-breaking developments, internationally and domestically, and to put their vote to good use in upcoming polls and such like democratic exercises. They would be acting in the interest of democracy worldwide by doing so.

More specifically it is up to Donald Trump’s Republican voter base to see the damage that is being done by the present administration to the US’ standing as the ‘world’s mightiest democracy’. They need to bring pressure on Trump and his ‘inner cabinet’ to change course and restore the reputation of their country as the foremost democracy. In the absence of such action it is the US citizenry that would face the consequences of Trump’s policy indiscretions.

Meanwhile, the political Opposition in the US too needs to get its act together, so to speak, and pressure the Trump administration into doing what is needed to get the US back to the relevant policy track. Needless to say, the Democratic Party would need to lead from the front in these efforts.

While, in the foreign policy field the US under President Trump could be said to be acting with a degree of ambivalence and ambiguity currently, in the area of domestic policy it is making it all to plain that it intends to traverse a fascistic course. As has been proved over the past two months, white supremacy is being made the cardinal principle of domestic governance.

Trump has made it clear, for example, that his administration would be close to ethnic chauvinists, such as the controversial Ku Klux Klan, and religious extremists. By unceremoniously rolling back the ‘diversity programs’ that have hitherto helped define the political culture of the US, the Trump administration is making no bones of the fact that ethnic reconciliation would not be among the government’s priorities. The steady undermining of USAID and its main programs worldwide is sufficient proof of this. Thus the basis has been adequately established for the flourishing of fascism and authoritarianism.

Yet, the US currently reflects a complex awareness of foreign policy questions despite having the international community wondering whether it is sealing a permanent alliance with the main powers of the East. For instance, President Trump is currently in conversation on matters in the external relations sphere that are proving vital with the West’s principal leaders. For example, he has spoken to President Emmanuel Macron of France and is due to meet Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the UK.

Obviously, the US is aware that it cannot ‘go it alone’ in resolving currently outstanding issues in external relations, such as the Ukraine question. There is a clear recognition that the latter and many more issues require a collaborative approach.

Besides, the Trump administration realizes that it cannot pose as a ‘first among equals’, given the complexities at ground level. It sees that given the collective strength of the rest of the West that a joint approach to problem solving cannot be avoided. This is particularly so in the case of Ukraine.

The most major powers of the West are no ‘pushovers’ and Germany, under a possibly Christian Democratic Union-led alliance in the future, has indicated as much. It has already implied that it would not be playing second fiddle to the US. Accordingly, the US is likely to steer clear of simplistic thinking in the formulation of foreign policy, going forward.

Continue Reading

Features

Clean Sri Lanka – hiccups and remedies

Published

on

President AKD launching Clean Sri Lanka programme

by Upali Gamakumara,
Upali.gamakumara@gmail.com

The Clean Sri Lanka (CSL) is a project for the true renaissance the NPP government launched, the success of which would gain world recognition. It is about more than just cleaning up places. Its broader objectives are to make places attractive and happy for people who visit or use services in the country, focusing more on the services in public institutions and organisations like the SLTB. Unfortunately, these broader objectives are not apparent in its theme, “Clean Sri Lanka,” and therefore there is a misconception that keeping the environment clean is the main focus.

People who realise the said broader objectives are excited about a cleaner Sri Lanka, hoping the President and the government will tackle this, the way they are planning to solve other big problems like the economy and poverty. However, they do not see themselves as part of the solution.

From the management perspective, the CSL has a strategic plan that is not declared in that manner. When looking at the government policies, one can perceive its presence, the vision being “A Prosperous Nation and a Beautiful Life,” the mission “Clean Sri Lanka” and the broader objectives “a disciplined society, effective services, and a cleaner environment.” If the government published these as the strategy, there would have been a better understanding.

Retaining the spirit and expectations and continuing the ‘Clean Sri Lanka’ project is equally important as much as understanding its deep idea. For this, it needs to motivate people, which differs from those motivators that people push to achieve selfish targets. The motivation we need here is to evolve something involuntarily, known as Drivers. Drivers push for the survival of the evolution or development of any entity. We see the absence of apparent Drivers in the CSL project as a weakness that leads to sporadic hiccups and free flow.

Drivers of Evolution

Drivers vary according to the nature of envisaged evolution for progress. However, we suggest that ‘the force that pushes anything to evolve’ would fit all evolutions. Some examples are: ‘Fitting to survival’ was the driver of the evolution of life. Magnetism is a driver for the unprecedented development of physics – young Einstein was driven to enquire about the ‘attraction’ of magnets, eventually making him the greatest scientist of the 20th century.

Leadership is a Driver. It is essential but do not push an evolution continually as they are not sprung within a system involuntarily. This is one of the reasons why CSL has lost the vigour it had at its inception.

CSL is a teamwork. It needs ‘Drives’ for cohesion and to push forward continually, like the Quality Improvement Project of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Their drivers are outlined differently keeping Aims as their top driver and saying: Aims should be specific and measurable, not merely to “improve” or “reduce,” engage stakeholders to define the aim of the improvement project and a clear aim to identify outcome measures.

So, we think that CSL needs Aims as defined by NHS, built by stakeholder participation to help refine the project for continuous evolution. This approach is similar to Deming’s Cycle for continual improvement. Further, two more important drivers are needed for the CSL project. That is Attitudinal Change and Punishment. We shall discuss these in detail under Psychoactive Environment (pSE) below.

Aside from the above, Competition is another driver in the business world. This helps achieve CSL objectives in the private sector. We can see how this Driver pushes, with the spread of the Supermarket chains, the evolution of small and medium retail shops to supermarket level, and in the private banks and hospitals, achieving broader objectives of CSL; a cleaner environment, disciplined behaviuor, efficient service, and the instillation of ethics.

The readers can now understand the importance of Drivers pushing any project.

Three Types of Entities and Their Drives

We understand, that to do the transformation that CSL expects, we need to identify or adopt the drivers separately to suit the three types of entities we have in the country.

Type I entities are the independent entities that struggle for their existence and force them to adopt drivers involuntarily. They are private sector entities, and their drivers are the commitment of leadership and competition. These drivers spring up involuntarily within the entity.

Type II are the dependent entities. To spring up drivers of these entities commitment of an appointed trustee is a must. Mostly in state-owned entities, categorized as Boards, Authorities, Cooperations, and the like. Their drivers do not spring up within or involuntarily unless the leader initiates. The Government of a country also falls into this type and the emergence of drivers depends on the leader.

Type III entities have neither independent nor dependent immediate leader or trustee. They are mostly the so-called ‘Public’ places like public-toilets, public-playgrounds, and public-beaches. No team can be formed as these places are open to any, like no-man-land. Achieving CSL objectives at these entities depends on the discipline of the public or the users.

Clean Sri Lanka suffers the absence of drivers in the second and third types of entities, as the appointed persons are not trustees but temporary custodians.

The writer proposes a remedy to the last two types of entities based on the theory of pSE explained below.

Psychoactive Environment (pSE) –
The Power of Customer Attraction

Research by the writer introduced the Psychoactive Environment (pSE) concept to explain why some businesses attract more customers than others who provide the same service. Presented at the 5th Global Conference on Business and Economics at Cambridge University in 2006, the study revealed that a “vibe” influences customer attraction. This vibe, termed pSE, depends on Three Distinct Elements, which can either attract or repel customers. A positive pSE makes a business more attractive and welcoming. This concept can help develop Drivers for Type II and III entities.

pSE is not an all-inclusive solution for CSL, but it lays the foundation for building Drivers and motivating entities to keep entrants attractive and contented.

The structure of the pSE

The three distinct Elements are the Occupants, Systems, and Environment responsible for making a pSE attractive to any entity, be it a person, institution, organization, or county. Each of these elements bears three qualities named Captivators. These captivators are, in simple terms, Intelligent, Nice, and Active in their adjective forms.

pSE theorizes that if any element fails to captivate the entrant’s mood by not being Intelligent, Nice, or Active, the pSE becomes negative, repelling the entrant (customer). Conversely, the positive pSE attracts the entrants if the elements are Intelligent, Nice, and Active.

For example, think person who comes to a Government Office for some service. He sees that the employees, service, and environment are intelligent, nice, and active, and he will be delighted and contented. He will not get frustrated or have any deterioration in national productivity.

The Significance of pSE in CSL

The Elements and the Captivators are universal for any entity. Any entity can easily find its path to Evolution or Progress determined by these elements and captivators. The intangible broader objectives can be downsised to manageable targets by pSE. Achievements of these targets make the entrants happy and enhance productivity – the expectation of Clean Sri Lanka (CSL).

From the perspective of pSE, now we can redefine the Clean Sri Lanka project thus:

To make the Elements of every entity in Sri Lanka: intelligent, Nice, and Active.

How Would the pSE be A Remedy for The Sporadic Hiccups?

We have seen two possible reasons for sporadic setbacks and the discontinuity of some projects launched by the CSL. They are:

The absence of involuntary Drivers for evolvement or progress

Poor attitudes and behaviors of people and leaders

Remedy for the Absence of Drivers

Setting up a system to measure customer or beneficiary satisfaction, and setting aims can build Drivers. The East London NHS principles help build the Aims that drive type II & II entities. The system must be designed to ensure continual improvement following the Deming Cycle. This strategy will create Drivers for Type I & II entities.

This process is too long to explain here therefore we refrain from detailing.

Attitudinal Change

The most difficult task is the attitudinal and behavioural change. Yet it cannot be postponed.

Punishment as a strategy

In developed countries, we see that people are much more disciplined than in the developing countries. We in developing countries, give credit to their superior culture, mitigating ours as rudimental. The long experience and looking at this affair from a vantage point, one will understand it is not the absolute truth. Their ruthless wars in the past, rules, and severe punishment are the reasons behind this discipline. For example, anyone who fails to wear a car seatbelt properly will be fined 400 AUD, nearly 80,000 LKR!

The lesson we can learn is, that in Sri Lanka, we need strong laws and strict punishment together with a type of strategic education as follows.

Psychological Approach as a Strategy

The psychological theory of attitude formation can be used successfully if some good programmes can be designed.

All attitude formations start with life experience. Formed wrong or negative attitudes can be reversed or instilled with correct attitudes by exposure to designed life experiences. The programmes have been developed using the concepts of Hoshin Kanri, Brainstorming, Cause-and-Effect analysis, and Teamwork, in addition to London NTS Quality Improvement strategies.

The experience and good responses we received for our pSE programs conducted at several institutions prove and have built confidence in our approach. However, it was a time, when governments or organisations did not pay much attention to cultural change as CSL expects in the country.

Therefore, we believe this is a golden opportunity to take the CSL supported by the pSE concept.

Continue Reading

Features

Visually impaired but ready to do it their way

Published

on

The visually impaired artistes. From Left: Theekshana (rhythm guitar and vocals), Sadun (vocals and keyboards) Akila, (keyboards and vocals), Navoda (drums), Samudra (compere and vocals), Randi (violin and vocals), Sethini (keyboards and vocals), Rashini (keyboards and vocals), Dinesh (percussion and vocals), Tharidu (lead guitar and vocals) and Jonathan (bass guitar and vocals), with Melantha Perera (behind – centre)

Although they are visually impaired youngsters, under the guidance of renowned musician Melantha Perera, these talented individuals do shine bright … hence the name Bright Light.

Says Melantha: “My primary mission is to nurture their talent and ensure their sustainable growth in music, and I’m thrilled to announce that Bright Light’s first public performance is scheduled for 7th June, 2025. The venue will be the MJF Centre Auditorium in Katubadda, Moratuwa.”

Melantha went on to say that two years of teaching, online, visually impaired youngsters, from various parts of the island, wasn’t an easy ride.

There were many ups and downs but Melantha’s determination has paid off with the forming of Bright Light, and now they are gearing up to go on stage.

According to Melantha, they have come a long way in music.

“For the past few months, we have been meeting, physically, where I guide them to play as a band and now they show a very keen interest as they are getting to the depth of it. They were not exposed to English songs, but I’ve added a few English songs to widen their repertoire.

Melantha Perera: Invented a notation
system for the guitar

“On 7th June, we are opening up for the public to come and witness their talents, and I want to take this product island-wide, giving the message that we can do it, and I’m hoping to create a database so there will be a following. Initially, we would like your support by attending the show.”

Melantha says he didn’t know what he was getting into but he had confidence teaching anyone music since he has been in the scene for the past 45 years. He began teaching in 2015,

“When I opened my music school, Riversheen School of Music, the most challenging part of teaching was correcting tone deaf which is the theoretical term for those who can’t pitch a note, and also teaching students to keep timing while they sang and played.”

Melantha has even invented a notation system for the guitar which he has named ‘MelaNota’. He has received copyrights from the USA and ISO from Australia, but is yet to be recognised in Sri Lanka.

During Covid-19, Melantha showcased MelaNota online and then it was officially launched with the late Desmond De Silva playing one of his tunes, using MelaNota.

Melantha says that anyone, including the visually impaired, can play a simple melody on a guitar, within five minutes, using his notation system.

“I’ve completed the system and I’m now finalising the syllabus for the notation system.”

Melantha has written not only for the guitar, but also for drums, keyboards, and wind instruments.

For any queries, or additional information, you could contact Melantha at 071 454 4092 or via email at thebandbrightlight@gmail.com.

Continue Reading

Trending