Connect with us

News

Prof. Peiris complains of continuing shenanigans by President in the run-up to presidential poll

Published

on

Prof. Peiris

Vote on Economic Transformation Bill acid test for SLPP group – Prof. Peiris

By Shamindra Ferdinando

The Opposition has questioned President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recently concluded visit to the Northern Province, where he declared open a new hospital and university facilities, etc., as part of his Presidential Poll campaign.

Prof. G. L. Peiris raised the latest alleged violation at his regular media briefing at his Kirula Avenue residence on Monday (27). The former External Affairs Minister pointed out that the President, in line with his overall campaign, took advantage of the opening of foreign funded projects.

The dissident SLPP MP accused the President of taking advantage of the foreign funded projects and also campaigning at the public expense. The former Minister was referring to the inauguration of two hospitals built with funds provided by the Netherlands.

MP Peiris alleged that the distribution of free rice, awarding of free land ownership in terms of the Urumaya programme, granting of proprietorship of over 50,000 housing units and opening of hospital and university facilities were meant to win votes at the forthcoming Presidential Poll.

Prof. Peiris said that the people couldn’t be deceived by such a propaganda campaign. The former Minister recently switched his allegiance to the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) along with several of his colleagues in July 2022 over the SLPP’s decision to elect Ranil Wickremesinghe as the President.

Declaring that Wickremesinghe’s job was to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksas’s five-year term, Prof. Peiris took exception to a proposal to conduct a referendum meant to extend Wickremesinghe’s term instead of conducting the scheduled Presidential Poll by Sept/Oct this year, as per the Constitution.

The academic emphasized that constitutionally a Presidential Poll couldn’t be substituted by a referendum under any circumstances. Prof. Peiris challenged efforts to compare the proposed referendum on the next Presidential Poll and President J.R. Jayewardene extending the life of Parliament by a period of six years in 1982, through a rigged referendum.

Prof. Peiris said that JRJ didn’t run away from the Presidential Poll. The first President called for a referendum – the only national referendum held so far in the country after winning the 1982 Presidential Poll. That allowed JRJ to put off the Parliamentary Poll that was to be held by August 1983 to Feb 1989.

Having been appointed President by Parliament in July 2022, Wickremesinghe shouldn’t contemplate extending his disputed term by way of a referendum, the ex-Minister said, alleging that the UNP leader feared facing the electorate.

Commenting on the SLPP’s proposal to conduct the Parliamentary Poll ahead of the presidential election, Prof. Peiris said that if the President so desired he could dissolve Parliament immediately and the election could be held within 52 days, or in seven and a half weeks. The former law professor said that the President is constitutionally empowered to dissolve Parliament after the Parliament completed two and half years of its five-year term.

However, in case the President hadn’t been willing to dissolve Parliament, those who desired so could submit a resolution to Parliament to that effect, Prof. Peiris said. But, the Parliamentary Poll couldn’t be conducted in a way that affected the Presidential Poll, he said, urging the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government to reach consensus on this contentious matter without further delay.

Prof. Peiris dismissed suggestions that the much delayed Local Government poll should be held instead of the Presidential Poll. Blaming President Wickremesinghe for indefinitely putting off LG polls that should have been held in March last year, Prof. Peiris stressed that the Presidential Poll couldn’t be delayed on the promise of LG poll.

Referring to funds required for the elections, Prof. Peiris said that Rs. 10 bn had been allocated through the last Budget to conduct the Presidential Poll. In case the President on his own, or under pressure from the SLPP, decided to advance the Parliamentary Poll, Rs 11 bn should be allocated in terms of the relevant constitutional provision.

Prof. Peiris said that the Presidential and Parliamentary Polls couldn’t be conducted simultaneously, though some said so. Responding to such suggestions the Election Commission has pointed out the difficulty in simultaneously conducting two national polls, the retired top law academic said.

The former Minister backed SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa’s recent call for the suspension of the ongoing controversial privatization and restructuring programme pending the conclusion of the Presidential Poll.

Recalling how he campaigned with the SLPP in the run-up to the 2019 Presidential and 2020 Parliamentary Polls assuring the public that state assets wouldn’t be privatized, Prof. Peiris alleged that President Wickremesinghe was on a privatization spree.

Declaring that 6.9 mn people voted for the SLPP at the Presidential Polls and the party won 145 seats at the last Parliamentary Poll, Prof. Peiris emphasized that it would be the responsibility of the SLPP parliamentary group to uphold the mandates received at those national polls.

“We believe the parliamentary group would abide by the SLPP Chairman’s position on privatization and restructuring,” Prof. Peiris said. The SLPP parliamentary group would face an acid test when the Parliament voted on the highly debatable Economic Transformation Bill next week.

Prof. Peiris said that the moves to fully privatize cash cows – Sri Lanka Insurance and Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) – couldn’t be justified. Alleging that privatization of the SLT would compromise national security, he said that the SLPP couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for President Wickremesinghe’s actions.

Responding to SJB Chairman Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka’s criticism of the party accepting ‘outsiders’ at the expense of their original ideals, Prof. Peiris said that the leadership was selective in accepting those willing to join the main Opposition.

The Field Marshal’s criticism has been primarily over the SJB accommodating former Army Commander General Daya Ratnayake to the fold. Prof Peiris said that there had been cases of some of those interested in joining the SJB being rejected.

Defending SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa’s projects, Prof. Peiris said that they couldn’t be compared with the President’s as the latter campaigned on taxpayers’ money and timed the opening of foreign funded projects for his benefit.



News

Gnanasara Thero absconding after SC ruling

Published

on

Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero was not at his temple in Rajagiriya when prison officials visited the premises yesterday to take steps following the Supreme Court ruling that nullified the presidential pardon granted to him, police sources said.

Prison officials who visited the temple on Nawala Road, Rajagiriya, were reportedly informed by those present that the Thero’s whereabouts were unknown. The development comes a day after the Supreme Court declared former President Maithripala Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Gnanasara Thero null and void.

The three-member Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Janak De Silva, Dr. Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath B. Abayakoon held that the pardon was arbitrary, violated the public trust and principles of natural justice, and was made beyond the proper exercise of the President’s constitutional discretion.

The case arose from Gnanasara Thero’s conduct at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court in January 2016 during proceedings relating to the disappearance of journalist and political cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda.

The Court of Appeal convicted him on four counts of contempt of court in 2018 and imposed concurrent prison terms amounting to six years. He had served about nine months when Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon on May 23, 2019.

The Supreme Court found that although Article 34 empowers the President to grant pardons, that power is held in trust for the people and is subject to constitutional limitations and judicial review. The Court concluded that Sirisena had effectively acted on the recommendation of the Additional Secretary (Legal) without demonstrating that he had independently considered the relevant material.

Justice De Silva held that the pardon was “arbitrary”, violated public trust and the rules of natural justice, and was ultra vires the President’s powers. The Court consequently found that the decision violated the fundamental right to equality guaranteed by Article 12(1) of the Constitution.

The ruling effectively restores the legal position under the original conviction, leaving Gnanasara Thero without the benefit of the 2019 pardon. The Supreme Court also clarified that a pardon does not erase a conviction or sentence, but merely relieves an offender from serving the sentence to the extent specified in the pardon.

Gnanasara Thero, the General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena, had been convicted over his conduct during proceedings concerning the disappearance of Eknaligoda, who went missing in January 2010 and has not been located.

Sandhya Eknaligoda, Prageeth Eknaligoda’s wife, was among those who challenged the presidential pardon before the Supreme Court, alongside the Centre for Policy Alternatives and its Executive Director Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu.

The detailed account of the judgment indicates that the Court’s ruling primarily nullified the pardon and restored the legal effect of the original sentence, with the implementation of the sentence falling to the relevant authorities.

Police sources said that the Supreme Court, however, did not permanently close the door on executive clemency. It held that a future President could grant Gnanasara Thero another pardon, provided the power is exercised lawfully and after proper consideration of all relevant material.

The Supreme Court has so far overturned three presidential pardons granted to two former Presidents. In January 2024, the Court declared former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s pardon of former MP Duminda Silva unlawful and invalid. In June 2024, it invalidated two pardons granted by former President Maithripala Sirisena to Royal Park murder convict Jude Shramantha Anthony Jayamaha — the first in May 2016, which commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment, and the second in October 2019, which released him from prison. Jayamaha, who was convicted of the murder of 19-year-old Yvonne Johnson, remains at large. Most recently, on September 10, 2026, the Supreme Court declared Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero null and void, ruling that it was arbitrary and inconsistent with the Constitution.

Continue Reading

News

House to debate 22A, Judicature Bill next week

Published

on

Parliament is scheduled to debate the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill on September 24 and 25, subject to the Speaker’s announcement following the delivery of the Supreme Court determination on petitions filed against the Bills.

The programme for the Parliamentary Week from September 22 to 25 was decided at a meeting of the Committee on Parliamentary Business held on Thursday (10) under the chairmanship of Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne.

On each sitting day, Parliamentary Business under Standing Orders 22(1) to 22(6) will be taken up from 9.30 am to 10 am, followed by Questions for Oral Answers from 10 am to 11 am Questions under Standing Order 27(2) will be taken up from 11 am to 11.30 am.

On Tuesday (22), the Orders published in Extraordinary Gazette No. 2497/37 under the Petroleum Resources Act and the Promotion of Export Agriculture (Amendment) Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm.

The Tredso Development Foundation (Incorporation) Bill, a Private Member’s Bill, will then be taken up for Second Reading before being referred to the Legislative Standing Committee.

An Opposition motion at the Adjournment Time will follow.

On Wednesday (23), the Chartered Institute of Media Professionals of Sri Lanka Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm, followed by Questions at the Adjournment Time.

The Second Reading debate on the 22nd Amendment Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill is scheduled for 11.30 am to 7 pm on Thursday (24) and Friday (25).

Continue Reading

News

Wrong house targeted in underworld grenade attack: Two children killed

Published

on

Two children aged 11 and 17 were mistakenly killed and their 55-year-old father injured in an early morning hand grenade attack on Sirisangabo Mawatha on Friday. Police investigations later revealed that the attackers targeted the wrong house during an ongoing underworld clash.

Three police teams have been deployed to investigate the attack, which occurred at around 3 am.

According to police, a man who arrived near the house in a three-wheeler knocked on the front door before throwing a grenade into the premises and fleeing.

The victims were identified as 17-year-old Kasun Rashmika and 11-year-old Duminda Gihan. Their 56-year-old father, Nalin Thusantha Perera, was seriously injured and admitted to the Kalubowila Teaching Hospital.

Police said the injured man’s brother was allegedly a close associate of a drug trafficker known as ‘Sando’ and had also been accused of involvement in drug trafficking.

The brother lives in a house adjoining the one targeted in the attack, and police suspect the grenade may have been thrown at the wrong house.

Police are also investigating information that the attack was allegedly carried out at the direction of several overseas-based drug traffickers, identified as Pandithage Shantha Kumara alias ‘Kos Malli’, Samantha Perera alias ‘Chuwa Samantha’, ‘Kudu Avishka’ and ‘I.D.’

Police said the attack was believed to be linked to an ongoing conflict between two underworld factions, which have targeted each other’s associates in shootings and grenade attacks. More than 20 people have reportedly been killed in such attacks.

Security agencies are also investigating alleged links between one faction and overseas-based criminals including Kanjipani Imran, Unakuruwe Shantha, Dubai Gagana and Handaya.

Security agencies have also received information that overseas-based criminals identified as Kanjipani Imran, Unakuruwe Shantha, Dubai Gagana and Handaya are allegedly behind the supply of firearms and drugs to the faction associated with Kos Malli and Chuwa Samantha.

Continue Reading

Trending