Connect with us

Features

Men or mice? Sri Lanka at debt negotiations

Published

on

BY SANJA DE SILVA JAYATILLEKA

Sirasa TV1’s Public Platform (anchored by Sonali Wanigabaduge) of 29th June is only the latest in a series of valuable, one might say crucial, civil society and independent media initiatives to bring more clarity on Sri Lanka’s debt crisis and the on-going negotiations believed to be rescuing us from it.

Despite government hype, experts with impeccable credentials that appeared on this and other programmes like it, are seriously worried about the on-going restructuring efforts which seem to be characterised by capitulation to creditor interests rather than responsible negotiations in order to achieve a fair deal for the people of Sri Lanka.

On this particular TV programme, Prof Jayati Ghosh, joined by Germany’s Christina Rehbein (member of the European Network on Debt and Development) threw a completely different light on what we are led to believe is the problem and its only solution. It appears that Sri Lanka’s negotiators’ understanding of “good news” was to settle for a creditor-friendly, shortsighted solution at the expense of its own citizenry.

The government’s recent self-congratulatory hype needs serious re-scrutiny.

Our Right to Sustainable Solutions

It was at an event at the SLFI, organized by Ahilan Kadirgamar and the newly-founded Yukthi, that first brought an alternative perspective on Sri Lanka’s debt crisis. The public event had Jayati Ghosh, Martin Guzman and Charles Abugre on their panel. Yukthi deserves our deepest gratitude for this initiative at which we came to know that the usual narrative of corruption and bad governance which had been fed to us, including by the populist Opposition, as the primary reason for our plight, was a lesser cause for the crisis.

These scholar-practitioners spoke about other, bigger systemic and structural reasons for this crisis, with the structure being the current international financial architecture as it is constituted today. This structure and its processes are being challenged and sought to be corrected at this moment, including through an initiative of Pope Francis as well as one by the Secretary-General of the UN. Jayati Ghosh was on an important advisory panel to the Secretary-General, the report of which seeks to reform the existing, flawed system.

At the Yukthi event, and reiterated later on TV1’s People’s Platform by Jayati Ghosh, it was pointed out that there have been successive debt cycles going back to the 1970s. After the 2008 financial crisis in the West, there was an excess of liquidity floating in the Western economies, which needed investing for profit. Thus began the untrammeled lending to emerging economies to the delight of the elites running those countries. As the experts pointed out, it takes two to manufacture debt, with responsibility on both sides for the risks. But the lenders, while recognizing the danger of lending to certain higher-risk countries, nevertheless weren’t deterred. They introduced a risk premium to cover that risk. The private money markets made it easy to borrow, and many countries did, including ours, at high interest rates.

However, when the risk actually came to pass and some countries defaulted, the lenders refused to take any responsibility for making a bad investment and demanded the full pound of flesh, while having made plenty of profit on the lending already. All the blame was put on the borrower country which then squeezed its citizens to extract the penalty for which they were not responsible.

This, we are told by the progressive experts, does not have to be the last word on the subject. Countries have the right, yes, the right, to negotiate a deal in which both parties to the contract take responsibility. This includes a substantial haircut on the borrowing; a cap on interest rates; debt standstill until new terms are negotiated so the interest doesn’t pile up while the creditors drag their feet; and critically questioning the IMF programmes which are meant to help with recovery.

17th Going On 18th?

It was on TV1’s Public Platform that it was revealed that the mandatory IMF programme, which is considered imperative for negotiations of debt restructuring, is not required by international law. It is only that creditors insist on it. From their perspective, it is probably seen as necessary to introduce some fiscal discipline to errant elites. However, this doesn’t mean that the programmes that the IMF proposes to countries as imperative for recovery aren’t full of holes. In fact, it was suggested that most of the IMF programmes have failed.

Jayati Ghosh pointed out that when the bulk of the ISBs were borrowed by Sri Lanka after 2014, the country was under an IMF programme. What, she asks, was the IMF doing, by allowing it? How could it be the case that the IMF has the answers to a problem it failed to prevent while on its watch and actually under its supervision?

The visiting experts said that while the IMF has the status of a UN institution, it primarily represents the interests of the creditors in rich capitalist countries due to the quota system that gives those countries dominance over IMF decisions. It is not a neutral umpire. Therefore, the IMF protects the creditors rather than the debtor countries and their citizens.

In Sri Lanka’s case, Prof Ghosh pointed out that while our crisis was a foreign exchange crisis, the IMF programme has lumped our local currency debt together with the foreign currency debt, which, according to her, is plain wrong. This unwarranted clubbing together then makes it possible to squeeze the already burdened citizens, as in the case of the pension funds. The visiting experts asserted that the Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) produced by the IMF cannot be trusted to be correct, and in fact, appears to be wrong. This is a serious matter considering our programmes for recovery are based on this DSA.

Verite Research has asked for transparency of the basis for the IMF’s assumptions included in their DSA, in order to verify that the conclusions are correct. The IMF will not reveal it, and those concerned for Sri Lanka fear that the IMF programme will inevitably fail because of its unrealistic assumptions on which our day-to-day existence depends. On TV1’s Public Platform, Christina Rehbein said that the 18th IMF programme is already almost an inevitability, given the flawed nature of the 17th programme we are in now.

The recent ludicrous suggestion by the IMF of taxing owner-occupied houses, which even this IMF-friendly government was quick to backtrack on, should be an indicator of the kind of economic expertise deployed to oversee our recovery. The government had no objections and indeed issued a gazette for its implementation until there was a spirited backlash from the public, including Opposition parliamentarians.

The nature of the government’s relationship with the IMF is certainly our business. Its mistakes, when meekly accepted by our governments, are eventually borne by us. Therefore, we need the negotiating teams of our government to be well-informed, self-confident men and women, not mice. If our government agrees to conditions without adequate forethought, the elites negotiating for the government are unlikely to suffer the consequences. They will simply pass it on to the majority of Sri Lankan citizens. Right now, it does look as if we have deployed mice, to the barely concealed disdain of foreign and local experts.

Elect wisely

The civil society discussions and seminars on the debt crisis such as the ones mentioned, and other interventions by local experts in the media, indicate that the perspective on the global financial system on the part of the governing elite is critical.

If the governing elite is intimidated by the hegemonic system and disinclined to or lack the courage to challenge the shortcomings of it, its institutions, its products and assessment of its personnel, we as citizens will pay.

It is imperative that as a nation in default, our elites have the imagination and the courage to think creatively, gather support from sympathetic, experienced international experts (like Prof Manuel Guzman, former Finance Minister of Argentina) and present a stronger, more favourable case.

Jayati Ghosh repeatedly advised that it is foolish to accept that “there is no alternative” to the proffered IMF programme or even to what the private creditors may be willing to offer. Scholars such as her who are now working with the world community to make the changes to the system, provide evidence that there is much that needs to change. They say Sri Lanka is in a good position to demand those changes and to negotiate a good deal for its citizens.

Since it’s election year, who and which group of politicians are more likely to re-evaluate the international system and ensure we are treated fairly? Which group regards the status quo as sacred, and invokes TINA (Maggie Thatcher’s “there is no alternative”) most regularly? Certainly, this government does. Its negotiators have also agreed to secrecy terms with the creditors, which prevents anyone from figuring out if the best deal is being negotiated for us. While they negotiate in the dark, we pay in plenty in the cold light of day.

But we need to ask this about the governments-in-waiting, too. Some in the Opposition think that the suggestion that one of the causes of the debt crises in non-Western states is the dumping of dollars in newly emerging markets, is a “conspiracy theory”. Fair enough, since it is during their time in power that most of the ISB dollar debt was obtained. However, when in office, had it regarded the private money markets with a little more skepticism if not downright suspicion, we may not have such a huge debt burden.

Sri Lanka has had the experience of successfully challenging the received wisdom with regard to the international system and winning the day, even at the UN. When it works in the interest of the country with good men and women, it can achieve much. And yet, even after that victory, a different Government, and different men and women capitulated at the UN with joint resolutions detrimental to the country, without offering any challenge whatsoever; and not making the effort to negotiate a fair position for all concerned. The men and women we choose to govern us will dictate our fate for years to come. In some cases, the agreements they bind us to may have very long-lasting deleterious consequences.

We need to choose wisely. The politicians need to make the effort to take enlightened positions. In this day and age, things are not so technical that an expert cannot be found who explains it clearly, lucidly. The people will strive to understand and make the choices accordingly. The more enlightened the legislator, the better they would discern the information they are given.

Debtor Coalitions

Prof Jayati Ghosh suggested that Sri Lanka’s best chance is building ‘debtor country coalitions’ in order to negotiate from strength. Some have already negotiated with brilliant results, obtaining 50% haircuts on their debts. This was confirmed at the Yukthi seminar by Finance Minister of Argentina, Manuel Guzman who negotiated his country’s foreign debt restructuring. By contrast, our government is apparently happy with 7%!

Dumping dollars cheaply in the emerging markets made our imports cheaper than manufacturing at home, Jayati Ghosh explains. Having made it so, the people are blamed for living beyond their means. The management of the national budget is in the hands of our legislature and the bureaucrats who advise them. They need to find the best strategies to reverse their own errors. Talking to other countries who have successfully managed the crises will throw up some valuable ideas for consideration.

The experts suggested that Sri Lanka can utilize local laws in creditor countries which protect debtors from unfair deals, such as in Germany (a creditor country of Sri Lanka), to get a better deal. This was suggested because, obviously, we have not done so already.

Prof Ghosh pointed out that there is a debtor conference in Spain next year and urged Sri Lanka to use the opportunity to present an effective case for a fair deal, together with a like-minded group of debtor countries. There is no better opportunity, and Sri Lanka is well placed to take advantage of this, she advised.

She was also firmly of the opinion that Sri Lanka’s solution was not to constrict the economy and the purchasing power of the people, but to “grow out of the crisis”.

With all these experts, who do give a damn about people like us who are being put through the ringer, why isn’t our own government doing better? We ought to be grateful to those who took it upon themselves to educate the Sri Lankan public in what was considered “too technical”, through shining a light on the crisis, its origins and purported solutions, so that we may be able to play a role in our own destiny. And that would be by challenging our governing elites on their lies, compelling our leaders to do better by us, and electing those who would be relatively more capable of standing up successfully for our interests.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Ships, vel palam and other concerns

Published

on

President Ranil Wickremasinghe got a bellyful of criticism in the print media last Sunday – June 30.  Why? His Address to the Nation which he named Good News and believed would descend, Cass is certain, like manna on an adoring public; consolation and salvation brought unto them singly and solely by him throughout-negotiating the IMF as he outdid the bankruptcy of the country. True, if bankruptcy is solely measured by queues for gasoline products.

He did accept the challenge when the House of the Rajapaksas was in a shambles with the PM Mahinda R, slinking home after being made to shed his premiership; and President Gotabaya fleeing overseas, shorn of his presidency, leaving the country headless. Sajith and his team made unfulfillable demands to steer the country forwards; he was cowardly. Ranil accepted the challenge, working with the Pohottu Cabinet.

He succeeded to a large measure in steadying the country but definitely not all by himself and not really satisfactorily. He is widely accused of shielding the corrupt and allowing corruption to continue like receiving commissions and handouts. The culmination of his appeasing greed in others, in his greed to continue as Prez, will be if he permits luxury car licenses to the present MPs and gives in to their demand for insurance for life in addition to the pensions for life, they get from serving just one term in Parliament.

Cass speaks as a householder. Her burdens have increased. Her domestic expenses have not decreased much. The meager interest earned from depositing her stringently saved earnings when she was employed is taxed; having a meal in a restaurant is now an unrealised dream since a heavy tax has to be paid. More people have fallen below the poverty line.

Malnutrition is on the rise and the education and health sectors are not at all what they should be. Past leaders lived it up and we have to pay; they borrowed heavily and built useless vanity structures and we have to pay. We the poor bear so much of the expenses of the state, which state they crashed. And they live carefree in comfort.

To come back to the broadcast to the Nation by the President, his good news was that the country is now on an economic even keel and repayment of taxes is off our shoulders for a long time. We are far from economically all right and repayment of borrowed money has to be done, though temporarily debtor countries have given us grace periods.

The analogies, similes, metaphors, comparisons were what took Cass’ goat as the saying goes. She was astounded and then giggled uncontrollably. Ranil equated himself to Grusha of the Caucasian Chalk Circle. Bertolt Brecht had Grusha, the maid in the Governor’s mansion save the deserted Governor’s child and carry it to safety and then when the Governor’s wife claimed the child as hers, Azdak the Judge, very wisely decreed the child belonged to Grusha, who had proved herself a genuine mother.

And so Ranil Wickremasinghe himself decreed that he carried deserted, bereft Sri Lanka to a safe economic state and thus (though unsaid in so many words) should be rewarded with getting Sri Lanka as his: continued protector alias its next Prez. Quite an analogy included in his Address to the Nation, said before too, and later in his address to Parliament on 02 July.

Another analogy cropped up at a recent political meeting of a motley collection of members of different political parties with Harin Fernando leading the bandwagon. He said that Ranil Wicks, wisely, adroitly, most cleverly, and with remarkable seamanship (economic knowhow) steered the ship – Sri Lanka – to safe waters, a haven where all people can now breathe free and be happy, their economic and other burdens lifted. Listening, Cass spat out: What nonsense!

Then, when it came to the one being lauded and launched (as likely Prez), Ranil made his speech of acceptance of being lauded and launched by upgrading the ship he steered to safety as the Titanic! He was successful in steering it to a safe haven (even if it is to pretend economic recovery) unlike Captain Edward J Smith, who had his Titanic sink to the bottom of the ocean on April 14, 1912.

You have to admit that Wickremesinghe did bring sanity into government madness, a kind of stability to the situation in Sri Lanka; got the economy going and influenced the IMF and funders to help the country. But definitely not single-handedly. So many helped.

Ranil W is not safe and settled.  He has not in plain Sinhala announced he is contesting the to-be presidential election? Not in English nor Tamil either. However he has been strongly hinting so and Harin Fernando and others who bawled out at the meeting on June 29 indicated definitely it was a launching of candidature event.

Now Cassandra comes into her own; meaning she is able to make prophetic pronouncements like her Trojan ancestor who shouted ‘I see blood’ and soon enough her abductor/patron/keeper, King Agamemnon, was dead – murdered by his queen’s lover. Present day Cass’ warning is to Wickremesinghe. She says: “Some of the politicians seen at the Harin Fdo meeting which means they are in your camp are sure too heavy ballast to carry on your ship as you secure it.

The ship will sink even in shallow water with such on board.” Another warning: “Remember Winston Churchill lost the parliamentary election of 1945 soon after the victory of the Allies of which Britain was a partner in WWII. More than your achievement, RW, he was instrumental in winning a world war that raged for five years and Britain was almost invaded by the Nazis.” So, beware whom you take on board. You worked with a Cabinet including some dubious characters, or should it be said ‘most’? Now don’t have those who are known for thuggery and thieving.

The Sea around Sri Lanka

Cass joins in mourning the death of a Navy person who was shot and killed by Indian fishermen illegally fishing in Sri Lankan waters. Priyanka Ratnayake, aged 40 and father of two, lost his life in service. He was said to be a competent swimmer and diver and a man well-spoken of. This focuses very necessary attention on fishers’ poaching, of which thieving act South Indians seem to outdo very much our own. A solution must be negotiated. Easier said than done, but another cliché is apt here: If there is a will, there is a way.

Four deep sea fishermen have died because of their greed, stupidity and the common factor of anything free is fair fare. Sri Lankans are notoriously known to accept even a headache if free. A bottle floating in the high seas is dragged or fished in and contents consumed. These men surely had to be already inebriated on drink or drugs to swig off a bobbing bottle. Did they not fear it could contain a spirit caught and bottled and flung into the sea as is done by our kattadiyas?

Last bit of sea news. A seascape of mountains fairly distant from the south of the island but within its territorial waters has attracted commercial attention. Believed to be rich in cobalt it is to be exploited. And who is a forerunner businessman wanting to lay his hands on this treasure – Gautam Shantilal Adani, great friend of PM Modi and exploiter of our land. Cannot we keep the cobalt to ourselves or is it to be sold cheap to fill a couple of rogue pockets, as is usual in this land like no other?

Continue Reading

Features

‘Miniature Superpower’ Australia aiming at cooperation network in IOR

Published

on

Australian H.C. Paul Stephens (left) and Pathfinder Foundation Chairman Ambassador Bernard Goonetilleke

‘Miniature Superpower’ Australia has as one of its main foreign policy aims, the forging of a network of cooperation among countries of the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and is not inclined to figure in current global political rivalries. A correlated aim of Australia is to work amicably with the international community in bilateral and multilateral fora towards establishing a rules-based international political and economic order.

The above were some of the key points that emerged from an address made by Australian High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, Paul Stephens, as Chief Guest at the Pathfinder Foundation’s ‘Ambassadors’ Round Table’ forum. The event was held on June 28, at the Colombo Club, Hotel Taj Samudra. The forum was chaired by Ambassador Bernard Goonetilleke, Chairman, Pathfinder Foundation.

The round table was attended by diplomatic personnel, public personalities, heads of academic institutions and think tanks and members of the local media community, among others. Following the main presentation, a lively Q&A session followed, where queries relating to Australia’s foreign policy were aired and clarified.

Other principal observations made by H.C. Stephens, in the course of his address as well as during the Q&A, were as follows: ‘Australia is for the fostering of openness, transparency and the adherence to International Law, inclusive of the Law of the Sea, by countries of the IOR.

‘For Australia, creating an even playing field in the international system for states is vital. The unhindered exercising of sovereignty by states is also of the utmost importance. We look forward to the prospect of all the countries of the world community exercising a beneficial influence in international relations. In this connection we value very much the progressive strengthening of international institutions that aim at fostering world cooperation and the WTO is just one of these.

‘Australia believes that a collective positive response by countries is vital for the management of international disputes and tensions. Maintaining international stability, prosperity and peace is of the paramount importance for us. Australia is for working steadily in bilateral and multilateral forums for the furtherance of the common good.

‘We are in the process of strengthening relations with India. The value proposition of each of us is mutually recognized. While the liberalisation of trade between our countries is ongoing, we are also further expanding diplomatic ties. For example, we are setting up consulates in Calcutta and Bengalaru as well.

‘As for China, our position is that we cooperate with China where we can and disagree with it where we must. Generally, we are for constructive, open and stable relations with China. It is left for countries to decide whether the research conducted by China in their sea areas is beneficial to them or not.

‘Australia-Sri Lanka ties, meanwhile, are in good order. It must be remembered that Australia recognised Sri Lanka’s Independence even before it occurred. We are placing much emphasis on strengthening educational relations with Sri Lanka. Very soon, a full Australian degree would be obtainable in the latter. Besides, we place considerable emphasis on migration from Sri Lanka and on touristic ties. Australian companies, meanwhile, are increasingly interested in investing in the island.

‘We welcome current successes in Sri Lanka’s debt restructuring efforts and are for a stable, prosperous and resilient Sri Lanka. This is our firm belief.

‘There are numerous issue areas in the IOR that call for international cooperation for their resolution. Just two of these are the rising temperature of the Indian Ocean and tensions related to fishing. Generally, climate change issues call for cooperative, international efforts aimed at their early resolution. We believe that by working positively in multilateral fora, such questions could be resolved by the international community.

‘Currently, the potential for international conflicts exists in the South China Sea and in regions where border disputes are ongoing. These questions call for international cooperative efforts for their peaceful resolution. However, freedom of navigation in the South China Sea has to be maintained and this is important for us.

‘For Australia, South-East Asia is important and we view the region as a strategic partner. On “good habits” and “good architecture” in the region we place considerable emphasis. Besides, it is of the utmost importance to manage tensions in this region cooperatively.

‘It is also vital to recognize that the QUAD grouping of which Australia is a member, is a purely diplomatic initiative and that it does not have an Indian Ocean focus.’

Thus, the Pathfinder forum proved to be most informative and revealing for the commentator of international politics. It is significant that Australia is seen by the latter’s authorities as a ‘Miniature Superpower’ and it was named as such by the Australian H.C. at the discussion. It could be described as a weighty middle power that is fast developing into a great power or a super power.

Australia’s increasing international stature has foreign policy implications for the developing world in general and for South and South-East Asia in particular. Right now, Australia could be described as traversing a pragmatic, and in a sense, a Non-aligned course in foreign policy practice and this trend augurs well for the South. That is, increasingly linking up with Australia on the external relations front should not prove controversial for countries such as Sri Lanka.

Besides, Southern states too need to take a leaf from Australia in its ties with China and cooperate with China where they could and disagree with it where they must. Right now, too many Southern states seem to be bending over backwards to accommodate China in particularly the economic and security spheres. This amounts to a compromising of state sovereignty.

The years ahead will be crucial for Small Sri Lanka in the area of foreign policy. Considering that it would be dependent on quite a few global economic powers to see it through its ‘debt restructuring’ exercise, it is bound to lose whatever autonomy it had in the crafting of its foreign policy parameters. To what extent, for instance, could it stand up to the US or China on crucial foreign policy questions in consideration of its financial dependence on these principal powers?

In view of the fact that the above question cannot be answered in the affirmative by Sri Lanka it would do well to increasingly broad base and strengthen its foreign relations with particularly bourgeoning big powers, such as Australia, and aim at pursuing a truly Non-aligned foreign policy.

Continue Reading

Features

Do you pump Octane 95 Petrol into your car to get better performance?

Published

on

If your answer is YES, this article is for you …

(This article was first published in The Island on 23 April 2021. It is reproduced today in view of the introduction of Octane 100 petrol to the Sri Lankan market.)

by Dr. Saliya Jayasekara

Many passenger vehicles, including three-wheelers and motorcycles are fueled by Octane 95 gasoline when Octane 92 gasoline (petrol) is available at a lower price.

Otto engine (petrol engine) is an internal combustion spark ignition engine invented by a German engineer Nicolaus Otto in 1876 and used in most of the lightweight vehicles, including cars, three-wheelers and motor bicycles. Otto engines can burn most of the hydrocarbon fuels (including hydrogen and ethanol) that can mix with air by evaporation (low boiling point). But the combustion characteristics of different hydrocarbons are not the same when burned inside an engine. If an Otto engine is designed for a particular fuel, it would not perform similarly with a fuel that has a different chemical composition.

In a well-tuned Otto engine run on gasoline for which the engine is designed, the combustion of the gasoline (petrol)/air mixture will continue smoothly from the spark plug to the piston head by igniting successive layers of the mixture as shown in Figure 1 (a).

If low grade gasolines are used, the combustion of some of the air/fuel mixture in the cylinder does not result from propagation of the flame front initiated by the spark plug, but one or more pockets of air/fuel mixture explode (Detonate) outside the envelope of the normal combustion front as shown in Figure 1 (b). This detonation can cause severe damage to the piston and the head of the engine while deteriorating thermal performance of the engine (low efficiency)

Gasoline is a petroleum-derived product comprising a mixture of different hydrocarbons, ranging from 4 to 12 carbon atoms in a carbon chain with the boiling point ranging of 30–225°C. It is predominantly a mixture of paraffins, naphthenes, aromatics and olefins. Additives and blending agents are added to improve the performance and stability of gasoline. The engine designers learned that straight-chain paraffin have a much higher tendency to detonate than do branched-chain paraffin.

The tendency of a particular gasoline to detonate is expressed by its Octane number (ON). Arbitrarily, tri-methyl-pentane, C8H18 (iso-Octane) is assigned an ON of 100, while the straight-chain paraffin n-heptane, C7H16 is given an ON of zero. Hence, a fuel sample with the same anti-detonation quality as that of a mixture containing 90% iso-Octane and 10% n-heptane is said to have an ON of 90. Gasoline is made up of a mixture of mostly branched-chain paraffin with suitable additives to give an ON in the range 90 –100. It was also learned through experiments that the ON of a gasoline blends (e.g. gasoline and ethanol) can be calculated by using weighted average ON of each compound. Most importantly, the octane number has nothing to do with the heating value (Calorific value) or the purity of the fuel.

Engine thermodynamics show that engines with a high compression ratio offer higher thermal performance than engines with a low compression ratio. These engines having high compression ratio require high octane gasoline (for example Octane 95) to avoid detonation. However, using gasoline having higher Octane ratings for the engines designed for a low Octane rating (for example, 92 Octane) would not provide an additional benefit or loss, other than increased fuel cost.

Therefore, it is important to know the designed Octane number of the engine before fueling (refer owner’s manual of the vehicle). For example: the minimum ON requirement for two- and three-wheelers in south Asia is 87 (The World Bank). Most of the Toyota, Honda and Nissan models, including hybrid engines, recommend 92 Octane gasoline.

(Dr. Jayasekara received the B. Sc. degree in mechanical engineering from university of Moratuwa in 2001, and the M.Sc. and PhD degrees in decentralized power generation systems from Royal institute of technology Sweden and the Melbourne University Australia in 2004 and 2013 respectively. He has well over 13 years of national and international experience in design and installation of centralised/decentralised power plants, boilers (utility/package) and heat exchangers. Currently he is serving as a senior lecture at University of Moratuwa, a visiting lecturer and fellow at Deakin University Australia.)

Continue Reading

Trending