News
Prof. Peiris complains of continuing shenanigans by President in the run-up to presidential poll
Vote on Economic Transformation Bill acid test for SLPP group – Prof. Peiris
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The Opposition has questioned President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s recently concluded visit to the Northern Province, where he declared open a new hospital and university facilities, etc., as part of his Presidential Poll campaign.
Prof. G. L. Peiris raised the latest alleged violation at his regular media briefing at his Kirula Avenue residence on Monday (27). The former External Affairs Minister pointed out that the President, in line with his overall campaign, took advantage of the opening of foreign funded projects.
The dissident SLPP MP accused the President of taking advantage of the foreign funded projects and also campaigning at the public expense. The former Minister was referring to the inauguration of two hospitals built with funds provided by the Netherlands.
MP Peiris alleged that the distribution of free rice, awarding of free land ownership in terms of the Urumaya programme, granting of proprietorship of over 50,000 housing units and opening of hospital and university facilities were meant to win votes at the forthcoming Presidential Poll.
Prof. Peiris said that the people couldn’t be deceived by such a propaganda campaign. The former Minister recently switched his allegiance to the main Opposition Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) along with several of his colleagues in July 2022 over the SLPP’s decision to elect Ranil Wickremesinghe as the President.
Declaring that Wickremesinghe’s job was to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksas’s five-year term, Prof. Peiris took exception to a proposal to conduct a referendum meant to extend Wickremesinghe’s term instead of conducting the scheduled Presidential Poll by Sept/Oct this year, as per the Constitution.
The academic emphasized that constitutionally a Presidential Poll couldn’t be substituted by a referendum under any circumstances. Prof. Peiris challenged efforts to compare the proposed referendum on the next Presidential Poll and President J.R. Jayewardene extending the life of Parliament by a period of six years in 1982, through a rigged referendum.
Prof. Peiris said that JRJ didn’t run away from the Presidential Poll. The first President called for a referendum – the only national referendum held so far in the country after winning the 1982 Presidential Poll. That allowed JRJ to put off the Parliamentary Poll that was to be held by August 1983 to Feb 1989.
Having been appointed President by Parliament in July 2022, Wickremesinghe shouldn’t contemplate extending his disputed term by way of a referendum, the ex-Minister said, alleging that the UNP leader feared facing the electorate.
Commenting on the SLPP’s proposal to conduct the Parliamentary Poll ahead of the presidential election, Prof. Peiris said that if the President so desired he could dissolve Parliament immediately and the election could be held within 52 days, or in seven and a half weeks. The former law professor said that the President is constitutionally empowered to dissolve Parliament after the Parliament completed two and half years of its five-year term.
However, in case the President hadn’t been willing to dissolve Parliament, those who desired so could submit a resolution to Parliament to that effect, Prof. Peiris said. But, the Parliamentary Poll couldn’t be conducted in a way that affected the Presidential Poll, he said, urging the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government to reach consensus on this contentious matter without further delay.
Prof. Peiris dismissed suggestions that the much delayed Local Government poll should be held instead of the Presidential Poll. Blaming President Wickremesinghe for indefinitely putting off LG polls that should have been held in March last year, Prof. Peiris stressed that the Presidential Poll couldn’t be delayed on the promise of LG poll.
Referring to funds required for the elections, Prof. Peiris said that Rs. 10 bn had been allocated through the last Budget to conduct the Presidential Poll. In case the President on his own, or under pressure from the SLPP, decided to advance the Parliamentary Poll, Rs 11 bn should be allocated in terms of the relevant constitutional provision.
Prof. Peiris said that the Presidential and Parliamentary Polls couldn’t be conducted simultaneously, though some said so. Responding to such suggestions the Election Commission has pointed out the difficulty in simultaneously conducting two national polls, the retired top law academic said.
The former Minister backed SLPP leader Mahinda Rajapaksa’s recent call for the suspension of the ongoing controversial privatization and restructuring programme pending the conclusion of the Presidential Poll.
Recalling how he campaigned with the SLPP in the run-up to the 2019 Presidential and 2020 Parliamentary Polls assuring the public that state assets wouldn’t be privatized, Prof. Peiris alleged that President Wickremesinghe was on a privatization spree.
Declaring that 6.9 mn people voted for the SLPP at the Presidential Polls and the party won 145 seats at the last Parliamentary Poll, Prof. Peiris emphasized that it would be the responsibility of the SLPP parliamentary group to uphold the mandates received at those national polls.
“We believe the parliamentary group would abide by the SLPP Chairman’s position on privatization and restructuring,” Prof. Peiris said. The SLPP parliamentary group would face an acid test when the Parliament voted on the highly debatable Economic Transformation Bill next week.
Prof. Peiris said that the moves to fully privatize cash cows – Sri Lanka Insurance and Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT) – couldn’t be justified. Alleging that privatization of the SLT would compromise national security, he said that the SLPP couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for President Wickremesinghe’s actions.
Responding to SJB Chairman Field Marshal Sarath Fonseka’s criticism of the party accepting ‘outsiders’ at the expense of their original ideals, Prof. Peiris said that the leadership was selective in accepting those willing to join the main Opposition.
The Field Marshal’s criticism has been primarily over the SJB accommodating former Army Commander General Daya Ratnayake to the fold. Prof Peiris said that there had been cases of some of those interested in joining the SJB being rejected.
Defending SJB and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa’s projects, Prof. Peiris said that they couldn’t be compared with the President’s as the latter campaigned on taxpayers’ money and timed the opening of foreign funded projects for his benefit.
News
Showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
WEATHER FORECAST FOR 11 MAY 2026
Issued at 05.30 a.m. on 11 May 2026 by the Department of Meteorology
The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka is likely to develop into a low-pressure area around the next 36 hours. Therefore, the prevailing showery conditions over the island are expected to continue during the next few days.
Showers or thundershowers will occur at times in most parts of the island and Cloudy skies are expected, under the influence of the aforementioned system. Heavy showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.
The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damage caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.
News
Treasury theft: Speaker’s conduct brought to IPU’s attention: SJB
SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera has sought the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to pressure the JVP-NPP government to respect the rights of the Opposition.
MP Jayasekera told The Island that they wouldn’t allow the NPP to suppress the truth regarding the theft of Treasury funds amounting to USD 2.5 million. He accused Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne of depriving the Opposition of its legitimate rights, at the behest of the government.
Jayasekera said that the Speaker’s conduct regarding the action taken against Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, too, had been brought to the notice of IPU and other international associations.
The text of MP Jayasekera’s letter to the Secretary general of IPU: “I respectfully submit this petition seeking the attention and intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union concerning a matter affecting parliamentary accountability, the rights of elected representatives, and the proper functioning of constitutional oversight within the Parliament of Sri Lanka.
On 06 May 2026, I Dayasiri Jayasekara MP submitted a formal request to the Hon. Speaker of Parliament seeking permission, under the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act No. 21 of 1953 and Standing Order 29(1), to raise a question of privilege regarding alleged constitutional and parliamentary violations by Mr. Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the Treasury of Sri Lanka.
The proposed privilege motion raised matters including:
1. Alleged violations of Articles 148, 149, and 150 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka concerning parliamentary control over public finance;
2. Alleged failure to report to Parliament concerning a controversial and unlawful transfer of approximately USD 2.5 million from the Treasury;
3. Alleged non-compliance with parliamentary committee procedures under the Standing Orders of Parliament;
4. Questions relating to constitutional eligibility under Article 91(1)(d)(xiii) of the Constitution concerning dual citizenship and qualification to sit and vote in Parliament;
5. A request that the matter be referred to the Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee established under Standing Order 118.
Despite the seriousness of the constitutional and parliamentary issues raised, the Hon. Speaker declined permission for the privilege issue to be raised in Parliament.
It is respectfully submitted that this refusal has the effect of:
• Preventing an elected Member of Parliament from exercising his parliamentary oversight function;
• Restricting parliamentary scrutiny over matters involving public finance and constitutional accountability;
• Undermining the privileges of Members of Parliament to raise matters of urgent public importance;
• Limiting institutional transparency concerning allegations involving senior state officials.
The right of parliamentarians to raise questions of privilege and matters relating to constitutional governance is an essential component of parliamentary democracy and legislative independence. The refusal to permit even the presentation or preliminary consideration of such a matter raises serious concerns regarding parliamentary accountability mechanisms in Sri Lanka.
Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:
1.Take cognizance of this matter as one affecting the rights and functions of Members of Parliament;
2.Seek clarification from the relevant parliamentary authorities in Sri Lanka regarding the grounds upon which the privilege motion was disallowed;
3.Consider whether the refusal is compatible with internationally recognised principles of parliamentary democracy, accountability, and freedom of parliamentary speech;
4. Encourage the Parliament of Sri Lanka to ensure fair and transparent procedures governing parliamentary privilege motions and constitutional oversight.
I further request that this communication be placed before the appropriate committee or mechanism within the IPU dealing with the rights and duties of parliamentarians.”
News
Navin calls for formal alliance between UNP and SJB
UNP Vice President and Kandy District Leader, Navin Dissanayake, on Saturday, stressed that any proposed merger between the UNP and the SJB must be carried out formally rather than in an ad hoc manner.
Addressing a media briefing in Kandy, Dissanayake said a structured framework was essential to ensure the successful reunification of the two parties ahead of future elections.
“A formal mechanism must be established for the unification of the UNP and the SJB. This process cannot be confined to personal verbal assurances given to suit individual interests. We must build a strong framework to contest future elections as a united force,” he said.
He added that the UNP could only regain political strength by reuniting with factions that had broken away from the party.
Dissanayake also claimed that the Government would be compelled to hold Provincial Council elections amid mounting international and domestic pressure.
“India is exerting pressure to conduct these elections, while the people in the North are also demanding governance under the Provincial Council system. They are awaiting the polls,” he said.
Announcing his own political intentions, Dissanayake said he hoped to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province at the next Provincial Council election.
“I intend to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province. Having served as a Governor, I understand the extent of service that can be delivered to the people through a Provincial Council,” he said.
Recalling the history of constitutional devolution, Dissanayake said his late father, Gamini Dissanayake, had played a significant role in the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.
by SK Samaranayake
-
News5 days agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News7 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News2 days agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
Editorial5 days agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
-
Opinion7 days agoSecurity, perception, and trust: Sri Lanka’s delicate balancing act
-
Editorial4 days agoThe Vijay factor
-
News3 days agoSLPP expresses concern over death of former SriLankan CEO
-
News6 days agoDevelopment Officer bids Rs. 48 mn for CPC’s V8 at auction
